This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | At current rates, the world will not meet the Paris Agreement |
1.2. | Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) |
1.3. | CO2 utilization and storage pathways |
1.4. | Global status of CCUS |
1.5. | Large-scale CCUS facilities in operation in 2020 |
1.6. | Carbon pricing |
1.7. | Carbon pricing across the world |
1.8. | Carbon capture |
1.9. | CO2 source impacts costs and technology choice |
1.10. | Current point source CO2 capture costs |
1.11. | Global point source CO2 capture capacity by year |
1.12. | Global point source CO2 capture capacity by CO2 source |
1.13. | What is Direct Air Capture (DAC)? |
1.14. | DAC vs. point source carbon capture |
1.15. | Carbon capture capacity forecast, 2021-2040 |
1.16. | Carbon capture capacity forecast by capture type |
1.17. | Carbon utilization |
1.18. | Major emerging applications of CO2 utilization |
1.19. | Overview of major emerging CO2 utilization applications |
1.20. | Potential for use and climate benefits of major emerging CO2 utilization applications |
1.21. | Key players in CO2 utilization |
1.22. | Carbon pricing is needed for most applications to break even |
1.23. | Carbon storage |
1.24. | Global CO2 storage potential |
1.25. | The cost of carbon sequestration |
1.26. | The impact of oil prices on CCS |
1.27. | EOR: an on-ramp for CCS |
1.28. | Carbon capture capacity forecast by end use |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Reduced carbon dioxide emissions directives |
2.2. | Why is a 1.5°C global temperature rise significant? |
2.3. | Global CO2 emissions by region, 1900-2019 |
2.4. | At current rates, the world will not meet the Paris Agreement |
2.5. | The need for negative emissions technologies (NETs) |
2.6. | Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) |
2.7. | CCUS is needed for the world to reach its targets |
2.8. | Carbon capture |
2.9. | Carbon transport |
2.10. | CO2 utilization and storage pathways |
2.11. | Carbon utilization |
2.12. | Examples of CO2 utilization pathways |
2.13. | Carbon storage |
2.14. | Challenges in CCUS |
2.15. | Carbon capture - technical challenges |
2.16. | Carbon storage - technical challenges |
2.17. | Carbon utilization - technical challenges |
2.18. | Will CCUS arrive in time to make a difference? |
2.19. | Global status of CCUS |
2.20. | CCUS - developments in 2019 |
2.21. | CCUS - developments in 2020 |
2.22. | COVID-19 and CCUS |
2.23. | Large-scale CCUS facilities in operation in 2020 |
2.24. | Gorgon Carbon Dioxide Injection Project |
2.25. | Century Plant |
2.26. | Large-scale CCUS facilities in operation in 2020 |
2.27. | Large-scale CCUS facilities in construction in 2020 |
2.28. | Large-scale CCUS facilities in advanced development in 2020 |
2.29. | Large-scale CCUS facilities in early development in 2020 |
3. | CARBON PRICING STRATEGIES |
3.1. | Carbon pricing |
3.2. | Carbon pricing across the world |
3.3. | Challenges with carbon pricing |
3.4. | The European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) |
3.5. | Carbon pricing in the European Union |
3.6. | Has the EU ETS had an impact? |
3.7. | Carbon pricing in the UK |
3.8. | Carbon pricing in the US |
3.9. | 45Q tax credits in the US |
3.10. | Carbon pricing in China |
3.11. | Carbon pricing in South Africa |
3.12. | Carbon prices in currently implemented ETS or carbon tax schemes (2021) |
4. | CARBON CAPTURE |
4.1. | Point source carbon capture |
4.1.1. | Point source carbon capture - overview |
4.1.2. | Point sources of CO2 emissions |
4.1.3. | CO2 source impacts costs and technology choice |
4.1.4. | Post-combustion CO2 capture |
4.1.5. | Pre-combustion CO2 capture |
4.1.6. | Oxyfuel combustion CO2 capture |
4.1.7. | Methods of CO2 separation |
4.1.8. | Metrics for CO2 capture |
4.1.9. | Solvent-based CO2 separation |
4.1.10. | Chemical absorption solvents |
4.1.11. | Liquid absorption with amines |
4.1.12. | Physical absorption solvents |
4.1.13. | Major commercially available physical absorption solvents |
4.1.14. | Solvents used in current operational CCUS projects |
4.1.15. | Innovation in carbon capture solvents |
4.1.16. | Carbon Clean Solutions |
4.1.17. | Examples of next generation solvent technologies |
4.1.18. | Sorbent-based CO2 separation |
4.1.19. | Solid sorbents for CO2 capture |
4.1.20. | Svante |
4.1.21. | Membrane-based CO2 separation |
4.1.22. | Membranes: operating principles |
4.1.23. | Membrane Technology and Research |
4.1.24. | Novel concepts for CO2 separation |
4.1.25. | FuelCell Energy |
4.1.26. | Capture technology innovation |
4.1.27. | The costs of carbon capture |
4.1.28. | Power plants with CCUS generate less energy |
4.1.29. | The Petra Nova Project |
4.1.30. | The closure of Petra Nova - a lesson for the industry? |
4.1.31. | Boundary Dam |
4.1.32. | Current point source CO2 capture costs |
4.1.33. | Global point source CO2 capture capacity by year |
4.1.34. | Global point source CO2 capture capacity by CO2 source |
4.1.35. | Going beyond CO2 capture rates of 90% |
4.1.36. | Is a zero-emissions fossil power plant possible? |
4.1.37. | 99% capture rate: suitability of different technologies |
4.1.38. | Higher capture rates are possible, but add significant cost using today's technology |
4.1.39. | CO2 transportation |
4.1.40. | Cost considerations in pipeline transport |
4.1.41. | Technical challenges in CO2 transport |
4.1.42. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.1.43. | BECCS deployment has historically been slow |
4.1.44. | BECCS facilities in operation or planning worldwide |
4.1.45. | BECCS has major potential for emissions mitigation |
4.1.46. | Challenges in BECCS |
4.2. | Direct air capture (DAC) |
4.2.1. | What is Direct Air Capture (DAC)? |
4.2.2. | Methods of DAC |
4.2.3. | Challenges associated with DAC technology |
4.2.4. | Companies active in the field of CO2 direct air capture |
4.2.5. | High temperature aqueous solution DAC |
4.2.6. | Low temperature solid sorbent DAC |
4.2.7. | Sorbents used in low temperature solid sorbent DAC |
4.2.8. | High temperature vs. low temperature DAC |
4.2.9. | A comparison of DAC sorbents in commercial development |
4.2.10. | Alternative technologies for DAC |
4.2.11. | A comparison of DAC companies at or approaching commercial scale |
4.2.12. | Operating DAC plants and plants in development |
4.2.13. | Carbon Engineering |
4.2.14. | Climeworks |
4.2.15. | The acquisition of Antecy by Climeworks |
4.2.16. | Global Thermostat |
4.2.17. | Hydrocell |
4.2.18. | Infinitree |
4.2.19. | Skytree |
4.2.20. | Prometheus Fuels |
4.2.21. | The economics of direct air capture |
4.2.22. | CAPEX and evolution of DAC capacity |
4.2.23. | Assumptions made in the CAPEX and capacity forecasts |
4.2.24. | OPEX in DAC |
4.2.25. | The influence of power costs |
4.2.26. | Estimating the cost of DAC |
4.2.27. | Evolution of DAC costs |
4.2.28. | Additional considerations in DAC deployment |
4.2.29. | DAC vs. point source carbon capture |
4.3. | Carbon Capture: Outlook |
4.3.1. | Carbon capture in the IEA Sustainable Development Scenario |
4.3.2. | Carbon capture capacity if all current projects begin or remain in operation |
4.3.3. | Carbon capture capacity forecast, 2021-2040 |
4.3.4. | Carbon capture capacity forecast by capture type |
4.3.5. | Carbon capture capacity forecast by end use |
4.4. | Other negative emissions technologies (NETs) |
4.4.1. | Negative emissions technologies (NETs) |
4.4.2. | The major negative emissions technologies (NETs) |
4.4.3. | Afforestation and reforestation |
4.4.4. | Soil carbon sequestration |
4.4.5. | Biochar |
4.4.6. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.4.7. | Direct air capture (DAC) - see Section 3ii. for more details |
4.4.8. | Enhanced weathering and ocean alkalinisation |
4.4.9. | Ocean fertilisation |
4.4.10. | Technical and environmental characteristics of NETs |
4.4.11. | Negative emissions technologies: deferring the problem? |
5. | CARBON UTILIZATION |
5.1. | Overview |
5.1.1. | Carbon utilization |
5.1.2. | How is CO2 produced conventionally? |
5.1.3. | How is CO2 used today? |
5.1.4. | CO2 utilization can contribute to climate goals |
5.1.5. | Factors driving future market potential |
5.1.6. | Major emerging applications of CO2 utilization |
5.1.7. | DyeCoo |
5.2. | CO2-derived fuels |
5.2.1. | CO2-derived fuels |
5.2.2. | CO2-derived fuels as e-fuels |
5.2.3. | Routes to e-fuel production |
5.2.4. | The challenge of energy efficiency |
5.2.5. | The price and availability of hydrogen |
5.2.6. | Introduction to fuel cells |
5.2.7. | Fuel cell and electrolyser overview |
5.2.8. | Electrolyser basics |
5.2.9. | Electrolyser overview |
5.2.10. | Introduction to solid oxide electrolysers |
5.2.11. | SOEC syngas production |
5.2.12. | Sunfire |
5.2.13. | Haldor Topsøe |
5.2.14. | Electrolyser degradation |
5.2.15. | Solid oxide electrolyser cell players |
5.2.16. | Room-temperature electrochemical CO2 reduction |
5.2.17. | Electrochemical CO2 reduction products |
5.2.18. | Electrolyser/fuel cell manufacturers |
5.2.19. | Methanol from CO2 |
5.2.20. | Methanol from CO2: conversion methods |
5.2.21. | Carbon Recycling International |
5.2.22. | CO2-derived methane |
5.2.23. | Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthesis of fuels from syngas |
5.2.24. | Audi synthetic fuel |
5.2.25. | Dimensional Energy |
5.2.26. | Algae based biofuels |
5.2.27. | Algenol |
5.2.28. | LanzaTech |
5.2.29. | CO2-derived fuel: players |
5.2.30. | CO2-derived fuels: market potential |
5.3. | CO2-derived chemicals |
5.3.1. | CO2 can be converted into a giant range of chemicals |
5.3.2. | Urea production: the most developed application |
5.3.3. | Methanol is a valuable chemical feedstock |
5.3.4. | Commercial production of polycarbonate from CO2 |
5.3.5. | Econic |
5.3.6. | Opus 12 |
5.3.7. | CO2 utilization in biomanufacturing |
5.3.8. | Cemvita Factory |
5.3.9. | CO2-derived chemicals: market potential |
5.4. | CO2-derived building materials |
5.4.1. | CO2-derived building materials from natural minerals |
5.4.2. | Why decarbonisation of concrete matters |
5.4.3. | CO2 mineralisation |
5.4.4. | Carbonfree Chemicals |
5.4.5. | CarbonCure |
5.4.6. | Solidia Technologies |
5.4.7. | CO2-derived building materials from natural minerals: market potential |
5.4.8. | CO2-derived building materials from waste |
5.4.9. | CO2-derived building materials from waste: market potential |
5.4.10. | Carbon8 |
5.5. | CO2 utilization to boost biological yields |
5.5.1. | CO2 utilization to boost yields of biological processes |
5.5.2. | CO2 utilization to boost yields of biological processes: market potential |
5.6. | CO2 utilization: market perspective |
5.6.1. | Overview of major emerging CO2 utilization applications |
5.6.2. | Overview of major emerging CO2 utilization applications - further information |
5.6.3. | Potential for use and climate benefits of major emerging CO2 utilization applications |
5.6.4. | Climate benefits of major CO2 utilization applications |
5.6.5. | Climate benefits of major CO2 utilization applications |
5.6.6. | Key players in CO2 utilization |
5.6.7. | Carbon capture capacity forecast by end use |
5.6.8. | Cost effectiveness of CO2 utilization applications |
5.6.9. | Carbon pricing is needed for most applications to break even |
6. | CARBON STORAGE |
6.1. | Carbon storage/sequestration |
6.2. | Storing CO2 underground |
6.3. | Mechanisms of subsurface CO2 trapping |
6.4. | Storage types for geologic CO2 storage |
6.5. | Global CO2 storage potential |
6.6. | Estimates of global CO2 storage space |
6.7. | CO2 leakage is a small risk |
6.8. | Can CO2 storage be monetized? |
6.9. | Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) |
6.10. | The cost of carbon sequestration |
6.11. | The impact of oil prices on CCS |
6.12. | EOR: an on-ramp for CCS |
6.13. | Potential for cost reduction in transport and storage |
Slides | 277 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2040 |
ISBN | 9781913899356 |