| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
| 1.1. | Overview of PEMFCs |
| 1.2. | Major components for PEMFCs |
| 1.3. | Applications for fuel cells and major players |
| 1.4. | BPP: Purpose and form factor |
| 1.5. | Materials for BPPs: Graphite vs metal |
| 1.6. | BPP manufacturers flow chart |
| 1.7. | GDL: Purpose and form factor |
| 1.8. | GDL supply chain for FCEV stacks |
| 1.9. | Membrane: Purpose and form factor |
| 1.10. | Leading modern PFSA membranes - key players & properties |
| 1.11. | Ion exchange membrane material benchmarking - PEM fuel cells |
| 1.12. | Ongoing concerns with PFAS regulations |
| 1.13. | Catalyst: Purpose and form factor |
| 1.14. | Trends for fuel cell catalysts |
| 1.15. | Key suppliers of catalysts for fuel cells |
| 1.16. | Balance of plant for PEM fuel cells |
| 1.17. | Overview of market forecasts |
| 1.18. | PEM Fuel Cell Market Value (US$ millions) 2026-2036 |
| 1.19. | Access more with an IDTechEx subscription |
| 2. | MARKET FORECASTS |
| 2.1.1. | Forecast methodology and assumptions |
| 2.1.2. | PEM Fuel Cell Demand by Application (MW) 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.3. | PEM Fuel Cell Market Value (US$ millions) 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.4. | Market Forecasts: Bipolar Plates |
| 2.1.5. | BPP Demand (millions of units) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.6. | BPP Demand (millions of units) by Material 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.7. | BPP Value (US$ millions) by Material 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.8. | Market Forecasts: Gas Diffusion Layer |
| 2.1.9. | GDL Demand (000s m2) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.10. | GDL Value (US$ millions) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 2.1.11. | GDL Material Demand (metric tonne) 2023-2036 |
| 2.2. | Market Forecasts: Membrane, Catalyst & CCM |
| 2.2.1. | PEM Demand (000s m2) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 2.2.2. | PEM Value (US$ millions) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 2.2.3. | Catalyst/PGM Demand (kg) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 2.2.4. | CCM Value (US$ millions) by Application 2023-2036 |
| 3. | INTRODUCTION |
| 3.1.1. | Introduction to fuel cells |
| 3.1.2. | What is a fuel cell? |
| 3.1.3. | Overview of PEMFCs |
| 3.1.4. | PEMFCs operating principle |
| 3.1.5. | Water-gas shift (WGS) & sour shift reactors |
| 3.1.6. | PEM electrolyzer vs PEM fuel cell |
| 3.1.7. | Major components for PEMFCs |
| 3.1.8. | Fuel cell technologies - overview |
| 3.1.9. | Comparison of fuel cell technologies |
| 3.1.10. | High temperature PEMFC (1) |
| 3.1.11. | High temperature PEMFC (2) |
| 3.1.12. | What is a Fuel Cell Vehicle? |
| 3.1.13. | Attraction of fuel cell vehicles |
| 3.1.14. | Mobility applications for fuel cells |
| 3.1.15. | PEMFC market players |
| 3.1.16. | Chinese PEMFC market players |
| 3.2. | Hydrogen Economy |
| 3.2.1. | State of the hydrogen market today |
| 3.2.2. | Major drivers for hydrogen production & adoption |
| 3.2.3. | Key legislation & funding mechanisms driving hydrogen development |
| 3.2.4. | European hydrogen market - major developments |
| 3.2.5. | European hydrogen market - major setbacks & challenges |
| 3.2.6. | US hydrogen market drivers - pre-2025 |
| 3.2.7. | US hydrogen market challenges - 2024 and 2025 |
| 3.2.8. | Outlook on the low-carbon hydrogen industry in the US |
| 3.2.9. | Outlook on the low-carbon hydrogen industry globally |
| 4. | FCEV MARKETS |
| 4.1. | What is a Fuel Cell Vehicle? |
| 4.2. | Fuel Cell Vehicles as a Part of the Hydrogen Economy |
| 4.3. | 30 Years of Fuel Cell Vehicle Prototypes |
| 4.4. | System Efficiency Between BEVs and FCEVs |
| 4.5. | Fuel Cell Car Models |
| 4.6. | Growth, Stagnation, and Fall of Fuel Cell Passenger Cars |
| 4.7. | Toyota Mobility Roadmap |
| 4.8. | Toyota Mirai 2nd Generation |
| 4.9. | Toyota FCEV Goals 2024 and Beyond |
| 4.10. | Hyundai Fuel Cell Passenger Car History |
| 4.11. | Hyundai NEXO SUV |
| 4.12. | Korea Subsidy Incentives from 2021: FCEV push but BEV far ahead |
| 4.13. | Honda Discontinue FC-Clarity: Weak Demand |
| 4.14. | Honda to Re-enter FCEV Market |
| 4.15. | BMW to Produce FCEVs |
| 4.16. | Chinese FCEV Cars |
| 4.17. | Outlook for Fuel Cell Passenger Cars |
| 4.18. | Light Commercial Vehicles Definition |
| 4.19. | Fuel Cell LCVs |
| 4.20. | IDTechEx's Outlook on Fuel Cell LCVs |
| 4.21. | Truck Weight Definitions |
| 4.22. | Battery vs Fuel Cell Trucks: Driving Range |
| 4.23. | Fuel Cell Manufacturers Collaboration on FC-Trucks |
| 4.24. | Fuel Cells Trucks Outlook |
| 4.25. | Fuel Cell Buses - New Markets May Boost Low Sales |
| 4.26. | Main Advantages / Disadvantages of Fuel Cell Buses |
| 4.27. | Outlook for Fuel Cell Buses |
| 4.28. | FCEV vs BEV Market Share in 2045 |
| 5. | FC TRAIN MARKETS |
| 5.1. | Overview of Train Types |
| 5.2. | Drivers for Zero-emission Rail |
| 5.3. | Fuel Cell Train Overview |
| 5.4. | Range Advantage for Fuel Cell Trains |
| 5.5. | Fuel Cell Technology Benchmarking for Rail |
| 5.6. | Rail Fuel Cell Suppliers |
| 5.7. | FC Multiple Unit Overview |
| 5.8. | FC Locomotives Overview |
| 5.9. | Outlook for Fuel Cell & Electric Trains |
| 6. | FC SHIP MARKETS |
| 6.1. | Marine Fuel Cells Introduction |
| 6.2. | Fuel Cells Technologies for Ships |
| 6.3. | Fuel Cell Suppliers: Leaders & Challengers |
| 6.4. | Fuel Cell Supplier Market Share 2019-2024 |
| 6.5. | Fuel Cell Deliveries by Vessel Type 2019-2024 |
| 6.6. | Policy Drivers for Maritime Fuel Cells |
| 6.7. | Outlook for Marine PEM Fuel Cells |
| 7. | STATIONARY FC MARKETS |
| 7.1.1. | Stationary fuel cell applications |
| 7.1.2. | Overview of the stationary fuel cell application market |
| 7.1.3. | PEMFC industrial case studies |
| 7.1.4. | PEMFC commercial case studies |
| 7.1.5. | PEMFC utilities generation case studies |
| 7.1.6. | PEMFC telecommunications case studies |
| 7.1.7. | Outlook of the stationary fuel cell market |
| 7.2. | Stationary PEMFC Players |
| 7.2.1. | Overview of the stationary PEMFC market |
| 7.2.2. | Acquisitions by major players |
| 7.2.3. | Ballard Power Systems Overview |
| 7.2.4. | Ballard technologies |
| 7.2.5. | Ballard Power stationary fuel cell technology |
| 7.2.6. | Ballard Power global manufacturing capabilities and key partners |
| 7.2.7. | Plug Power overview |
| 7.2.8. | Plug Power technology overview |
| 7.2.9. | Plug Power stationary power technology and fuelling |
| 7.2.10. | Plug Power customers |
| 7.2.11. | PowerCell Group overview |
| 7.2.12. | PowerCell Group technologies |
| 7.2.13. | PowerCell Group partnerships and agreements |
| 7.2.14. | Intelligent Energy overview |
| 7.2.15. | Intelligent Energy stationary power technology |
| 7.2.16. | Intelligent Energy partnerships |
| 7.2.17. | Toshiba overview |
| 7.2.18. | Toshiba fuel cell technology |
| 7.2.19. | Cummins overview |
| 7.2.20. | Accelera by Cummins fuel cell technology |
| 7.2.21. | SFC Energy overview |
| 7.2.22. | SFC Energy PEMFC technology |
| 8. | BIPOLAR PLATES |
| 8.1.1. | Purpose of bipolar plate |
| 8.1.2. | BPP form factor |
| 8.1.3. | Effect of BPP form factor |
| 8.1.4. | Bipolar plate assembly (BPA) |
| 8.2. | Materials for BPPs |
| 8.2.1. | Important material parameters to consider for BPPs |
| 8.2.2. | Graphite as a BPP material |
| 8.2.3. | Metal as a BPP material |
| 8.2.4. | Cost progression of BPAs |
| 8.2.5. | Coatings are required for metal BPPs |
| 8.2.6. | Coating choices for metal BPPs |
| 8.2.7. | Manufacturing methods for BPPs |
| 8.2.8. | BPP manufacturers flow chart |
| 8.3. | BPP manufacturers |
| 8.3.1. | Overview of BPP Suppliers (non-exhaustive list) |
| 8.3.2. | Case Study (NC Titanium): Kobe Steel |
| 8.3.3. | Case Study (Dual Supply): Dana |
| 8.3.4. | Case Study (Graphite): SGL Carbon |
| 8.3.5. | Case Study (Graphite Composite): FJ Composite |
| 8.3.6. | Case Study (System Supplier): Schuler |
| 8.3.7. | Case Study (Laser Etch): SITEC |
| 8.3.8. | Micro Precision - Chemical Etching |
| 8.3.9. | Switzer - Chemical Etching |
| 8.3.10. | Yiangteng |
| 8.3.11. | Hongfeng - Graphite |
| 8.3.12. | Comparison of graphite BPP suppliers |
| 8.3.13. | Ranked comparison of graphite BPPs |
| 8.4. | BPP coating specialists |
| 8.4.1. | Impact Coatings |
| 8.4.2. | Precors |
| 8.5. | Latest trends and research for BPPs |
| 8.5.1. | Future directions for bipolar plate flow fields |
| 8.5.2. | Printed Circuit Board BPPs - Bramble Energy |
| 8.5.3. | Latest trends for BPPs |
| 8.5.4. | Loop Energy |
| 8.5.5. | CoBiP project |
| 8.5.6. | Collaborative Approaches to BPP |
| 8.5.7. | Early-stage commercial developments for BPPs |
| 8.5.8. | Recent academic research for BPPs |
| 8.5.9. | Woven mesh for fuel cells |
| 8.5.10. | NBC Meshtec |
| 8.5.11. | Haver & Boecker |
| 8.5.12. | Emerging manufacturing methods |
| 8.5.13. | Collaborative Approaches to BPP |
| 9. | GAS DIFFUSION LAYERS |
| 9.1.1. | Porous transport layer (PTL) & gas diffusion layer (GDL) summary |
| 9.1.2. | PTL/GDL characteristics & materials |
| 9.1.3. | Typical GDL structure |
| 9.1.4. | Cathode GDL: Hydrophobic treatment |
| 9.1.5. | Wet vs dry GDL performance |
| 9.1.6. | GDL manufacturing process |
| 9.1.7. | Cellulosic fiber GDL: No MPL required |
| 9.1.8. | Interactions between GDL & catalyst layer |
| 9.1.9. | GDL innovation trends |
| 9.1.10. | Focus on dual hydrophobic and hydrophilic behaviour |
| 9.2. | GDL Supply Chain & Players |
| 9.2.1. | GDL supply chain for FCEV stacks |
| 9.2.2. | GDL player: SGL Carbon |
| 9.2.3. | GDL player: Toray |
| 9.2.4. | GDL player: Freudenberg |
| 9.2.5. | AvCarb - advancements in GDL designs for fuel cells |
| 9.2.6. | Key GDL suppliers |
| 10. | MEMBRANES |
| 10.1.1. | Purpose of the membrane |
| 10.1.2. | Form factor of the membrane |
| 10.1.3. | Water management in the fuel cell |
| 10.1.4. | Proton exchange membranes - brief history, functions & materials |
| 10.1.5. | Key parameters defining PFSA ionomer structure & properties |
| 10.1.6. | Important material parameters to consider for the membrane |
| 10.1.7. | Overview of factors causing PEM membrane degradation |
| 10.1.8. | Historical perspective on membrane manufacturers & key properties |
| 10.1.9. | Nafion - the market leading membrane |
| 10.1.10. | Chemours' Nafion properties & grades |
| 10.1.11. | Pros & cons of Nafion & PFSA membranes |
| 10.1.12. | Proton exchange membrane market landscape |
| 10.1.13. | Leading modern PFSA membranes - key players & properties |
| 10.1.14. | Comparison of PFSA membrane properties |
| 10.1.15. | Ion exchange membrane material benchmarking - PEM fuel cells |
| 10.1.16. | Example supply chain for proton exchange membranes - Gore |
| 10.1.17. | High-temperature proton exchange membranes |
| 10.1.18. | Innovations in PEMFC membranes may influence PEMEL (1) |
| 10.1.19. | Innovations in PEMFC membranes may influence PEMEL (2) |
| 10.1.20. | Ongoing concerns with PFAS |
| 10.1.21. | Hydrocarbons as PEM fuel cell membranes |
| 10.1.22. | Alternative PEM materials: Hydrocarbon IEMs |
| 10.1.23. | Assessment of hydrocarbon membranes |
| 10.1.24. | Benchmarking of Ionomr membrane against incumbent PFAS membrane |
| 10.1.25. | Alternative PEM materials: graphene composites |
| 10.2. | Production of PFAS membranes |
| 10.2.1. | Fluoropolymers in the polymer pyramid |
| 10.2.2. | PFSA ionomer design |
| 10.2.3. | PFSA membrane extrusion casting process |
| 10.2.4. | PFSA membrane solution casting process |
| 10.2.5. | Special release membrane for PFSA solution casting process |
| 10.2.6. | PFSA membrane dispersion casting process |
| 10.2.7. | Melt-blowing PEM manufacturing process - NRC Canada |
| 10.2.8. | Improvements to PFSA membranes |
| 10.2.9. | Trade-offs in optimizing membrane performance |
| 10.2.10. | Improving dimensional and mechanical stability using simultaneous stretching |
| 10.2.11. | Reinforced PFAS membranes: Multilayer vs woven membranes |
| 10.2.12. | Chemours reinforced Nafion membranes |
| 10.2.13. | Gore reinforced SELECT membranes |
| 10.2.14. | Reinforcing ion exchange membranes using multilayer co-extrusion |
| 10.2.15. | Innovation areas for reinforced multilayer IEMs |
| 10.2.16. | PFSA composite materials |
| 10.2.17. | Graphene composites |
| 10.3. | Alternatives to PFAS in ion exchange membranes |
| 10.3.1. | PFAS Regulations Affecting PEM Fuel Cells & Electrolyzers |
| 10.3.2. | Chemours' focus on responsible manufacturing of Nafion |
| 10.3.3. | Key Parameters Required to Replace PFAS Membranes |
| 10.3.4. | Emerging Alternative Membranes |
| 10.3.5. | Hydrocarbon membranes are leading competitors to PFAS-containing membranes |
| 10.3.6. | Alternative polymer materials for ion exchange membranes |
| 10.3.7. | Boron-containing hydrocarbon membranes |
| 10.3.8. | Other non-PBI containing ion solvating membranes |
| 10.3.9. | Glass-filled cross-linked PEEK for improved membrane stiffness |
| 10.3.10. | Bio-based PFSA-free membranes based on cellulose |
| 10.3.11. | Inorganic and inorganic-organic hybrid ion exchange membranes |
| 10.3.12. | Inorganic membranes: Membrion |
| 10.3.13. | Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) - overview |
| 10.3.14. | MOF applications in ion exchange membranes |
| 10.3.15. | MOF-based ion exchange membranes are not ready for commercialization |
| 10.3.16. | Commercial maturity of PFAS alternatives in ion exchange membranes |
| 11. | CATALYSTS |
| 11.1.1. | Critical platinum group metals: Introduction |
| 11.1.2. | Critical platinum group metals: Supply chain considerations |
| 11.1.3. | Global PGM demand and application segmentation |
| 11.1.4. | Critical platinum group metals: Applications and recycling rates |
| 11.1.5. | Platinum as a catalyst |
| 11.1.6. | Influence of carbon black support on Pt/C |
| 11.1.7. | Catalyst coated membrane (CCM) |
| 11.1.8. | CCM production technologies |
| 11.1.9. | CCM production technologies |
| 11.1.10. | Comparison of coating processes |
| 11.1.11. | Roll-to-roll CCM production processes (1/2) |
| 11.1.12. | Roll-to-roll CCM production processes (2/2) |
| 11.1.13. | RWTH Aachen & Laufenberg's research into CCM production |
| 11.1.14. | Catalyst ink formulation - key considerations |
| 11.1.15. | Typical catalyst coated membrane (CCM) |
| 11.1.16. | Targets for reducing loading of catalytic materials in fuel cells |
| 11.1.17. | Recycling of the catalyst |
| 11.1.18. | Catalyst degradation mechanisms |
| 11.1.19. | Overview of trends for catalysts |
| 11.1.20. | Increasing catalytic activity - alternative metals |
| 11.1.21. | Increasing catalytic activity - form factor |
| 11.1.22. | SonoTek - Ultrasonic Deposition |
| 11.1.23. | Mebius - Pt Skin over Catalyst Core |
| 11.1.24. | Reduction of catalyst poisoning |
| 11.1.25. | Reduction of cost of catalyst |
| 11.1.26. | Future directions for catalysts |
| 11.2. | Key Suppliers of Catalysts |
| 11.2.1. | Cataler Corporation |
| 11.2.2. | Umicore |
| 11.2.3. | Johnson Matthey (Honeywell) |
| 11.2.4. | Tanaka, Heraeus and BASF |
| 11.2.5. | Newly developed catalysts |
| 12. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 12.1. | Alleima: Fuel Cell BPP & Interconnect Materials |
| 12.2. | Ames Goldsmith Ceimig: PEMEL/FC Electrocatalysts |
| 12.3. | AvCarb |
| 12.4. | Ballard Motive Solutions |
| 12.5. | Ballard Power Systems |
| 12.6. | Ballard Power Systems |
| 12.7. | Bramble Energy |
| 12.8. | CellMo |
| 12.9. | Cummins/Hydrogenics: Hydrogen Fuel Cells |
| 12.10. | Dana (Bipolar Plates) |
| 12.11. | EKPO Fuel Cell Technologies |
| 12.12. | FJ Composite |
| 12.13. | Heraeus: Catalysts for the Hydrogen Economy |
| 12.14. | Hongfeng Carbon Solutions |
| 12.15. | Hydrogenics |
| 12.16. | Impact Coatings |
| 12.17. | Ionomr Innovations |
| 12.18. | Jiangsu Yiangteng |
| 12.19. | Johnson Matthey: Blue Hydrogen Solutions |
| 12.20. | KnitMesh Technologies: Electrolyzer Electrodes & PTL/GDLs |
| 12.21. | Kobelco (Bipolar Plates) |
| 12.22. | Plug Power |
| 12.23. | Plug Power Inc |
| 12.24. | Precision Micro |
| 12.25. | Schunk |