This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1.1. | What is this report about? |
1.1.2. | Growing population and growing demand for food |
1.1.3. | Major crop yields are plateauing |
1.1.4. | Employment in agriculture |
1.1.5. | Global evolution of employment in agriculture |
1.1.6. | Aging farmer population |
1.1.7. | Trends in minimum wages globally |
1.1.8. | Towards ultra precision agriculture via the variable rate technology route |
1.1.9. | Towards better disease prevention, yield prediction, and quality management |
1.1.10. | Key enabling technologies of the future |
1.1.11. | Ultra Precision farming will cause upheaval in the farming value chain |
1.1.12. | Agricultural robotics and ultra precision agriculture will cause upheaval in agriculture's value chain |
1.1.13. | Agriculture is one of the last major industries to digitize: a look at investment in data analytics/management firms in agricultural and dairy farming |
1.1.14. | The battle of business models between RaaS and equipment sales |
1.1.15. | Transition towards swarms of small, slow, cheap and unmanned robots |
1.1.16. | Robots and drones: market and technology readiness by agricultural activity |
1.1.17. | Robotic product classes used in our forecasts and analysis |
1.1.18. | Technology readiness level of different companies |
1.1.19. | Technology progression towards driverless autonomous large-sized tractors |
1.1.20. | Technology progression towards autonomous, ultra precision de-weeding |
1.1.21. | Technology and progress roadmap for robotic fresh fruit harvesting |
1.1.22. | Different areas in agriculture into which machine learning penetrates |
1.1.23. | Machine learning in agriculture: research state of the art |
1.1.24. | Definition of AI abbreviations |
1.1.25. | Various algorithm types: definitions |
1.1.26. | Data, model, and results are correlated |
1.1.27. | Evolution of model leads to the evolution of capability |
1.1.28. | Products are maturing |
1.1.29. | AI and robotics to enable ultra precision agriculture |
1.1.30. | Electric vs non-electric autonomous agricultural robots. |
1.1.31. | Categorising firms by location, type of robot, level of autonomy, power source, technology readiness level, and function |
1.1.32. | Categorising firms by location, type of robot, level of autonomy, power source, technology readiness level, and function |
1.1.33. | Summary of market forecasts |
1.1.34. | Autonomous small and mid-sized robots in data collection, precision weeding, precision pruning, etc: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.35. | Autonomous small and mid-sized robots: penetration rate into the addressable market |
1.1.36. | Autonomous small and mid-sized robots: accumulated fleet size and annual sales |
1.1.37. | Intelligent robotic implements: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.38. | Intelligent robotic implements: penetration rate into the addressable market |
1.1.39. | Intelligent robotic implements: accumulated fleet size and annual sales |
1.1.40. | Simple robotic implements: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.41. | Highly automated and autonomous tractors: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.42. | Robotic fresh fruit and citrus harvesting: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.43. | Addressable market for fresh fruit and citrus harvesting (apples, grapes, pears, lemons, grapefruit, tangerines, oranges) |
1.1.44. | Robotic fresh fruit and citrus harvesting |
1.1.45. | Robotic fresh fruit and citrus harvesting: productivity |
1.1.46. | Robotic fresh fruit and citrus harvesting: accumulated fleet size and annual sales |
1.1.47. | Robotic fresh berry and similar fruit harvesting: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.48. | Robotic fresh berry and similar fruit harvesting: accumulated fleet size and annual sales |
1.1.49. | Imaging and spraying drones in agriculture: 2020 to 2040 market forecasts |
1.1.50. | Robotic milking is already a major market: 2018:2038 market forecasts |
2. | AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY FOR LARGE TRACTORS |
2.1. | Number of tractors sold globally |
2.2. | Value of crop production and average farm sizes per region |
2.3. | Revenues of top agricultural equipment companies |
2.4. | Overview of top agricultural equipment companies |
2.5. | Tractor Guidance and Autosteer Technology for Large Tractors |
2.6. | Autosteer for large tractors |
2.7. | Ten-year forecasts for autosteer tractors |
2.8. | Master-slave or follow-me large autonomous tractors |
2.9. | Fully autonomous driverless large tractors |
2.10. | Fully autonomous unmanned tractors |
2.11. | New Holland Autonomous Tractor |
2.12. | Precision Makers |
2.13. | Agrointellli: developing autonomous high horse-power agricultural vehicles |
2.14. | Handsfree Hectar: fully autonomous human-free barley farming |
2.15. | Technology progression towards driverless autonomous large-sized tractors |
2.16. | Tractors evolving towards full autonomy: 2018-2038 market forecasts in unit numbers segmented by level of navigational autonomy |
2.17. | Tractors evolving towards full autonomy: 2018-2038 market forecasts in market value segmented by level of navigational autonomy |
2.18. | Tractors evolving towards full autonomy: 2018-2038 market forecasts segmented by level of navigational autonomy (value of automation only) |
3. | AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC AGRICULTURAL PLATFORMS |
3.1.1. | Autonomous small-sized agricultural robots |
3.1.2. | FENDT (AGCO) launches swarms of autonomous agrobots |
3.1.3. | Autonomous agricultural robotic platforms |
3.1.4. | IdaBot: autonomous agricultural robotic platforms |
3.1.5. | Augen Robotics: autonomous vision-navigated mobile platform or transporter |
3.1.6. | Octinion: autonomous mobile platform and robotic strawberry picking |
3.2. | Artificial intelligence in crop yield prediction |
3.2.1. | Content outline |
3.2.2. | Artificial intelligence in crop yield prediction: summary and conclusions |
3.2.3. | Types of crop prediction |
3.2.4. | Yield prediction: summary of algorithms used and results obtained |
3.2.5. | Yield prediction: a shift from other methods to neural network-based method |
3.2.6. | Trends: (a) from large-data based to Image based methods and (b) from massive to site-specific crop yield prediction |
3.3. | Artificial intelligence in crop yield prediction: review |
3.3.1. | Grassland biomass estimation using spectrography |
3.3.2. | Biomass estimation process |
3.3.3. | Biomass estimation results |
3.3.4. | What is MODIS? |
3.3.5. | Wheat yield prediction |
3.3.6. | Wheat yield prediction materials and method |
3.3.7. | General crop yield prediction based on ensemble learning |
3.3.8. | Ensemble learning results are best in prediction of general crop yield |
3.3.9. | Rice development stages prediction |
3.3.10. | What is included in rice development stage and yield prediction? |
3.3.11. | Cloud-Based Agricultural Framework for Soil Classification and Crop Yield Prediction as a Service |
3.3.12. | Rapid yield prediction in paddy fields based on 2D image modelling of rice panicles |
3.3.13. | Procedure and method |
3.3.14. | Crop yield prediction with deep convolutional neural networks |
3.3.15. | Network used and the procedure |
3.3.16. | Artificial Neural Network-Based Crop Yield Prediction Using NDVI, SPI, VCI Feature Vectors |
3.3.17. | Method and result |
3.3.18. | Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning |
3.3.19. | Hardware and network model |
4. | AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC WEED KILLING |
4.1. | From manned, broadcast towards autonomous, ultra precision de-weeding |
4.2. | Crop protection chemical sales per top suppliers globally |
4.3. | Sales of top global and Chinese herbicide suppliers |
4.4. | Global herbicide consumption data |
4.5. | Glyphosate consumption and market globally |
4.6. | Regulations will impact the market for robotic weed killers? |
4.7. | Glyphosate banning state in the world now |
4.8. | Penetration of herbicides in different field crops |
4.9. | Growing challenge of herbicide-resistant weeds |
4.10. | Glyphosate is no longer as effective as it was |
4.11. | In almost all major crops, weeds are showing resistance |
4.12. | Autonomous weed killing robots |
4.13. | Autonomous robotic weed killers |
4.14. | EcoRobotix: energy-independent autonomous precision weeder |
4.15. | EcoRobotix: precision positioning and spraying |
4.16. | EcoRobotix: deep learning for crop and weed recognition |
4.17. | EcoRobotix: target markets |
4.18. | EcoRobotix: autonomous mobility |
4.19. | EcoRobotix: next generation of products |
4.20. | Adigio: autonomous weeding machine with precision sprayer and DNN-based week detection |
4.21. | Small Robot Company: supporting the rise of small autonomous agricultural robots |
4.22. | Small Robot Company: going from robotic data acquisition and mapping to precision weeding and planning |
4.23. | Earthsense: from autonomous data analytics robots to precision weeders |
4.24. | Naio Technologies: autonomous large-sized mechanical weeding robot |
4.25. | Agerris: autonomous robot with an AI suite |
4.26. | Farmwise: autonomous precision weeding (robot and AI) |
4.27. | DeepField Robotics: a Bosch start-up |
4.28. | Deepfield Robotics: cloud-based data management |
4.29. | Deepfield Robotics: machine vision technology |
4.30. | Deepfield Robotics: autonomous non-chemical precision weeding |
4.31. | Organic farming |
4.32. | Organic farming and market potential for robotic weed killing |
4.33. | Carre: autonomous mechanical in-row weeding |
4.34. | Robotic in-row mechanical weeding implements for organic farming |
4.35. | Robotic mechanical weeding for organic farming |
4.36. | Technology progression towards autonomous, ultra precision de-weeding |
5. | ROBOTIC IMPLEMENTS: WEEDING, VEGETABLE THINNING, AND HARVESTING |
5.1.1. | Autonomous lettuce thinning robots |
5.1.2. | Blue River Tech ( now John Deere): see and spray |
5.1.3. | Blue River Tech (now John Deere): machine vision and machine learning |
5.1.4. | Blue River Tech (now John Deere): evolution of the machinery |
5.1.5. | Blue River Tech (now John Deere): business model |
5.1.6. | Blue River Tech (now John Deere): long-term vision |
5.1.7. | Why asparagus harvesting should be automated |
5.1.8. | Automatic asparagus harvesting |
5.1.9. | Robotic/Automatic asparagus harvesting |
5.1.10. | Robotic/Automatic asparagus harvesting |
5.2. | Artificial intelligence in weed (and other object) detection |
5.2.1. | Content outline |
5.3. | Artificial intelligence in weed (and other object) detection: summary and conclusion |
5.3.1. | Trend: a shift from SVM to SOM and to CNN and then to special CNNs in weed and other image object detection tasks |
5.3.2. | The evolution from binary classification to cloud based applications |
5.4. | Artificial intelligence in weed (and other object) detection: review |
5.4.1. | Rumex and Urtica detection in grassland with different machine learning algorithms |
5.4.2. | Which algorithm performs better in Rumex and Urtica detection |
5.4.3. | Results of different scenarios for Rumex and Urtica detection |
5.4.4. | UAS based imaging for Silybum marianum detection by self organizing maps |
5.4.5. | Data specs and procedure |
5.4.6. | S. Marianum recognition accuracy by self organizing maps |
5.4.7. | Self organizing map with active learning to detect 11 different weed types from each other and plant |
5.4.8. | Sensors, features, and procedure for weed type detection |
5.4.9. | Results of different active-learned one-class classifier on classifying weed types |
5.4.10. | Weed location and recognition based on UAV imaging and deep learning |
5.4.11. | What kind of Deep network is YOLO |
5.4.12. | Vegetation detection and discrimination within vegetable plasticulture row-middles using a convolutional neural network |
5.4.13. | Deep localization model for intra-row crop detection in paddy field |
5.4.14. | Proposed architecture in use |
5.4.15. | Deep convolutional neural networks for image based Convolvulus sepium detection in sugar beet fields |
5.4.16. | The structure of network and results |
5.4.17. | Transfer learning between crop types for semantic segmentation of crops versus weeds in precision agriculture |
5.4.18. | Network structure and results |
5.5. | Artificial intelligence in crop disease detection |
5.5.1. | Artificial intelligence in crop disease detection: summary and conclusions |
5.5.2. | Technology trend: from a single disease detection to nutrient or water stress detection to 58 plant-disease combinations detection |
5.5.3. | Trend: from hyperspectral images to RGB only images and from SVM to SOM to deep learning and convolutional deep learning |
5.5.4. | Content outline |
5.6. | Artificial intelligence in crop disease detection: literature review |
5.6.1. | More than 99% accuracy in detecting yellow rust infected wheat |
5.6.2. | Process and model for yellow rust infected wheat detection |
5.6.3. | Fluorescence and spectral imaging for yellow rust detection by Kohonen maps |
5.6.4. | Kohonen performs much better |
5.6.5. | Optical discrimination between healthy and water stressed wheat canopies |
5.6.6. | Fused spectral reflectance and fluorescence features are better for both binary and multiclass classification |
5.6.7. | Detecting Microbotryum Silybum infected plants by hierarchical self organizing maps |
5.6.8. | Contaminated rice seed detection |
5.6.9. | Feature selection and training method |
5.6.10. | Good features are selected for S. marianum health state recognition |
5.6.11. | Vision-based pest detection based on SVM |
5.6.12. | Pest detection classification method |
5.6.13. | Wheat crop biotic and abiotic stress detection |
5.6.14. | 95% accurate detection of stresses in wheat plant by self organizing map based classifiers |
5.6.15. | General plant healthy and diseased state detection with deep convolutional neural network |
5.6.16. | 58 classes of [plant, disease] to be detected by deep learning |
5.6.17. | Seasonal Crops Disease Prediction and Classification Using Deep Convolutional Encoder Network |
5.6.18. | Network architecture and results |
5.6.19. | Machine vision-based automatic disease symptom detection of onion downy mildew |
5.6.20. | Network structure and method and results |
5.6.21. | Mathematical and Visual Understanding of a Deep Learning Model Towards m Agriculture for Disease Diagnosis |
5.6.22. | The models compared and model selection strategy |
5.7. | Robotic spraying |
5.7.1. | Guss: autonomous robotic sprayers for permanent crops |
5.7.2. | Guss: key drivers of adoption |
5.7.3. | Guss: navigation technology |
5.7.4. | Guss: market, price, unit sales, etc. |
5.7.5. | Guss: future roadmap |
5.7.6. | Autonomous weed killing robots |
5.7.7. | Swarm Farm Robotics: moving platform into orchard spraying |
5.7.8. | Jacto: autonomous spray vehicles |
6. | ROBOTIC FRESH FRUIT PICKING |
6.1.1. | Field crop and non-fresh fruit harvesting is largely mechanized |
6.1.2. | Fresh fruit picking remains largely manual |
6.1.3. | Machining aiding humans in fresh fruit harvesting have not evolved in the past 50 years |
6.1.4. | Emerging robotic fresh fruit harvest assist technologies |
6.1.5. | Robot orchard data scouts and yield estimators |
6.1.6. | Emerging robotic fresh fruit harvest assist technologies |
6.1.7. | Robotic fresh apple harvesting |
6.1.8. | Robotic fresh citrus harvesting |
6.1.9. | Fresh fruit harvesting robots |
6.1.10. | Fresh Fruit Robotics: system evolution and current design |
6.1.11. | Fresh Fruit Robotics: business model and future product roadmap |
6.1.12. | Abundant Robotics: RaaS, at least for now |
6.1.13. | Technology and progress progression roadmap for robotic fresh fruit harvesting |
6.1.14. | Agrobot: Robotic fresh strawberry harvesting |
6.1.15. | Harvest Croo: Evolution of fresh strawberry harvesting robots |
6.1.16. | Octinion: autonomous mobile platform and robotic strawberry picking |
6.1.17. | Fully autonomous strawberry picking robots with soft grippers |
6.1.18. | Dogtooth: robotic arm on an autonomous platform to pick fresh, grade and pack fresh berries |
6.1.19. | Traptic: open field robotic strawberry pickers offered as RaaS |
6.1.20. | Advanced Farm Robotics: open field strawberry or similar picking |
6.2. | Artificial intelligence in crop detection, counting, and localization |
6.2.1. | Coffee fruit: counting and predicting ripeness state |
6.2.2. | Coffee fruit counting method |
6.2.3. | Green citrus identification using support vector machine |
6.2.4. | Citrus identification flowchart |
6.2.5. | Sweet cherry branch detection to automate shake-and-catch picking |
6.2.6. | How cherry branch is detected |
6.2.7. | Tomato detection via drone images and AI clustering |
6.2.8. | How tomato gets detected |
7. | VINE PRUNING ROBOTS |
7.1. | Autonomous robotic vineyard scouts and pruners |
7.2. | Vision Robotics Cop: Advanced vision systems in agricultural robotics |
7.3. | Fieldwork Robotics |
8. | GREENHOUSES AND NURSERIES |
8.1. | The problem with agriculture |
8.2. | Is vertical farming the answer? |
8.3. | Components of a vertical farm |
8.4. | Vertical farming vs other production methods |
8.5. | The argument against vertical farming |
8.6. | The argument for vertical farming |
8.7. | Investments in vertical farming |
8.8. | What crops do vertical farms grow? |
8.9. | Vertically farmed produce has a cost premium |
8.10. | Automation levels in vertical farming |
8.11. | Automation is not yet widespread in vertical farming |
8.12. | Technology adoption in vertical farming |
8.13. | Automation: environmental control |
8.14. | Autogrow |
8.15. | Priva |
8.16. | Automation: nutrient control |
8.17. | Imagination Garden |
8.18. | Automation: light recipes |
8.19. | Bowery Farming |
8.20. | Taking automation beyond level 2 |
8.21. | Logiqs |
8.22. | Is automation worth it? |
8.23. | Intelligent Growth Solutions |
8.24. | SananBio US |
8.25. | What could automation provide? |
8.26. | Autonomous robotics for greenhouses and nurseries |
9. | ROBOTIC SEEDERS |
9.1. | Variable rate technology for precision seed planting |
9.2. | Robotic seed planting |
10. | ROBOTIC DAIRY FARMING |
10.1. | Global trends and averages for diary farm sizes |
10.2. | Global number and distribution of dairy cows by territory |
10.3. | Robotic milking parlours |
10.4. | Overview of robotic milking parlours |
10.5. | Autonomous robotic feed pushers |
10.6. | Alternatives to autonomous robotic feed pushers |
10.7. | Autonomous robotic shepherds |
10.8. | Autonomous manure cleaning robots |
11. | AERIAL DATA COLLECTIONS AND DRONES |
11.1. | Drones: dominant designs begin to emerge |
11.2. | Drones: moving past the hype? |
11.3. | Drones: company formation slows down |
11.4. | Drones: global geographical spread of companies |
11.5. | Drones: platforms commoditize? |
11.6. | Drones: market forecasts |
11.7. | Drones: application pipeline |
11.8. | Satellite vs. plane vs drone mapping and scouting |
11.9. | Benefits of using aerial imaging in farming |
11.10. | Unmanned drones in rice field pest control in Japan |
11.11. | Unmanned drones and helicopters for field spraying |
11.12. | Unmanned agriculture drones on the market |
11.13. | Comparing different agricultural drones on the market |
11.14. | Regulation barriers coming down? |
11.15. | Agricultural drones: the emerging value chain |
11.16. | Core company information on key agricultural drone companies |
11.17. | Software opportunities: Vertical focused actionable analytics |
11.18. | Drones: increasing autonomy |
12. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: GRIPPER TECHNOLOGY |
12.1. | Suction-based end effector technologies for fresh fruit harvesting |
12.2. | Simple and effective robotic end effectors for fruit harvesting |
12.3. | Soft robotics based end effector technologies for fresh fruit handling |
12.4. | Pneumatic soft actuator: extensible layer + fiber |
12.5. | Soft actuator: self-contained McKibbern-type muscle |
12.6. | Shape Deposition Manufacturing (SDM) Compliant Joint |
12.7. | Fabrication processes for soft robotic actuators |
12.8. | Robotic end effector technologies for fresh fruit harvesting |
12.9. | Robotic end effector technologies for fresh fruit harvesting |
12.10. | Dexterous robotic hands for agricultural robotics |
12.11. | Examples of dexterous robotic hands |
13. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: NAVIGATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (RTK, LIDAR, LASERS AND OTHERS) |
13.1.1. | RTK systems: operation, performance and value chain |
13.1.2. | Lidar- basic operation principles |
13.1.3. | Review of LIDARs on the market or in development |
13.1.4. | Performance comparison of different LIDARs on the market or in development |
13.1.5. | Assessing suitability of different LIDAR for agricultural robotic applications |
13.1.6. | Hyperspectral image sensors |
13.1.7. | Hyperspectral imaging and precision agriculture |
13.1.8. | Hyperspectral imaging in other applications |
13.1.9. | Hyperspectral imaging sensors on the market |
13.1.10. | Common multi-spectral sensors used with agricultural drones |
13.1.11. | GeoVantage |
13.2. | Enabling technologies: long-term price and performance trends in key hardware components (transistors, memory, camera, MEMS, GPS, batteries, electric motors, etc.) |
13.2.1. | Why is new robotics becoming possible now? A hardware point of view |
13.2.2. | Why is new robotics possible now? |
13.2.3. | Transistors (computing): price evolution |
13.2.4. | Transistors (computing): performance evolution |
13.2.5. | Memory (RAM, hard driver and flash): price evolution in $/Mbit |
13.2.6. | Memory: performance evolution in Gbit/ sq inch |
13.2.7. | Sensors (Camera): price evolution |
13.2.8. | Sensors (MEMS): price evolution |
13.2.9. | Sensors (GPS): price and market adoption (in unit numbers) evolution of GPS sensors |
13.2.10. | Is Lidar on a similar path as other robotic sensor technologies? |
13.2.11. | Li ion battery: performance evolution in Wh/Kg and Wh/L |
13.2.12. | Energy storage technologies: price evolution in $/kWh by sector |
13.2.13. | Electric motors: evolution of size of a given output since 1910 |
13.3. | Enabling Technology: Software, deep learning and big data |
13.3.1. | Artificial intelligence: waves of development |
13.3.2. | Terminologies explained: AI, machine learning, artificial neural networks, deep neural networks |
13.3.3. | Rising interesting in deep learning |
13.3.4. | Algorithm training process in a single layer |
13.3.5. | Towards deep learning by deepening the neutral network |
13.3.6. | The main varieties of deep learning approaches explained |
13.3.7. | Evolution of deep learning |
13.3.8. | The rise of the big data quantified: fuel for deep learning applications |
13.3.9. | Examples of milestones in deep learning AI: word recognition supresses human level |
13.3.10. | Examples of milestones in deep learning AI: image recognition supresses human level |
13.3.11. | Deepening the neutral network to increase accuracy rate |
13.3.12. | GPUs: an enabling component for deep learning? |
13.3.13. | Examples of milestones in deep learning AI: translation approaching human level performance |
13.3.14. | Examples of milestones in deep learning AI: leap in progress in robotic grasping |
13.3.15. | What is 'good enough' accuracy in deep learning? |
13.3.16. | RoS and RoS-I: major open source movement slashing development costs and enticing OEMs to finally engage |
13.3.17. | Robotic Operating System (RoS): Examples of cutting edge projects |
14. | COMPANY INTERVIEWS AND PROFILES |
Slides | 401 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2040 |