Off Grid & Energy Harvesting Report

Multi-billion dollar investments are boosting sales to multi-billion dollar level

Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) 2018-2028

Market forecast, technology roadmap, AWES, CKP, HAWP, BAT: kite, aerostat, drone

Table of Contents
1.1.Purpose of this report
1.2.Primary conclusions: the MW grid opportunity most are chasing
1.3.Primary conclusions: the opportunity beyond MW grid
1.4.Market driven approach
1.5.Off-Grid Energy Harvesting technology intermittent power generated
1.6.Main options taken seriously
1.7.Some of the risks and misleading claims identified
1.8.Big gap in the market
1.9.1.Conventional wind power reaches its limits
1.9.2.Next stage AWE?
1.9.3.The technical opportunity
1.9.4.Market requirements by parameter for small vs large AWES
1.9.5.Current appraisal of largest addressable markets
1.9.6.No guarantees
1.10.Diesel killer or wind turbine killer?
1.10.1.Kill some diesel: prospect for low power AWEs off-grid
1.10.2.Kill some wind turbines and use "impossibly poor wind" locations: prospect for large on-grid AWEs
1.11.Energy Independent shipping
1.12.Potential for multi-mode
1.13.Choice of altitude
1.14.Capacity factor
1.15.On-grid vs off-grid, optimal power
1.16.Investment by technology: wrong focus
1.17.Technology choice
1.18.The lightning flash dilemma
1.19.The illumination at night dilemma
1.20.Killing birds and bats
1.21.Derisked technology
1.23.1.Most promising future AWE system providers
1.24.Investment timeline
1.25.Technology roadmap 1900-2038
1.26.Commercialisation roadmap 2017-2025
1.26.1.Overview and roadmap
1.26.2.Effect of plummeting cost of offshore wind farms
1.27.Market forecast 2017-2038
1.28.Sophisticated technology, often primitive marketing
1.28.1.Over simplification
1.28.2.The addressable market
1.28.5.Wind power where there is no (ground) wind
1.28.6.Multiple benefits
1.28.7.Energy independent electric vehicles; fully responsive renewable gensets without battery storage: fully responsive wind farms
1.29.Example of opportunity: Ukraine
2.1.Definition of energy harvesting
2.2.Need for high power harvesting
2.3.Characteristics of energy harvesting
2.4.Capacity factors, utilisation factors and load factors
2.5.Offshore energy innovation could leverage AWES
2.6.World's biggest wind turbines go online near Liverpool UK
3.1.Definition and scope
3.2.Many modes and applications compared
3.2.1.Options by medium
3.2.2.Examples compared
3.2.3.Photovoltaics: Natural AWE partner
4.2.The jargon
4.3.Favoured technologies
4.3.1.Aerostat and autogiro
4.3.2.Tethered devices
4.3.3.Passive tether formats
4.4.ABB assessment
4.5.Rotating dual kites the ultimate?
4.6.Main options still taken seriously
5.1.Aenarete Netherlands
5.2.Aerosense Japan
5.3.Airloom Energy USA
5.4.Altaeros Energies USA
5.5.Ampyx Power Netherlands
5.5.2.Ampyx in the past: consistency of purpose and meeting objectives
5.5.3.Ampyx Power in 2017: doing what it said it would do
5.5.4.Airborne Wind Energy questions for Ampyx Power
5.5.5.Update - 2017
5.5.6.Mocean Offshore BV update August 2017
5.5.7.IDTechEx "Off Grid Energy Independence" conference update April 2018
5.5.8.Part I: Launch & land
5.5.9.Part II the drone
5.5.10.Part III safe power
5.6.Artemis Intelligent Power
5.7.AWESCO European Union
5.7.1.PhD programs
5.8.Bladetips Energy France
5.8.1.Update from the IDTechEx "Off Grid Energy Independence" conference April 2018
5.9.Delft University of Technology Netherlands/ Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences Germany
5.10.e-Kite Netherlands
5.11.EnerKite Germany
5.12.e-Wind Solutions USA
5.13.Kite Power Systems UK
5.13.2.The technology
5.13.4.Further comment
5.14.KiteGen Italy
5.15.Kitemill Norway
5.15.1.Kitemill presentation at IDTechEx Energy Independent Electric Vehicle event September 26-27 2017 Delft
5.15.2.Interview September 28 2017
5.15.4.Interview with Kitemill - 25 March 2017
5.16.Kitenergy Italy
5.16.1.Kitenergy presentation at IDTechEx Energy Independent Electric Vehicle event September 26-27 2017 Delft
5.16.2.Interview Sept 28 2017
5.16.3.Earlier information
5.17.Kitepower Netherlands
5.17.1.Interview September 28 2017
5.17.3.Announcement in June 2017
5.17.4.Kitepower presentation at IDTechEx Energy Independent Electric Vehicle event September 26-27 2017 Delft
5.18.Kiteswarms UK, Germany
5.19.Kitewinder France
5.20.KiteX Denmark
5.21.kPower USA
5.22.2.The system
5.23.Omnidea Portugal
5.24.Open Source AWE
5.25.Pierre Benhaïem, Conception, Troyes Area, France
5.26.Rotokite Italy
5.27.Skypull Switzerland
5.28.SkySails Power Germany
5.28.1.EnBW joins kite-wind project
5.29.Superturbine ™ USA, France
5.30.SwissKitePower Project Switzerland
5.31.Technical University Munich Germany
5.32.TwingTec Switzerland
5.32.1.TwingTec interview May 3rd, 2017
5.33.University of Limerick
5.34.Upwind Portugal
5.35.Windlift USA
5.36.Windswept and Interesting UK
6.1.Guangdong High Altitude Wind Power China/ SkyWind USA
6.2.Highest Wind USA
6.3.Joby Energy USA
6.4.Magenn Power Canada
1.1.Some challenges
1.2.Comparison of the very different markets for small and large AWES showing features usually essential in red and features sometimes valued in yellow.
1.3.Remote power and microgrid global market $ billion
1.4.Degrees of autonomy for AWES
1.5.Comparison of some AWE developers intending commercialisation. Most promising for successful commercialisation of those investigated so far are shown red.
1.6.Technology roadmap 1900-2038
1.7.Declared intentions for commercialisation and possible achievements
1.8.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of installed fully-functional AWE systems 100kW and below 2017-2038 number, unit price, market value
1.9.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of installed fully-functional AWE systems above 100kW2017-2038 number, unit price, market value
1.10.IDTechEx forecast of manufacturers of installed fully-functional AWE systems 2017-2038
1.11.IDTechEx forecast of numbers of AWE drones 2017-2038
3.1.Some modes of high power, 10 watts or more, electrodynamic energy harvesting with related processes highlighted in green
3.2.Examples of actual high power electrodynamic harvesting by type, sub type and manufacturer with comment. Those in volume production now are in yellow, within five years in grey, those with much development but no volume production
1.1.Each major wind turbine company has a $100 million research budget: perceptions
1.2.Evolution of wind turbine heights and output
1.3.Weak and strong business cases within the two main AWE addressable markets.
1.4.Conventional wind turbine compared to AWE.
1.5.Competitive position of AWE against other energy sources. Illustrative and contentious.
1.6.Spider diagram for the attributes of 30-150kW off-grid AWES bought singly, when its key challenges are overcome, compared with diesel gensets, conventional wind turbines and photovoltaics producing similar power.
1.7.Spider diagram for the attributes of 1-5 MW off-grid AWES bought in wind farms, when its key challenges are overcome, compared with conventional wind turbines, tidal and wave power and photovoltaics producing similar power. LCoE =
1.8.Energy independent ship opportunity
1.9.How a mobile AWE generator can double as solar in sea container format. We understand that a French company is developing such an AWE+solar sea container but details are as yet secret.
1.10.Typical wind speed vs altitude - some AWE dilemmas. Optimal altitudes vary per system from 300 meters to about 1000 meters.
1.11.Average power density at 400ft top and 2000ft bottom where it particularly benefits the large communities in North America central and eastern, Europe and east to Moscow and Ukraine, East Asia central and, less populated, South Am
1.12.On-grid vs off-grid AWE opportunity by power of unit
1.13.Ground-gen a) vs fly-gen b)
1.14.Generation a) and recovery b)
1.15.Scalability, safety and autonomy challenges by type of AWE shown green and conventional wind turbine shown blue.
1.16.Some of the organisations that have been involved in airborne wind energy
1.17.AWE technology by altitude flown/ soon to be flown and trajectory showing figure of eight YoYo pumping action and height of 2-300 meters - usually lower than the highest conventional wind turbines and not therefore necessarily acc
1.18.Investment timeline
1.19.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of AWE systems 100kW and below 2017-2028 number
1.20.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of AWE systems 100kW and below 2017-2028 showing average unit price
1.21.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of AWE systems 100kW and below 2017-2028 market value
1.22.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of AWE systems above 100kW 2017-2028 number
1.23.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of AWE systems above 100kW 2017-2028 showing average unit price increasing due to size and power increase
1.24.IDTechEx forecast of global sales of AWE systems above 100kW 2017-2028 market value
1.25.IDTechEx forecast of manufacturers of installed fully-functional AWE systems 2017-2028
1.26.IDTechEx forecast of numbers of AWE drones 2017-2028
1.27.US average levelized costs for plants entering service in 2018 with IDTechEx indication of AWE targets and diesel generation cost in remote regions shown as blue arrow.
1.28.Conventional wind turbine sales MW yearly 1991-2007
1.29.Renewable share in Remap 2030 model
1.30.Location of almost all large wind turbines in Ukraine with wind map at ground level
1.31.Wind turbine at Kiev International Airport
3.1.Background to PV for energy independent vehicles
3.2.One dream: Solar road/ AWE dynamic vehicle charging.
4.1.Twind and tumbling wing aerostat concepts top and blimp version and system below.
4.2.Principle of U kite generator
4.3.Passive tether configurations
4.4.Early options for the flying device
4.5.Early Ground-Gen examples of parameters
4.6.ABB assessment
4.7.Tether drag solution
4.8.Main options still taken seriously with examples of developers
5.1.Altaeros BAT airborne wind turbine compared
5.2.Ampyx Power presentation October 2017
5.3.Ampyx Power business plan presented to IDTechEx 2017
5.4.Ampyx Power staff
5.5.Kite Power 2
5.6.E-Kite system
5.7.e-Kite system
5.8.E-kite ground station
5.9.EnerKite presentation at the IDTechEx Energy Independent Electric vehicle event TU Delft September 2017
5.10.eWind system
5.11.e-Wind proposition hiring land from farmers
5.12.Two kite system
5.13.KiteGen kite providing supplementary power to a ship
5.14.Parameters compared
5.15.Aircraft, winch and operating station
5.16.Typical vertical wind profiles above boundary layer
5.17.Production and return
5.18.Output power vs wind speed
5.19.Global development of LCoE for solar and wind compared to the scenario for Airborne Wind.
5.20.Ground generator and kite
5.21.Kitenergy technology
5.22.Operating Data
5.23.System operation
5.24.The wing
5.25.The floating wind turbine
5.26.The ground generator
5.27.Kite-X laboratory
5.28.Makani-x Freiburg Germany October 2017
5.29.Makani AWES in action
5.30.Evidence cited by Makani
5.31.Power profile
5.32.Circular trajectory with parameters vs conventional wind turbine.
5.33.600 kW energy kite
5.34.Future models envisaged
5.35.Google patented ideas
5.36.Regions where conventional wind turbines and Makani can operate
5.37.Basis of EC FP7 HAWE program headed by Omnidea
5.38.Rotating reeling
5.39.Rotating tether spinning kite collapses for retrieval before next power run.
5.40.Images from assessment
5.41.Average wind power density
5.42.Skysails system
5.43.Superturbine ™
5.44.TwingTec presentation October 2017
5.45.TwingTec USP
5.46.W&I kite systems
6.1.Guangdong HAWP
6.2.Joby system
6.3.Magenn air rotor system

Subscription Enquiry