| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | Analyst opinion - SMR market overview |
| 1.2. | Small modular reactors (SMRs): What and why? |
| 1.3. | Why is interest re-emerging for nuclear energy? |
| 1.4. | Nuclear is becoming part of the long-term solution for sustainable data center power, but will not be a near-term quick fix |
| 1.5. | SMRs are expected to reduce the cost of nuclear energy |
| 1.6. | The cost of energy from SMRs is set to be competitive with renewables + storage and fossil fuels |
| 1.7. | SMRs could significantly improve energy security |
| 1.8. | Despite growing interest for nuclear from private capital, SMR projects are still heavily reliant on public funding and support |
| 1.9. | Where are the SMR projects? |
| 1.10. | Commercial SMRs in existence today |
| 1.11. | SMR reactor technologies can be split into Gen III+ and Gen IV designs |
| 1.12. | The Gen III/III+ SMR technology landscape |
| 1.13. | The Gen IV SMR technology landscape |
| 1.14. | When are commercial SMRs expected to come online? |
| 1.15. | Hyperscalers each bet on a different Gen IV SMR startup - except Microsoft |
| 1.16. | Building SMRs vs extending/restarting large nuclear power plants |
| 1.17. | Not-so-small modular reactors - some SMRs are getting bigger |
| 1.18. | SMRs enable new use-cases for nuclear power |
| 1.19. | SMRs Could Boost the Growth of the Hydrogen Economy |
| 1.20. | What is holding back SMRs? |
| 1.21. | What factors are important when comparing SMR technologies? |
| 1.22. | Overall benchmarking results split SMR designs into three groups |
| 1.23. | Forecasting the SMR market |
| 1.24. | Forecasting growth in the number of SMRs |
| 1.25. | Forecasting reactor types: Overall breakdown |
| 1.26. | SMR technology breakdown by region: 2046 predictions |
| 1.27. | Forecasting revenue from SMR construction: Reactor types |
| 1.28. | Conclusions from SMR forecasting |
| 1.29. | Access more with an IDTechEx subscription |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1.1. | Introduction: The nuclear industry, SMRs and technical background |
| 2.2. | Nuclear industry overview |
| 2.2.1. | Nuclear energy: The story so far |
| 2.2.2. | Nuclear energy has struggled in recent years |
| 2.2.3. | Nuclear power in the global energy mix |
| 2.2.4. | Nuclear new builds: Why or why not? |
| 2.2.5. | Nuclear for net zero: How much is needed? |
| 2.2.6. | How realistic is rapid nuclear expansion? |
| 2.2.7. | Segmenting nuclear technologies: Generations |
| 2.2.8. | How have commercial nuclear power plants been constructed? |
| 2.2.9. | Historical economics of US nuclear plant construction have a negative learning curve |
| 2.2.10. | Nuclear economics are more optimistic in China |
| 2.2.11. | The United States is "reinvigorating" its nuclear industry |
| 2.2.12. | Frustrations with regulation push nuclear startups across borders |
| 2.2.13. | Conclusions: The nuclear industry needs an overhaul |
| 2.3. | Nuclear Fuels |
| 2.3.1. | Fuel types in nuclear reactors: Enrichment |
| 2.3.2. | SMR Projects by Fuel Enrichment |
| 2.3.3. | Nuclear fuel costs are typically a small fraction of total LCOE |
| 2.3.4. | Key players in uranium enrichment |
| 2.3.5. | Case study: Urenco ramping up LEU+ and HALEU production |
| 2.3.6. | TRISO: The new paradigm for nuclear fuel? |
| 2.3.7. | Could mining shortages bottleneck SMR rollout? |
| 2.4. | Introduction to small modular reactors |
| 2.4.1. | Small modular reactors (SMRs): What and why? |
| 2.4.2. | Defining small modular reactors |
| 2.4.3. | SMR drivers: Transferring the economy of scale |
| 2.4.4. | SMR construction economics: The evidence |
| 2.4.5. | Motivation for adopting SMRs |
| 2.4.6. | Modularization as a cost saving |
| 2.4.7. | Cost of capital for SMRs vs traditional NPP projects |
| 2.4.8. | The cost of energy from SMRs compared to renewables, fossil fuels, and storage |
| 2.4.9. | SMRs as an answer to energy security |
| 2.4.10. | Where are the SMR projects? |
| 2.4.11. | Production bottlenecks for SMRs: Reactor pressure vessels |
| 2.4.12. | International cooperation in design licensing would speed up SMR deployment |
| 2.4.13. | Are SMRs safer than large nuclear power plants? |
| 2.4.14. | Conclusions: SMRs aim to make nuclear power economically viable |
| 3. | FORECASTS |
| 3.1. | Introduction to forecasting |
| 3.2. | Nuclear energy by region and country today |
| 3.3. | Nuclear energy by region - historical data |
| 3.4. | Constructing the forecast: Establishing when SMRs enter operation |
| 3.5. | When are commercial SMRs expected to come online? |
| 3.6. | Forecasting methodology: Projecting growth, technology focus |
| 3.7. | Forecasting growth in the number of SMRs |
| 3.8. | Number of Installed SMRs by Region, Historic and Forecast (2026-2046) |
| 3.9. | Reactor technology forecasts |
| 3.10. | Forecasting reactor types: Overall breakdown |
| 3.11. | Number of Installed SMRs by Reactor Type, Historical and Forecast (2026-2046) |
| 3.12. | SMR technology breakdown by region: 2046 predictions |
| 3.13. | Growth in installed SMR electrical capacity: Regions |
| 3.14. | SMR Electricity Generated by Region Forecast (2026-2046, TWh per year) |
| 3.15. | Installed Electrical Capacity of SMRs by Region Forecast (2026-2046, GWe) |
| 3.16. | Forecasting nuclear energy growth |
| 3.17. | Energy from SMRs as a Proportion of Total Nuclear Energy (2026-2046) |
| 3.18. | How much will SMRs cost to build? |
| 3.19. | Forecasting revenue from SMR construction: Reactor types |
| 3.20. | SMR construction revenue by reactor type, forecast (2026-2046, US$ Billions) |
| 3.21. | Forecasting revenue from SMR construction: Regions |
| 3.22. | SMR Construction Revenue by Region, Forecast (2026-2046, US$ Billions) |
| 3.23. | Conclusions from SMR forecasting |
| 4. | SMR TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT |
| 4.1.1. | Structure of this chapter |
| 4.2. | Technical primer |
| 4.2.1. | Nuclear fission: Subatomic components |
| 4.2.2. | Fission processes: Releasing energy |
| 4.2.3. | Segmenting SMRs: Active vs passive vs inherent safety |
| 4.2.4. | Controlling and maintaining chain reactions |
| 4.2.5. | Void coefficient as an indicator of safety |
| 4.2.6. | Temperature coefficient also affects safety |
| 4.2.7. | Explaining how nuclear reactors work through the context of light water reactors |
| 4.2.8. | Ultimate heat sinks and reactor siting |
| 4.3. | Segmenting SMRs by type |
| 4.3.1. | Reactor technology coverage in this report |
| 4.3.2. | Reactor designs: Dividing by technology parameters |
| 4.3.3. | New reactor designs: Evolution vs revolution |
| 4.3.4. | Coolant temperature defines efficiency, application fit |
| 4.3.5. | Distribution of project types by reactor class |
| 4.3.6. | Project stage by reactor class (I) - how to measure the progress of SMRs |
| 4.3.7. | Project stage by reactor class (II) - frontrunner technologies |
| 4.3.8. | Project stage by reactor class (III) - SMRs with potential but lower readiness |
| 4.3.9. | Project stage by reactor class (IV) - speculative technologies |
| 4.3.10. | Which technologies are likely to see wide use in a future SMR fleet? |
| 4.3.11. | Comparing promising technologies |
| 4.3.12. | Conclusions: A wide range of reactor types are competing for use in SMRs |
| 4.4. | SMR technology benchmarking |
| 4.4.1. | Introduction to Benchmarking |
| 4.4.2. | Benchmarking KPIs |
| 4.4.3. | Building the benchmark |
| 4.4.4. | Comparing benchmarks |
| 4.4.5. | Which variables form each benchmark? |
| 4.4.6. | Judging overall reactor performance |
| 4.4.7. | The issue of unavailable data |
| 4.4.8. | Benchmarking changes from the previous edition of this report |
| 4.4.9. | Unweighted benchmarking scores |
| 4.4.10. | Does industry interest correlate with other performance benchmarks? |
| 4.4.11. | Plant efficiency has little correlation with technological focus |
| 4.4.12. | More power-dense plants are seeing greater industry focus |
| 4.5. | Gen III+ Reactor Designs |
| 4.5.1. | Pre-Gen IV designs: Introduction to established nuclear technologies |
| 4.5.2. | Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs): Overview |
| 4.5.3. | Layout of PWRs |
| 4.5.4. | Types of PWR: Overview |
| 4.5.5. | Shrinking PWRs could improve safety and smooth operations |
| 4.5.6. | CNNC ACP100 (Linglong One): Likely the first land-based Gen III+ SMR to come online |
| 4.5.7. | CNNC ACP100 (Linglong One): Large plant footprint for an SMR |
| 4.5.8. | Westinghouse Electric: Scaling proven PWR technology down to create an SMR |
| 4.5.9. | Westinghouse SMR gains traction in US, but drops out of UK competition |
| 4.5.10. | Westinghouse AP300: Safety based on proven designs |
| 4.5.11. | Westinghouse Electric AP300: SWOT |
| 4.5.12. | CAREM: Slow progress towards an Argentinian SMR |
| 4.5.13. | CAREM: Passive safety and a conventional approach |
| 4.5.14. | CAREM/CAREM25: SWOT |
| 4.5.15. | NuScale: Potentially the closest SMR to market in the USA |
| 4.5.16. | NuScale: A new approach to PWR design |
| 4.5.17. | NuScale: UAMPS project collapses, new opportunities emerge |
| 4.5.18. | NuScale/VOYGR: SWOT |
| 4.5.19. | Rolls-Royce SMR: The not-so-small modular reactor |
| 4.5.20. | Rolls-Royce SMR wins UK SMR competition |
| 4.5.21. | Rolls-Royce SMR: Small pressure vessel, large power output |
| 4.5.22. | Rolls-Royce SMR: SWOT |
| 4.5.23. | KAERI: SMART-C nearing maturity alongside Gen IV long-term ambitions |
| 4.5.24. | KAERI Gen IV reactor portfolio: Tailoring the reactor to the application |
| 4.5.25. | SMART-C: Twin iPWR with iterative design improvements |
| 4.5.26. | KAERI SMART-C: SWOT |
| 4.5.27. | Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs): Overview |
| 4.5.28. | Why are less BWR SMR projects ongoing than PWRs? |
| 4.5.29. | GE Hitachi's BWRX-300: Accelerating project timespans is key |
| 4.5.30. | BWRX-300: Promising progress and export interest |
| 4.5.31. | BWRX-300: Compact plant design eases siting difficulties |
| 4.5.32. | BWRX-300: SWOT |
| 4.5.33. | Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs): Overview |
| 4.5.34. | PHWR-based SMRs |
| 4.5.35. | Summary: The Gen III/III+ SMR landscape |
| 4.5.36. | Comparison of leading Gen III/III+ designs |
| 4.5.37. | Conclusion: Older reactor designs will continue to see use in SMRs |
| 4.6. | Gen IV Reactor Designs |
| 4.6.1. | Gen IV designs: Introduction to transformational nuclear technologies |
| 4.6.2. | High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGRs) |
| 4.6.3. | High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGRs): Overview |
| 4.6.4. | HTGRs: Introduction |
| 4.6.5. | HTGRs: Multiple possible generation schemes |
| 4.6.6. | HTGRs: Rankine vs Brayton vs combined cycle generation |
| 4.6.7. | HTR-PM: The first commercial-scale land-based SMR |
| 4.6.8. | HTR-PM: Use of HALEU, Rankine cycle approach |
| 4.6.9. | HTR-PM: SWOT |
| 4.6.10. | X-Energy: HTGR SMR, TRISO fuel plant, and support from Amazon |
| 4.6.11. | X-Energy Xe-100: Potentially the first HTGR for the United States |
| 4.6.12. | U-Battery update: Urenco exits, project likely suspended |
| 4.6.13. | JAEA: HTGR development in Japan |
| 4.6.14. | Comparing benchmarking scores for HTGR types |
| 4.6.15. | Pebble bed HTGRs: Commercially deployed but with notable performance and safety downsides |
| 4.6.16. | GFRs appear to be high technical performers, yet see very limited industry interest |
| 4.6.17. | Liquid Metal Fast Reactors (LMFRs) |
| 4.6.18. | Liquid Metal Fast Reactors (LMFRs): Overview |
| 4.6.19. | LMFRs: Extensive demonstrator experience has struggled to transfer to commercial use |
| 4.6.20. | TerraPower/GEH Natrium: Sodium LMFR with flexible output |
| 4.6.21. | TerraPower/GEH Natrium: Sodium-cooled LMFR collaboration |
| 4.6.22. | Oklo: 2 sites underway with INL & Meta for configurable sodium-cooled SMR |
| 4.6.23. | Dual Fluid Energy: Novel reactor design with both fuel and coolant as a liquid metal |
| 4.6.24. | Comparing LMFRs to other Gen IV types |
| 4.6.25. | Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) |
| 4.6.26. | Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs): Overview |
| 4.6.27. | Kairos Power - TRISO fueled MSR supported by Google |
| 4.6.28. | Kairos Power KP-FHR: Pebble bed MSR with modular design |
| 4.6.29. | Copenhagen Atomics: Thorium molten salt SMR |
| 4.6.30. | Terrestrial Energy: IMSR pilot reactor and fuel salt production plant approved by DOE |
| 4.6.31. | Terrestrial Energy: Focus on co-generation as a business model |
| 4.6.32. | Terrestrial Energy: LEU in a Gen IV reactor |
| 4.6.33. | ISMR400: SWOT |
| 4.6.34. | Molten salt reactors perform highly in technology benchmarks - yet adoption has lagged |
| 4.6.35. | Conclusions for Gen IV SMRs |
| 4.6.36. | Not every Gen IV design is being considered for SMRs |
| 4.6.37. | Summary: The Gen IV SMR landscape |
| 4.6.38. | Conclusion: Gen IV designs are likely to see success as SMRs |
| 5. | NUCLEAR POWER FOR DATA CENTERS |
| 5.1.1. | Nuclear is becoming part of the long-term solution for sustainable data center power, but will not be a near-term quick fix |
| 5.2. | Decarbonizing Data Center Power - the Challenge |
| 5.2.1. | Data centers consume large & increasing amounts of power globally |
| 5.2.2. | Data centers are increasingly constrained by power available from the grid |
| 5.2.3. | Carbon intensity of power production varies geographically |
| 5.2.4. | The US Energy Sector: Transitioning from abundance to scarcity |
| 5.2.5. | A significant "power gap" between supply and demand of power for data centers is expected in the US within the next 5 years |
| 5.2.6. | Data center hyperscalers - becoming power generation companies |
| 5.3. | Nuclear Power for Data Centers - the Solution? |
| 5.3.1. | Nuclear is becoming a larger part of hyperscaler clean energy portfolios |
| 5.3.2. | Hyperscalers each bet on a different Gen IV SMR startup - except Microsoft |
| 5.3.3. | Data centers are getting bigger, and so are SMR projects |
| 5.3.4. | Opportunities to extend or restart large-scale nuclear power plants |
| 5.3.5. | Building SMRs vs extending/restarting the lifetime of large NPPs |
| 5.3.6. | Nuclear energy has very low carbon emissions compared even to other renewables |
| 5.3.7. | SMRs could work alongside renewable energy systems towards decarbonization |
| 5.3.8. | Comparison of different power sources for data centers |
| 5.3.9. | LCOE does not tell the full story: Revisiting the cost of electricity for data centers |
| 5.3.10. | Key insights from Reuters Energy Live 2025 for nuclear power |
| 5.3.11. | Fusion energy: Potential competitor for data center power? |
| 5.3.12. | Fusion power rollout will have a longer time to market than SMRs |
| 5.3.13. | More information on fusion energy can be found in the IDTechEx Fusion Energy Market report |
| 5.3.14. | More information on decarbonizing power for data centers can be found in the IDTechEx Sustainability for Data Centers report |
| 6. | NEW APPLICATIONS FOR SMRS |
| 6.1. | SMRs and new use-cases for nuclear |
| 6.2. | Cogeneration: Getting the most out of nuclear fuel |
| 6.3. | Pairing SMRs with industrial zones for efficient use of nuclear cogeneration |
| 6.4. | Compatibility between processes and reactor types relies on reactor temperature range |
| 6.5. | Nuclear energy and the hydrogen economy |
| 6.6. | JAEA: Demonstrating hydrogen production with a HTGR |
| 6.7. | Desalination using nuclear energy |
| 6.8. | Nuclear district heating - a proven concept enhanced by SMRs |
| 6.9. | Case study: Steady Energy - district heating SMR in Finland |
| 6.10. | Case study: Steady Energy - importance of non-nuclear tests before rollout |
| 6.11. | High temperature reactors open new possibilities for process heat supply |
| 6.12. | The "nuclear battery": Nuclear microreactors |
| 6.13. | Case study: Terra Innovatum SOLO - compact 1MWe microreactor concept |
| 6.14. | Case study: AMPERA - subcritical microreactor concept |
| 6.15. | Microreactor concepts are particularly popular in the United States |
| 6.16. | Marine SMRs: Portable nuclear power |
| 6.17. | Coal-fired power plant repowering |
| 6.18. | Development status of new SMR use-cases |
| 6.19. | Summary: SMRs make nuclear energy more versatile |
| 7. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 7.1. | AMPERA |
| 7.2. | CAREM: Argentinian Small Modular Reactor Project |
| 7.3. | CNNC AP100 (Linglong One) |
| 7.4. | Copenhagen Atomics |
| 7.5. | Dual Fluid |
| 7.6. | GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy BWRX-300 (update) |
| 7.7. | Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) |
| 7.8. | KAERI (SMART-C) |
| 7.9. | Kairos Power |
| 7.10. | Lightbridge Corporation |
| 7.11. | NuScale Power VOYGR (update) |
| 7.12. | Oklo |
| 7.13. | Rolls-Royce SMR |
| 7.14. | Steady Energy |
| 7.15. | Terra Innovatum |
| 7.16. | TerraPower Natrium |
| 7.17. | Terrestrial Energy |
| 7.18. | Tsinghua University and the HTR-PM Reactor |
| 7.19. | U-Battery (update) |
| 7.20. | Urenco |
| 7.21. | Westinghouse Electric Company (AP300) |
| 7.22. | X-Energy |