1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
1.2. | The CDR technologies covered in this report (1/2) |
1.3. | The CDR technologies covered in this report (2/2) |
1.4. | Scale and technology readiness level of carbon dioxide removal methods |
1.5. | The CDR business model and its challenges: Carbon credits |
1.6. | The carbon removal supply chain: Carbon credit market players |
1.7. | Shifting buyer preferences for durable CDR in carbon credit markets |
1.8. | Overall picture: Voluntary carbon credit markets in 2024 |
1.9. | How expensive were durable carbon removals in 2024? |
1.10. | DACCS: Summary |
1.11. | Current status of DACCS |
1.12. | The role of tax credits in supporting DACCS: 45Q and ITC |
1.13. | What are the major challenges for scaling up direct air capture? |
1.14. | DAC technology landscape: Companies |
1.15. | Which DAC technologies will be the most successful? |
1.16. | How will DAC technologies develop? |
1.17. | Solid sorbents - semi-continuous operation can lower energy intensity |
1.18. | Electrochemical DAC: Key takeaways |
1.19. | The potential for BiCRS goes beyond BECCS: Benchmarking |
1.20. | Most existing BECCS projects are in ethanol production |
1.21. | Solvent capture technologies dominate the BECCS space |
1.22. | Government support for BECCS is accelerating |
1.23. | BECCS: Key takeaways |
1.24. | The state of the global biochar market |
1.25. | Biochar CDR is scaling up |
1.26. | Biochar: Key takeaways |
1.27. | BiCRS Value Chain |
1.28. | Afforestation and reforestation: Key takeaways |
1.29. | Key takeaways: Soil carbon sequestration |
1.30. | Key takeaways: Mineralization CDR |
1.31. | Key players in ocean-based CDR |
1.32. | Key takeaways: Ocean-based CDR |
1.33. | Carbon dioxide removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
1.34. | Carbon dioxide removal annual carbon credit revenue forecast by technology (billion US$), 2025-2035 |
1.35. | Carbon dioxide removal market forecast, 2025-2035: Discussion |
1.36. | The evolution of the durable CDR market |
1.37. | Access More With an IDTechEx Subscription |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Introduction and general analysis |
2.1.1. | What is carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
2.1.2. | Description of the main CDR methods |
2.1.3. | Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
2.1.4. | What is the difference between CDR and CCUS? |
2.1.5. | High-quality carbon removals: Durability, permanence, additionality |
2.1.6. | Scale and technology readiness level of carbon dioxide removal methods |
2.1.7. | Carbon dioxide removal technology benchmarking |
2.1.8. | Status and potential of CDR technologies |
2.1.9. | Monitoring, reporting, and verification of CDR |
2.1.10. | CDR: Deferring the problem? |
2.1.11. | What is needed to further develop the CDR sector? |
2.1.12. | CDR market traction in 2024 |
2.1.13. | The Xprize Carbon Removal |
2.1.14. | Regional factors could determine the best CDR strategy |
2.2. | Carbon credit markets |
2.2.1. | Global climate action - the Paris Agreement |
2.2.2. | Carbon pricing and carbon markets |
2.2.3. | Compliance carbon pricing mechanisms across the globe |
2.2.4. | What is the price of CO2 in global carbon pricing mechanisms? |
2.2.5. | What is a carbon credit? |
2.2.6. | How are carbon credits certified? |
2.2.7. | The role of carbon registries in the credit market |
2.2.8. | Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) of Carbon Credits |
2.2.9. | How are voluntary carbon credits purchased? |
2.2.10. | The carbon removal carbon credit market players |
2.2.11. | Interaction between compliance markets and voluntary markets (geographical) |
2.2.12. | Interaction between compliance markets and voluntary markets (sectoral) |
2.2.13. | Governmental carbon crediting mechanisms |
2.2.14. | Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement: Global, unified carbon credit market |
2.2.15. | Quality of carbon credits |
2.2.16. | Carbon removal vs carbon avoidance/reduction credits |
2.2.17. | Carbon dioxide removal vs emissions reductions |
2.2.18. | Carbon dioxide removal has a very limited role in $100 billion compliance markets |
2.2.19. | The state of CDR in the voluntary carbon market |
2.2.20. | Shifting buyer preferences for durable CDR in carbon credit markets |
2.2.21. | Overall picture: Voluntary carbon credit markets in 2024 |
2.2.22. | Advanced market commitment in durable CDR |
2.2.23. | Businesses should be investing in carbon dioxide removal now |
2.2.24. | Biggest durable carbon removal buyers |
2.2.25. | Pre-purchases still dominate the durable CDR space |
2.2.26. | Prices of CDR credits |
2.2.27. | How expensive were durable carbon removals in 2024? |
2.2.28. | Current carbon credit prices by company and technology |
2.2.29. | Carbon market sizes |
2.2.30. | Are there enough buyers for durable CDR technologies? |
2.2.31. | CDR technologies: key takeaways |
3. | DIRECT AIR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (DACCS) |
3.1. | Introduction to direct air capture (DAC) |
3.1.1. | What is direct air capture (DAC)? |
3.1.2. | Why DACCS as a CDR solution? |
3.1.3. | Current status of DACCS |
3.1.4. | DACCS project pipeline: Locations and technologies |
3.1.5. | Momentum: Policy support for DAC by region |
3.1.6. | The role of tax credits in supporting DACCS: 45Q and ITC |
3.1.7. | The US has plans to establish 20 large-scale regional DAC Hubs |
3.1.8. | Momentum: Private investment in DAC |
3.1.9. | Where did money for DAC come from in 2024? |
3.1.10. | DAC land requirement is an advantage |
3.1.11. | DAC vs point-source carbon capture |
3.1.12. | Power requirements for DAC |
3.1.13. | Nameplate capacity vs actual net removal |
3.1.14. | Difficulties sourcing clean energy |
3.1.15. | Operational flexibility - powering DAC with intermittent renewables |
3.1.16. | What are the major challenges for scaling up direct air capture? |
3.2. | Leading DAC technologies |
3.2.1. | CO2 capture/separation mechanisms in DAC |
3.2.2. | Direct air capture technologies |
3.2.3. | Regeneration methods for solid and liquid DAC |
3.2.4. | Comparing regeneration methods for solid and liquid DAC |
3.2.5. | Leading DAC companies |
3.2.6. | Direct air capture space: Technology and location breakdown |
3.2.7. | Solid sorbents for DAC |
3.2.8. | Climeworks |
3.2.9. | Process flow diagram of S-DAC: Climeworks |
3.2.10. | Solid sorbents - semi-continuous operation can lower energy intensity |
3.2.11. | Heirloom |
3.2.12. | Process flow diagram of CaO looping: Heirloom |
3.2.13. | Liquid solvents for DAC |
3.2.14. | Liquid solvent-based DAC: Carbon Engineering |
3.2.15. | Carbon Engineering |
3.2.16. | Stratos: Bringing DAC to the half megatonne scale |
3.2.17. | Process flow diagram of L-DAC: Carbon Engineering |
3.2.18. | DAC process: Climeworks and Carbon Engineering |
3.2.19. | Electricity and heat sources: Climeworks and Carbon Engineering |
3.2.20. | Requirements to capture 1 Mt of CO2 per year: Climeworks and Carbon Engineering |
3.2.21. | DAC technology landscape: Companies |
3.2.22. | Which DAC technologies will be the most successful? |
3.2.23. | How will DAC technologies develop? |
3.2.24. | DACCS carbon credit sales by company |
3.3. | Electroswing/electrochemical DAC technologies |
3.3.1. | Electroswing/electrochemical DAC |
3.3.2. | Types of electrochemical DAC (1/2) |
3.3.3. | Types of electrochemical DAC (2/2) |
3.3.4. | Desired characteristics of electrochemical cell components |
3.3.5. | Electrochemical DAC company landscape |
3.3.6. | Benchmarking electrochemical DAC methods |
3.3.7. | Technical challenges in electrochemical DAC |
3.3.8. | Electrochemical DAC: Flexibility for low-cost intermittent renewable power |
3.3.9. | Electrochemical DAC costs depend strongly on electricity prices |
3.3.10. | Electrochemical DAC: Key takeaways |
3.4. | Novel DAC technologies |
3.4.1. | Moisture-swing direct air capture (humidity swing) |
3.4.2. | Ion exchange resins for moisture swing DAC |
3.4.3. | Cryogenic direct air capture companies |
3.4.4. | Membrane direct air capture |
3.4.5. | Reactive direct air capture - combined capture and conversion |
3.5. | Equipment for DAC - design and manufacturing |
3.5.1. | Manufacturing supply chains for DAC |
3.5.2. | Air contactors: Existing designs |
3.5.3. | Commercial air contactor manufacturing facility |
3.5.4. | Lessons learned from Carbon Engineering: Adapt existing industrial equipment to establish supply chain |
3.5.5. | Lessons learned from Global Thermostat: Partnerships essential for technology development |
3.5.6. | Passive air contacting |
3.5.7. | Integration DAC into existing industrial processes: Cooling towers, HVAC, and waste heat |
3.6. | DAC economics |
3.6.1. | The economics of DAC |
3.6.2. | The CAPEX of DAC: Sub-system contribution |
3.6.3. | The OPEX of DAC |
3.6.4. | Overall capture cost of DAC (1/2) |
3.6.5. | Overall capture cost of DAC (2/2) |
3.6.6. | Component specific capture cost contributions for DACCS |
3.6.7. | Financing DAC |
3.6.8. | Business models for DAC |
3.6.9. | Direct air capture carbon credit selling prices |
3.7. | CO2 storage |
3.7.1. | DAC must be coupled with permanent storage for carbon dioxide removals |
3.7.2. | Storing supercritical CO₂ underground |
3.7.3. | Mechanisms of subsurface CO₂ trapping |
3.7.4. | CO2 leakage is a small risk |
3.7.5. | Storage type for geologic CO2 storage: Saline aquifers |
3.7.6. | Storage type for geologic CO2 storage: Depleted oil and gas fields |
3.7.7. | Unconventional storage resources: Basalts and ultra-mafic rocks |
3.7.8. | Estimates of global CO₂ storage space |
3.7.9. | CO2 storage potential by country |
3.7.10. | Permitting and authorization of CO2 storage |
3.7.11. | Class VI permits are delaying DACCS development in US |
3.7.12. | Examples of storage providers for DAC |
3.7.13. | Key takeaways: CO2 storage |
3.8. | DAC Challenges |
3.8.1. | Challenges associated with DAC technology |
3.8.2. | Oil and gas sector involvement in DAC |
3.8.3. | DACCS co-location with geothermal energy |
3.8.4. | What can DAC learn from the wind and solar industries' scale-up? |
3.8.5. | What is needed for DAC to achieve the gigatonne capacity by 2050? |
3.8.6. | DACCS SWOT analysis |
3.8.7. | DACCS: Summary |
4. | BIOMASS WITH CARBON REMOVAL AND STORAGE (BICRS) |
4.1. | Introduction |
4.1.1. | Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) |
4.1.2. | BiCRS possible feedstocks |
4.1.3. | What type of biomass is currently used for CDR? |
4.1.4. | The potential for BiCRS goes beyond BECCS: Benchmarking |
4.1.5. | BiCRS conversion pathways |
4.2. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.2.1. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.2.2. | Point source capture technologies |
4.2.3. | Most existing BECCS projects are in ethanol production |
4.2.4. | Solvent capture technologies dominate the BECCS space |
4.2.5. | Amine-solvent technologies dominate BECCS |
4.2.6. | Government support for BECCS is accelerating |
4.2.7. | BECCS business model - Ørsted example |
4.2.8. | BECCS dominates the sales of durable, engineered CDR credits |
4.2.9. | Biogenic CO2 must be coupled with permanent storage for carbon dioxide removals |
4.2.10. | BECCS projects - trends and discussion |
4.2.11. | UK BECCS case studies |
4.2.12. | Ethanol production dominates the BECCS project pipeline |
4.2.13. | Network connecting bioethanol plants for BECCS |
4.2.14. | Opportunities in BECCS: Heat generation |
4.2.15. | Opportunities in BECCS: Waste-to-energy |
4.2.16. | The challenges of BECCS |
4.2.17. | The energy and carbon efficiency of BECCS |
4.2.18. | Importance of regrowth rates on carbon accounting for biogenic emissions |
4.2.19. | Is BECCS sustainable? |
4.2.20. | BECCS: Key takeaways |
4.3. | Biochar |
4.3.1. | What is biochar? |
4.3.2. | How is biochar produced? (1/2) |
4.3.3. | How is biochar produced? (2/2) |
4.3.4. | Biochar feedstocks |
4.3.5. | Permanence of biochar carbon removal |
4.3.6. | Biochar applications |
4.3.7. | Economic considerations in biochar production (1) |
4.3.8. | Economic considerations in biochar production (2) |
4.3.9. | Biochar: Market and business model |
4.3.10. | The state of the global biochar market |
4.3.11. | Artisanal vs industrial biochar |
4.3.12. | Biochar carbon credit selling price |
4.3.13. | Key players in biochar CDR by scale |
4.3.14. | Biochar business model: Equipment suppliers and project developers |
4.3.15. | Biochar business model: Discussion |
4.3.16. | Biochar legislation and certification |
4.3.17. | Additionality of biochar carbon removal |
4.3.18. | Biochar: Key takeaways |
4.4. | Other BiCRS (bio-oil and biomass burial) |
4.4.1. | Bio-oil geological storage for CDR |
4.4.2. | Biomass burial for CO2 removal |
4.4.3. | Capture costs below $100/tonne of CO2 drive popularity of biomass burial |
4.4.4. | Biomass burial commercial landscape |
4.4.5. | Best use of biomass - biochar, BECCS, or burial? |
4.4.6. | BiCRS Value Chain |
5. | AFFORESTATION/REFORESTATION |
5.1. | What are nature-based CDR approaches? |
5.2. | Why land-based carbon dioxide removal? |
5.3. | The CDR potential of afforestation and reforestation |
5.4. | The case for and against A/R for climate mitigation |
5.5. | Technologies in A/R: Remote sensing |
5.6. | Company landscape: Robotics in afforestation/reforestation |
5.7. | Afforestation/reforestation carbon credit market status in 2024 |
5.8. | Afforestation/reforestation is already part of many government net-zero targets |
5.9. | "Just plant more trees!" - sustainability and greenwashing considerations |
5.10. | Comparing A/R and BECCS solutions |
5.11. | Afforestation and reforestation: Key takeaways |
6. | SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION |
6.1. | What is soil carbon sequestration (SCS)? |
6.2. | The soil carbon sequestration potential is vast |
6.3. | Agricultural management practices to improve soil carbon sequestration |
6.4. | Companies using microbial inoculation for soil carbon sequestration |
6.5. | Approaches to MRV for soil carbon sequestration |
6.6. | Additionality, measurement, and permanency of soil carbon is in doubt |
6.7. | Challenges in SCS deployment |
6.8. | The soil carbon sequestration value chain |
6.9. | Market trends for soil carbon sequestration in 2024 |
6.10. | Soil carbon sequestration carbon credit market status in 2024 |
6.11. | Soil carbon sequestration pros and cons |
6.12. | Key takeaways: Soil carbon sequestration |
7. | BASED CDR |
7.1. | CO2 mineralization is key for CDR |
7.2. | Ex situ mineralization CDR methods |
7.3. | Source materials for ex situ mineralization |
7.4. | Ex situ carbonation of mineral wastes |
7.5. | Carbon dioxide storage in CO2-derived concrete |
7.6. | CO2-derived concrete: Commercial landscape |
7.7. | Oxide looping: Mineralization in DAC |
7.8. | Enhanced weathering |
7.9. | Enhanced rock weathering overview |
7.10. | MRV in Enhanced Rock Weathering |
7.11. | Enhanced weathering commercial landscape |
7.12. | Enhanced rock weathering CDR market |
7.13. | Enhanced rock weathering status: Startups |
7.14. | Key takeaways: Mineralization CDR |
8. | OCEAN-BASED CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL |
8.1. | Introduction |
8.1.1. | Ocean pumps continuously pull CO2 from the atmosphere into the ocean |
8.1.2. | Ocean-based CDR methods |
8.1.3. | Definitions of ocean-based CDR technologies |
8.1.4. | Why ocean-based CDR? |
8.1.5. | Scale and technology readiness level for ocean-based CDR |
8.1.6. | Benchmarking of ocean-based CDR methods |
8.1.7. | Key players in ocean-based CDR |
8.2. | Ocean-based CDR: Abiotic methods |
8.2.1. | Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) |
8.2.2. | Electrochemical ocean alkalinity enhancement |
8.2.3. | Ocean alkalinity enhancement status: Start-ups |
8.2.4. | Direct ocean capture |
8.2.5. | Direct ocean capture status: Start-ups |
8.2.6. | Electrochemical direct ocean capture |
8.2.7. | Electrolysis for direct ocean capture: Avoiding chlorine formation |
8.2.8. | Other direct ocean capture technologies |
8.2.9. | Barriers remain for direct ocean capture |
8.2.10. | Artificial downwelling |
8.3. | Ocean-based CDR: Biotic methods |
8.3.1. | Status of coastal blue carbon credits in the voluntary carbon markets |
8.3.2. | Algal cultivation - seaweed sinking |
8.3.3. | Ocean fertilization |
8.3.4. | Several ocean fertilization start-ups have failed |
8.3.5. | Will ocean fertilization resurge in 2025? |
8.3.6. | Artificial upwelling |
8.3.7. | The governance challenge in large-scale deployment of ocean CDR |
8.3.8. | MRV for marine CDR |
8.3.9. | Price of ocean-based CDR credits |
8.3.10. | Key takeaways: Ocean-based CDR |
9. | CDR MARKET FORECASTS |
9.1. | Forecast scope: Durable, engineered removals |
9.2. | Forecast scope: Nature-based approaches |
9.3. | Overall Carbon Dioxide Removal Forecast Methodology/Scope |
9.4. | Carbon dioxide removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
9.5. | Data table for carbon dioxide removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
9.6. | Carbon dioxide removal carbon credit annual revenue forecast by technology (billion US$), 2025-2035 |
9.7. | Data table for carbon dioxide removal carbon credit annual revenue forecast by technology (million US$), 2025-2035 |
9.8. | Carbon dioxide removal market forecast, 2025-2035: discussion |
9.9. | The evolution of the durable CDR market |
9.10. | Changes since the previous IDTechEx CDR forecast |
9.11. | DACCS carbon removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
9.12. | DACCS carbon credit revenue forecast by technology (million US$), 2025-2035 |
9.13. | DACCS forecast methodology and discussion |
9.14. | BiCRS forecast methodology |
9.15. | BECCS, biochar and biomass burial carbon removal capacity forecast (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
9.16. | BECCS, biochar, and biomass burial carbon credit revenue forecast (million US$), 2025-2035 |
9.17. | BECCS: Forecast discussion |
9.18. | Biochar and biomass burial: Forecast discussion |
9.19. | Enhanced rock weathering carbon removal capacity forecast (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
9.20. | Enhanced rock weathering carbon credit revenue forecast (million US$), 2025-2035 |
9.21. | Mineralization CDR: Enhanced rock weathering forecast methodology and discussion |
9.22. | Ocean-based CDR: Forecast methodology |
9.23. | Ocean-based carbon removal capacity forecast (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035 |
9.24. | Ocean-based carbon credit revenue forecast (million US$), 2025-2035 |
9.25. | Ocean-based CDR: Forecast discussion |
10. | APPENDIX |
10.1. | Large-scale DACCS projects database |
10.2. | Operational BECCUS projects |
10.3. | BECCS projects under construction or advanced development |
10.4. | Biochar companies (1/2) |
10.5. | Biochar companies (2/2) |
11. | COMPANY PROFILES |
11.1. | 3R-BioPhosphate |
11.2. | 8 Rivers |
11.3. | 8 Rivers |
11.4. | Airex Energy |
11.5. | Airhive |
11.6. | BC Biocarbon |
11.7. | Brineworks |
11.8. | CapChar |
11.9. | Captura |
11.10. | Carbo Culture |
11.11. | Carbofex |
11.12. | Carbogenics |
11.13. | Carbon Asset Solutions |
11.14. | Carbon Blade |
11.15. | CarbonBlue |
11.16. | Climeworks |
11.17. | Climeworks |
11.18. | Climeworks |
11.19. | CO2 Lock |
11.20. | DACMA |
11.21. | Equatic |
11.22. | Freeze Carbon |
11.23. | JCCL (Japan Carbon Cycle Labs) |
11.24. | Myno Carbon |
11.25. | NeoCarbon |
11.26. | neustark |
11.27. | O.C.O Technology |
11.28. | Paebbl |
11.29. | Paebbl |
11.30. | Parallel Carbon |
11.31. | Phlair |
11.32. | PyroCCS |
11.33. | Seaweed Generation |
11.34. | Skytree |
11.35. | Takachar |
11.36. | UNDO |
11.37. | Vycarb |
11.38. | WasteX |
11.39. | Yama |