1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Long term vision for 3D electronics |
1.2. | Readiness level of 3D electronics technologies and applications |
1.3. | Metallization and materials for each 3D electronics methodology |
1.4. | Comparison of metallization methods (aerosol, inkjet, extruded conductive paste, laser direct structuring, print-then-plate, two-shot molding, laser induced forward transfer, electrohydrodynamic printing) |
1.5. | SWOT Analysis: Electronics onto 3D surfaces |
1.6. | Summary: Electronics onto 3D surfaces |
1.7. | SWOT analysis: In-mold electronics (IME) |
1.8. | In-mold electronics: Summary |
1.9. | SWOT analysis: 3D printed electronics |
1.10. | Summary: 3D printed electronics |
1.11. | 10-year forecast by revenue for different types of 3D electronics |
1.12. | 10-year forecast by area (sqm) for electronics on 3D surface. (Categories: LDS, extruded paste, aerosol, two-shot molding, LIFT) |
1.13. | 10-year forecast by revenue for electronics on 3D surface. (Categories: LDS, extruded paste, aerosol, two-shot molding, LIFT) |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Overview of the electronics market |
2.2. | What are molded interconnect devices (MIDs) |
2.3. | 3D electronics manufacturing method flowchart |
2.4. | IME: 3D friendly process for circuit making |
2.5. | Motivation for 3D electronics |
2.6. | Advantages of 3D electronics vs conventional PCBs |
2.7. | Comparing the production speed of approaches to 3D electronics |
2.8. | 3D electronics requires special electronic design software |
2.9. | Readiness level of 3D electronics technologies and applications |
2.10. | 2D printed electronics (on surface) |
2.11. | Printed Electronics: Commercial failures |
2.12. | Printed Electronics: Commercial successes |
2.13. | Benchmarking competitive processes to 3D electronics |
3. | TRADITIONAL 2D PCBS |
3.1. | Traditional PCBs: History |
3.2. | Traditional PCBs: Mounting components |
3.3. | Traditional PCBs: Layers |
3.4. | Traditional PCBs: Complexity |
3.5. | Traditional PCBs: Geography |
3.6. | Traditional PCBs: Prototyping |
3.7. | Traditional PCBs: Mechanics |
3.8. | Traditional PCBs: Heat |
3.9. | SWOT analysis: Traditional PCBs |
4. | ELECTRONICS ONTO 3D SURFACES (INCLUDING 3D MID) |
4.1.1. | Applying electronics to 3D surfaces (including molded interconnect devices) |
4.1.2. | MID challenges for LED integration |
4.2. | Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Metallization methods |
4.2.1. | Metallization methods. |
4.2.2. | Comparing selective metallization methods |
4.2.3. | Comparison of metallization methods (aerosol, inkjet, extruded conductive paste, laser direct structuring, print-then-plate, two-shot molding, laser induced forward transfer, electrohydrodynamic printing) |
4.3. | Aerosol printing |
4.3.1. | Aerosol deposition |
4.3.2. | Aerosol deposition onto 3D surfaces |
4.3.3. | Aerosol deposition vs LDS (laser direct structuring) |
4.3.4. | Applications of aerosol beyond antennas |
4.3.5. | Varying line width to control resistance. |
4.3.6. | Example aerosol jet printed functionality |
4.3.7. | Aerosol jet in R&D |
4.3.8. | Academic Research: Aerosol jet printed transistors |
4.3.9. | Academic research: Aerosol jet printing for the fabrication of terahertz metamaterials |
4.3.10. | Case study: Aerosol deposition of mobile phone antennas |
4.3.11. | Aerosol jet printing: SWOT |
4.3.12. | Company profile: Optomec |
4.3.13. | SWOT Analysis: Optomec |
4.3.14. | Company Profile: Integrated Deposition Solutions |
4.3.15. | SWOT Analysis: Integrated Deposition Solutions |
4.4. | Laser direct structuring |
4.4.1. | Laser direct structuring (LDS) |
4.4.2. | Laser direct structuring has many applications |
4.4.3. | Using LDS to make a bionic ant (LPKF, Festo) |
4.4.4. | Capabilities of laser direct structuring |
4.4.5. | Laser roughing to enhance adhesion |
4.4.6. | Galvanic rather than electroless plating |
4.4.7. | LDS: Fine pitch capability |
4.4.8. | LDS application examples: Insulin pump |
4.4.9. | LDS for IC packaging through-hole vias |
4.4.10. | Mass manufacturing the all-plastic-substrate paint? |
4.4.11. | Combining 3D printing with LDS for prototyping? |
4.4.12. | Expanding LDS MID to non-plastic substrates? |
4.4.13. | LDS MID 3D LED retrofit |
4.4.14. | LDS MID in LED with improved heat dissipation |
4.4.15. | LDS MID in sensors |
4.4.16. | LDS manufacturers authorised by LPKF |
4.4.17. | LDS MID application examples: Insulin pump and diagnostic laser pen |
4.4.18. | Laser direct structuring: SWOT |
4.4.19. | Company Profile: LPKF |
4.4.20. | SWOT analysis: LPKF |
4.5. | Inkjet printing |
4.5.1. | Inkjet printing conductive traces: Commercial and hobbyist |
4.5.2. | Inkjet onto 3D surfaces (Nano Dimension) |
4.5.3. | SWOT analysis: Inkjet printing electronics |
4.5.4. | SWOT analysis: Ceradrop |
4.6. | Extruded conductive paste |
4.6.1. | Extruding conductive paste for structurally-integrated antennas |
4.6.2. | Details of extruded paste printing. |
4.6.3. | Extruded conductive paste examples |
4.6.4. | SWOT Analysis: Extruded paste |
4.6.5. | Extrude molten solder |
4.6.6. | SWOT Analysis: Extrude molten solder |
4.6.7. | SWOT Analysis: Pulse Electronics (Fluidant) |
4.7. | Two-shot molding |
4.7.1. | Two shot molding: Process description |
4.7.2. | Comparing LDS and two-shot molding |
4.7.3. | SWOT analysis: Two-shot molding |
4.8. | Laser induced forward transfer |
4.8.1. | Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) |
4.8.2. | How paste viscosity influences LIFT |
4.8.3. | SWOT analysis: Laser induced forward transfer |
4.9. | Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Materials |
4.9.1. | Material considerations for LDS |
4.9.2. | Ink requirements for aerosol printing |
4.9.3. | Beyond IME conductive inks: Adhesives |
4.9.4. | Conductive adhesives: General requirements and challenges |
4.9.5. | Different types of conductive adhesives |
4.9.6. | Conductive adhesives: Surviving the IME process |
4.9.7. | Attaching components to low temperature substrates |
4.9.8. | AlphaAssembly: Low temperature solder |
4.9.9. | Low temperature solder alloys |
4.9.10. | Low temperature soldering |
4.9.11. | Conductive paste bumping on flexible substrates |
4.9.12. | Ag pasted for die attachment |
4.9.13. | Safi-Tech: Ambient soldering with core-shell nanoparticles |
4.9.14. | Photonic soldering: A step up from sintering |
4.9.15. | Photonic soldering: Prospects and challenges |
4.9.16. | Photonic soldering: Substrate dependence. |
4.9.17. | Electrically conductive adhesives |
4.9.18. | Multilayer circuits: need for cross-overs in IME devices |
4.9.19. | Cross-over dielectric: Requirements |
4.9.20. | Cross-over dielectric: Flexibility tests |
4.10. | Electronics on 3D surfaces: Applications |
4.10.1. | Automotive applications of 3D electronics in development |
4.10.2. | LDS MID application examples: Automotive HMI |
4.10.3. | LDS MID application examples: Automotive HMI |
4.10.4. | LDS MID in LED implementation |
4.10.5. | MID application examples: Antenna |
4.10.6. | Applications of aerosol deposition |
4.10.7. | Conformal printing examples: Harvard University, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Optomec |
4.11. | Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Equipment companies |
4.11.1. | Neotech AMT |
4.11.2. | Equipment from Neotech-AMT |
4.11.3. | SWOT analysis: Neotech-AMT |
4.11.4. | Ceradrop |
4.11.5. | Ceradrop - printing ceramics |
4.11.6. | SWOT analysis: Ceradrop |
4.12. | Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Summary |
4.12.1. | SWOT Analysis: Electronics onto 3D surfaces |
4.12.2. | Summary: Electronics onto 3D surfaces |
5. | IN-MOLD ELECTRONICS (IME) AND FUNCTIONAL FILM INSERT MOLDING (FIM) |
5.1.1. | What is in-mold electronics (IME)? |
5.1.2. | Advantages of IME |
5.1.3. | Challenges for IME |
5.1.4. | Overview of key players across the supply chain |
5.1.5. | Examples of true structural electronics: Plastic Electronic, Smart Plastics Network |
5.1.6. | IME market forecast - application |
5.1.7. | IME surfaces and capabilities |
5.1.8. | Integrating IME into existing systems |
5.2. | In-mold electronics: Technologies and manufacturing methods |
5.2.1. | What is the in-mold electronic process? |
5.2.2. | In-mold electronics manufacturing - TactoTek |
5.2.3. | SMD assembly: before or after forming? |
5.2.4. | IME production: Required equipment set |
5.2.5. | In-mold decoration (IMD) production: Required equipment set |
5.2.6. | Processing conditions: Traditional electronics vs. IME |
5.2.7. | IME products have exceptional environmental tolerance |
5.2.8. | Aircraft aerofoil flap with integral heater for de-icing using in-mold electronics |
5.2.9. | IME requirements |
5.2.10. | Observations on the IME design process |
5.2.11. | Transfer printing: printing test strips & using lamination to compete with IME |
5.2.12. | PolyIC: inserting complex patterned functional films into 3D shaped parts |
5.2.13. | IME with functional films made with evaporated lines |
5.2.14. | Print-then-plate: Overview (Elephantech) |
5.2.15. | Print-then-plate: Advantages |
5.2.16. | Print-then-plate for in-mold electronics |
5.2.17. | SWOT analysis: Elephantech |
5.2.18. | Increasing number of research prototypes |
5.2.19. | Extending IME: Thermoformed polymeric actuator? |
5.2.20. | Thermoformed 3D shaped reflective LCD display |
5.2.21. | Thermoformed 3D shaped RGB AMOLED with LTPS |
5.2.22. | Molding electronics in 3D shaped composites |
5.3. | In-mold electronics: Materials |
5.3.1. | Stretchable carbon nanotube transparent conducting films |
5.3.2. | Prototype examples of carbon nanotube in-mold transparent conductive films |
5.3.3. | 3D touch using carbon nanobuds |
5.3.4. | In-mold and stretchable metal mesh transparent conductive films |
5.3.5. | Other IME transparent conductive film technologies |
5.3.6. | Prototype examples of in-mold and stretchable PEDOT:PSS transparent conductive films |
5.3.7. | CNBs: Insert film molding for 3D-shaped sensor transparent heaters |
5.3.8. | Benchmarking CNT 3D-shaped molded transparent heaters |
5.3.9. | Ultra fine metal mesh as transparent heater |
5.3.10. | Technology roadmap of ultra-fine metal mesh as transparent heater |
5.3.11. | Feature control capability of ultra fine metal mesh as transparent heater |
5.3.12. | IME: Value transfer from PCB board to ink |
5.3.13. | New ink requirements: Thermoformability |
5.3.14. | Evolution and improvements in performance of stretchable conductive inks |
5.3.15. | Performance of stretchable conductive inks |
5.3.16. | Bridging the conductivity gap between printed electronics and IME inks |
5.3.17. | The role of particle size in stretchable inks |
5.3.18. | Elantas: Selecting right fillers and binders to improve stretchability |
5.3.19. | E2IP Technologies/GGI Solutions: Particle-free IME inks |
5.3.20. | The role of resin in stretchable inks |
5.3.21. | New ink requirements: portfolio approach |
5.3.22. | IME materials: A portfolio approach |
5.3.23. | All materials in the stack must be compatible: Conductivity perspective |
5.3.24. | All materials in the stack must be compatible: Forming perspective |
5.3.25. | New ink requirements: Surviving heat stress |
5.3.26. | New ink requirements: stability |
5.3.27. | All materials in the stack must be reliable |
5.3.28. | The need for formable conductive adhesives |
5.3.29. | Stretchable conductive ink suppliers multiply |
5.3.30. | IME conductive ink suppliers multiply |
5.3.31. | Bendable conductive strips |
5.3.32. | IME with functional films made with evaporated lines |
5.3.33. | One-film vs Two-film approach |
5.3.34. | Different molding materials and conditions |
5.3.35. | Special PET as alternative to common PC? |
5.3.36. | Can TPU also be a substrate? |
5.4. | In-mold electronics: Applications |
5.4.1. | Is IME commercial yet? |
5.4.2. | Application areas for IME |
5.4.3. | Increasing number of IME research prototypes |
5.5. | In-mold electronics applications: Automotive |
5.5.1. | In-mold electronic application: Automotive |
5.5.2. | Addressable market in vehicle interiors in 2020 and 2025 |
5.5.3. | Automotive: In-mold decoration product examples |
5.5.4. | HMI: Trend towards 3D touch surfaces |
5.5.5. | Case study: Ford and T-ink |
5.5.6. | First (ALMOST) IME success story: Overhead console in cars |
5.5.7. | Growing need for 3D shaped transparent heater in automotive |
5.5.8. | Automotive: direct heating of headlamp plastic covers |
5.5.9. | Automotive: Human machine interfaces |
5.6. | IME applications: White goods |
5.6.1. | White goods: human machine interfaces |
5.6.2. | White goods, medical and industrial control (HMI) |
5.6.3. | White goods: In-Mold Decoration product examples |
5.6.4. | IME for washing machine HMI (from Molex) |
5.7. | In-mold electronics applications: consumer electronics |
5.7.1. | Consumer electronics prototypes to products |
5.7.2. | Home automation with IME becomes commercial |
5.7.3. | Antennas with IME |
5.7.4. | Commercial products: Wearable technology |
5.8. | In-mold electronics: Companies |
5.8.1. | TactoTek |
5.8.2. | IME examples from TactoTek |
5.8.3. | TactoTek business model & market |
5.8.4. | Recent TactoTek projects |
5.8.5. | TactoTek capabilities |
5.8.6. | Faurecia concept: Prototype to test functionality |
5.8.7. | Faurecia concept: Traditional vs. IME design |
5.8.8. | SWOT analysis: TactoTek |
5.8.9. | Company profile: Plastic Electronic |
5.8.10. | SWOT analysis: Plastic Electronic |
5.9. | In-mold electronics: Summary |
5.9.1. | SWOT analysis: In-mold electronics (IME) |
5.9.2. | In-mold electronics: Summary |
6. | 3D PRINTED ELECTRONICS |
6.1.1. | 3D printed electronics extends 3D printing |
6.1.2. | Fully 3D printed electronics |
6.1.3. | 'Conventional' 3D printing |
6.1.4. | 3D printed electronics combines existing manufacturing technologies |
6.1.5. | Comparing 3D printed electronics with other applications |
6.1.6. | Approaches to 3D printed structural electronics |
6.1.7. | Extrude conductive filament for 3D printed electronics |
6.1.8. | Extruding molten solder for 3D printed electronics |
6.1.9. | Extrude sensing filament |
6.1.10. | Conductive plastics using graphene additives |
6.1.11. | Conductive plastics using carbon nanotube additives |
6.1.12. | Paste extrusion, dispensing or printing during 3D printing |
6.1.13. | Ink requirements for 3D printed electronics |
6.1.14. | 3D printed with embedded metallization |
6.1.15. | Routes to 3D printing of structural electronics |
6.1.16. | 3D printing of soft electronics (Harvard University) |
6.1.17. | 3D electronics with stereolithography (Nascent Objects) |
6.1.18. | Roadmap for 3D printed electronics |
6.1.19. | Lessons learned from 3D printing and printed electronics |
6.2. | 3D printed electronics: Technologies |
6.2.1. | Comparing performance parameters of metallization and dielectric deposition methods |
6.2.2. | Increasing processing speed with parallelization |
6.2.3. | 3D Printer and conductive ink/paste/glue |
6.2.4. | University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) |
6.2.5. | Cornell University |
6.2.6. | Technology strengths and weaknesses |
6.3. | 3D printed electronics: Materials |
6.3.1. | Functional materials |
6.3.2. | Metals |
6.3.3. | Extrude conductive filament |
6.3.4. | SWOT analysis: Extrude conductive filament |
6.3.5. | Conductive thermoplastic filaments |
6.3.6. | Conductive inks |
6.3.7. | Ink requirements for 3D printed electronics |
6.3.8. | Conductive pastes |
6.3.9. | Conductive photopolymers |
6.4. | 3D printed electronics: Applications |
6.4.1. | Applications of 3D printed electronics |
6.4.2. | Integrating electronics into 3D printed structures: Toyota, Japan |
6.4.3. | Low volume manufacturing |
6.4.4. | Electromagnets |
6.4.5. | Ceramic capacitor |
6.4.6. | Metamaterials |
6.4.7. | Ballistic rectifier |
6.4.8. | Customized medical devices |
6.5. | 3D printed electronics: Companies |
6.5.1. | Novacentrix and nScrypt |
6.5.2. | Nano Dimension |
6.5.3. | Multi-layer printed PCB (NanoDimension) |
6.5.4. | Commercialization challenges for Nano Dimension |
6.5.5. | SWOT analysis: Nano Dimension |
6.5.6. | From 3D printed electronics to 3D printed shoes: Voxel8 |
6.5.7. | Conductive thermoplastic: Functionalize (USA) |
6.5.8. | SWOT analysis: nScrypt |
6.5.9. | SWOT analysis: Voxel8 |
6.6. | 3D printed electronics: Novel business models |
6.6.1. | 3D printed electronics and economies of scale |
6.6.2. | 3D printed electronics enable on-demand manufacturing |
6.6.3. | 3D printed electronics enable distributed manufacturing |
6.6.4. | Advantages and disadvantages of distributed manufacturing |
6.6.5. | On-demand manufacturing: US Army and NASA use nScrypt printer. |
6.6.6. | Our view on 3D printed electronics and distribute on-demand manufacturing |
6.7. | 3D printed electronics: Summary |
6.7.1. | SWOT analysis: 3D printed electronics |
6.7.2. | 3D printed electronics: Summary |
7. | 3D ELECTRONICS AND FLEXIBLE HYBRID ELECTRONICS |
7.1. | 3D electronics and flexible hybrid electronics (FHE) |
7.2. | FHE Examples: Combing conventional components with flexible/printed electronics on flexible substrates |
7.3. | Commonality with other electronics methodologies |
7.4. | Materials and technologies for FHE |
7.5. | FHE value chain: Many materials and technologies |
8. | FORECASTS |
8.1. | Forecast Methodology |
8.2. | 10-year forecast by revenue for different types of 3D electronics |
8.3. | IME market forecast - application |
8.4. | Ten-year in-mold-electronics market forecast by area |
8.5. | Estimate of value capture by different elements in an IME product |
8.6. | Ten-year IME value capture by plastic substrates and functional inks |
8.7. | Key observations from the MID market |
8.8. | 10-year forecast by area (sqm) for electronics on 3D surface. (Categories: LDS, extruded paste, aerosol, two-shot molding, LIFT) |
8.9. | 10-year forecast by revenue for electronics on 3D surface. (Categories: LDS, extruded paste, aerosol, two-shot molding, LIFT) |
8.10. | 10-year forecast by area (sqm) for extruded conductive paste |
8.11. | 10-year forecast by revenue for extruded conductive paste |
8.12. | 10-year forecast by area for laser direct structuring (LDS) |
8.13. | 10-year forecast by area for laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) |
8.14. | 10-year forecast by revenue for laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) |
8.15. | 10-year forecast by volume for fully 3D printed electronics (Categories: Fused deposition modelling, stereolithography) |