This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Redox flow batteries will take over stationary storage |
1.2. | Some technologies are stalling, others are growing |
1.3. | News from 2018 - BASF invests in ESS Inc. |
1.4. | News from 2018 - Hunan Vanadium Valley New Energy |
1.5. | News from 2018 - ViZn energy shuts down |
1.6. | News from 2018 - Redflow simplifies battery design |
1.7. | News from 2018 - South Africa to pilot vanadium redox flow battery |
1.8. | News from 2018 - redT energy awarded £750k grant by UK Government |
1.9. | News from 2018 - Schmid delivers flow battery to China |
1.10. | News from 2018 - Vanadium Demand Driven by Flow Batteries |
1.11. | News from 2018 - Stina Announces Spring / Summer Exploration Program for Vanadium Project |
1.12. | News from 2018 - ZincNyx Plans Flow Battery Mass Production Within a Year |
1.13. | News from 2018 - Shell Canada delves into vanadium flow battery technology |
1.14. | News from 2018 - Lockheed Martin hopes to launch a new flow battery made of inexpensive, nontoxic materials |
1.15. | News from 2018 - Synergy Group announces US$ 3.2 Million Expansion to the Vanadium Industry |
1.16. | News from 2018 - Voltstorage tries out residential flow battery |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | What is a battery? |
2.1.1. | Electrochemistry definitions |
2.1.2. | What does 1 kilowatthour (kWh) look like? |
2.1.3. | Useful charts for performance comparison |
2.2. | The battery trilemma |
2.2.1. | Lessons from the computer industry |
2.2.2. | Stationary energy storage is not new |
2.2.3. | The increasingly important role of stationary storage |
2.2.4. | New avenues for stationary storage |
2.2.5. | Values provided at the customer side |
2.2.6. | Values provided at the utility side |
2.2.7. | Values provided in ancillary services |
2.3. | Enter Tesla PowerWall |
2.3.1. | The case for RFBs |
2.3.2. | Performance comparison of energy storage technologies |
2.3.3. | The price of RFBs |
2.3.4. | The price of RFBs - LCOS |
2.3.5. | The price of RFB - comparisons with other technologies |
2.4. | Redox flow batteries in the news |
2.5. | Redox flow batteries and caves |
2.6. | Guide to understanding the charts |
2.6.1. | Largest operational RFB projects |
2.6.2. | Market players (operational projects) |
2.6.3. | Companies' market share by MW |
2.6.4. | Companies' market share by MWh |
2.6.5. | Technology market share by MW |
2.6.6. | Technology market share by MWh |
2.6.7. | List of operational projects |
2.7. | ARPA-E funding on RFBs |
3. | TYPES OF REDOX FLOW BATTERIES |
3.1. | Gaseous and liquid electrodes |
3.2. | Catholytes and anolytes |
3.3. | Exploded view of an RFB and polarisation curve |
3.4. | History of RFBs |
3.5. | Choice of redox-active species and solvents |
3.6. | Types of RFBs |
3.6.1. | RFB chemistries: Iron/Chromium |
3.6.2. | RFB chemistries: PSB flow batteries |
3.6.3. | RFB chemistries: Vanadium/Bromine |
3.6.4. | RFB chemistries: all Vanadium (VRFB) |
3.6.5. | Hybrid RFBs: Zinc/Bromine |
3.6.6. | Hybrid RFBs: Hydrogen/Bromine |
3.6.7. | Hybrid RFBs: all Iron |
3.6.8. | Other RFBs: organic |
3.6.9. | Other RFBs: non-aqueous |
3.6.10. | Lab-scale flow battery projects |
3.6.11. | Microflow batteries? |
3.7. | Technology Recap |
3.8. | Comparison with fuel cells and conventional batteries |
3.9. | Hype Curve for RFB technologies |
3.10. | Other RFB configurations |
4. | MATERIALS FOR REDOX FLOW BATTERIES |
4.1. | Membranes |
4.2. | Current collectors |
4.3. | Flow distributors and turbulence promoters |
4.4. | Electrolyte flow circuit |
4.4.1. | Raw materials for RFB electrolytes |
4.4.2. | Vanadium and the steel industry |
5. | PROPERTIES OF REDOX FLOW BATTERIES |
5.1. | Power and energy are decoupled |
5.2. | Fit-and-forget philosophy |
5.2.1. | Competing technologies: Li-ion |
5.2.2. | Competing technologies: Na/S |
6. | REDOX FLOW FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES |
6.1. | Liquid electricity |
6.2. | General Electric |
6.3. | Toyota |
6.4. | nanoFlowcell |
7. | COST AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS |
7.1. | Cost factors at electrolyte level |
7.2. | Cost breakdown of a Vanadium-redox flow battery |
7.3. | The effect of temperature and current density |
7.4. | Zn/Br batteries from Primus Power in comparison |
7.5. | Finding the right market |
7.5.1. | Self-consumption according to Agora Energiewende |
7.5.2. | Agora Energiewende's opinion |
7.6. | RFB value chain |
8. | TECHNOLOGY AND MARKET READINESS |
8.1. | Companies in this report |
8.2. | Technology and manufacturing readiness |
8.3. | Addressable markets for stationary storage |
8.4. | Battery size by market and technology |
8.5. | Score comparison |
9. | CASE STUDIES |
9.1. | VRFB - UniEnergy Technologies (UET) |
9.2. | VRFB - VoltStorage |
9.3. | Zn/Br - Primus Power |
9.4. | H/Br - EleStor |
9.5. | Zn/air flow - ViZn Energy |
10. | MARKETS FORECASTS |
10.1. | Market forecast assumptions |
10.2. | Global value of stationary storage 2018-2028 ($M) |
10.3. | Global value of RFB storage 2018-2028 ($M) |
10.3.1. | RFB market share snapshots |
10.4. | Technology diversification (MWh) |
10.4.1. | Technology diversification (MWh) |
11. | COMPANY PROFILES |
11.1. | eChemion |
11.2. | EleStor |
11.3. | Enstorage Inc |
11.4. | ESS Inc |
11.5. | GILDEMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft |
11.6. | ITN Energy Systems Inc |
11.7. | JenaBatteries GmbH |
11.8. | KemWatt |
11.9. | nanoFlowcell |
11.10. | Primus Power Corp |
11.11. | RedFlow Technologies |
11.12. | redT |
11.13. | SCHMID Group |
11.14. | Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd |
11.15. | ThyssenKrupp |
11.16. | Unienergy Technologies |
11.17. | ViZn Energy |
11.18. | Volterion |
11.19. | Voltstorage |
11.20. | WattJoule |
12. | APPENDIX |
12.1. | Technology and manufacturing readiness |
Slides | 224 |
---|---|
Companies | 20 |
Forecasts to | 2028 |