This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | |
1. | INTRODUCTION |
1.1. | Structure of single-walled carbon nanotubes |
1.1. | What are Carbon Nanotubes |
1.1.2. | History of CNTs |
1.2. | The chiral vector is represented by a pair of indices (n, m). T denotes the tube axis, and a1 and a2 are the unit vectors of graphene in real space. |
1.2. | What is Graphene |
1.2.1. | Manufacturing graphene |
1.3. | Traditional CNT film processes are complex |
1.3. | Properties for electronic and electrical applications |
1.4. | Manufacture of CNTs |
1.4. | CNT networks for flexible displays |
1.4.2. | Arc Method |
1.4.3. | Laser Ablation Method |
1.4.4. | Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) |
1.5. | CNT Transistors through Specialized Printing Processes from NEC Corporation |
1.5. | Printing Carbon Nanotubes |
1.6. | Latest progress with printing carbon nanotubes |
1.6.1. | Application of printed carbon nanotubes to flexible displays |
1.6.2. | Application of printed carbon nanotubes to transistors |
1.6.3. | Application of printed carbon nanotubes to energy storage devices - supercapacitors |
2. | CNT/GRAPHENE TRANSISTOR |
2.1. | Comparison to other semiconductors |
2.1. | Comparison of the main options for semiconductors |
2.1. | Atomic Force Microscope image of carbon nanotubes before and after processing. |
2.2. | Carbon nanotube Field Effect transistors |
2.2. | Latest progress with CNT/Graphene Transistors |
2.2.1. | Separating metallic and semiconductor carbon nanotubes |
2.2.2. | Graphene field effect transistors |
2.3. | Challenges |
2.3. | Epitaxial graphene FETs on a two-inch wafer scale |
2.4. | Graphene field effect transistor from IBM |
2.5. | An enlarged photo of a several-millimeter square chip with graphene transistors. The graphene transistors can be seen in the enlarged photo of the tips of the two electrodes |
2.6. | An LSI mounted on a flexible substrate by using CNT bumps |
2.7. | Printed CNT-TFT on a DuPont® Kapton® FPC polyimide film: (a) schematic structure cross-section view, [(b) and (c)] picture of the CNT-TFT, (b) circuit, and (c) optical microphotography of the CNT-TFT (top view). The CNT-TFT is in a top-gated configuratio |
3. | CARBON NANOTUBES AS CONDUCTORS |
3.1. | Potential applications are flexible solar cells, displays and touch screens. |
3.2. | Targeted applications for carbon nanotubes by Eikos |
3.2. | Typical Sheet Resistivity figures for conductors |
3.2. | Comparison to other conductors |
3.3. | Conductor deposition technologies and main applications |
3.3. | Main applications of conductive inks and some major suppliers today |
3.3. | Conductance in ohms per square for the different printable conductive materials, at typical thicknesses used, compared with bulk metal |
3.4. | New printable elastic conductors made of carbon nanotubes are used to connect OLEDs in a stretchable display that can be spread over a curved surface |
3.4. | Latest progress with Carbon Nanotube conductors |
3.5. | Challenges |
3.5. | Stretchable mesh of transistors connected by elastic conductors |
3.6. | Hybrid graphene-carbon nanotube G-CNT conductors |
4. | OTHER APPLICATIONS OF CNTS |
4.1. | A three-terminal memory cell based on suspended carbon nanotubes: (a) nonconducting state '0', (b) conducting state '1', and (c) Nantero's NRAM™. |
4.1. | NRAM data storage device |
4.2. | Organic photovoltaic devices and hybrid organic-inorganic photovoltaics |
4.2. | Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) scientists have demonstrated an ability to precisely grow "towers" composed of carbon nanotubes atop silicon wafers. The work could be the basis for more efficient solar power for soldiers in the field. |
4.3. | The carbon nanotube supercapacitor versus batteries and traditional capacitors |
4.3. | Supercapacitors and/or batteries |
4.4. | CNTs for smart textiles |
4.4. | Anatomy of a supercapacitor: two films combining Indium Oxide (In2O3) separated by a layer of Nafion film |
4.5. | Transparent film holds embedded nanotube/nanowire capacitor with high energy density and storage capacity |
4.5. | Thin film loudspeakers |
4.6. | Battery from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA |
4.7. | (a) SEM image of CMG particle surface, (b) TEM image showing individual graphene sheets extending from CMG particle surface, (c) low and high (inset) magnification SEM images of CMG particle electrode surface, and (d) schematic of test cell assembly. |
4.8. | Proposed battery design from UCLA |
4.9. | Four scanning electron microscope images of the spinning of carbon nanotube fibres |
4.10. | Photographs of CNT-cotton yarn. (a) Comparison of the original and surface modified yarn. (b) 1 meter long piece as made. (c) Demonstration of LED emission with the current passing through the yarn. |
4.11. | The CNT thin film was put on a flag to make a flexible flag loudspeaker |
4.12. | Carbon nanotube thin film loudspeakers |
5. | COMPANIES PROFILES |
5.1. | Baytubes product specifications |
5.1. | Directly produced prepatterned films |
5.1. | Angstron Materials LLC., USA |
5.2. | Apex Nanomaterials, USA |
5.2. | Cap-XX supercapacitor technology with carbon coating. |
5.2. | Results of pulse-heat CVD |
5.3. | Characteristics of the CNT-FED compared with LEDs |
5.3. | Layout of CNT-FE BLU fabricated through pulse |
5.3. | Applied Nanotech, USA |
5.4. | Arry International Group, Hong Kong |
5.4. | Schematic illustration of experimental setup |
5.5. | Illustrations of micro-patterned cathodes |
5.5. | BASF, Germany |
5.6. | Bayer MaterialScience, Germany |
5.6. | SEM images of CNTs on Samples C, D and E |
5.7. | Field emission properties of CNT-emitters patterned on a glass substrate by pulse-heat CVD. Luminescence images from the backsides of the cathode at various applied voltages are indicated in inset. |
5.7. | Canatu Ltd., Finland |
5.8. | Carben Semicon Ltd, Russia |
5.8. | SEM images of CNTs on the micro-patterned electrodes with interline spacing (a) 20, (b) 50, (c) 100 and (d)200 !m (top view). |
5.9. | CNT Ink Production Process |
5.9. | Carbon Solutions, Inc., USA |
5.10. | CarboLex, Inc., USA |
5.10. | Target application areas of Eikos |
5.11. | The graphene microchip mostly based on relatively standard chip processing technology |
5.11. | Cap-XX Australia |
5.12. | CheapTubes, USA |
5.12. | Color pixel; 3mm, display area; 48mm x480mm |
5.13. | Color pixel; 1.8mm, display area; 57.6mm x 460.8mm. |
5.13. | Chengdu Organic Chemicals Co. Ltd. (Timesnano), China |
5.14. | Cornell University, USA |
5.14. | A prototype display of digital signage. |
5.15. | Application images of public displays. |
5.15. | CSIRO, Australia |
5.16. | Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd., Japan |
5.16. | Schematic structure of CNT-FED using line rib spacer. |
5.17. | Phosphor-dot pattern and conductive black-matrix pattern. |
5.17. | DuPont, USA |
5.18. | Eikos, USA |
5.18. | An application on the information desk. The color pixel pitch were 3mm(left) and 1.8mm (right). |
5.19. | A photograph of a displayed color character pattern in two lines. The color pixel pitch was 1.8mm. |
5.19. | Frontier Carbon Corporation (FCC), Japan |
5.20. | Fujitsu Laboratories, Japan |
5.20. | SEM images of CNT deposited metal electrode.(a) A photograph of the CNT deposited metal frame. (b) SEM image; boundary of barrier area. (c) SEM image; surface of the CNT layer. (d) SEM image; a surface morphology of CNT. |
5.21. | One of prototype displays on the vending machine. The display was under field-testing in out-door. The CNT-FED and display module were under testing continuously during ca.15months in Osaka-city up to date, and they were still continued. |
5.21. | Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI), USA |
5.22. | Graphene Energy Inc., USA |
5.22. | A photograph of driving system. A solar cell and the charging controller, yellow small battery and CNT-FED module. |
5.23. | A photograph of a displayed color character which was driven by solar cell and small battery. The color pixel pitch was 1.8mm. |
5.23. | Graphene Industries Ltd., UK |
5.24. | HeJi, Inc., China |
5.24. | High density SWCNT structures on wafer-scale flexible substrate. |
5.25. | Helix Material Solutions Inc., USA |
5.26. | Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd., Japan |
5.27. | Honjo Chemical Corporation, Japan |
5.28. | HRL Laboratories, USA |
5.29. | Hyperion Catalysis International, Inc. |
5.30. | IBM, USA |
5.31. | ILJIN Nanotech Co. Ltd., Korea |
5.32. | Intelligent Materials PVT. Ltd. (Nanoshel), India |
5.33. | MER Corporation, USA |
5.34. | MIT, USA |
5.35. | Mitsui Co., Ltd, Japan |
5.36. | Mknano, Canada |
5.37. | Nano-c, USA |
5.38. | NanoCarbLab (NCL), Russia |
5.39. | Nano Carbon Technologies Co., Ltd. (NCT) |
5.40. | Nanocs, USA |
5.41. | Nanocyl s.a., Belgium |
5.42. | NanoIntegris, USA |
5.43. | NanoLab, Inc., USA |
5.44. | NanoMas Technologies, USA |
5.45. | Nano-Proprietary, Inc., USA |
5.46. | Nanoshel, Korea |
5.47. | Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials, Inc., USA |
5.48. | Nanothinx S.A. , Greece |
5.49. | Nantero, USA |
5.50. | NEC Corporation, Japan |
5.51. | Noritake Co., Japan |
5.52. | Northeastern University, Boston, USA |
5.53. | Optomec, USA |
5.54. | Rice University, USA |
5.55. | Rutgers University, USA |
5.56. | Samsung Electronics, Korea |
5.57. | SES Research, USA |
5.58. | Shenzhen Nanotechnologies Co. Ltd. (NTP) |
5.59. | Showa Denko Carbon, Inc. (SDK), USA |
5.60. | ST Microelectronics, Switzerland |
5.61. | SouthWest NanoTechnologies (SWeNT), USA |
5.62. | Sungkyunkwan University Advanced Institute of Nano Technology (SAINT), Korea |
5.63. | Sun Nanotech Co, Ltd., China |
5.64. | Surrey NanoSystems, UK |
5.65. | Toray Industries, Japan |
5.66. | Tsinghua University, China |
5.67. | Unidym, Inc., USA |
5.68. | University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), USA |
5.69. | University of Cincinnati (UC), USA |
5.70. | University of Oklahoma, USA |
5.71. | University of Southern California (USC), USA |
5.72. | University of Stanford, USA |
5.73. | University of Stuttgart, Germany |
5.74. | University of Surrey, UK |
5.75. | University of Texas at Austin, USA |
5.76. | University of Tokyo, Japan |
5.77. | Vorbeck Materials Corp, USA |
5.78. | XG Sciences, USA |
5.79. | Xintek Nanotechnology Innovations, USA |
5.80. | Y-Carbon |
5.81. | Zyvex, Inc., USA |
6. | FORECASTS AND COSTS |
6.1. | Market forecast by component type for 2009 to 2029 in US $ billions, for printed and potentially printed electronics including organic, inorganic and composites |
6.1. | Market Opportunity and roadmap for Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene |
6.2. | Costs of SWCNTs |
6.2. | Costs of SWeNTs |
6.3. | SES Research |
6.3. | New Focus for Printed Electronics - the importance of flexible electronics |
6.4. | Focus on invisible electronics |
6.4. | Nanothinx S.A. (price per gram in Euros) |
6.5. | Nanocs |
6.5. | Shakeout in organics |
6.6. | Market pull |
6.6. | Arry International Group |
6.7. | Carbon Solutions |
6.8. | Carbolex |
6.9. | Cheaptubes |
6.10. | Helix Material Solutions |
6.11. | MER Corporation |
7 | APPENDIX 1: GLOSSARY |
8 | APPENDIX 2: IDTECHEX PUBLICATIONS AND CONSULTANCY |
TABLES | |
FIGURES |
Pages | 185 |
---|---|
Tables | 18 |
Figures | 64 |
Companies | 80 |