This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1.1. | Executive introduction |
1.1.2. | Strategy comparison amongst the largest players |
1.1.3. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Glucose sensors |
1.1.4. | Focus shifts from test strips to CGM |
1.1.5. | CGM options are expanding |
1.1.6. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Insulin delivery |
1.1.7. | Today: Hybrid closed loop systems |
1.1.8. | The objective: Closing the feedback loop |
1.1.9. | Managing side effects accounts for 90% of the total cost of diabetes |
1.1.10. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Side-effect management |
1.1.11. | List of 75 companies mentioned in this report |
1.1.12. | Diabetes management devices: Historic revenue, 2010-2018 (by device type) |
1.1.13. | Diabetes management devices: Revenue forecast, 2019-2029 (by device type) |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Diabetes today, in numbers |
2.1.1. | Type 1 vs Type 2 |
2.1.2. | Diabetes on the rise |
2.1.3. | The cost of diabetes |
2.1.4. | Managing side effects accounts for 90% of the total cost of diabetes |
2.1.5. | Diabetes management process |
2.2. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Summary |
2.2.1. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Glucose sensors |
2.2.2. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Insulin delivery |
2.2.3. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Side-effect management |
2.3. | Visualisation of activity and partnerships at over 30 of the largest players in diabetes management |
2.3.1. | Glucose sensors for diabetes management: players |
2.3.2. | Strategy comparison amongst the largest players |
2.4. | Patent trends amongst the largest players |
2.4.1. | Patents amongst the largest players |
2.5. | Future outlook for diabetes management |
3. | SENSORS FOR DIABETES MANAGEMENT |
3.1. | History of glucose monitoring |
3.1.1. | Academic research trends |
3.1.2. | Patents trends: shifting between techniques |
3.1.3. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Sensors |
3.1.4. | Glucose sensors for diabetes management: players |
3.1.5. | Test strips and glucometers |
3.2. | Glucose monitoring strip mechanisms |
3.2.1. | Development of the glucose monitoring assay |
3.2.2. | Strip monitoring through a glucometer |
3.2.3. | Profitability in the test strip industry is falling |
3.2.4. | Strip manufacture |
3.2.5. | Electrode deposition: screen printing vs sputtering |
3.2.6. | Business model for glucose test strips |
3.2.7. | Manufacturers of blood glucose meters |
3.2.8. | Electrode deposition: screen printing vs sputtering |
3.2.9. | New directions with glucometers: Connectivity |
3.2.10. | New directions with glucometers: Smartphone cases |
3.2.11. | Finger stick tests as a subscription service |
3.2.12. | Porters five force analysis of disposable test strip industry |
3.3. | Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) |
3.3.1. | The case for CGM |
3.3.2. | Skin patches are the form factor of choice |
3.3.3. | CGM sensor manufacturing and anatomy |
3.3.4. | Sensor membranes are critical |
3.3.5. | Foreign body responses to CGM devices |
3.3.6. | Calibration of glucose monitoring devices |
3.3.7. | CGM: Overview of key players |
3.3.8. | Medtronic |
3.3.9. | Medtronic: Patents in CGM |
3.3.10. | Dexcom |
3.3.11. | Dexcom: Patents in CGM |
3.3.12. | Abbott Laboratories |
3.3.13. | Abbott: FreeStyle Libre |
3.3.14. | Abbott: SMBG vs CGM comparison |
3.3.15. | Abbott: Patents in CGM |
3.3.16. | Roche |
3.3.17. | Roche: Patents in CGM |
3.3.18. | PKVitality |
3.4. | Implantable glucose sensors |
3.4.1. | Implantable glucose sensors: Introduction |
3.4.2. | Key Players in Implantable Glucose Monitoring |
3.4.3. | Senseonics |
3.4.4-6. | ... 3 other players |
3.5. | Other approaches for glucose monitoring |
3.5.1. | Beyond blood and ISF: Other ways to determine glucose concentration |
3.5.2. | Assessment of different analytes for glucose monitoring |
3.5.3. | Case studies by target analyte |
3.5.4. | Measuring glucose in sweat |
3.5.5. | Binghampton University |
3.5.6. | Measuring glucose in tears |
3.5.7. | Verily / Novartis: Contact lenses |
3.5.8. | Noviosense |
3.5.9. | Measuring glucose in saliva |
3.5.10. | Measuring glucose in breath |
3.5.11. | Measuring glucose in urine |
3.5.12. | Non-Invasive Glucose Monitoring |
3.5.13. | Sano |
3.5.14. | University of Bath |
3.6. | Conclusions: Glucose sensing |
3.6.1. | Focus shifts from test strips to CGM |
3.6.2. | CGM options are expanding |
3.6.3. | When will non-invasive glucose monitoring be commercialised? |
4. | INSULIN DELIVERY |
4.1.1. | Delivering insulin is a critical part of diabetes management |
4.1.2. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Insulin delivery |
4.2. | Insulin pens |
4.2.1. | Insulin pens: Introduction |
4.2.2. | Smarter insulin delivery informing decisions |
4.2.3. | Smart insulin delivery device manufacturers |
4.2.4. | Emperra: A pen to prevent missed doses |
4.2.5. | Novo Nordisk: Traditional players launch smart options |
4.2.6. | Companion Medical: Bluetooth connected pens |
4.2.7. | Common Sensing: Smart features for disposable pens |
4.2.8. | Digital Medics: First smart pen to market |
4.2.9. | Outlook for insulin pens |
4.3. | Insulin pumps |
4.3.1. | Insulin pumps: Introduction |
4.3.2. | Patent activity in insulin pumps is prominent |
4.3.3. | Insulin pumps currently available |
4.3.4. | Insulin pump breakdown |
4.3.5. | Disposable insulin pumps for type 2 diabetics |
4.3.6. | Academic frontiers: Smart patches for insulin delivery |
4.3.7. | Insulin pump technology roadmap |
4.3.8. | Outlook for insulin pumps |
4.4. | Linking insulin pumps and CGM: Towards an artificial pancreas |
4.4.1. | Today: Hybrid closed loop systems |
4.4.2. | The objective: Closing the feedback loop |
4.4.3. | Example: Towards an artificial pancreas |
4.4.4. | Unanswered questions about device security |
5. | DIABETES MANAGEMENT AND DIGITAL HEALTH |
5.1.1. | Chronic diseases are an obvious starting point for digital health |
5.1.2. | Diabetes apps |
5.1.3. | Growing ecosystem via acquisitions and partnerships |
5.1.4. | Roche & mySugr |
5.1.5. | Lilly & Rimidi, Lilly & Livongo |
5.1.6. | Blue Mesa Health & Merck |
5.1.7. | Glooko-Novo Nordisk in Diabetes Care |
5.1.8. | Other case studies: Digital diabetes management |
5.1.9. | BlueStar |
5.1.10. | Voluntis |
5.1.11. | DIABNEXT |
5.1.12. | iHealth Labs |
5.1.13. | Better Therapeutics |
5.1.14. | Amazon Tackle Diabetes Care |
5.1.15. | Alexa Diabetes Challenge Finalists |
5.1.16. | Sugarpod Champions Diabetes Care |
6. | TECHNOLOGY FOR MANAGING DIABETES SIDE EFFECTS |
6.1.1. | Managing side effects accounts for 90% of the total cost of diabetes |
6.1.2. | Diabetes management device roadmap: Side effect management |
6.2. | Diabetic neuropathy |
6.2.1. | Preface: Diabetic neuropathy |
6.2.2. | Optical measurement of neuropathy |
6.2.3. | Sudomotor function as biomarker for neuropathy |
6.2.4. | Gait measurement to assess neuropathy |
6.3. | Diabetic foot ulcers |
6.3.1. | Basic requirements of a diabetic footwear |
6.3.2. | Smart options for diabetic footwear |
6.3.3. | Sensoria |
6.3.4-6. | ... 3 other players |
6.4. | Diabetic ketoacidosis |
6.4.1. | A severe lack of insulin can lead to Diabetic Ketoacidosis |
6.4.2. | Ketone monitoring via electrochemical sensors |
6.4.3. | Ketone test strips: examples and comparison to glucose test strips |
6.4.4. | Will we see continuous ketone monitoring? |
7. | TECHNOLOGY FOR DIABETES DIAGNOSIS |
7.1.1. | Diagnosis of diabetes is not a fast process |
7.1.2. | Remote Glucose Tolerance Testing is Possible |
7.1.3. | E. coli bacteria to change colour in the presence of sugar |
7.1.4. | Optical Sensors For Infant Diagnosis |
8. | REIMBURSEMENT FOR DIABETES PRODUCTS |
8.1.1. | Austria |
8.1.2. | Canada |
8.1.3. | France |
8.1.4. | Germany |
8.1.5. | Ireland |
8.1.6. | Netherlands |
8.1.7. | Switzerland |
8.1.8. | United Kingdom |
8.1.9. | USA |
8.1.10. | Reimbursement status for CGM by country |
9. | FUNDING AND INVESTMENT |
9.1. | JDRF $80million investment fund for diabetes |
10. | MARKET FORECASTS FOR DIABETES MANAGEMENT |
10.1.1. | Forecast assumptions |
10.1.2. | Forecasting in two different methodologies |
10.2. | 1. Company revenue in diabetes management |
10.2.1. | Diabetes management devices: Historic revenue, 2010-2018 (by device type) |
10.2.2. | Diabetes management devices: Historic volumes & pricing, 2010-2018 (by device type) |
10.2.3. | Diabetes management devices: Revenue forecast, 2019-2029 (by device type) |
10.2.4. | Diabetes management devices: Forecast volumes & pricing, 2019-2029 (by device type) |
10.3. | 2. Number of diabetics and adoption rates |
10.3.1. | Number of diabetics, diagnosis percentage and distribution between Type 1 and Type 2 |
10.3.2. | Insulin pump use and adoption rate |
10.3.3. | CGM use and adoption rate |
10.3.4. | Comparison between the two methodologies |
11. | COMPANY PROFILES |
11.1. | List of company profiles |
11.1.1. | Bonbouton |
11.1.2. | Companion Medical |
11.1.3. | Dexcom |
11.1.4. | DIABNEXT |
11.1.5. | Emperra Diabetes Care |
11.1.6. | GlySens |
11.1.7. | Google - Verily |
11.1.8. | GSI Technologies |
11.1.9. | LifeScan (Johnson & Johnson) |
11.1.10. | Medtronic |
11.1.11. | Pkvitality |
11.1.12. | Sensoria |
11.1.13. | Siren Care Denmark |
Slides | 260 |
---|---|
Companies | 75 |
Forecasts to | 2029 |