Optik für virtuelle, erweiterte und gemischte Realität 2026-2036: Technologien, Prognosen, Märkte

AR-Kombinatoren, einschließlich diffraktiver (SRG und holographischer) und reflektiver/geometrischer Wellenleiter, sowie Birdbath-Kombinatoren für AR-Datenbrillen und KI-Brillen. Objektive für VR, einschließlich Pancake-, Fresnel- und asphärische Linsen.

Show All Description Contents, Table & Figures List FAQs Pricing Related Content
"Optics for Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality 2026-2036: Technologies, Forecasts, Markets" provides an assessment of the optical technologies that enable virtual, augmented, and mixed reality devices, analyzing their development, application areas, and expected market trajectory from 2026 to 2036. It examines the optical technologies used across different XR product categories and evaluates how their performance, cost, and manufacturability influence device design and adoption. The analysis covers both established approaches and emerging alternatives, supported by updated industry data and new insights from the growing interest in smart‑glasses and AI glasses.
 
The AR headset market is forecast to reach over 35 million units by 2036. Source: IDTechEx.
 
XR products span a range of form factors, levels of immersion, and physical design constraints. Application requirements vary widely depending on the intended use case. Relevant performance metrics may include efficiency, power consumption, comfort, image quality, field of view (FoV), color fidelity, and battery life. In some applications, optical efficiency and weight may be the priority, while in others, wide FoV or high image quality may be more important. This diversity shapes the optical choices available to headset manufacturers.
 
Consumer expectations for XR devices also depend on their intended purpose. For everyday wear, AR glasses will require a lightweight design, unobtrusive or fashionable styling, and sufficient battery life for extended use. As a result, compact optical systems and efficient waveguide designs are of particular relevance. In contrast, more immersive VR applications, such as gaming or media consumption, may allow for trade‑offs in weight or battery life in favor of enhanced image clarity, improved color fidelity, or larger field of view. In these scenarios, achieving a high level of immersion often becomes the primary objective. Across all consumer use cases, comfort remains a key consideration, influencing both device adoption and usage duration.
 
Professional and industrial use cases can accommodate different sets of constraints. Many enterprise deployments prioritize robustness, controlled‑environment operation, and application‑specific functionality. This can allow for acceptance of external battery packs, larger form factors, or more complex optical assemblies where necessary. These devices may cover a wide range of immersion levels, from monocular near‑eye displays to fully enclosed mixed‑reality headsets. Such variance contributes to the continued market demand for a diverse range optical solutions.
 
Significant activity is occurring in consumer smart glasses, driven in part by the integration of AI systems which may give smart glasses a 'killer application'. These applications require simple, lightweight optical components that can display notifications, cues, and contextual information. Meta's Ray‑Ban Display device, launched in September 2025, represents one recent example of this category. Further devices from major technology companies, including expected products from Google and Snap in 2026, are likely to contribute to this segment. These developments have increased interest in optics suitable for glasses‑like form factors, particularly those enabling thin, lightweight designs.
 
AR devices rely on optical combiners and waveguides to deliver imagery while maintaining transparency. Key challenges include managing color performance, achieving acceptable efficiency, ensuring a suitably wide field of view, and providing a sufficiently large eye box to accommodate natural eye movement. Prescription integration and encapsulation is another active area of development.
 
VR devices make use of lenses and manufacturers are exploring solutions to the vergence accommodation conflict. Pancake lenses are now the standard technology used in the vast majority of released devices, offering compactness and providing a solution to god ray issues that hampered Fresnel lenses. However, pancake lenses are not without any trade-offs, including low optical efficiency, ghost images and higher cost.
 
The report examines a broad range of optical technologies used in AR and VR systems. For AR, these include waveguide‑based combiners using diffractive, holographic, reflective, and other coupling and propagation methods such as birdbath combiners and display-only headsets. For VR, optical systems including pancake lenses, Fresnel lenses, and aspheric lenses, as well as potential future technologies such as geometric phase optics. Each technology is assessed via benchmarking of commercial and technological factors, alongside a SWOT analysis.
 
The report compares technology classes with these criteria and provides analysis on which are best positioned for growth across the coming decade. Market forecasts from 2026 to 2036 are provided for AR and VR devices, supported by historical data and industry developments. Adoption projections for optical technologies are included, with segmentation by AR and VR device type. By 2036, AR headset shipments are projected to reach around 35 million units per year, with VR shipments exceeding 27 million units. These markets create opportunities for suppliers of optical components and related materials. Combined revenues for AR and VR devices is forecast to surpass US$22 billion by 2036. The distribution of this value across components will vary depending on device category, and manufacturing costs.
 
This report forms part of IDTechEx's broader XR research portfolio. It builds on prior editions with new analysis of the XR market, updated benchmarking, and further discussion of the company landscape. Drawing on interviews and ongoing industry engagement, the report provides a neutral assessment of the technologies and market factors shaping the future of optics for virtual, augmented, and mixed reality devices.
 
Key Aspects
This report from IDTechEx covers the following key contents:
  • An introduction to the augmented, mixed and virtual reality (AR/MR/VR) headset market, including analysis of key trends, expected market entrance from major players and assessment of the competitive landscape, including Chinese players.
  • Introduction to the optical requirements of XR devices, including the differences between categories of device.
  • Technological background, expected innovations, analysis of important players, overview of the ecosystem, and SWOT analysis are included for more than ten distinct optical combiner and lens technologies.
  • Over 50 company profiles.
  • Market Forecasts & Analysis: 10-year granular market volume and revenue forecasts for the following, including basis in historical data and narratives:
• Overall headset market (VR including MR-capable devices, AR including MR-capable devices).
• Combiners for AR, split into 10 classes of technology. AR devices are divided into narrow vs wide field of view.
• Lenses for VR, split into 4 different technologies.
  • Benchmarking of the above optics technologies on commercial and technological factors, with quantitative application fitness assessment for narrow and wide field of view AR devices, and VR headsets.
Report MetricsDetails
Historic Data2025 - 2025
CAGRThe global augmented reality and virtual reality headset market to reach US$22.6 billion by 2036, at a CAGR of 14% relative to 2025.
Forecast Period2026 - 2036
Forecast UnitsHeadset units, headset revenue (US$)
Regions CoveredWorldwide
Segments CoveredHeadsets (VR and AR). VR categorized by optics technologies. AR categorized by field of view and optics technologies.
Analyst access from IDTechEx
All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.
Further information
If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact our report team at research@IDTechEx.com or call one of our sales managers:

AMERICAS (USA): +1 617 577 7890
ASIA (Japan and Korea): +81 3 3216 7209
EUROPE (UK) +44 1223 812300
1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1.VR, AR, MR and XR as experiences
1.2.Segmenting devices: VR vs AR
1.3.AR: Field of view categorization
1.4.Is XR approaching the slope of enlightenment?
1.5.XR market development
1.6.Will AI give smart glasses a killer application?
1.7.Requirements differ across consumer and professional markets
1.8.Overall AR headset forecasts
1.9.Overall VR headset forecasts
1.10.Reflective waveguides for AR: Summary
1.11.SRG waveguides for AR: Summary
1.12.Holographic waveguides for AR: Summary
1.13.Non-waveguide combiners for AR: Summary
1.14.AR adoption forecast by FOV
1.15.Status and market potential of selected optical combiners for AR
1.16.AR combiner technology player landscape
1.17.AR combiner player landscape segmented by material and FOV
1.18.Pancake lenses for VR: Summary
1.19.Dioptric lenses for VR: Summary
1.20.Focus-tunable lenses for VR: Summary
1.21."Generations" of VR lens
1.22.VR optics technology forecast: Adoption proportions
1.23.Company profiles
1.24.Access More With an IDTechEx Subscription
2.INTRODUCTION
2.1.Introduction to XR and terminology
2.1.1.VR, AR, MR and XR as experiences
2.1.2.Segmenting devices: VR vs AR
2.1.3.Classifying headsets by field of view
2.1.4.Passthrough MR in VR devices
2.1.5.Terminology: Standalone vs tethered
2.1.6.AR: Field of view categorization
2.1.7.AR overview
2.2.Introduction to the XR market
2.2.1.AR, MR, VR and XR: A brief history
2.2.2.AR, MR, VR, and XR: 2010 onwards
2.2.3.2025: An exciting time for smart glasses?
2.2.4.XR market development
2.2.5.The VR market is consolidating
2.2.6.The commercial status of XR in 2025
2.2.7.Requirements differ across consumer and professional markets
2.2.8.Is XR approaching the slope of enlightenment?
2.2.9.What went wrong with the metaverse?
2.2.10.Applications in VR, AR & MR
2.2.11.Industry 4.0 and XR
2.2.12.A rocky history for consumer AR headsets
2.2.13.Consumer AR devices face tough competition
2.2.14.AR headsets as a replacement for other smart devices
2.2.15.AR as the end goal, smartphone replacement
2.2.16.Will AI give smart glasses a killer application?
2.2.17.VR headsets: Selected players
2.2.18.AR headsets: Selected players
2.2.19.Meta as an XR ecosystem player
2.2.20.Meta to cut 30% of metaverse budget
2.2.21.Google and Samsung as XR ecosystem players
2.2.22.Other big tech entries to the AR market
2.2.23.The Biggest XR News in 2024: Signs of Meta's Long-Term Plays Working
2.2.24.Smart glass market shifts up a gear in 2025
2.2.25.Other key XR industry news (I)
2.2.26.Other key XR industry news (II)
2.2.27.Chinese XR players should not be overlooked
2.2.28.Chinese XR players (I)
2.2.29.Chinese XR players (II)
2.2.30.Smart contact lenses
2.2.31.The outlook for XR: Comparing the VR and AR markets
2.2.32.Introduction to the XR market: Key takeaways
2.3.Introduction to XR optics
2.3.1.Optical requirements for XR
2.3.2.Pairing optics with displays
2.3.3.AR vs VR optics: Development status and design considerations
2.3.4.Optical engines: Combining displays and optics in XR
2.3.5.Field of view defines XR experiences
2.3.6.Is an immersive wide FOV always necessary?
2.3.7.Eyebox and eye relief: Keys to XR usability
2.3.8.Measuring brightness and efficiency
2.3.9.Etendue: Optical entropy
2.3.10.Resolution, FoV, and pixel density
2.3.11.Foveated rendering and displays: Higher display quality at reduced resolution
2.3.12.The vergence-accommodation conflict
2.3.13.Contrast and dynamic range
2.3.14.Display requirements for XR
2.3.15.Optical aberrations present design challenges
2.3.16.Optic coatings in VR and AR
2.3.17.Optical combiners for AR
2.3.18.Choices of AR optic
2.3.19.Choices of VR optic
2.3.20.Introduction to the XR market: Key takeaways
3.AR AND VR MARKET FORECASTS
3.1.Forecasting methodology
3.1.1.AR headset forecasting: Important data sources
3.1.2.VR headset forecasting: Important data sources
3.1.3.Methodology: Optics volume forecasts
3.1.4.IDTechEx's view of the AR market
3.1.5.IDTechEx's view of the VR market
3.2.Headset forecasts
3.2.1.AR: FOV categorization
3.2.2.What is not considered in forecasting
3.2.3.AR headsets: Volume forecast
3.2.4.AR headsets: Pricing forecast methodology
3.2.5.AR headsets: Revenue forecast
3.2.6.Cyclic nature of VR hardware sales
3.2.7.VR headsets: Volume forecast
3.2.8.VR headsets: Pricing data
3.2.9.VR headsets: Revenue forecast
3.3.Optical combiners for AR market forecasts
3.3.1.The future of combiner technology
3.3.2.Non-waveguide combiners expected to be replaced by waveguides
3.3.3.Waveguides may be beginning to compete with birdbath combiners on price
3.3.4.Forecasting adoption proportion for AR combiner technologies
3.3.5.Historic assessment of AR combiner adoption: Wide FOV
3.3.6.Wide FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Adoption proportions
3.3.7.Wide FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Adoption data table
3.3.8.Wide FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Headset volume
3.3.9.Wide FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Volume data table
3.3.10.SRG and reflective waveguides: Wide FOV volume forecast
3.3.11.Polymer and glass waveguides: Wide FOV volume forecast
3.3.12.Historic assessment of AR combiner adoption: Narrow FOV
3.3.13.Narrow FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Adoption proportions
3.3.14.Narrow FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Adoption data table
3.3.15.Narrow FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Headset volume
3.3.16.Narrow FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Volume data table
3.3.17.SRG and reflective waveguides: Narrow FOV volume forecast
3.3.18.Polymer and glass waveguides: Narrow FOV volume forecast
3.4.Lenses for VR market forecasts
3.4.1.Historic assessment of VR optics adoption
3.4.2.VR optics technology forecast: Adoption proportions
3.4.3.Narrow FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Adoption data table
3.4.4.VR optics technology forecast: Headset volume
3.4.5.Narrow FOV AR combiner technology forecast: Adoption data table
3.5.Summary of market forecasts
3.5.1.Status and market potential of selected optical combiners
3.5.2.AR combiner forecasts: Summary
3.5.3."Generations" of VR lens
3.5.4.VR optics forecasts: Summary
4.AR OPTICS TECHNOLOGIES
4.1.Optical combiners/waveguides in AR
4.1.1.Optical combiners: Definition and classification
4.1.2.Optical combiners for AR
4.1.3.Waveguides vs other combiner types
4.1.4.Status and market potential of selected optical combiners
4.1.5.AR combiner technology player landscape
4.1.6.AR combiner player landscape segmented by material and FOV
4.2.Waveguide combiners
4.2.1.Common waveguide architectures
4.2.2.Classes of Waveguide
4.2.3.Projector entry to waveguides
4.2.4.Exit pupil expansion in waveguides
4.2.5.Eye glow is a barrier to social acceptability and efficiency
4.2.6.Waveguide substrate materials: Refractive index
4.2.7.Comparing glass suppliers for waveguide substrates
4.2.8.Waveguide substrate materials: Glass vs polymers
4.2.9.Weight minimization in waveguides
4.2.10.Comparison between waveguide methodologies
4.2.11.It is still unclear which waveguide technology is 'best'
4.2.12.Strategies in waveguide combiner supply
4.2.13.Big Tech and AR: Waveguide technologies
4.2.14.Big Tech and AR: Meta's waveguide technologies
4.2.15.Reflective waveguides
4.2.16.Introduction: Reflective waveguides
4.2.17.Reflective waveguide players assessment (I)
4.2.18.Reflective waveguide players assessment (II)
4.2.19.Lumus still leading the way for reflective waveguides
4.2.20.Plastic vs glass reflective waveguides
4.2.21.Reflective waveguides: SWOT analysis
4.2.22.Reflective waveguides: Key takeaways
4.2.23.Diffractive waveguides
4.2.24.Introduction: Diffractive waveguides
4.2.25.Diffractive waveguides: Method of operation
4.2.26.Challenges for color accuracy in diffractive waveguides
4.2.27.Solutions to color accuracy in diffractive waveguides
4.2.28.Development direction to single plate for diffractive waveguides
4.2.29.Technology variation within diffractive waveguide architectures
4.2.30.Diffractive surface relief grating (SRG) waveguides
4.2.31.Introduction: Surface relief grating waveguides
4.2.32.SRG waveguide players assessment (I)
4.2.33.SRG waveguide players assessment (II)
4.2.34.SRG waveguide players assessment (III)
4.2.35.Grating structures in SRG waveguides
4.2.36.SRG waveguide materials
4.2.37.SiC waveguides: Worth the extra cost?
4.2.38.SRG waveguides: SWOT analysis
4.2.39.SRG waveguides: Key takeaways
4.2.40.Holographic waveguides
4.2.41.Introduction: Holographic grating waveguides
4.2.42.Holographic waveguide players assessment (I)
4.2.43.Commercial status of holographic waveguides
4.2.44.DigiLens' SRG+ technology
4.2.45.Holographic waveguides: SWOT analysis
4.2.46.Holographic waveguides: Key takeaways
4.3.Non-waveguide combiners
4.3.1.Simple reflective combiners
4.3.2.Introduction: Simple reflective combiners
4.3.3.Simple reflective combiners players assessment (I)
4.3.4.Birdbath optics: Introduction
4.3.5.Birdbath optics have significant commercial adoption
4.3.6.Freeform mirrors: Introduction
4.3.7.Bugeye combiners: Large-scale freeform mirrors
4.3.8.Birdbath combiners: SWOT analysis
4.3.9.Freeform mirror combiners: SWOT analysis
4.3.10.Bugeye combiners: SWOT analysis
4.3.11.Simple reflective combiners: Key takeaways
4.3.12.Freespace holographic optical element (HOE) combiners
4.3.13.Introduction: Free-space holographic optical element (HOE) combiners
4.3.14.Free-space holographic combiner players assessment (I)
4.3.15.HOE free-space combiners: Trouble taking off?
4.3.16.Free-space HOE: SWOT analysis
4.3.17.Free-space HOE: Key takeaways
4.3.18.Non-transparent displays: No optical combiner required
4.3.19.Introduction: Non-transparent displays
4.3.20.Non-transparent displays: SWOT analysis
4.3.21.Non-transparent displays: key takeaways
4.4.AR technology benchmarking and analysis
4.4.1.Introduction to AR optical combiner benchmarking
4.4.2.AR optical combiners: Benchmarking categories
4.4.3.Optical combiners in AR: Technology benchmarking
4.4.4.Optical combiners in AR: Radar charts
4.4.5.Comparison of SRG and reflective waveguides
4.4.6.Comparison of glass and polymer substrates: Reflective waveguides
4.4.7.Comparison of glass and polymer substrates: SRG waveguides
4.4.8.Ranking performance of factors: Wide and narrow FOV devices
4.4.9.Narrow FOV optics technology ranking
4.4.10.Wide FOV optics technology ranking
4.4.11.Reduction in optical efficiency at higher FOV by waveguide technology
4.4.12.Technology benchmarking: Key takeaways
4.5.Encapsulation and prescription correction in AR
4.5.1.Approaches to prescription correction in today's AR devices
4.5.2.Future approaches to prescription correction: User-customization
4.5.3.Why encapsulate waveguides with lenses?
4.5.4.Ancillary lenses fill gaps in waveguide capabilities
4.5.5.Static accommodation adjustment
4.5.6.Prescription correction: 3D printing offers an elegant solution
4.5.7.Meta, Luxexcel and AddOptics
4.5.8.AddOptics
4.5.9.Correcting the vergence-accommodation conflict
4.5.10.Deep Optics and liquid crystal lenses
4.5.11.Future AR eyepieces development
4.5.12.Encapsulation and prescription correction players
4.5.13.Encapsulation and prescription correction: Key takeaways
4.6.Optical simulation software providers
4.6.1.Optical software providers
4.6.2.Optical simulation software: Custom or off the shelf?
4.6.3.Optical simulation software: Key takeaways
5.VR OPTICS TECHNOLOGIES
5.1.VR optics introduction
5.1.1.The VR optics technology landscape
5.1.2.Lenses in VR
5.1.3.Pancake lenses now the dominating for current and near future VR
5.1.4."Generations" of VR lens
5.1.5.Technological status of VR lens technologies
5.1.6.Big Tech and VR: Optics technologies
5.2.Pancake lenses
5.2.1.Pancake lenses: Introduction
5.2.2.Pancake lenses: From niche to standard
5.2.3.Pancake devices: Dominating in 2025
5.2.4.Comparing pancake and Fresnel lens headsets
5.2.5.Artefacts in pancake vs Fresnel lenses
5.2.6.Pancake lenses and new design possibilities
5.2.7.Holographic pancake lenses
5.2.8.Other catadioptric lens designs
5.2.9.Polarization-based pancake lenses: SWOT analysis
5.3.Dioptric lenses
5.3.1.Fresnel lenses: The previous standard in VR lenses
5.3.2.Meta's patented hybrid Fresnel lens
5.3.3.Other approaches to god ray mitigation in Fresnel lenses
5.3.4.Fresnel doublets
5.3.5.Users modifying headsets
5.3.6.Aspherical lenses at the high end in VR
5.3.7.Comparing aspheric and pancake lenses
5.3.8.Fresnel lenses: SWOT analysis
5.3.9.Aspherical lenses: SWOT analysis
5.4.Focus-tuneable lenses
5.4.1.Why is dynamically variable focus important for XR?
5.4.2.Emerging lens technologies by technology readiness
5.4.3.Solutions to the vergence-accommodation conflict for XR
5.4.4.VAC workarounds and focus-free systems: SWOT analysis
5.4.5.Dynamic optics (focus tunable lenses): SWOT analysis
5.4.6.SWOT: "True 3D" displays
5.4.7."True 3D" displays
5.4.8."True 3D" displays overview
5.4.9.Light field displays: Reconstructing scenes from multiple viewpoints
5.4.10.Avoiding the resolution limit: Sequential light field displays
5.4.11.Case study: CREAL's light field near-eye displays
5.4.12.Holography: Reconstructing wavefronts
5.4.13.Computer-generated holography: Digital hologram generation
5.4.14.VividQ: Holographic displays for AR
5.4.15.Summary: "True 3D" displays as competitors to focus-tunable lenses
5.4.16.Geometric phase lenses
5.4.17.Introduction to geometric phase lenses
5.4.18.Flat lenses: Diffractive optics, metasurfaces, liquid crystals and more
5.4.19.Why geometric phase lenses matter
5.4.20.What is geometric (Pancharatnam-Berry) phase?
5.4.21.Optically anisotropic materials and GPLs
5.4.22.Liquid crystals and switchable waveplates
5.4.23.Liquid crystals in GPLs
5.4.24.Metasurfaces: Another method to apply geometric phase
5.4.25.Introduction to optical meta-surfaces
5.4.26.Manufacturing optical metamaterials: Havard research
5.4.27.Applications for metasurfaces: Harvard research
5.4.28.Metasurfaces for distributing light and imaging
5.4.29.Manufacturing metasurfaces via semiconductor fabrication
5.4.30.Rolling mask lithography
5.4.31.Meta's GPL prototypes
5.4.32.The vision for GPL use in headsets
5.4.33.Geometric phase lenses for XR: Outlook
5.4.34.Other focus tunable lenses
5.4.35.Tunable liquid crystal lenses
5.4.36.Meta: Various approaches to solving the VAC
5.4.37.Alvarez lenses
5.4.38.Focus-tunable lenses: Key takeaways
5.5.VR technology benchmarking and analysis
5.5.1.Introduction to VR lens benchmarking
5.5.2.Benchmarking criteria (I): Commercial factors
5.5.3.Benchmarking criteria (II): Technological factors
5.5.4.Benchmark scores: VR lenses
5.5.5.Comparing overall lens performance
5.5.6.Ranking the performance of optical lenses
5.5.7.Attribute importance in VR devices
5.5.8.VR lens benchmark performance
5.5.9.VR lens benchmarking: Conclusions to inform forecasting
6.COMPANY PROFILES
6.1.AddOptics (2022)
6.2.AddOptics (2025)
6.3.AddOptics: 2023 Update
6.4.Cambridge Mechatronics (2022)
6.5.Deep Optics (2022)
6.6.DigiLens (2022)
6.7.DigiLens (2025)
6.8.Dispelix (2022)
6.9.EverySight (2025)
6.10.HTC Vive (2022)
6.11.Inkron (2022)
6.12.Kubos Semiconductors (2025)
6.13.Kura Technologies (2022)
6.14.Lenovo: The ThinkReality A3 (2022)
6.15.LetinAR (2022)
6.16.LetinAR (2024)
6.17.LetinAR: Optics in a High-Volume Headset (2024)
6.18.LightTrans (2025)
6.19.Limbak (2022)
6.20.Limbak: Acquired by Apple? (2023)
6.21.Lumus (2022)
6.22.Lumus (2023)
6.23.Lumus (2025)
6.24.Luxexcel (2022)
6.25.Luxexcel Acquired by Meta (2023)
6.26.Lynx (2022)
6.27.Lynx — Q2 2022 Update
6.28.Meta (VR Optics) (2022)
6.29.Meta: Professional Use of VR and Quest for Business (2023)
6.30.Meta: Smart Glasses Update (2025)
6.31.MICROOLED (2023)
6.32.Mira Reality (2022)
6.33.Mira Reality: Acquired by Apple (2023)
6.34.Mojo Vision (2022)
6.35.Morphotonics (2022)
6.36.Morphotonics (2025)
6.37.Oorym (2023)
6.38.Optiark 2025 Update
6.39.Optinvent (2022)
6.40.Optinvent (2025)
6.41.Optix (2025)
6.42.Samsung: Galaxy Event (2025)
6.43.Schott AG (2025)
6.44.Schott AG: Augmented/Mixed Reality Operations (2022)
6.45.SCIL Nanoimprint (2025)
6.46.Snap: AWE 2025 (2025)
6.47.Sony (CES 2023)
6.48.TruLife Optics (2022)
6.49.Varjo (2023)
6.50.VividQ (2022)
6.51.VividQ and Dispelix: Pairing Holographic Displays with Waveguides (2023)
6.52.VividQ: Visit and Tech Demo (2022)
 

About IDTechEx reports

What are the qualifications of the people conducting IDTechEx research?

Content produced by IDTechEx is researched and written by our technical analysts, each with a PhD or master's degree in their specialist field, and all of whom are employees. All our analysts are well-connected in their fields, intensively covering their sectors, revealing hard-to-find information you can trust.

How does IDTechEx gather data for its reports?

By directly interviewing and profiling companies across the supply chain. IDTechEx analysts interview companies by engaging directly with senior management and technology development executives across the supply chain, leading to revealing insights that may otherwise be inaccessible.
 
Further, as a global team, we travel extensively to industry events and companies to conduct in-depth, face-to-face interviews. We also engage with industry associations and follow public company filings as secondary sources. We conduct patent analysis and track regulatory changes and incentives. We consistently build on our decades-long research of emerging technologies.
 
We assess emerging technologies against existing solutions, evaluate market demand and provide data-driven forecasts based on our models. This provides a clear, unbiased outlook on the future of each technology or industry that we cover.

What is your forecast methodology?

We take into account the following information and data points where relevant to create our forecasts:
  • Historic data, based on our own databases of products, companies' sales data, information from associations, company reports and validation of our prior market figures with companies in the industry.
  • Current and announced manufacturing capacities
  • Company production targets
  • Direct input from companies as we interview them as to their growth expectations, moderated by our analysts
  • Planned or active government incentives and regulations
  • Assessment of the capabilities and price of the technology based on our benchmarking over the forecast period, versus that of competitive solutions
  • Teardown data (e.g. to assess volume of materials used)
  • From a top-down view: the total addressable market
  • Forecasts can be based on an s-curve methodology where appropriate, taking into account the above factors
  • Key assumptions and discussion of what can impact the forecast are covered in the report.

How can I be confident about the quality of work in IDTechEx reports?

Based on our technical analysts and their research methodology, for over 25 years our work has regularly received superb feedback from our global clients. Our research business has grown year-on-year.
 
Recent customer feedback includes:
"It's my first go-to platform"
- Dr. Didi Xu, Head of Foresight - Future Technologies, Freudenberg Technology Innovation
 
"Their expertise allows us to make data-driven, strategic decisions and ensures we remain aligned with the latest trends and opportunities in the market."
- Ralf Hug, Global Head of Product Management & Marketing, Marquardt

What differentiates IDTechEx reports?

Our team of in-house technical analysts immerse themselves in industries over many years, building deep expertise and engaging directly with key industry players to uncover hard-to-find insights. We appraise technologies in the landscape of competitive solutions and then assess their market demand based on voice-of-the-customer feedback, all from an impartial point of view. This approach delivers exceptional value to our customers—providing high-quality independent content while saving customers time, resources, and money.

Why should we pick IDTechEx research over AI research?

A crucial value of IDTechEx research is that it provides information, assessments and forecasts based on interviews with key people in the industry, assessed by technical experts. AI is trained only on content publicly available on the web, which may not be reliable, in depth, nor contain the latest insights based on the experience of those actively involved in a technology or industry, despite the confident prose.

How can I justify the ROI of this report?

Consider the cost of the IDTechEx report versus the time and resources required to gather the same quality of insights yourself. IDTechEx analysts have built up an extensive contact network over many years; we invest in attending key events and interviewing companies around the world; and our analysts are trained in appraising technologies and markets.
 
Each report provides an independent, expert-led technical and market appraisal, giving you access to actionable information immediately, rather than you having to spend months or years on your own market research.

Can I speak to analysts about the report content?

All report purchases include up to 30 minutes of telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.

What is the difference between a report and subscription?

A subscription from IDTechEx can include more reports, access to an online information platform with continuously updated information from our analysts, and access to analysts directly.

Before purchasing, I have some questions about the report, can I speak to someone?

Please email research@idtechex.com stating your location and we will quickly respond.

About IDTechEx

Who are IDTechEx's customers?

IDTechEx has served over 35,000 customers globally. These range from large corporations to ambitious start-ups, and from Governments to research centers. Our customers use our work to make informed decisions and save time and resources.

Where is IDTechEx established?

IDTechEx was established in 1999, and is headquartered in Cambridge, UK. Since then, the company has significantly expanded and operates globally, having served customers in over 80 countries. Subsidiary companies are based in the USA, Germany and Japan.

Questions about purchasing a report

How do I pay?

In most locations reports can be purchased by credit card, or else by direct bank payment.

How and when do I receive access to IDTechEx reports?

When paying successfully by credit card, reports can be accessed immediately. For new customers, when paying by bank transfer, reports will usually be released when the payment is received. Report access will be notified by email.

How do I assign additional users to the report?

Users can be assigned in the report ordering process, or at a later time by email.

Can I speak to someone about purchasing a report?

Please email research@idtechex.com stating your location and we will quickly respond.
 

Ordering Information

Optik für virtuelle, erweiterte und gemischte Realität 2026-2036: Technologien, Prognosen, Märkte

£$¥
Electronic (1-5 users)
£5,650.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
£8,050.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
£6,450.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
£8,850.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
€6,400.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
€9,200.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
€7,400.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
€10,200.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
$7,500.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
$10,750.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
$8,600.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
$11,850.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
元54,000.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
元76,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
元61,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
元84,000.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
¥990,000
Electronic (6-10 users)
¥1,406,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
¥1,140,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
¥1,556,000
Electronic (1-5 users)
₩10,500,000
Electronic (6-10 users)
₩15,000,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
₩12,100,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
₩16,600,000
Click here to enquire about additional licenses.
If you are a reseller/distributor please contact us before ordering.
お問合せ、見積および請求書が必要な方はm.murakoshi@idtechex.com までご連絡ください。
Der Markt für Augmented-Reality-Headsets wird bis 2036 15 Milliarden US-Dollar erreichen.

Report Statistics

Slides 331
Companies 52
Forecasts to 2036
Published Jan 2026
 

Preview Content

pdf Document Sample pages
 

Customer Testimonial

quote graphic
"The resources provided by IDTechEx, such as their insightful reports and analysis, engaging webinars, and knowledgeable analysts, serve as valuable tools and information sources... Their expertise allows us to make data-driven, strategic decisions and ensures we remain aligned with the latest trends and opportunities in the market."
Global Head of Product Management and Marketing
Marquardt GmbH
 
 
 
ISBN: 9781835701669

Subscription Enquiry