| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | The IDTechEx view on In-Mold Electronics |
| 1.2. | Introduction to In-Mold Electronics (IME) |
| 1.3. | In-mold electronics applications (and prototypes) |
| 1.4. | IME manufacturing process flow |
| 1.5. | Comparing smart surface manufacturing methods |
| 1.6. | Commercial advantages of IME |
| 1.7. | IME facilitates versioning and localization |
| 1.8. | IME value chain - a development of in-mold decorating (IMD) |
| 1.9. | SWOT Analysis: IME-with-SMD |
| 1.10. | Overview of IME manufacturing requirements |
| 1.11. | Overview of competing manufacturing methods |
| 1.12. | Distinguishing manufacturing methods for 3D electronics |
| 1.13. | Overview of specialist materials for IME |
| 1.14. | Investment in In-Mold Electronics |
| 1.15. | TactoTek announces multiple licensees and collaborations |
| 1.16. | Overview of IME applications |
| 1.17. | Overview of IME and sustainability |
| 1.18. | Conclusions for the IME industry (I) |
| 1.19. | Conclusions for the IME industry (II) |
| 1.20. | Outlook for In-mold Electronics |
| 1.21. | 10-year forecast for IME component area by application (in m2) |
| 1.22. | 10-year forecast for IME revenue by application (in US$ millions) |
| 1.23. | Company Profiles |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | Introduction to In-Mold Electronics (IME) |
| 2.2. | Transition from 2D to 2.5D to 3D electronics |
| 2.3. | Motivation for 3D/additive electronics |
| 2.4. | In-mold electronics applications (and prototypes) |
| 2.5. | Deciphering integrated/3D electronics terminology (I) |
| 2.6. | Deciphering integrated/3D electronics terminology (II) |
| 2.7. | Comparing smart surface manufacturing methods |
| 2.8. | IME value chain overview, examples of players |
| 2.9. | In-mold electronics with and without SMD components |
| 2.10. | The long road to IME commercialization |
| 2.11. | The functionality integration paradox |
| 2.12. | In-mold electronics lags functional film bonding in automotive adoption |
| 2.13. | When is functionality integration worthwhile? |
| 2.14. | Greater functionality integration should enhance value proposition (yields permitting) |
| 2.15. | IME players divided by location and value chain stage |
| 2.16. | Porters' analysis for In-mold electronics |
| 3. | MARKET FORECASTS |
| 3.1. | Forecast methodology |
| 3.2. | IME forecast adjustments relative to previous report |
| 3.3. | 10-year forecast for IME component area by application (in m2) |
| 3.4. | 10-year forecast for IME revenue by application (in USD) |
| 3.5. | Future (2035) IME market by application |
| 3.6. | IME value capture estimate at market maturity (2035) |
| 3.7. | Ten-year market forecasts for IME by value capture element (revenue, USD millions) |
| 4. | MANUFACTURING METHODS |
| 4.1. | Overview |
| 4.1.1. | Distinguishing manufacturing methods for 3D electronics |
| 4.2. | Manufacturing IME |
| 4.2.1. | Manufacturing IME components |
| 4.2.2. | IME manufacturing process flow (I) |
| 4.2.3. | IME manufacturing process flow (III) |
| 4.2.4. | IME manufacturing process flow (III) |
| 4.2.5. | Progression towards 3D electronics with IME |
| 4.2.6. | Manufacturing methods: Conventional electronics vs. IME |
| 4.2.7. | Equipment required for IME production |
| 4.2.8. | Hybrid approach provides an intermediate route to market |
| 4.2.9. | Forecast progression in IME complexity |
| 4.2.10. | Surface mount device (SMD) attachment: Before or after forming |
| 4.2.11. | Component attachment cross-sections |
| 4.2.12. | One-film vs two-film approach |
| 4.2.13. | Multilayer IME circuits require cross-overs |
| 4.2.14. | IC package requirements for IME |
| 4.2.15. | IME requires special electronic design software |
| 4.2.16. | Faurecia concept: traditional vs. IME design |
| 4.2.17. | Conventional vs. IME comparison (Faurecia) |
| 4.2.18. | IME: value transfer from PCB board to ink |
| 4.2.19. | Print-then-plate for in-mold electronics |
| 4.2.20. | Automating IME manufacturing |
| 4.2.21. | Overview of IME manufacturing requirements |
| 4.3. | Similar manufacturing methodologies to IME |
| 4.3.1. | Multiple manufacturing methods similar to IME |
| 4.3.2. | Comparative advantage of in-mold electronic likely to increase over time |
| 4.3.3. | Applying functional foils (transfer printing) (I) |
| 4.3.4. | Applying functional films (evaporated lines) |
| 4.3.5. | Adding capacitive touch with films |
| 4.3.6. | Functional film bonding: an introduction |
| 4.3.7. | Applying functional films into 3D shaped parts (II) (PolyIC) |
| 4.3.8. | Process Comparison |
| 4.4. | Other 3D metallization methods |
| 4.4.1. | Molded interconnect devices (MIDs) for 3D electronics |
| 4.4.2. | 3D electronics manufacturing method flowchart |
| 4.4.3. | Approaches to 3D printed electronics |
| 4.4.4. | Comparison of metallization methods |
| 4.4.5. | Comparison of metallization methods |
| 4.4.6. | Technical Specs Comparison |
| 4.4.7. | Aerosol deposition of conductive inks onto 3D surfaces |
| 4.4.8. | Laser direct structuring (LDS) |
| 4.4.9. | Applications of LDS |
| 4.4.10. | LDS MID application examples: Automotive HMI |
| 4.4.11. | Extruding conductive paste for structurally-integrated antennas |
| 4.4.12. | Two shot molding - an alternative method for high volume MID devices |
| 4.4.13. | Printing electronics on 3D surfaces for automotive applications |
| 4.4.14. | Replacing wiring bundles with partially additive electronics |
| 4.4.15. | Application targets for printing wiring onto 3D surfaces |
| 4.4.16. | Impulse printing could speed up ink deposition for 3D electronics |
| 4.4.17. | Pad printing: A new, simpler method for 3D additive electronics |
| 4.4.18. | Spray metallization and its capabilities on 3D surfaces |
| 4.4.19. | The promise of 3D printed electronics |
| 4.4.20. | Emerging approach: Multifunctional composites with electronics |
| 4.4.21. | Emerging approach: Electrical functionalization by additive manufacturing |
| 4.4.22. | Benchmarking competitive processes to 3D electronics |
| 4.4.23. | Overview of electronics on 3D surfaces |
| 5. | FUNCTIONALITY WITHIN IME COMPONENTS |
| 5.1. | Overview |
| 5.1.1. | Integrating functionality within IME components |
| 5.2. | Capacitive touch sensing |
| 5.2.1. | Capacitive sensors: Operating principle |
| 5.2.2. | Printed capacitive sensor technologies |
| 5.2.3. | Automotive HMI market for printed capacitive sensors |
| 5.3. | Lighting |
| 5.3.1. | Motivation for integrating lighting with IME |
| 5.3.2. | Comparing conventional backlighting vs integrated lighting with IME (I) |
| 5.3.3. | Comparing conventional backlighting vs integrated lighting with IME (II) |
| 5.3.4. | IME lighting example |
| 5.4. | Additional functionalities |
| 5.4.1. | Integration of haptic feedback |
| 5.4.2. | Thermoformed polymeric haptic actuator |
| 5.4.3. | Thermoformed 3D shaped reflective LCD display |
| 5.4.4. | Thermoformed 3D shaped RGD AMOLED with LTPS |
| 5.4.5. | Antenna integration with IME |
| 6. | MATERIALS FOR IME |
| 6.1. | Overview |
| 6.1.1. | IME requires a wide range of specialist materials |
| 6.1.2. | Materials for IME: A portfolio approach |
| 6.1.3. | All materials in the stack must be compatible: Conductivity perspective |
| 6.1.4. | Material composition of IME vs conventional HMI components |
| 6.1.5. | Stability and durability is crucial |
| 6.1.6. | IME material suppliers |
| 6.2. | Conductive inks |
| 6.2.1. | Silver flake-based ink dominates IME |
| 6.2.2. | Comparing different conductive inks materials |
| 6.2.3. | Challenges of comparing conductive inks |
| 6.2.4. | Conductive ink requirements for in-mold electronics |
| 6.2.5. | Stretchable vs thermoformable conductive inks |
| 6.2.6. | In-mold electronics requires thermoformable conductive inks |
| 6.2.7. | Bridging the conductivity gap between printed electronics and IME inks |
| 6.2.8. | Improvement in thermoformability |
| 6.2.9. | Thermoformable conductive inks from different resins |
| 6.2.10. | The role of particle size in thermoformable inks |
| 6.2.11. | Selecting right fillers and binders to improve stretchability (Elantas) |
| 6.2.12. | The role of resin in stretchable inks |
| 6.2.13. | All materials in the stack must be compatible: forming perspective |
| 6.2.14. | New ink requirements: Surviving heat stress |
| 6.2.15. | New ink requirements: Stability |
| 6.2.16. | Particle-free thermoformable inks (I) (E2IP/National Research Council of Canada) |
| 6.2.17. | Particle-free thermoformable inks (II) (E2IP/National Research Council of Canada) |
| 6.2.18. | In-mold conductive inks |
| 6.2.19. | In-mold conductive ink examples |
| 6.2.20. | Comparing properties of stretchable/thermoformable conductive inks |
| 6.3. | Dielectric inks |
| 6.3.1. | Dielectric inks for IME |
| 6.3.2. | Multilayer IME circuits require cross-overs |
| 6.3.3. | Cross-over dielectric: Requirements |
| 6.4. | Electrically conductive adhesives |
| 6.4.1. | Electrically conductive adhesives: General requirements and challenges for IME |
| 6.4.2. | Electrically conductive adhesives: Surviving the IME process |
| 6.4.3. | Specialist formable conductive adhesives required |
| 6.4.4. | Different types of conductive adhesives |
| 6.4.5. | Comparing ICAs and ACAs |
| 6.4.6. | Attaching components to low temperature substrates |
| 6.5. | Transparent conductive materials |
| 6.5.1. | Stretchable carbon nanotube transparent conducting films |
| 6.5.2. | Prototype examples of carbon nanotube in-mold transparent conductive films |
| 6.5.3. | 3D touch using carbon nanobuds |
| 6.5.4. | Prototype examples of in-mold and stretchable PEDOT:PSS transparent conductive films |
| 6.5.5. | In-mold and stretchable metal mesh transparent conductive films |
| 6.5.6. | Polythiophene-based conductive films for flexible devices (Heraeus) |
| 6.6. | Substrates and thermoplastics |
| 6.6.1. | Substrates and thermoplastics for IME |
| 6.6.2. | Different molding materials and conditions |
| 6.6.3. | Special PET as alternative to common PC? |
| 6.6.4. | Can TPU also be a substrate? |
| 6.6.5. | Covestro: Plastics for IME |
| 7. | APPLICATIONS, COMMERCIALIZATION, AND PROTOTYPES |
| 7.1. | Overview |
| 7.1.1. | IME interfaces break the cost/value compromise |
| 7.2. | Automotive |
| 7.2.1. | Opportunities for IME in automotive HMI |
| 7.2.2. | Automotive HMI is good and bad for IME developers |
| 7.2.3. | Addressable market in vehicle interiors in 2020 and 2025 |
| 7.2.4. | Automotive: In-mold decoration product examples |
| 7.2.5. | Early case study: Ford and T-ink |
| 7.2.6. | GEELY seat control: Development project not pursued |
| 7.2.7. | Capacitive touch panel with backlighting |
| 7.2.8. | Direct heating of headlamp plastic covers |
| 7.2.9. | Steering wheel with HMI (Canatu) |
| 7.2.10. | Threat to automotive IME: Touch sensitive interior displays |
| 7.2.11. | Alternative to automotive IME: Integrated stretchable pressure sensors |
| 7.2.12. | Alternative to automotive IME: Integrated capacitive sensing |
| 7.2.13. | IME in automotive - 2025 to 2028 outlook |
| 7.3. | White goods |
| 7.3.1. | Opportunities for IME in white goods |
| 7.3.2. | Example prototypes of IME for white goods (I) |
| 7.3.3. | Example prototypes of IME for white goods (II) |
| 7.4. | Medical, industrial, wearable and other applications |
| 7.4.1. | Other IME applications: Medical and industrial HMI |
| 7.4.2. | Home automation creates opportunities for IME |
| 7.4.3. | Case study: IME for industrial controls |
| 7.4.4. | IME for smart home becomes commercial |
| 7.4.5. | Industrial and home sensors |
| 7.4.6. | Commercial products: wearable technology |
| 7.4.7. | Weight savings make IME compelling for aerospace applications |
| 8. | IME AND SUSTAINABILITY |
| 8.1. | IME and sustainability |
| 8.2. | IME reduces plastic consumption |
| 8.3. | VTT life cycle assessment of IME parts |
| 8.4. | IME vs reference component kg CO2 equivalent (single IME panel): Cradle to gate |
| 8.5. | IME vs reference component kg CO2 equivalent (100,000 IME panels): Cradle-to-grave |
| 8.6. | Summary of results from VTT's life cycle assessment |
| 9. | FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS FOR IME |
| 9.1. | IME with incorporated ICs |
| 9.2. | Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) could replace screen printing |
| 9.3. | Thin film digital heaters for in-mold electronics thermoforming |
| 9.4. | S-shape copper traces facilitate stretchability without loss of conductivity |
| 10. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 10.1. | Advanced Decorative Systems |
| 10.2. | Altium |
| 10.3. | BeLink Solutions |
| 10.4. | Butler Technologies |
| 10.5. | Canatu |
| 10.6. | Canatu |
| 10.7. | CHASM |
| 10.8. | Clayens NP |
| 10.9. | Covestro |
| 10.10. | Dycotec |
| 10.11. | Dycotec |
| 10.12. | E2IP |
| 10.13. | Elantas |
| 10.14. | Embega |
| 10.15. | Eurecat |
| 10.16. | Faurecia |
| 10.17. | Genes'Ink |
| 10.18. | Henkel |
| 10.19. | Kimoto |
| 10.20. | MacDermid Alpha |
| 10.21. | Marabu |
| 10.22. | niebling |
| 10.23. | PolyIC |
| 10.24. | Proell |
| 10.25. | Sun Chemical |
| 10.26. | Symbiose |
| 10.27. | TactoTek |
| 10.28. | TG0 |
| 10.29. | TNO Holst Centre |