This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Heavy-duty autonomous vehicles report |
1.2. | What makes it a roboshuttle? |
1.3. | Distribution of roboshuttle cities |
1.4. | Autonomous bus introduction |
1.5. | Categories of bus |
1.6. | Autonomous trucking - the right conditions right now |
1.7. | Why Automate Trucks? |
1.8. | Technology Readiness |
1.9. | Different powertrains for different vehicles |
1.10. | Types of service for roboshuttles and buses |
1.11. | Business model options for autonomous trucks |
1.12. | Number Of Active Companies |
1.13. | The Sensor Trifactor |
1.14. | Sensor suites for heavy-duty autonomous vehicles |
1.15. | SWOT analysis and comparisons for roboshuttles, autonomous buses and autonomous trucks. |
1.16. | Commercial readiness and opportunity comparison, roboshuttle, autonomous buses, autonomous trucks. |
1.17. | IDTechEx predicted timelines |
1.18. | Roboshuttle fleet size and unit sales 2020-2043 |
1.19. | Roboshuttle revenues, vehicle sales and passenger fares 2020-2043 |
1.20. | Autonomous bus unit sales 2023-2043 |
1.21. | Autonomous bus revenue 2023-2043 |
1.22. | Heavy Duty Trucking Unit Sales 2022-2042 |
1.23. | Heavy Duty Trucking Revenue 2022-2042 |
1.24. | Heavy Duty Autonomous Unit Sales 2023-2043 |
1.25. | Heavy Duty Autonomous Revenue 2023-2043 |
1.26. | Sensors for Heavy Duty Autonomous Vehicles 2023-2043 |
1.27. | Access to 20 IDTechEx Portal Company Profiles |
2. | ROBOSHUTTLES: PLAYERS AND ANALYSIS |
2.1. | Introduction |
2.1.1. | Key Takeaways For Roboshuttles |
2.1.2. | What Makes it a Roboshuttle? - Part 1 |
2.1.3. | What Makes it a Roboshuttle? - Part 2 |
2.1.4. | Table Comparison Of Active Companies (1) |
2.1.5. | Table Comparison Of Active Companies (2) |
2.1.6. | Table Comparison Of Active Companies (3) |
2.1.7. | Funding |
2.1.8. | EasyMile |
2.1.9. | EasyMile Real World Trials And Testing |
2.1.10. | EasyMile Business Model |
2.1.11. | Navya |
2.1.12. | Navya Testing Locations |
2.1.13. | Navya Use Case Examples |
2.1.14. | Navya's Installation Process |
2.1.15. | Navya's Business Model |
2.1.16. | ZF - A Robot Shuttle Future. |
2.1.17. | ZF - Robot Shuttle Deployment |
2.1.18. | ZF 2getthere Trial in Saudi Arabia |
2.1.19. | Coast |
2.1.20. | Cruise Origin |
2.1.21. | Toyota e-PALETTE |
2.1.22. | Sensible 4 - GACHA |
2.1.23. | IAV and the HEAT project |
2.1.24. | Lohr, Torc and Transdev |
2.1.25. | Torc/Lohr i-Cristal Sensor Suite |
2.1.26. | May Mobility |
2.1.27. | NEVS |
2.1.28. | Ohmio - Lift |
2.1.29. | Yutong |
2.1.30. | Apollo - Autonomous Branch of Baidu |
2.1.31. | Higer |
2.1.32. | Zoox |
2.1.33. | Zoox Sensor Suite |
2.1.34. | Service Providers |
2.2. | Roboshuttle projects that have discontinued |
2.2.1. | Continental |
2.2.2. | Bosch |
2.2.3. | Local Motors - Olli |
2.2.4. | e.Go Moove |
2.2.5. | DGWORLD |
2.2.6. | Projects That Are No Longer Active (1) |
2.2.7. | Projects That Are No Longer Active (2) |
2.2.8. | Projects That Are No Longer Active (3) |
2.3. | Roboshuttles analysis and conclusions |
2.3.1. | Technology Readiness |
2.3.2. | Decline in Roboshuttle Companies |
2.3.3. | Technology Readiness - Still Active |
2.3.4. | Where Players Exit |
2.3.5. | Where Are Players In The Value Chain |
2.3.6. | Speed And Distance |
2.3.7. | Passenger Capacity |
2.3.8. | Total Cost of Ownership Analysis |
2.3.9. | Reasons Roboshuttles Will Succeed |
2.3.10. | Reasons Roboshuttles Will Fail |
2.3.11. | IDTechEx Opinion On Roboshuttles |
3. | AUTONOMOUS BUSES: PLAYERS AND ANALYSIS |
3.1. | Introduction |
3.1.1. | Categories of Bus |
3.1.2. | Bus Category Sizing |
3.1.3. | Reasons to automate |
3.1.4. | Types Of Autonomous Services |
3.1.5. | Challenges Of Automating |
3.1.6. | Table Comparison Of Active Players (1) |
3.1.7. | Table Comparison Of Active Players (2) |
3.1.8. | Table Comparison Of Active Players (3) |
3.2. | Players - Minibuses |
3.2.1. | King Long |
3.2.2. | Aurrigo |
3.2.3. | Hyundai Autonomous Bus |
3.2.4. | Volkswagen |
3.2.5. | Volkswagen ID.Buzz - Sensor Suite |
3.2.6. | Volkswagens MOIA Project |
3.2.7. | Perrone Robotics - Overview |
3.2.8. | Perrone Robotics - Sensor Suite |
3.2.9. | Perrone Robotics - Deployment And Planned Rollout |
3.3. | Players - Midibuses |
3.3.1. | ADASTEC and Karsan |
3.3.2. | ADASTEC And Karsan - Sensor Suite |
3.3.3. | Golden Dragon ASTAR |
3.3.4. | QCraft |
3.3.5. | QCraft - Sensor Suite |
3.3.6. | LILEE |
3.3.7. | Zhongtong |
3.4. | Players - City Buses |
3.4.1. | Fusion Processing - Overview |
3.4.2. | Fusion Processing - Testing and Trials |
3.4.3. | ST Engineering |
3.4.4. | ANA and BYD - Airport Bus Trials |
3.4.5. | New Flyer - Overview |
3.4.6. | New Flyer - Sensor Suite |
3.4.7. | Irizar |
3.4.8. | Iveco |
3.4.9. | DeepBlue |
3.5. | Companies No Longer Active In Autonomous Buses |
3.5.1. | Daimler |
3.5.2. | Scania |
3.5.3. | Proterra |
3.5.4. | Other Big Players Either Not Involved Or Stopped |
3.6. | Autonomous Bus Analysis |
3.6.1. | Bus Sizes |
3.6.2. | Activity |
3.6.3. | Technology Readiness |
3.6.4. | Few Large Trials |
3.6.5. | Vehicle Type Vs Company Type |
3.6.6. | Lack Of Start-Ups, Driven By Established OEMs |
3.6.7. | Options For Early Deployments Of Autonomous Tech |
3.6.8. | Autonomous Bus Deployments In Other ODDs |
3.6.9. | Companies Spread Across The World |
3.6.10. | Drivetrains - Most Are Thinking Electric |
3.6.11. | Reasons Autonomous Buses Will Be A Success |
3.6.12. | Reasons Autonomous Buses Will Fail |
3.6.13. | IDTechEx Opinion On Autonomous Buses |
4. | AUTONOMOUS TRUCKS: PLAYERS AND ANALYSIS |
4.1. | Introduction |
4.1.1. | Pain points in the trucking industry |
4.1.2. | Why Automate Trucks? |
4.1.3. | SAE levels of automation |
4.1.4. | Level-2 And Level-4 Trucking |
4.1.5. | Level-4 MaaS for trucking |
4.1.6. | Authorities for regulating autonomous driving |
4.1.7. | The Autonomous Legal Race |
4.2. | Players - Start-ups |
4.2.1. | Funding and Maturity |
4.2.2. | TuSimple - Overview |
4.2.3. | TuSimple's AFN |
4.2.4. | TuSimple's unique perception solution |
4.2.5. | Perception system of TuSimple's autonomous trucks |
4.2.6. | TuSimple's enhanced night vision camera system |
4.2.7. | World's first fully autonomous semi-truck operating on public roads without human intervention |
4.2.8. | TuSimple's Business Model |
4.2.9. | Embark - Overview |
4.2.10. | Embark - Sensors |
4.2.11. | Embark - Trials And Rollout |
4.2.12. | Einride - Overview |
4.2.13. | Einride: a closer look into the T-pod and E-truck |
4.2.14. | Kodiak Robotics - Overview |
4.2.15. | Kodiak - Sensor Suite |
4.2.16. | Kodiak - Trials And Business Model |
4.2.17. | Plus - Overview |
4.2.18. | Plus - Sensor Suite |
4.2.19. | Plus - Testing, Trials and Deployments |
4.2.20. | Inceptio - Overview |
4.2.21. | Inceptio - Sensor Suite |
4.2.22. | Inceptio - Driverless Test |
4.2.23. | Waymo - Background |
4.2.24. | Waymo - Sensor Suite |
4.2.25. | Waymo - Trials |
4.2.26. | Torc Robotics - Overview |
4.2.27. | Torc Robotics - Sensor Suite |
4.2.28. | Torc Robotics - Testing And Trials |
4.2.29. | Aurora |
4.2.30. | Aurora - Sensor Suite |
4.2.31. | Aurora - Trials, Rollout And Business Model |
4.2.32. | Pony.ai |
4.2.33. | Pony.ai Sensor Suite (Robotaxi version) |
4.2.34. | Tesla |
4.2.35. | Solo AVT |
4.2.36. | DeepWay - A Baidu Founded Start-up |
4.3. | Player - Established Truck OEMs |
4.3.1. | Volvo Truck - Overview |
4.3.2. | Volvo Truck - Vera And VNL |
4.3.3. | Daimler |
4.3.4. | MAN |
4.3.5. | Scania |
4.3.6. | Hyundai catching up in the autonomous trucking race |
4.4. | Trucking Players That Are No Longer Active |
4.4.1. | Why Starsky Robotics Failed |
4.4.2. | Ike |
4.4.3. | Uber and Otto |
4.5. | Redundancy In Autonomous Trucks |
4.5.1. | Redundancy in Different Systems |
4.5.2. | Redundant Systems |
4.5.3. | Daimler Trucks - Redundancy in Braking Control |
4.5.4. | Daimler Trucks - Steering and Communication |
4.5.5. | Continental - Brakes (not Heavy Duty Specific) |
4.5.6. | Bosch - Brakes and Steering (not Heavy Duty Specific) |
4.5.7. | TuSimple - Functional Safety |
4.5.8. | TuSimple - Hardware Failure Tolerance |
4.5.9. | TuSimple - Software Fault Tolerance |
4.5.10. | TuSimple - Functional Safety Overview |
4.5.11. | Plus.AI - Single Sensor Type Redundancy |
4.5.12. | Kodiak - Localisation Redundancy |
4.5.13. | Aurora |
4.5.14. | Mobileye - A Different Approach To Redundancy |
4.5.15. | Redundancy in Connected Technologies |
4.6. | Truck analysis |
4.6.1. | Technology Maturity Status Definitions |
4.6.2. | Market readiness level of L4 autonomous truck companies |
4.6.3. | Maturity |
4.6.4. | Testing Distances |
4.6.5. | Company Backgrounds |
4.6.6. | Autonomous Trucking Activity |
4.6.7. | Company Locations |
4.6.8. | Business Model Options For Start-ups |
4.6.9. | Business Model Adoption |
4.6.10. | Key Drivers For Autonomous Trucks |
4.6.11. | Key Drivers For Autonomous Trucks |
4.6.12. | Remaining Hurdles For Autonomous Trucks |
4.6.13. | IDTechEx Opinion |
5. | SENSOR SUITES AND COMPUTERS FOR COMMERCIAL AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES |
5.1. | The Sensor Trifactor |
5.2. | Sensors for Roboshuttles |
5.3. | Sensors for autonomous buses |
5.4. | Sensors for autonomous trucks |
5.5. | Comparison to robotaxis |
5.6. | Computation for heavy-duty autonomous vehicles |
5.7. | Main computer supplier - Nvidia |
5.8. | Main computer supplier - Mobileye |
5.9. | Main LiDAR suppliers - Velodyne and Ouster |
5.10. | Sensor suite attributes |
5.11. | Conclusions |
6. | SUMMARY OF AUTONOMOUS ACTIVITY AND PROGRESS ACROSS TRUCKS, BUSES, ROBOSHUTTLES |
6.1. | Number Of Active Companies |
6.2. | Big Map of Activity Across The World |
6.3. | Locations Split By Vehicle Types |
6.4. | Table Of Vehicles And Players |
6.5. | Value Chain Position Of Companies In Commercial Autonomy |
6.6. | Technology Readiness |
6.7. | Ones To Watch - Roboshuttles (1) |
6.8. | Ones To Watch - Roboshuttles (2) |
6.9. | Ones to watch - Autonomous buses (1) |
6.10. | Ones to watch - Autonomous buses (2) |
6.11. | Ones To Watch - Autonomous Trucks |
6.12. | SWOT analysis and comparisons for roboshuttles, autonomous buses and autonomous trucks. |
6.13. | Commercial readiness and opportunity comparison, roboshuttle, autonomous buses, autonomous trucks. |
6.14. | IDTechEx predicted timelines |
6.15. | Conclusions |
7. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: CAMERAS |
7.1. | RGB/Visible light camera SWOT |
7.2. | CMOS image sensors vs CCD cameras |
7.3. | Key Components of CMOS |
7.4. | Front vs backside illumination |
7.5. | Reducing Cross-talk |
7.6. | Global vs Rolling Shutter |
7.7. | TPSCo: leading foundry for global shutter |
7.8. | Sony: CMOS Breakthrough? |
7.9. | Sony: BSI global shutter CMOS with stacked ADC |
7.10. | OmniVision: 2.µm global shutter CMOS for automotive |
7.11. | Hybrid organic-Si global shutter CMOS |
7.12. | Event-based Vision: a New Sensor Type |
7.13. | What is Event-based Sensing? |
7.14. | General event-based sensing: Pros and cons |
7.15. | What is Event-based Vision? (I) |
7.16. | What is Event-based Vision? (II) |
7.17. | What is event-based vision? (III) |
7.18. | What does event-based vision data look like? |
7.19. | Event Based Vision in Autonomy? |
8. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: THERMAL CAMERAS |
8.1. | Segmenting the Electromagnetic Spectrum |
8.2. | Thermal camera SWOT |
8.3. | IR Cameras |
8.4. | The Need for NIR |
8.5. | OmniVision: Making Silicon CMOS Sensitive to NIR |
8.6. | OmniVision: Making Silicon CMOS Sensitive to NIR |
8.7. | Motivation For Short-Wave Infra-Red (SWIR) Imaging |
8.8. | Why SWIR in Autonomous Mobility |
8.9. | Other SWIR Benefits: Better On-Road Hazard Detection |
8.10. | SWIR Sensitivity of Materials |
8.11. | SWIR Imaging: Incumbent and Emerging Technology Options |
8.12. | The Challenge of High Resolution, Low Cost IR Sensors |
8.13. | Silicon Based SWIR Detection - TriEye |
9. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: QUANTUM DOTS AS OPTICAL SENSOR MATERIALS FOR IR, NIR, SWIR |
9.1. | Quantum Dots as Optical Sensor Materials |
9.2. | Quantum Dots: Choice of the Material System |
9.3. | Other Ongoing Challenges |
9.4. | Advantage of Solution Processing |
9.5. | QD-Si CMOS at IR and NIR |
9.6. | Hybrid QD-Si Global Shutter CMOS at IR and NIR |
9.7. | Emberion: QD-Graphene SWIR Sensor |
9.8. | Emberion: QD-Graphene-Si Broadrange SWIR sensor |
9.9. | SWIR Vision Sensors: First QD-Si Cameras and/or an Alternative to InVisage? |
9.10. | QD-ROIC Si-CMOS integration Examples (IMEC) |
9.11. | QD-ROIC Si-CMOS Integration Examples (RTI International) |
9.12. | QD-ROIC Si-CMOS Integration Examples (ICFO) |
9.13. | QD-ROIC Si-CMOS Integration Examples (ICFO) |
10. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: LIDAR |
10.1. | LiDAR classifications |
10.2. | Automotive LiDAR: Operating process |
10.3. | Automotive LiDAR: Requirements |
10.4. | LiDAR system |
10.5. | LiDAR working principle |
10.6. | Laser range finder function for the first production car |
10.7. | Comparison of lidar product parameters |
10.8. | TOF vs. FMCW LiDAR |
10.9. | LiDAR scanning categories |
10.10. | Comparison of Common Beam Steering Options |
10.11. | Overview of beam steering technologies |
10.12. | Summary of lidars with various beam steering technologies |
10.13. | Point cloud |
10.14. | LiDAR signal applications |
10.15. | 3D point cloud modelling |
10.16. | LiDAR challenges |
10.17. | Poor weather performance: challenges & solutions |
10.18. | Autonomous mobility goes beyond cars |
10.19. | Early possible adoption of LiDAR |
10.20. | Velodyne lidar portfolios |
10.21. | Valeo SCALA |
10.22. | Livox: Risley prisms |
10.23. | Automotive lidar players by technology |
11. | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: RADAR |
11.1. | Radar SWOT |
11.2. | Radars are common in private vehicles |
11.3. | Radar Has a Key Place in Automotive Sensors |
11.4. | Front Radar Applications |
11.5. | The Role of Side Radars |
11.6. | Radars Limited Resolution |
11.7. | Radar Performance Trends |
11.8. | Radar Trilemma |
11.9. | Radar Anatomy |
11.10. | Primary Radar Components - The Antenna |
11.11. | Primary Radar Components - The RF Transceiver |
11.12. | Primary Radar Components - MCU |
11.13. | Automotive Radars: Frequency Trends |
11.14. | Trends in Transceivers |
11.15. | Two Approaches to Larger Channel Counts |
11.16. | Radar Board Trends |
11.17. | Radar Suppliers: Tier 1s and Start Ups |
11.18. | Leading players - tier 1 suppliers |
11.19. | Transceiver suppliers |
11.20. | Supply chain |
11.21. | Example products from a tier 1 - Continental |
11.22. | Example products from a tier 1 - Bosch |
11.23. | Example of radar start-up - Arbe |
11.24. | Arbe and its Investors |
11.25. | Example of radar start-up - Zadar |
12. | FORECASTS |
12.1. | Notes on the forecasts chapter |
12.2. | Forecasts: Roboshuttles |
12.2.1. | Method |
12.2.2. | Vehicle assumptions |
12.2.3. | Cities Considered |
12.2.4. | Adoption within cities |
12.2.5. | Current and forecasted city roll out 2020-2043 |
12.2.6. | Distribution of roboshuttle cities |
12.2.7. | Roboshuttle fare pricing for different economies |
12.2.8. | Roboshuttle price decline |
12.2.9. | Roboshuttle fleet size and unit sales 2020-2043 |
12.2.10. | Roboshuttle revenues, vehicle sales and passenger fares 2020-2043 |
12.2.11. | Sensors for roboshuttles 2020-2043 |
12.3. | Forecasts: Autonomous Buses |
12.3.1. | Method |
12.3.2. | Minibus utilization, adoption and city roll-out |
12.3.3. | Autonomous bus adoption |
12.3.4. | Autonomous bus unit sales 2023-2043 |
12.3.5. | Vehicle pricing |
12.3.6. | Autonomous bus revenue 2023-2043 |
12.3.7. | Seating capacity in autonomous buses and roboshuttles |
12.3.8. | Roboshuttle and autonomous bus sales revenue 2023-2043 |
12.3.9. | Powertrains of autonomous buses 2023-2043 |
12.3.10. | Sensors for autonomous buses |
12.4. | Forecasts: Autonomous Trucking |
12.4.1. | Method |
12.4.2. | Heavy Duty Trucking Unit Sales 2022-2042 |
12.4.3. | Autonomous truck pricing |
12.4.4. | Heavy Duty Trucking Revenue 2022-2042 |
12.4.5. | Miles and service revenue for autonomous trucks 2023-2043 |
12.4.6. | Autonomous truck powertrains 2023-2043 |
12.4.7. | Sensors for autonomous trucks |
12.5. | Forecast: Unit sales and sales revenues for roboshuttles, autonomous buses and autonomous trucks combined |
12.5.1. | Heavy duty autonomous unit sales: 2023-2043 |
12.5.2. | Heavy-duty autonomous revenue 2023-2043 |
12.5.3. | Sensors for heavy duty autonomous vehicles 2023-2043 |
Slides | 403 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2043 |