This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.


| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
| 1.1. | Overall Market Size in 2022 |
| 1.1. | Touch market forecast by technology in 2012 |
| 1.1. | Organisations working in touch screens |
| 1.2. | Conductance in ohms per square for the different printable conductive materials, at typical thicknesses used, compared with bulk metal |
| 1.2. | Main Touch Technologies |
| 1.3. | Leading Market Applications |
| 1.4. | The Big Opportunity for TCFs |
| 1.5. | ITO Alternatives |
| 1.6. | Over 100 Profiled Organizations |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | Main touch screen technologies (mainstream and emerging) with and without transparent electrodes (mainly ITO) |
| 2.1. | Mainstream Touch Technologies and Applications |
| 3. | TECHNOLOGIES |
| 3.1. | Mainstream Touch Technologies |
| 3.1. | How Projected Capacitive Touch Technology Works |
| 3.1. | Main Characteristics of Projected Capacitive Touch Technology |
| 3.1.1. | Projected Capacitive |
| 3.1.2. | Analog Resistive |
| 3.1.3. | Surface capacitive |
| 3.1.4. | Infrared |
| 3.1.5. | Surface Acoustic Wave |
| 3.2. | Emerging Touch Technologies |
| 3.2. | How Resistive Touch Technology Works |
| 3.2. | Main Characteristics of Analog Resistive Touch Technology |
| 3.2.1. | Embedded |
| 3.2.2. | Optical Imaging |
| 3.3. | Other Touch Technologies |
| 3.3. | How Surface Capacitive Touch Technology Works |
| 3.3. | Main Characteristics of Surface Capacitive Touch Technology |
| 3.4. | Main Characteristics of Infrared Touch Technology |
| 3.4. | How Infrared (IR) Touch Technology Works |
| 3.4. | Comparison |
| 3.5. | How Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) Technology Works |
| 3.5. | Main Characteristics of Surface Acoustic Wave Touch Technology |
| 3.6. | Main Characteristics of Embedded Touch Technologies |
| 3.6. | How Optical Touch Technology Works |
| 3.7. | Touch market forecast by technology in 2012 |
| 3.7. | Main Characteristics of Optical Imaging Touch Technology |
| 3.8. | Comparison of the most common touch screen technologies |
| 4. | MATERIALS USED |
| 4.1. | Indium-Tin-Oxide (ITO) |
| 4.1. | Touch Technologies with ITO for the Transparent Conductor |
| 4.1. | Global Indium Production in the last five years |
| 4.1.1. | ITO Challenges: Cost and availability |
| 4.2. | ITO Alternatives |
| 4.2. | Cost of Indium and global Indium production |
| 4.2. | Main suppliers of ITO alternatives |
| 4.2.1. | Organic conductors |
| 4.2.2. | Carbon Nanotubes |
| 4.2.3. | Nano-metal |
| 4.2.4. | Graphene |
| 4.2.5. | Quantum Tunneling Composite (QTC™) |
| 4.3. | Global Indium Production in 2011: 640 tonnes |
| 4.3. | Comparison of TCF material of Heraeus Clevios and ITO films |
| 4.4. | Global indium production by country from 2007 to 2011 |
| 4.5. | Conductance in ohms per square for the different printable conductive materials, at typical thicknesses used, compared with bulk metal |
| 4.6. | Conductivity of several materials |
| 4.7. | PEDOT:PSS conductivity development |
| 4.8. | Polymer-based, 14-inch touch screen panel fabricated by GSI Technologies LLC featuring Kodak HCF-225 film/ESTAR™ Base and Clevios™ PEDOT:PSS coating from Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG. |
| 4.9. | Targeted applications for carbon nanotubes |
| 4.10. | Cambrios Sample TC Film |
| 4.11. | Prototype demonstration of a touch screen using silver nanowire TCE. Schematic of a touch screen fabricated (a) without and (b) with complete connection. Insets show the actual working devices. |
| 4.12. | An electron microscope image of a hybrid electrode developed at Rice University shows solid connections after 500 bends. The transparent material combines single-atom-thick sheets of graphene and a fine mesh of aluminum nanowire o |
| 4.13. | Left: A transparent graphene film transferred on a 35-inch PET sheet. Right: A graphene-based touchscreen panel connected to a computer |
| 4.14. | The researchers built up a graphene layer on copper foil and then used rollers to transfer the graphene to a polymer support and then onto a final substrate |
| 5. | PROCESSES USED |
| 5.1. | Overview |
| 5.1. | Comparison of OLED performance. The top electrode made of printed ITO |
| 5.1. | Overview of the main deposition processes used for transparent conductive (patterned) films in touch screens |
| 5.2. | TCOs |
| 5.2.1. | Vacuum processes |
| 5.2.2. | Wet processes |
| 5.2.3. | Patterning of TCO layers |
| 5.2.4. | Recent developments: Printable ITO |
| 5.3. | Deposition of Organic Materials |
| 5.4. | Nanomaterials |
| 5.4.1. | Nanoparticles |
| 5.5. | New processes |
| 6. | SUPPLIERS AND COMPANIES |
| 6.1. | Z mode actuator by Artificial Muscle |
| 6.1. | Specifications fo Flexx 100 and Flexx 300 |
| 6.1. | Advanced Touchscreen Technology (ATT) by Wintek |
| 6.2. | Alps Electric |
| 6.2. | Specifications of DigiTech ITO film |
| 6.2. | CLEAR conductive PET film |
| 6.3. | Touchview product with membrane switch combination |
| 6.3. | Specifications of GeneralTouch Infrared Touch screen technology |
| 6.3. | Altera |
| 6.4. | Analog Devices (ADI) |
| 6.4. | Specifications Host Optical pro-cap touch panel |
| 6.4. | Directly produced prepatterned films |
| 6.5. | AUO 6-inch touch function eBook with Sipix's Microcup® technology |
| 6.5. | Apple |
| 6.6. | Applied Materials |
| 6.6. | A new flexible film made of copper nanowires and plastic conducts electricity illuminating a small light bulb. |
| 6.7. | Eastman Kodak HCF Film |
| 6.7. | Arayon Optics |
| 6.8. | Artificial Muscle Inc. (AMI) |
| 6.8. | Performance of PEDOT formulation from Eastman Kodak versus ITO |
| 6.9. | Fujitsu's eFLEPia |
| 6.9. | Atmel |
| 6.10. | Avago |
| 6.10. | Fujitsu's FLEPia Lite |
| 6.11. | Gunze's touch panel made with Direct Printing Technology, presented early 2009 |
| 6.11. | Broadcom |
| 6.12. | Caledon Controls |
| 6.12. | Hanvon N518 e-reader with pen-input touch screen |
| 6.13. | Schematic of isiQiri's Q-Foil-technology |
| 6.13. | CAM Graphics |
| 6.14. | Cambrios |
| 6.14. | Airbus A-380 with J Touch's 23" touch panel at the first class |
| 6.15. | Transmittance vs conductivity for Cu nanowires compared to other technologies |
| 6.15. | Canatu Ltd. |
| 6.16. | Cando (AUO) |
| 6.16. | Sharp's Mebius PC-NJ70A multi-touch netbook, launched in 2009 |
| 6.17. | Sony's Vaio L Series 3D all-in-one PC, launched in 2009 |
| 6.17. | Carestream Advanced Materials |
| 6.18. | Chimei Innolux Corp. (CMO?) |
| 6.19. | Cirque |
| 6.20. | CPT |
| 6.21. | Cypress |
| 6.22. | DanoTech |
| 6.23. | DGTUS Tech |
| 6.24. | DigiTech |
| 6.25. | DMC |
| 6.26. | Duke University |
| 6.27. | Eastman Kodak Co. |
| 6.28. | EELY |
| 6.29. | EETI (eGalax) |
| 6.30. | EFUN |
| 6.31. | Elan Micorelectronics |
| 6.32. | Emerging Display Technology (EDT) |
| 6.33. | ESTECOM |
| 6.34. | eTurboTouch |
| 6.35. | FlatFrog |
| 6.36. | Focaltech Systems |
| 6.37. | Fujitsu |
| 6.38. | General Touch |
| 6.39. | GDS |
| 6.40. | GestureTek |
| 6.41. | Gunze |
| 6.42. | HannStar Display |
| 6.43. | Hanwang (Hanvon) |
| 6.44. | Heraeus Clevios (formerly H.C. Starck Clevios) |
| 6.45. | Higgstec |
| 6.46. | Hon Hai Precision Industry |
| 6.47. | Host Optical |
| 6.48. | Immersion (IMS) |
| 6.49. | Innolux |
| 6.50. | isiQiri Interface Technologies |
| 6.51. | JTouch |
| 6.52. | Keytec |
| 6.53. | LG Display |
| 6.54. | Melfas |
| 6.55. | Microchip Technology |
| 6.56. | Microsoft |
| 6.57. | Mirle Automation |
| 6.58. | Nanjing Wally |
| 6.59. | NanoForge |
| 6.60. | NEC Display Solutions |
| 6.61. | NextWindow |
| 6.62. | Nissha Printing |
| 6.63. | N-trig |
| 6.64. | NVIDIA |
| 6.65. | Ocular LCD |
| 6.66. | Oike & CO., Ltd. |
| 6.67. | Omek |
| 6.68. | Optera |
| 6.69. | Osram Opto Semiconductors |
| 6.70. | Panasonic Electric Devices (PED) |
| 6.71. | Pan Jit (Mildex) |
| 6.72. | Peratech |
| 6.73. | Perceptive Pixel |
| 6.74. | Pixcir Microelectronics |
| 6.75. | Planar |
| 6.76. | PolyIC |
| 6.77. | PRO |
| 6.78. | Quanta |
| 6.79. | RISIN Technology |
| 6.80. | Samsung Electronics |
| 6.81. | SAIT |
| 6.82. | Sang Bo Corporation (SBK), Korea |
| 6.83. | Seiko Epson |
| 6.84. | Sharp |
| 6.85. | Silicon Integrated Systems (SIS) |
| 6.86. | Sintek |
| 6.87. | Sitronics |
| 6.88. | SMART Technologies |
| 6.89. | SMK Electronics |
| 6.90. | Sony |
| 6.91. | Stantum |
| 6.92. | Synaptics |
| 6.93. | Swenc Technology |
| 6.94. | TAOS Inc. |
| 6.95. | TE Touch Solutions (ELO) |
| 6.96. | Texas Instruments (TI) |
| 6.97. | Toray Advanced Film (TAF) |
| 6.98. | Toshiba Mobile Display (TMD) |
| 6.99. | Touch International |
| 6.100. | Touch Revolution |
| 6.101. | TPK |
| 6.102. | Truly Semi |
| 6.103. | Unidym |
| 6.104. | UniPixel |
| 6.105. | USAN Technology |
| 6.106. | Visual Planet |
| 6.107. | Wacom |
| 6.108. | Wintek |
| 6.109. | Young Fast Optoelectronics |
| 6.110. | Zytronic |
| 6.111. | 3M |
| 7. | MARKET FORECAST FROM 2012 TO 2022 |
| 7.1. | Touch screen market forecast by application, market value in US$ bn, 2012 to 2022 |
| 7.1. | Touch screen market forecast by application, market value in US$ bn, 2012 to 2022 |
| 7.1. | Market forecast by application 2012-2022 |
| 7.2. | Market forecast by technology 2012-2022 |
| 7.2. | Touch screen market forecast by technology, 2012 to 2022 |
| 7.2. | Touch screen market forecast by technology, 2012 to 2022 |
| 7.3. | Market share by technology, by percentage, 2012 to 2022 |
| 7.3. | Comparison of the most common touch screen technologies |
| 7.3. | Primary use markets by technology |
| 7.3.1. | Projected Capacitive |
| 7.3.2. | Analog Resistive |
| 7.3.3. | MARS |
| 7.3.4. | Surface capacitive |
| 7.3.5. | Infrared |
| 7.3.6. | SAW |
| 7.3.7. | Embedded |
| 7.3.8. | Optical Imaging |
| 7.3.9. | Multi-touch |
| 7.4. | Touch Technology Market applicability by device size |
| 7.4. | Market size for touch technologies by device size in 2012 |
| APPENDIX 1: IDTECHEX PUBLICATIONS AND CONSULTANCY | |
| TABLES | |
| FIGURES |
| Pages | 179 |
|---|---|
| Tables | 22 |
| Figures | 45 |
| Companies | 110 |
| Forecasts to | 2022 |