This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Acronyms |
1.2. | What are quantum dots? |
1.3. | An old technology? |
1.4. | Snapshot of readiness level of various QD applications |
1.5. | Displays: benchmarking various integration methods |
1.6. | QD Technology and Market Roadmap (10 year view) |
1.7. | Ten-year quantum market solution forecasts in value segmented by 12 applications in displays, lighting, sensors, photovoltaics and so on |
1.8. | Ten-year quantum material market forecasts in value segmented by 12 applications in displays, lighting, sensors, photovoltaics, and so on |
2. | MARKET FORECASTS |
2.1. | Overall |
2.1.1. | Ten-year quantum market solution forecasts in value segmented by 12 applications in displays, lighting, sensors, photovoltaics, and so on |
2.1.2. | Ten-year quantum material market forecasts in value segmented by 12 applications in displays, lighting, sensors, photovoltaics, and so on |
2.2. | Displays |
2.2.1. | Ten-year forecast of change in QD technology mix in display sector (%) |
2.2.2. | Ten-year forecast for different QD solutions in displays in area or M sqm (film, color filter, on chip, edge optic, emissive QLED, etc.) |
2.2.3. | Ten-year forecast for different QD solutions in displays in TONNES (film, color filter, on chip, edge optic, emissive QLED, etc.) |
2.2.4. | Ten-year quantum market solution forecasts in value in displays (film, color filter, on chip, edge optic, emissive QLED, etc.) |
2.2.5. | Ten-year quantum dot material market forecasts in value in displays (film, color filter, on chip, edge optic, emissive QLED, etc.) |
2.3. | Non display |
2.3.1. | Ten-year quantum dot forecasts in value in lighting applications |
2.3.2. | Ten-year quantum dot forecasts in value in image sensors (visible and IR/NIR) |
2.3.3. | Ten-year quantum dot forecasts in value in other applications (photovoltaics, research, etc.) |
3. | BASIC INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM DOTS |
3.1. | An old technology? |
3.2. | What are quantum dots? |
3.3. | Typical structure of a quantum dot |
3.4. | Different types of colloidal quantum dots |
3.5. | Colloidal quantum dots |
3.6. | Photoluminescence of quantum dots |
3.7. | Typical nuclei based growth process |
3.8. | Example of a typical two-pot growth process for InP core-shell QDs |
3.9. | Basic approaches to synthesis: molecular seeding to lower temperature? |
3.10. | Basic approaches to synthesis: continuous QD growth |
3.11. | Key material requirements |
4. | CD AND CD FREE QUANTUM DOTS |
4.1. | Why use heavy metals? |
4.2. | Cadmium under RoHS |
4.3. | Cd-free InP-based quantum dots |
4.4. | Evolution of InP QD FWHM as a function of time |
4.5. | Cd-based to Cd-free quantum dots: commercial transition is in full swing |
4.6. | Timeline of exemption and the arrival of the ban |
4.7. | How much cadmium is there in a display? |
4.8. | Is Indium Phosphide a safer alternative? |
5. | OUTLINING SOME MATERIAL IMPROVEMENT TRENDS AND STRATEGIES |
5.1. | Eliminating self-absorption |
5.2. | Reducing lattice mismatch with graded core-shell compositions |
5.3. | Improved stability: embedding QDs in silica particles to form microspheres |
5.4. | Improved stability: embedding QDs in silica particles to form microspheres |
5.5. | Improved stability: sapphire QD coating |
6. | INTRODUCTION AND KEY ATTRIBUTES |
6.1. | Perovskite Quantum Dots |
6.1.1. | Perovskite quantum dots (or nanocrystals): a rival to traditional solutions? |
6.1.2. | Perovskite downconverters or emitters: an introduction |
6.1.3. | Perovskites: controlling emission wavelength via halide component |
6.1.4. | Perovskites: controlling emission wavelength via size |
6.1.5. | Perovskite QDs: higher defect tolerance of FWHM and QY |
6.1.6. | Perovskite QDs: high blue absorbance |
6.2. | Challenges or shortcomings |
6.2.1. | Perovskite quantum dots: why red is difficult |
6.2.2. | Red perovskite QDs: preventing phase instability |
6.2.3. | Perovskite quantum dots: self absorption issues |
6.2.4. | Perovskites: stability issue is a persistent concern |
6.2.5. | Perovskites: improving stability with ligands |
6.2.6. | Perovskite QDs: improving stability by embedding a host matrix |
6.2.7. | Perovskite QD-composites: improving stability by embedding in a polymer host |
6.2.8. | Perovskite QDs: toxicity concerns |
6.3. | Electroluminescent PeQD LEDs |
6.3.1. | Perovskite QLED: efficiency progress for inorganic green PeQLEDs? |
6.3.2. | Inorganic red PeQLED: what about lifetime? |
6.4. | Commercial progress and prospects |
6.4.1. | Perovskite green QD films for displays: stable commercial offerings |
6.4.2. | Perovskite QDs: the only way is hybrid? |
6.4.3. | Conclusions on perovskite QDs |
6.4.4. | InGaN/GaN QDs: viable material? |
6.4.5. | InGaN/GaN QDs: cutting reaction time and FWHM |
6.4.6. | InGaN/GaN QDs: cutting reaction time and FWHM |
6.4.7. | CuInS2/ZnS: broadband QDs useful in solar windows? |
6.4.8. | PdS QDs: optical sensor with high responsivity and wide spectrum |
6.4.9. | PdS QDs: optical sensor with high responsibility and wide spectrum |
6.4.10. | Rhodamine-based fluorescent materials as all organic downconverters |
6.4.11. | Carbon quantum dots (CQD) |
6.4.12. | Graphene Quantum Dots |
6.4.13. | ZnSe |
6.4.14. | White-blue emission from silicon QD |
7. | COMPARISON WITH PHOSPHORS |
7.1. | Phosphors: basic introduction |
7.2. | Thee ways to achieve white in LEDs |
7.3. | Requirements for phosphors in LEDs |
7.4. | Table of phosphor materials |
7.5. | Why the search for narrow FWHM red phosphors (I)? |
7.6. | Common and emerging red-emitting phosphors |
7.7. | Thermal stability of common red, green and yellow phosphors (I) |
7.8. | GE's narrowband red phosphor: KSF:Mn+4 |
7.9. | Commercial progress of GE's narrowband red phosphor |
7.10. | Lumileds red emitting phosphor (SLA) |
7.11. | Toray: High performance organic phosphors |
7.12. | Suppliers of phosphors |
7.13. | Phosphors: FWHM comparison with quantum dots |
7.14. | Phosphors: color tunability comparison with quantum dots |
7.15. | Phosphors: Particle size comparison with quantum dots |
7.16. | Phosphors: Response time comparison with quantum dots |
7.17. | Phosphors: Stability comparison with quantum dots |
7.18. | Strength of hybrid phosphor-QD approach |
7.19. | Conclusions |
8. | QUANTUM ROD DISPLAYS |
8.1. | Quantum rods |
8.2. | Quantum rods: demonstrating printed greyscale displays |
8.3. | Quantum rods: material choices for red, green and blue photoluminescence |
8.4. | Quantum rods: material performance for red, green and blue photoluminescence |
8.5. | Quantum rods: principle of voltage controlled emission resulting in high contrast ratio |
8.6. | Quantum rod displays: performance of 17" active matrix inkjet printed QR display |
8.7. | Importance of early patents |
8.8. | Case Study: Evident |
8.9. | Nanoco vs Nanosys |
8.10. | IP acquisition |
8.11. | Nanosys vs QD Vision |
9. | APPLICATIONS IN LIFE SCIENCES |
9.1. | Quantum dots as fluorescent tags |
9.2. | Examples of images |
9.3. | Advantages over organic dyes |
9.4. | Comparison of absorption/emission |
9.5. | Major milestones in academic research |
9.6. | Various approaches to use quantum dots |
9.7. | Example: monitoring enzyme activity |
9.8. | Zymera in vivo imaging |
10. | INTRODUCTION TO COLOR GAMUT IN DISPLAYS |
10.1. | Understanding color standards |
10.2. | How LED backlights reduced color performances |
10.3. | 100% sRGB can be achieved without QD |
10.4. | The challenge of Rec 2020 |
10.5. | FWHM and color gamut |
10.6. | Performance sensitivity to emission wavelength |
11. | DISPLAY APPLICATIONS |
11.1. | Displays: edge optic |
11.1.1. | LED backlight units in LCD |
11.1.2. | Replacing phosphors with quantum dots |
11.1.3. | Edge optic integration: a technology going obsolete? |
11.1.4. | Color IQ from QD Vision: going obsolete |
11.1.5. | Film type integration: growing commercial success but for how long? |
11.2. | Displays: enhancement film or remote film-film QD phosphors |
11.2.1. | QDEF film from Nanosys |
11.2.2. | Key direction of development for film type integration (I): transition towards Cd free materials |
11.2.3. | Key direction of development for film type integration (II): reducing barrier requirements |
11.2.4. | Key direction of development for film type integration (III): Premium pricing vs expanding product portfolio |
11.2.5. | Key direction of development for film type integration (IV): Glass based QD sheet in LCD displays |
11.3. | Displays: quantum dot color filters |
11.3.1. | Colour filter type: approaching commercial readiness? |
11.3.2. | Colour filter type remaining challenges (I): patterning |
11.3.3. | QDCF: strategies to make QDs compatible with photoresist and photolithography |
11.3.4. | QDCF: strategies to make QDs compatible with photoresist and photolithography |
11.3.5. | QDFC: performance of epoxied silica QDs as QDCF |
11.3.6. | Colour filter type remaining challenges (I): inkjetting |
11.3.7. | Inkjet printed InP QD color filters: performance levels |
11.3.8. | Colour filter type remaining challenges (I): color purity and contrast |
11.3.9. | Colour filter type remaining challenges (I): new polarizers, short-pass filters, and other additional layers? |
11.3.10. | QD color filters on OLED |
11.3.11. | QD color filters on OLED: pros and cons |
11.4. | Displays: quantum on-chip LEDs |
11.4.1. | On chip integration: improving stability |
11.4.2. | Colour filter type remaining challenges (I): patterning |
11.4.3. | On chip type remaining challenges: stress conditions |
11.4.4. | On chip type remaining challenges (III): heat and light stability |
11.4.5. | On chip type remaining challenges (IV): light flux stability |
12. | PHOTOPATTERNING FOR MICROLED DISPLAYS |
12.1. | On-chip QDs for micro-LED displays: range of devices and stress conditions |
12.2. | QDs vs Phosphors for micro LED displays: the size and resolution advantage |
12.3. | QDs: photopatternable QDs for micro-displays |
12.4. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: material consideration |
12.5. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: rational for engineered multi core-shell giant QDs |
12.6. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: material challenges |
12.7. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: surviving the photopatterning process |
12.8. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: demonstrating heat and light flux stability |
12.9. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: performance levels |
12.10. | Photo-patternable QD for micro LED displays: comparison with RGB LEDs |
13. | EMISSIVE QLED (QUANTUM LIGHT EMITTING DIODE) |
13.1. | Display trend: evolution from PLED to PhOLED to TADF to QDs? |
13.2. | Emissive type: how far off from commercial readiness? |
13.3. | Emissive QLED remaining challenges: optimal device design |
13.4. | Nanophotonica: performance progress of QLEDs |
13.5. | Progress from QD Vision (no longer active) |
13.6. | Perovskite QLED: efficiency progress for inorganic green PeQLEDs? |
13.7. | Emissive QLED remaining challenges (II): blue QD challenge |
13.8. | Emissive QLED remaining challenges (II): ink formulation challenge |
13.9. | Emissive QLED remaining challenges (II): transfer printing |
13.10. | Emissive QLED remaining challenges (III): lifetime |
13.11. | Inorganic red PeQLED: what about lifetime? |
14. | QUANTUM DOT IMAGE SENSORS (VISIBLE AND IR/NIR) |
14.1. | Improving silicon image sensors |
14.1.1. | QD layer advantage in image sensor (I): Increasing sensor sensitivity and gain |
14.1.2. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(II): reducing thickness |
14.1.3. | How is the QD layer applied? |
14.1.4. | QD optical layer: approaches to increase conductivity of QD films |
14.1.5. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(III): enabling high resolution global shutter |
14.1.6. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(III): enabling high resolution global shutter |
14.1.7. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(III): Low power and high sensitivity to structured light detection for machine vision? |
14.1.8. | Can hybrid organic CMOS image sensors also give high res global shutter? |
14.1.9. | Progress in CMOS global shutter using silicon technology only |
14.2. | Quantum dots for near infra sensors |
14.2.1. | Current issue with infrared image sensors |
14.2.2. | Quantum: covering the range from visible to near infrared |
14.2.3. | Results and status for IR vision |
14.2.4. | Potential unresolved questions and issues |
14.2.5. | PdS QDs: optical sensor with high responsibility and wide spectrum |
15. | QUANTUM DOTS IN LIGHTING APPLICATIONS |
15.1. | Quantum dots in lighting applications |
15.2. | QDs in horticulture |
15.3. | Achieving high CRI in general lighting |
15.4. | Why the search for narrow FWHM red phosphors (I)? |
15.5. | Achieving warm colours using 'remote' QD phosphors |
15.6. | Examples of LED lights with remote QD integration |
15.7. | Achieving high CRI using on-chip phosphors |
15.8. | On-chip QD integration: different LED types and performance requirements |
15.9. | Achieving high CRI using on-chip QDs: stability results |
16. | PHOTOVOLTAIC |
16.1. | Many competing technologies in PV |
16.2. | Quantum dot PV is still in early stage |
16.3. | Comparison of efficiencies |
16.4. | Quantum dot PV: SWOT analysis |
16.5. | Progress in QD photovoltaics |
16.6. | QD luminescent solar concentrator? |
17. | OTHER APPLICATIONS |
17.1. | Hydrogen production |
17.2. | Visible light photocatalysis |
17.3. | Sunscreen |
17.4. | Lasers |
17.5. | QDChip spectrometer |
17.6. | Security tagging |
18. | COMPANY PROFILES |
18.1. | Avantama |
18.2. | BOE |
18.3. | Consistent Electronic Materials |
18.4. | Cree |
18.5. | CrystalPlex |
18.6. | Dow Electronic Materials |
18.7. | Fraunhofer |
18.8. | Hansol |
18.9. | Korea University |
18.10. | Kyung Hee University |
18.11. | LG Display |
18.12. | LMS |
18.13. | Lumileds |
18.14. | Najing Technology Company |
18.15. | Nanoco |
18.16. | Nanosys |
18.17. | Nanophotonica |
18.18. | NexDot |
18.19. | Pacific Lighting Technology (Osram) |
18.20. | QD Vision |
18.21. | Qlight (Merck) |
18.22. | ? |
18.23. | Quantag |
18.24. | Quantum Material Corporation |
18.25. | Quantum Solutions |
18.26. | QustomDot |
18.27. | Samsung |
18.28. | Saphlux |
18.29. | Sharp |
18.30. | Shoei Chemical |
18.31. | SWIR Vision Sensors |
18.32. | Taiwan Nanocrystal |
18.33. | Takoma/Huntplus/Kyung Hee |
18.34. | TCL |
18.35. | Tohoku University |
18.36. | UbiQD |
18.37. | Ulvac Solutions |
18.38. | Wah Hong |
18.39. | Zhijing Nanotech |
18.40. | ZH-QTECH |
Slides | 473 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2029 |