This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
2. | SUMMARY OF MAIN MARKET FIGURES |
2.1. | Transparent conducting layer market forecast by technology |
2.2. | Transparent conducting layer market forecast by technology |
2.3. | ITO alternative TCFs- ten year market forecast by technology |
2.4. | Transparent conducting layer market forecast by technology in km sqr |
2.5. | Transparent conducting layer market forecast by application in km sqr |
2.6. | Transparent conducting layer market forecast by application in USD |
2.7. | Transparent conducting layer market forecast by application in USD |
3. | TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT |
3.1. | ITO on Glass |
3.2. | Application example of ITO-on-Glass |
3.3. | SWOT Analysis on ITO-on-Glass |
3.4. | ITO-on-Glass market forecast in km sqr split by application |
3.5. | ITO-on-Glass ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.6. | ITO-on-Glass ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.7. | ITO-on-PET performance |
3.8. | ITO-on-PET is not flexible |
3.9. | Large area applications need lower sheet resistance |
3.10. | ITO requires index matching layers |
3.11. | ITO-on-PET prices |
3.12. | Bill-of-Materials for ITO |
3.13. | Exaggerated single supplier risk? |
3.14. | ITO is not the thinnest but the substrate is the determinant factor |
3.15. | ITO-on-PET production capacity |
3.16. | SWOT analysis on ITO-on-PET |
3.17. | Key suppliers of ITO-on-PET |
3.18. | ITO-on-Plastic market forecast in km sqr split by application |
3.19. | ITO-on-Glass ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.20. | Non-ITO oxides |
3.21. | Silver nanowires |
3.22. | Silver nanowires performance data |
3.23. | Ag NW transparent conductive films are flexible |
3.24. | Ag NW touch screens amongst the best performers |
3.25. | Growth and deposition |
3.26. | Comparing manufacturing cost of Ag NW and ITO |
3.27. | Cost structure of Ag NW transparent conductive films |
3.28. | Existing applications of Ag NW TCFs |
3.29. | Key players |
3.30. | Silver nanowire TCF market forecast in km sqr split by application |
3.31. | Silver nanowire TCF ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.32. | Carbon nanotubes |
3.33. | CNT production capacity by player and applications |
3.34. | Carbon nanotube performance as TCF material |
3.35. | Carbon nanotube TCFs are flexible |
3.36. | Carbon nanotube TCFs are stretchable and thermo-formable |
3.37. | CNT TCFs have matched refractive index |
3.38. | SWOT analysis on carbon nanotube TCFs |
3.39. | Key players |
3.40. | Carbon nanotube TCF market forecast in km sqr split by application |
3.41. | Carbon nanotube TCF ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.42. | There are many graphene types of the market |
3.43. | Numerous ways of making graphene |
3.44. | Chemical vapour deposition |
3.45. | The transfer challenge |
3.46. | Latest in the transfer challenge |
3.47. | Direct CVD graphene growth on an insulating substrate? |
3.48. | Performance of CVD graphene as a TCF material |
3.49. | Doping as a strategy for improving graphene TCF performance |
3.50. | Be wary of extraordinary results |
3.51. | Graphene TCFs are flexible |
3.52. | SWOT analysis on graphene TCFs |
3.53. | Key players |
3.54. | PEDOT:PSS |
3.55. | Patterning PEDOT:PSS |
3.56. | Performance of PEDOT:PSS has drastically improved |
3.57. | PEDOT:PSS is now on a par with ITO-on-PET |
3.58. | PEDOT:PSS is mechanically flexible |
3.59. | PEDOT:PSS is stretchable and can be thermoformed |
3.60. | Stability and spatial uniformity of PEDOT:PSS |
3.61. | Use case examples of PEDOT:PSS TCFs |
3.62. | Key players |
3.63. | PEDOT TCF market forecast in km sqr split by application |
3.64. | PEDOT TCF ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.65. | Metal mesh |
3.66. | Directly printed metal mesh TCFs are low resistance |
3.67. | Printed metal mesh suffers from visible tracks |
3.68. | Printed metal mesh suffers from visible tracks |
3.69. | SWOT analysis on directly printed metal mesh TCFs |
3.70. | Key players |
3.71. | Embossing/Imprinting metal mesh TCFs |
3.72. | Uni-Pixel's metal mesh performance |
3.73. | O-Film's metal mesh TCF technology |
3.74. | MNTech's metal mesh TCF technology |
3.75. | Metal mesh TCF is flexible |
3.76. | Cost breakdown of metal mesh and yield |
3.77. | Market share of leading suppliers in metal mesh |
3.78. | SWOT analysis on embossed metal mesh TCFs |
3.79. | Key players |
3.80. | Fujifilm's photo-patterned metal mesh TCF |
3.81. | Conductive Inkjet Technology's photo-patterned metal mesh TCF |
3.82. | 3M's photo-patterned metal mesh TCF |
3.83. | Rolith's novel photo patterning technique |
3.84. | SWOT analysis on photo patterned metal mesh TCFs |
3.85. | Key players |
3.86. | Which companies uses what metal mesh technology? |
3.87. | Metal mesh TCF market forecast in km sqr split by application |
3.88. | Metal mesh TCF ten-year market forecast split by application |
3.89. | Micro fine wire TCF technology |
3.90. | SWOT analysis on micro wire TCFs |
3.91. | SWOT analysis on micro wire TCFs |
3.92. | Key players |
3.93. | CimaTech's self-assembled nanoparticle technology |
3.94. | Examples of Cima Nanotech's technology |
3.95. | Examples of Cima Nanotech's technology |
3.96. | ClearJet's inkjet printed nanoparticle-based TCFs |
3.97. | Technology comparison |
4. | APPLICATIONS |
4.1. | Smart phone shipment units |
4.2. | Different touch solutions in the market |
4.3. | Smart phones have been growing in size |
4.4. | Growth in smart phones to come in the low-cost brackets |
4.5. | Smart phone market is highly diverse and fragmented |
4.6. | Chinese brands are stealing market share in China |
4.7. | TCF market share by technology in smart phones |
4.8. | TCF market forecast in smart phones |
4.9. | Tablet sales are set to grow |
4.10. | TCF market share by technology in the tablets |
4.11. | TCF market forecast in tablets |
4.12. | Touch notebook sales |
4.13. | TCF market share by technology in touch notebooks |
4.14. | TCF market forecast in touch notebooks |
4.15. | Touch monitors underwhelm |
4.16. | TCF market share by technology in touch PC monitors |
4.17. | TCF market forecast in touch PC monitors |
4.18. | OLED lighting market |
4.19. | Latest OLED lighting market announcements |
4.20. | Integrated substrates for OLED lighting |
4.21. | TCF market share by technology in OLED lighting |
4.22. | TCF market forecast in OLED lighting |
4.23. | Market Forecast for Organic photovoltaics |
4.24. | Latest news on organic photovoltaics |
4.25. | TCF market share by technology in OPVs |
4.26. | TCF market forecast in OPVs |
4.27. | OLED Displays: Beginning of a 3rd wave |
4.28. | Latest progress in flexible OLED displays |
4.29. | Products launched in September 2014 |
4.30. | Segmented market forecast for flexible OLED displays |
4.31. | OLED display revenue by technology |
4.32. | Smart window production capacity by technology & player |
4.33. | Smart window market projection |
5. | COMPANY INTERVIEWS |
5.1. | Arkema, France |
5.2. | Blue Nano, USA |
5.3. | Bluestone Global Tech, USA |
5.4. | C3Nano |
5.5. | Cambrios, USA |
5.6. | Canatu, Finland |
5.7. | Carestream Advanced Materials, USA |
5.8. | Cima Nanotech, USA |
5.9. | ClearJet, Israel |
5.10. | Dai Nippon Printing, Japan |
5.11. | Displax Interactive Systems, Portugal |
5.12. | Epigem Ltd |
5.13. | Goss International Americas, USA |
5.14. | Graphene Frontiers |
5.15. | Graphene Laboratories, USA |
5.16. | Graphene Square |
5.17. | Graphenea |
5.18. | Haydale Ltd |
5.19. | Heraeus, Germany |
5.20. | Kimoto |
5.21. | Nanogap, Spain |
5.22. | NanoIntegris |
5.23. | Nanomade |
5.24. | Neonode |
5.25. | OCSiAl |
5.26. | O-Film, China |
5.27. | PolyIC, Germany |
5.28. | Poly-Ink, France |
5.29. | Promethean Particles |
5.30. | Rolith, USA |
5.31. | Seashell Technology, USA |
5.32. | Showa Denko, Japan |
5.33. | Showa Denko K.K |
5.34. | Sinovia Technologies, USA |
5.35. | SouthWest NanoTechnologies, USA |
5.36. | Toppan Printing |
5.37. | UniPixel, USA |
5.38. | University of Exeter, UK |
5.39. | Visual Planet, UK |
5.40. | Wuxi Graphene Film |
5.41. | XinNano Materials, Taiwan |
5.42. | Zytronic, UK |
5.43. | Zyvex |
6. | COMPANY PROFILES |
6.1. | Typical properties on PET with bar coater |
6.1. | Agfa-Gevaert, Belgium |
6.2. | 3M, USA |
6.2. | Key performance data characteristics 3M's metal mesh TCFs |
6.3. | Yielded cost per unit area of TCF for touch panel applications |
6.3. | Atmel, USA |
6.4. | C3Nano, USA |
6.4. | Tiny copper wires can be built in bulk and then "printed" on a surface to conduct current, transparently. |
6.5. | Eastman Kodak HCF Film |
6.5. | Chasm Technologies, USA |
6.6. | Cheil Industries, South Korea |
6.6. | Opportunity for PEDOT in the Display industry |
6.7. | Performance of PEDOT formulation from Eastman Kodak versus ITO |
6.7. | Chimei Innolux, Taiwan |
6.8. | Chisso Corp., Japan |
6.8. | CNT Ink Production Process |
6.9. | Target application areas of Eikos |
6.9. | Conductive Inkjet Technologies (Carlco), USA |
6.10. | Dontech Inc., USA |
6.10. | Transmittance (%) as a function of wavelength (nm) for organic conductive polymers and ITO. |
6.11. | Comparison of organic conductive polymers and configuration of the developed organic conductive polymer film |
6.11. | Duke University, USA |
6.12. | Eastman Kodak, USA |
6.12. | Gunze's flexible display, presented early 2009 |
6.13. | Picture and pattern of transparent thermally conductive film |
6.13. | Eikos, USA |
6.14. | ELK, South Korea |
6.14. | Efficiency of TCF vs cell size |
6.15. | Indium migration vs other TCFs |
6.15. | Evaporated Coatings Inc., USA |
6.16. | Evonik, Germany |
6.16. | A schematic giving insight into MNTech's manufacturing process and a table outlining performance levels |
6.17. | Ga:ZnO films on a glass panel with the inventors and scanning electron images of 3D transparent conducting electrodes |
6.17. | Fujifilm Ltd, Japan |
6.18. | Fujitsu, Japan |
6.18. | The owners of Nicanti |
6.19. | Nicanti Printaf project |
6.19. | Gunze Ltd, Japan |
6.20. | Hitachi Chemical, Japan |
6.20. | Transparent conductive film - ELECRYSTA |
6.21. | Sales and operating profits for Nitto Denko |
6.21. | Holst Center, Netherlands |
6.22. | Iljin Display, South Korea |
6.22. | Nitto Denko's product offerings for displays including ITO film |
6.23. | Transparent conductive film using organic semiconductors |
6.23. | Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences (ICES), Singapore |
6.24. | Join Well Technology Company Ltd., Taiwan |
6.24. | TCF solutions from Panipol |
6.25. | Polychem PEDOT Polymer Coating |
6.25. | J-Touch, Taiwan |
6.26. | KAIST, South Korea |
6.26. | Patterned Sample by the New Technology |
6.27. | JEFF FITLOW -Yu Zhu, a postdoctoral researcher at Rice University, holds a sample of a transparent electrode that merges graphene and a fine aluminum grid |
6.27. | Komoro, Japan |
6.28. | KPT Shanghai Keyan Phosphor Technology Co. Ltd., China |
6.28. | A hybrid material that combines a fine aluminum mesh with a single-atom-thick layer of graphene |
6.29. | An electron microscope image of a hybrid electrode developed at Rice University |
6.29. | Lee Tat Industrial Development (LTI) Ltd, Hong Kong |
6.30. | LG Chem, South Korea |
6.30. | Roll-to-roll CVD production of very large-sized flexible graphene films |
6.31. | ITO-on-PET film stack |
6.31. | Maxfilm, South Koera |
6.32. | Mianyang Prochema Plastics Co., Ltd., China |
6.32. | FLECLEAR structure |
6.33. | Teijin's ELECLEAR ITO film |
6.33. | Mirae/MNTec, South Korea |
6.34. | Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., Mitsui Ltd., Japan |
6.34. | New metal grid TCF technology developed by Toray |
6.35. | Etched metal mesh TCF technology developed by Toray |
6.35. | Mutto Optronics, China |
6.36. | Nagase Corporation, Japan |
6.36. | CNT TCF technology developed by Toray |
6.37. | Nanopyxis, South Korea |
6.38. | National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan |
6.39. | National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore |
6.40. | Nicanti, Finland |
6.41. | Nitto Denko, Japan |
6.42. | Oike & CO., Ltd., Japan |
6.43. | Oji Paper Group, Japan |
6.44. | Panipol Ltd., Finland |
6.45. | Perceptive Pixel, USA |
6.46. | Polychem UV/EB, Taiwan |
6.47. | Power Booster, China |
6.48. | Rice University, USA |
6.49. | Samsung Electronics, South Korea |
6.50. | Sang Bo Corporation (SBK), South Korea |
6.51. | Sekisui Nano Coat Technology Ltd., Japan |
6.52. | Sheldahl, USA |
6.53. | Sigma-Aldrich, USA |
6.54. | Sony Corporation, Japan |
6.55. | Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Inc., Japan |
6.56. | Suzutora, Japan |
6.57. | TDK, Japan |
6.58. | Teijin Kasei America, Inc. / Teijin Chemical, USA |
6.59. | Top Nanosys, South Korea |
6.60. | Toray Advanced Film (TAF), Japan |
6.61. | Toyobo, Japan |
6.62. | UCLA, USA |
6.63. | Unidym, USA |
6.64. | University of Michigan, USA |
6.65. | VisionTek Systems Ltd., UK |
6.66. | Young Fast Optoelectronics, Taiwan |
IDTECHEX RESEARCH REPORTS AND CONSULTING | |
FIGURES |
Slides | 167 |
---|---|
Companies | 107 |
Forecasts to | 2025 |