Cadres organométalliques 2025-2035 : marchés, technologies et prévisions
Matériaux à structure organométallique (MOF) pour le captage du carbone, la récupération de l'eau, le CVC, la séparation et la purification chimiques, le stockage du gaz et d'autres applications à un stade précoce avec analyse des acteurs, tendances et prévisions.
Show All
Description
Contents, Table & Figures List
FAQs
Pricing
Related Content
Driven by carbon capture as a major application, the metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) market is expected to grow 30-fold over the next decade. MOFs are a class of materials with exceptionally high porosity and surface area (up to 7000m2/g). The design flexibility and structural versatility afforded by MOFs have attracted widespread interest in numerous applications, albeit with several unsuccessful attempts to commercialize the materials historically. However, the tunability, cycling stability, and selective adsorption/desorption characteristics of these materials are opening opportunities for commercialization as energy-efficient alternatives for a range of critical energy-intensive technologies. In addition to carbon capture, these also include water harvesting for potable water production and HVAC systems, and various chemical separations and purification processes (e.g. gas separations, air filtration, direct lithium extraction, PFAS removal, and many more).
As MOF-based technologies approach commercialization, IDTechEx's report offers an independent analysis of key trends and considers applications of MOFs for several other early-stage technologies, including hydrogen storage, energy storage (e.g. batteries), semiconductors, sensors, and more. Informed by insights gained from primary research, the report analyzes key players in the field and provides market forecasts in terms of yearly mass demand and market value segmented by application.
Evolution of the price of MOFs towards commercial applications. Source: IDTechEx
Manufacturing MOFs
Industrial implementation depends on material availability, quality, and affordability. Most MOFs developed in research labs are synthesized using solvothermal methods on the milligrams scale. To produce MOFs on an industrial scale, the production methods need to be scalable. In addition, raw material availability is a critical factor in determining the commercial viability of a MOF. With over 100,000 reported structures, only a handful meet the criteria for potential commercialization. Using key insights gained from interviews with key players such as BASF, Numat, and Promethean Particles, this report critically assesses the merits and challenges of the various approaches undertaken by manufacturers to upscale MOF production. Informed by primary research, the factors that impact the production costs and ultimately the selling price of MOFs are also addressed. The report also presents an overview of the production capacities of key manufacturers.
MOFs for Carbon Capture
Deploying carbon capture technologies is an important tool for meeting net zero emission goals. However, despite the fair level of maturity of amine solvent-based methods (i.e. amine scrubbing) to capture CO2, deployment is still limited mainly due to the large installation cost and energy consumption associated with solvent regeneration. MOF-based modular solid sorbent carbon capture systems are gaining momentum, driven by significantly reduced energy requirements for sorbent regeneration, improved sorbent stability, CO2 selectivity, and lower capital expenditure compared to solvent-based systems. This report examines the material properties and strategies to tune capture performance and assesses the progress in point source and direct air capture applications. Through interviews with players such as Nuada, AspiraDAC, UniSieve, and others, the market activity and outlook of systems being developed by players are addressed with comparisons of technology readiness levels and commercial opportunity. The report forecasts the yearly material mass and market revenue for both point source and direct air capture technologies based on MOFs and the yearly carbon capture capacity using MOF-based solutions.
MOFs for Chemical Separations and Purification
Chemical separation and purification constitute core operations of manufacturing industries such as chemical production, mining, and oil and gas refining. Conventional distillation-based thermal chemical separation processes have significant drawbacks: they require a large spatial footprint, substantial capital expenditure, and are very energy-intensive. The tunable chemical selectivity and controllable pore architecture of MOFs enable selective separation of chemicals when used as solid sorbents or membranes. For example, MOF-based membrane manufacturer UniSieve told IDTechEx that it has demonstrated the separation of chemicals that have boiling points within ~5°C using its non-thermal membrane technology, which otherwise would require energy-intensive thermal separation using ~100m high distillation columns. Advances in applications such as refrigerant reclamation, direct lithium extraction, and several gas separation and purification processes such as biogas upgrading, and polymer grade propylene production, and more are evaluated within the report.
MOFs for water harvesting and HVAC Technologies
Atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) technologies using advanced sorbents (e.g. MOFs) offer an opportunity to harness water resources in regions where traditional water sources are limited. Additionally, heating and cooling effects induced by water adsorption and desorption properties of MOFs can also be used for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that can operate with up to 75% reduced electricity consumption compared to conventional vapor compression refrigeration technologies. This is specifically critical as the global electricity consumption by HVAC systems is expected to triple by 2050 with the surge in demand, especially in Asia and the Middle East. IDTechEx's report covers material and technology advances in AWH and HVAC systems that integrate MOFs with benchmarks and comparisons of the key performance metrics with other sorbents. The report also highlights the key players at the forefront of developing and commercializing these technologies.
MOFs for Gas Storage, Energy Storage, and Other Early-Stage Applications
MOFs are also being explored for gas storage applications, with US-based MOF manufacturer Numat having commercialized its ION-X range for the storage of dopant gases for the semiconductor industry. Several start-ups are also developing prototypes of MOF-based natural gas storage solutions to support gas supply networks, whilst developments in hydrogen storage applications are lagging. Energy storage and applications in batteries are also areas MOFs are witnessing a lot of interest with players such as Svolt, GM, LG Energy, and others leading R&D activities. Several other early-stage applications are also discussed in the report such as catalysis, sensors, and more.
The varied applications of MOFs present a large scope for the adoption of MOF-based technologies, particularly in applications where MOFs can result in a material reduction in energy consumption and operational costs. These include carbon capture, chemical separations, and water harvesting. However, these technologies have not yet been demonstrated on an industrial scale and novel technologies can be considered risky which may become a barrier to early adoption. Additionally, incumbent technologies have a stronghold in the key target markets, and MOFs may struggle to gain market share. With the advent of several commercial products over the next decade, MOF-based technologies will need to demonstrate their performance at scale. This must also be complemented by a sustained growth in manufacturing capacity using scalable methods. IDTechEx predicts this market will grow at 40% CAGR from 2025 to 2035.
Carbon Capture is Forecast to be a Key Driver of Growth in Demand for MOF Materials. Source: IDTechEx
Key Aspects
This report provides key market insights into metal-organic frameworks (MOF) materials, manufacturing methods, pricing considerations, and several key emerging applications.
The report provides an overview of MOFs, with critical assessment of material production and upscaling strategies:
- Manufacturing methods adopted by key players to upscale production including key comparisons
- Downstream processes
- Material pricing considerations and key contributions to production costs
- Production capacity of key players and examples of planned expansions
Material properties and analysis, market activity, key comparisons with incumbent technologies and more are evaluated for key applications, including:
- Carbon capture including point source and direct air capture technologies using MOF sorbents and membranes
- Water harvesting for atmospheric water harvesting and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) technologies using MOF sorbents
- Chemical separations and purification technologies (e.g. air filtration, refrigerant reclamation, direct lithium extraction, gas separations, biogas upgrading, wastewater treatment, and more) using MOF membranes and sorbents
- Gas storage and other early-stage applications including sensors, catalysis, energy storage (e.g. batteries, supercapacitors, and thermal management), biomedical applications (e.g. drug delivery), agricultural applications for soil cultivation and targeted release of actives, and more.
The report also provides 10 year market forecasts & analysis segmented by key applications:
- Total MOF market by application (tonnes)
- Total MOF market by application (US$)
- Carbon capture capacity for point source and direct air capture using MOF-based technologies (tonnes per annum)
| Report Metrics | Details |
|---|---|
| Historic Data | 2023 - 2024 |
| CAGR | Metal-organic frameworks market to grow at a CAGR of 40% between 2025 to 2035. |
| Forecast Period | 2025 - 2035 |
| Forecast Units | Tonnes, US$ |
| Regions Covered | Worldwide, Japan, North America (USA + Canada), Europe |
| Segments Covered | Manufacturing methods, cost and pricing considerations, carbon capture (point source and direct air capture), water harvesting (atmospheric water harvesting and HVAC technologies), chemical separations and purification (e.g. refrigerant reclamation, direct lithium extraction, PFAS removal, gas separations), gas storage, energy storage (e.g. batteries), other early-stage applications (catalysis, drug delivery, agriculture, and more) |
Analyst access from IDTechEx
All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.
Further information
If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact our report team at research@IDTechEx.com or call one of our sales managers:
ASIA: +82 10 3896 6219
| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | Metal-organic frameworks are tunable, porous materials with high surface area |
| 1.2. | Translation from laboratories to industrial manufacturing is a key challenge |
| 1.3. | Standard batch synthesis is the preferred method by large manufacturers |
| 1.4. | IDTechEx outlook for MOF production |
| 1.5. | Main applications are carbon capture, water harvesting, and chemical separation |
| 1.6. | Carbon capture technologies are key to achieving net zero emission goals |
| 1.7. | MOFs can reduce energy requirements and operational costs for carbon capture |
| 1.8. | Benchmark: MOF-based point source capture vs amine scrubbing |
| 1.9. | MOF-based technologies are advancing in point source carbon capture |
| 1.10. | IDTechEx outlook for MOFs in carbon capture |
| 1.11. | Forecast 2025-2035: CO2 Capture Capacity using MOFs - DAC vs Point Source |
| 1.12. | MOFs can increase energy efficiency of water harvesting and HVAC systems |
| 1.13. | Benchmark: MOFs and other sorbents for atmospheric water harvesting |
| 1.14. | Benchmark: MOF-based AWH and HVAC technologies vs incumbent systems |
| 1.15. | Landscape of MOF-based water harvesting and dehumidification companies |
| 1.16. | IDTechEx outlook for MOFs in water harvesting and HVAC systems |
| 1.17. | Wide scope of applications for MOFs in chemical separations and purification |
| 1.18. | IDTechEx outlook of MOFs in chemical separations and purifications |
| 1.19. | Research on MOFs for numerous applications is in the early stages |
| 1.20. | Player landscape of recent patent activity (excluding academic institutions) |
| 1.21. | Forecast 2025-2035: Total Material Demand (mass) |
| 1.22. | Forecast 2025-2035: Total Market Revenue |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION TO METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS (MOFS) |
| 2.1. | Introduction to metal-organic frameworks |
| 2.2. | Numerous structures of MOFs exist with a large scope of applications |
| 2.3. | MOFs in carbon capture and removal with emerging commercial applications |
| 2.4. | Commercial applications emerging for MOFs in gas storage and transport |
| 2.5. | MOF-based catalysts beginning to appear in the market for catalysis |
| 2.6. | MOFs are promising candidates for separation and purification |
| 2.7. | MOFs demonstrating potential in water harvesting and air conditioning systems |
| 2.8. | MOF-based fuel cell membranes not ready for commercialization |
| 2.9. | MOFs in energy storage may be limited by complex material synthesis |
| 2.10. | Academic research is driving exploration of MOFs in sensors |
| 2.11. | MOFs in biomedical applications encounter barriers to clinical translation |
| 2.12. | Material benchmark: MOFs vs other solid adsorbents |
| 2.13. | Scalability and high cost have been main historical barriers to commercialization |
| 3. | MANUFACTURING METHODS, PRODUCTION CAPACITY, AND PRICING CONSIDERATIONS |
| 3.1.1. | Translation from laboratories to industrial manufacturing is challenging |
| 3.1.2. | Factors to consider for industrial manufacturing of MOFs |
| 3.2. | Manufacturing Processes |
| 3.2.1. | Overview of common manufacturing processes |
| 3.2.2. | Solvothermal and hydrothermal synthesis used for bench scale production |
| 3.2.3. | Mechanochemical synthesis can enable large scale continuous production |
| 3.2.4. | Electrochemical synthesis |
| 3.2.5. | Spray-drying synthesis |
| 3.2.6. | Other examples of synthesis methods |
| 3.2.7. | Benchmarking common MOF manufacturing methods (1/2) |
| 3.2.8. | Benchmarking common MOF manufacturing methods (2/2) |
| 3.3. | Downstream Processes |
| 3.3.1. | Downstream processing |
| 3.3.2. | Shaping processes are necessary to obtain functional MOF products |
| 3.4. | Key Players |
| 3.4.1. | BASF uses large scale batch synthesis for industrial MOF production |
| 3.4.2. | BASF's position on batch vs continuous processes |
| 3.4.3. | BASF's process and cost considerations |
| 3.4.4. | Continuous flow hydrothermal synthesis for large-scale manufacturing |
| 3.4.5. | Morphologies obtained using Promethean's manufacturing process |
| 3.4.6. | Immaterial is scaling up its process to manufacture monolithic MOFs |
| 3.4.7. | Atomis has a patented process to manufacture MOFs |
| 3.4.8. | Mitsui Kinzoku is establishing scaled-up production system |
| 3.4.9. | SyncMOF can recommend and manufacture MOFs on the tonnes scale |
| 3.4.10. | Numat is expanding its manufacturing capability and commercializing products |
| 3.4.11. | EU4MOF: Initiative to accelerate MOF commercialization |
| 3.5. | Cost and Pricing Considerations |
| 3.5.1. | Key contributions to the production costs: Materials and manufacturing |
| 3.5.2. | Cost of raw materials is often prohibitive for large scale MOF production |
| 3.5.3. | MOFs with industrially available ligands can target a competitive selling price |
| 3.6. | Player Landscape and Production Capacity |
| 3.6.1. | Overview of MOF manufacturers |
| 3.6.2. | Landscape of MOF manufacturers and production capacity |
| 3.6.3. | Current Production Capacity and Planned Expansions |
| 3.7. | Outlook |
| 3.7.1. | IDTechEx outlook for MOF production |
| 4. | MOFS FOR CARBON CAPTURE |
| 4.1.1. | Growing global CO2 emissions is a challenge for tackling climate change |
| 4.1.2. | Industrial sources of emission and CO2 content varies with emission source |
| 4.1.3. | Current large-scale carbon capture facilities use solvent-based capture |
| 4.1.4. | For more information on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage |
| 4.2. | Carbon Capture Using MOF Sorbents |
| 4.2.1. | Overview of solid sorbents explored for carbon capture |
| 4.2.2. | Operation of solid sorbent-based DAC and point source adsorption systems |
| 4.2.3. | MOF-based sorbents approaching commercialization in carbon capture |
| 4.2.4. | Gas composition impacts the CO2 adsorption characteristics of MOFs |
| 4.2.5. | Different strategies for MOF development and binding mechanisms |
| 4.2.6. | Examples of MOFs with open metal sites |
| 4.2.7. | CO2 selectivity in humid conditions is a key challenge for DAC |
| 4.2.8. | Using DFT and AI tools to advance discovery of new MOFs for carbon capture |
| 4.2.9. | PriSMA platform integrates materials, process design, TEA, and LCA |
| 4.2.10. | CALF-20: A MOF that is being commercialized for point source capture |
| 4.2.11. | ZnH functionality on MOFs can enhance CO2 capture at high temperatures |
| 4.3. | Considerations for MOF Selection |
| 4.3.1. | Factors to consider when selecting MOF sorbents for carbon capture (1/2) |
| 4.3.2. | Factors to consider when selecting MOF sorbents for carbon capture (2/2) |
| 4.3.3. | Lower energy penalty for regeneration is a key driver for MOF-based sorbents |
| 4.4. | Membrane-based CO2 Separation |
| 4.4.1. | Membrane-based CO2 separation for carbon capture |
| 4.4.2. | MOF-based membranes for carbon capture |
| 4.4.3. | CO2 separation using MOF glass show potential in membrane applications |
| 4.5. | Market Activity for MOF Sorbents and Membranes - Point Source |
| 4.5.1. | Promethean Particles targets its MOFs for applications in carbon capture |
| 4.5.2. | Nuada's point source carbon capture technology is operating at pilot scale |
| 4.5.3. | Captivate Technology developing solution based on MUF-16 |
| 4.5.4. | Svante's carbon capture technology is approaching commercialization |
| 4.5.5. | Estimated capture costs using Svante's technology |
| 4.5.6. | Comparison of key MOF-based point source capture systems (1/2) |
| 4.5.7. | Comparison of key MOF-based point source capture systems (2/2) |
| 4.5.8. | MOFs used in key planned or operational CCUS projects (1/2) |
| 4.5.9. | MOFs used in key planned or operational CCUS projects (2/2) |
| 4.5.10. | SWOT assessment of MOF sorbents for point source carbon capture |
| 4.5.11. | UniSieve is developing MOF-based membranes for carbon capture |
| 4.5.12. | Orchestra Sci is developing membrane-based CO2 capture system |
| 4.5.13. | Comparison of key MOF-based membrane CO2 separation systems |
| 4.6. | Market Activity for MOF Sorbents - DAC |
| 4.6.1. | AspiraDAC's modular solar-powered DAC units gearing towards pilot scale |
| 4.6.2. | Mosaic Materials is upscaling its modular MOF-based DAC systems |
| 4.6.3. | Avnos's DAC removes CO2 and produces water for moisture swing adsorption |
| 4.6.4. | CSIRO's AirthenaTM DAC technology for industrial onsite gaseous CO2 supply |
| 4.6.5. | SyncMOF manufactures MOFs and engineers devices for carbon capture |
| 4.6.6. | Atoco is developing MOF-based point source and DAC solutions |
| 4.6.7. | Comparison of key MOF-based DAC systems |
| 4.6.8. | Comparison of key MOF-based DAC systems (2/2) |
| 4.7. | Comparisons with Incumbent Technology |
| 4.7.1. | Comparison of MOF-based point source capture with amine scrubbing (1/2) |
| 4.7.2. | Comparison of MOF-based point source capture with amine scrubbing (2/2) |
| 4.7.3. | Comparison of MOF-based DAC with aqueous solution-based DAC |
| 4.8. | Company Landscape |
| 4.8.1. | MOF-based carbon capture technologies |
| 4.8.2. | MOF-based carbon capture company landscape |
| 4.9. | Outlook |
| 4.9.1. | Key MOF development challenges that need to be tackled for carbon capture |
| 4.9.2. | Current challenges in carbon capture |
| 4.9.3. | IDTechEx outlook for MOFs in carbon capture |
| 4.9.4. | Forecast 2025-2035: MOFs for Carbon Capture |
| 4.9.5. | Forecast 2025-2035: CO2 Capture Capacity using MOFs - DAC vs Point Source |
| 5. | MOFS FOR WATER HARVESTING AND HVAC |
| 5.1.1. | Current AWH and HVAC systems are inefficient and energy-intensive |
| 5.1.2. | Wide range of applications for atmospheric water harvesting |
| 5.1.3. | Sorbents for water harvesting have a set of key requirements |
| 5.2. | MOFs for Water Harvesting |
| 5.2.1. | MOFs can adsorb water at lower humidity levels compared to other sorbents |
| 5.2.2. | Water adsorption isotherms of selected MOFs |
| 5.2.3. | Linear relationship between MOF pore volume and water uptake capacity |
| 5.2.4. | Solar powered device using MOF-801 harvested ~2.8L of water daily at 20%RH |
| 5.2.5. | MOF-303 tested for atmospheric water harvesting in Death Valley desert |
| 5.2.6. | Benchmark of sorbents for atmospheric water harvesting |
| 5.3. | Market Activity |
| 5.3.1. | AirJoule is commercializing its system for AWH and HVAC |
| 5.3.2. | Working principles of AirJoule's system |
| 5.3.3. | WaHa is commercializing its Vaporator® technology for AWH and HVAC |
| 5.3.4. | Framergy is commercialising AYRSORBTM F100 MOF for AWH and HVAC |
| 5.3.5. | Atomis and Daikin have patented a MOF-based AWH and humidity control device |
| 5.3.6. | Honeywell has partnered with Numat to develop MOF-based AWH device |
| 5.3.7. | Transaera is developing MOF-based hybrid air conditioning systems |
| 5.3.8. | Atoco is developing MOF-based water harvesting technology |
| 5.4. | Technology Assessment and Benchmarks |
| 5.4.1. | Comparison of MOF-based AWH and dehumidification systems (1/2) |
| 5.4.2. | Comparison of MOF-based AWH and dehumidification systems (2/2) |
| 5.4.3. | Benchmark: MOF-based AWH and HVAC technologies vs incumbent systems |
| 5.4.4. | SWOT Assessment of MOFs for AWH and HVAC |
| 5.5. | Company Landscape |
| 5.5.1. | Landscape of MOF-based water harvesting and dehumidification companies |
| 5.6. | Outlook |
| 5.6.1. | IDTechEx outlook for MOFs in water harvesting and HVAC systems |
| 5.6.2. | Forecast 2025-2035: MOFs for Water Harvesting & HVAC |
| 6. | MOFS FOR CHEMICAL SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION |
| 6.1.1. | Current chemical separation and purification processes are energy-intensive |
| 6.1.2. | Common industrial separation and purification technologies |
| 6.1.3. | Example applications of separation technologies |
| 6.1.4. | Key criteria for emerging technologies |
| 6.2. | MOF-based Mixed Membrane Matrices |
| 6.2.1. | Membrane-based separation technologies |
| 6.2.2. | CO2/CH4 separation has opportunities for MOF-based membranes |
| 6.2.3. | CO2/CH4 separation using MOF-based mixed membrane matrices |
| 6.2.4. | Impact of MOF loading on CO2/CH4 separation performance |
| 6.2.5. | Separation of C3H6/C3H8 using MOF-based mixed membrane matrices |
| 6.2.6. | MOF-based membranes are being explored for direct lithium extraction |
| 6.2.7. | Challenges and considerations |
| 6.3. | MOF-based Sorbents |
| 6.3.1. | Opportunities for challenging gas separation processes using MOF sorbents |
| 6.3.2. | Other examples of gas separations using MOF sorbents |
| 6.3.3. | Wastewater treatment using MOF sorbents in academic literature |
| 6.3.4. | MOF sorbents demonstrating PFAS removal and remediation |
| 6.3.5. | Refrigerant reclamation is key to meeting targets in Kigali Amendment |
| 6.3.6. | Refrigerant reclamation using MOF-based adsorptive separation |
| 6.4. | Market Activity for MOF-based Separation Technologies |
| 6.4.1. | Daikin and Atomis patented MOF-based technology to separate refrigerants |
| 6.4.2. | Daikin's current refrigerant recovery and reclamation efforts |
| 6.4.3. | UniSieve's membrane technology can separate propylene to 99.5% purity |
| 6.4.4. | Numat has commercialized MOF-based chemical filtration solutions |
| 6.4.5. | Tetramer is developing chemical protection and water purification solutions |
| 6.4.6. | EnergyX uses MOF-based MMMs for direct lithium extraction |
| 6.4.7. | Framergy has developed MOFs for gas purification |
| 6.4.8. | Squair Tech developed ST-Sorb13 for formaldehyde removal |
| 6.4.9. | Examples of patent application activity for separation and purification |
| 6.5. | Technology Assessment and Comparisons |
| 6.5.1. | Comparison of incumbent and emerging MOF-based separation technologies |
| 6.5.2. | Energy reduction for propane-propylene separation using membrane systems |
| 6.6. | Company Landscape |
| 6.6.1. | MOF-based chemical separation and purification company landscape |
| 6.7. | Outlook |
| 6.7.1. | Medium-term opportunities in hybrid separation systems |
| 6.7.2. | IDTechEx outlook of MOFs in chemical separations and purifications |
| 6.7.3. | Forecast 2025-2035: MOFs for Chemical Separations & Purification |
| 7. | OTHER APPLICATIONS - COMMERCIAL AND EARLY-STAGE RESEARCH |
| 7.1.1. | Research on MOFs for numerous applications is in the early stages |
| 7.2. | Gas Storage and Transport |
| 7.2.1. | Immaterial is developing MOF-based gas storage systems |
| 7.2.2. | H2MOF targeting long term hydrogen storage and long-haul transportation |
| 7.2.3. | Atomis is commercializing MOF-based gas storage solutions |
| 7.2.4. | BASF was previously unsuccessful at commercializing MOFs for NGVs |
| 7.2.5. | Numat has commercialized its ION-X gas storage and delivery systems |
| 7.2.6. | MOFs for hydrogen storage have key challenges to overcome |
| 7.3. | Sensors |
| 7.3.1. | Lantha Sensors is developing MOF-based sensors for chemical analysis |
| 7.3.2. | Matrix Sensors is developing MOF-based gas sensors for sorbent analysis |
| 7.3.3. | MOFs explored as sensors for food safety and motion sensing in academia |
| 7.4. | Membranes for PEM Fuel Cells |
| 7.5. | Energy Storage |
| 7.5.1. | Integration of MOFs into batteries is being explored to improve performance |
| 7.5.2. | Patent applications: Several players exploring MOFs for secondary cells |
| 7.5.3. | Framergy, NovoMOF, and EnergyX have explored MOFs for Li-ion batteries |
| 7.5.4. | MOF-based composite materials can be used for battery thermal management |
| 7.5.5. | MOF-based supercapacitors in academic literature |
| 7.5.6. | MOFs for thermal energy storage in academic literature |
| 7.6. | Semiconductors |
| 7.6.1. | MOFs in semiconductor devices to improve insulation and dielectric properties |
| 7.7. | Catalysis |
| 7.7.1. | Framergy is developing MOFs for catalytic degradation of harmful chemicals |
| 7.7.2. | Iron-based MOFs for breakdown of NOx gases under ambient conditions |
| 7.7.3. | Photocatalytic dye degradation using MOF-nanoparticle composites |
| 7.8. | Biomedical Applications |
| 7.8.1. | Targeted drug release using MOFs for orally delivered drugs |
| 7.8.2. | Targeted delivery of chemotherapy drugs using biocompatible MOFs |
| 7.9. | Others |
| 7.9.1. | MOFs can stabilize qubits at room temperature for quantum computing |
| 7.9.2. | Applications of MOFs in agriculture |
| 8. | PATENTS: TRENDS AND OVERVIEW |
| 8.1. | Trends in MOF-related patents applications 2006-2025 and the legal status |
| 8.2. | Global distribution of MOF-related patents and the top assignees |
| 8.3. | Top Applicants Over Time 2006-2025: BASF a key leader but others emerging |
| 8.4. | Patent examples published 2024 onwards: Granted or under examination (1/2) |
| 8.5. | Patent examples published 2024 onwards: Granted or under examination (2/2) |
| 8.6. | Player landscape of recent patent activity (excluding academic institutions) |
| 9. | FORECASTS |
| 9.1. | Methodology |
| 9.2. | MOF Pricing Considerations |
| 9.3. | Forecast 2025-2035: MOFs for Carbon Capture |
| 9.4. | Forecast 2025-2035: CO2 Capture Capacity using MOFs - DAC vs Point Source |
| 9.5. | Forecast 2025-2035: MOFs for Water Harvesting & HVAC |
| 9.6. | Forecast 2025-2035: MOFs for Chemical Separations & Purification |
| 9.7. | Forecast 2025-2035: Total Material Demand (mass) |
| 9.8. | Forecast 2025-2035: Total Market Revenue |
| 9.9. | Progression of the metal-organic frameworks market |
| 9.10. | Comparison with previous forecast: 2024 version vs 2025 version |
| 10. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 10.1. | AspiraDAC: MOF-Based DAC Technology Using Solar Power |
| 10.2. | Atoco (MOF-Based AWH and Carbon Capture) |
| 10.3. | Atomis: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.4. | BASF: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.5. | CSIRO: MOF-Based DAC Technology (Airthena) |
| 10.6. | Daikin: MOF-Based Refrigerant Separation |
| 10.7. | EnergyX |
| 10.8. | Framergy: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.9. | Green Science Alliance: MOF and Advanced Materials Developer |
| 10.10. | Immaterial: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.11. | Lantha Sensors: MOF-Based Chemical Analysis |
| 10.12. | Matrix Sensors: MOF-Based CO₂ Sensors |
| 10.13. | Montana Technologies: MOF-Based AWH and HVAC Technology |
| 10.14. | Mosaic Materials: MOF-Based DAC Technology |
| 10.15. | NovoMOF |
| 10.16. | Nuada: MOF-Based Carbon Capture |
| 10.17. | Numat: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.18. | Orchestra Scientific: MOF-Based Carbon Separation |
| 10.19. | ProfMOF: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.20. | Promethean Particles: MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.21. | Squair Tech: MOF-Based Indoor Air Quality |
| 10.22. | Svante: MOF-Based Carbon Capture |
| 10.23. | SyncMOF — MOF Manufacturer |
| 10.24. | Tetramer: MOFs for Decontamination and Filtration |
| 10.25. | Transaera: MOF-Based HVAC Technology |
| 10.26. | UniSieve: MOF-Based Membrane Technology |
Ordering Information
Cadres organométalliques 2025-2035 : marchés, technologies et prévisions
£€$元¥
Electronic (1-5 users)
£5,650.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
£8,050.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
£6,450.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
£8,850.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
€6,400.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
€9,100.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
€7,310.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
€10,010.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
$7,000.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
$10,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
$7,975.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
$10,975.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
元50,000.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
元72,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
元58,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
元80,000.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
¥990,000
Electronic (6-10 users)
¥1,406,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
¥1,140,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
¥1,556,000
Click here to enquire about additional licenses.
If you are a reseller/distributor please contact us before ordering.
お問合せ、見積および請求書が必要な方はm.murakoshi@idtechex.com までご連絡ください。
Le marché des charpentes organométalliques devrait croître à un TCAC de 40 % entre 2025 et 2035.
Report Statistics
| Slides | 275 |
|---|---|
| Companies | 26 |
| Forecasts to | 2035 |
| Published | Mar 2025 |
Preview Content
 Sample pages
|
|
|
Customer Testimonial
"The resources produced by IDTechEx are a valuable tool... Their insights and analyses provide a strong foundation for making informed, evidence-based decisions. By using their expertise, we are better positioned to align our strategies with emerging opportunities."