This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
| 1.1. | Definitions and context |
| 1.2. | Emerging needs |
| 1.2.1. | Decarbonising, securing, cost-reducing, scaling electricity supply |
| 1.2.2. | The largest stationary storage markets 2022-2042 |
| 1.2.3. | Seasonal and months of electricity shortage will not be solved by storage alone |
| 1.3. | Future toolkit for stationary energy storage |
| 1.4. | Importance of hydrogen and ammonia for electricity-to-electricity storage |
| 1.5. | Potential technologies |
| 1.5.1. | Beyond hydrogen and pumped hydro by storage time and power output |
| 1.5.2. | Battery contestants compared |
| 1.5.3. | Storage contestants beyond battery and supercapacitor compared |
| 1.6. | New options compared in storage time and scale |
| 1.7. | Levelised cost of storage LCOS comparisons |
| 1.8. | Long duration energy storage coming center stage |
| 1.9. | Mature technologies pumped hydro and lithium-ion batteries in detail |
| 1.10. | Conclusions concerning lithium-based battery competitive position for stationary storage 2022-2042 |
| 1.11. | Why lithium batteries will lose stationary market share in a few years |
| 1.12. | Primary conclusions for stationary storage without batteries 2021-2041: big picture |
| 1.13. | Primary conclusions for stationary storage without batteries 2021-2041: Technology choices |
| 1.14. | Progress to enduring profitability by technology 2022 |
| 1.15. | Progress to enduring profitability by technology 2032 |
| 1.16. | Progress to enduring profitability by technology 2042 |
| 1.17. | Stationary storage market and technology roadmap 2022-2042 |
| 1.18. | Possible scenario for stationary storage by eight technologies $ billion 2022-2042 |
| 1.19. | All energy storage: possible scenario of dollar sales by technology in 2042 |
| 1.20. | Possible other forecasts |
| 1.20.1. | Gravity, liquid air and compressed air stationary energy storage MW installed 2020-2031 |
| 1.20.2. | Installed gravity, liquid air, compressed air energy storage MW to 2030 |
| 1.20.3. | Forecast for installed liquid air, compressed air and gravity energy storage MWh to 2030 |
| 1.20.4. | RFB, Na-ion, Zn-based, high temperature battery forecasts GWh and $ billion to 2032 |
| 1.20.5. | Addressable Li-ion markets (GWh) - 2020-2032 |
| 1.20.6. | Li-ion battery addressable market (GWh) by sector - 2020-2032 |
| 1.20.7. | Li-ion batteries for stationary storage GWh 2032-2042 |
| 1.20.8. | Global supercapacitor market by application $ billion 2021-2041 with 10 top suppliers' sales |
| 1.21. | Supercapacitor technology roadmap 2022-2042 |
| 1.22. | Commercialisation timelines for RFB, Na and Zn battery companies |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | The increasingly important role of stationary storage |
| 2.2. | ESS, BESS, BTM, FTM |
| 2.3. | Stationary Energy Storage Markets |
| 2.4. | Here comes a massive intermittency problem |
| 2.5. | Grid stability and other functions of stationary storage |
| 2.6. | Emerging W/kg & Wh/kg are a focus for the smaller systems |
| 2.7. | Mature technologies pumped hydro and lithium-ion batteries |
| 2.8. | Some parameters and initiatives for different forms of stationary storage |
| 2.9. | Energy islands and underwater energy storage |
| 3. | HYDROGEN AND AMMONIA STORAGE |
| 3.1. | Overview |
| 3.2. | Hydrogen generation |
| 3.3. | Storage of hydrogen |
| 3.4. | Back to electricity with hydrogen turbines |
| 3.5. | Back to electricity with fuel cells |
| 4. | GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY STORAGE LIFTING WEIGHTS (GES) |
| 4.1. | Gravitational Energy Storage (GES) |
| 4.2. | History repeating itself? |
| 4.3. | Calculation from Gravitricity technology |
| 4.4. | Piston Based GES - Energy Stored example |
| 4.5. | GES Technology Classification |
| 4.6. | Can the GES reach the market? |
| 4.7. | Energy Vault - Technology working principle |
| 4.8. | Energy Vault - Brick Material |
| 4.9. | Energy Vault Technology and market analysis |
| 4.10. | Energy Vault Technology and market analysis |
| 4.11. | Gravitricity - Piston-based Energy storage |
| 4.12. | Gravitricity technology analysis |
| 4.13. | Underground - PHES |
| 4.14. | U-PHES - Gravity Power |
| 4.15. | U-PHES - Heindl Energy |
| 4.16. | Detailed description of Heindl Energy technology |
| 4.17. | U-PHES - Heindl Energy |
| 4.18. | Underground - PHES: Analysis |
| 4.19. | Storage using rails: ARES LLC Technology Overview |
| 4.20. | ARES Technologies: Traction Drive, Ridgeline |
| 4.21. | Technical Comparison: Traction Drive, Ridgeline |
| 4.22. | A considerable landscape footprint |
| 4.23. | ARES Market, and Technology analysis |
| 4.24. | Mountain Gravity Energy Storage (MGES): Overview |
| 4.25. | Mountain Gravity Energy Storage (MGES): Analysis |
| 5. | PUMPED HYDRO AND ITS NEW VARIANTS |
| 5.1. | Overview |
| 5.2. | Example of not needing to turn off excess wind power through 24 hours. |
| 5.3. | Beginning to be used for longer delay/duration where possible |
| 5.4. | Use hills if you lack mountains: RheEnergise |
| 5.5. | Going small: Natel Energy |
| 5.6. | Underwater: Ocean Grazer |
| 5.7. | Under Water Energy Storage (UWES) - Analysis |
| 6. | COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE (CAES) |
| 6.1. | CAES Historical Development |
| 6.2. | Hydrostor's 200MW/1,600MWh Broken Hill project |
| 6.3. | CAES Technologies overview |
| 6.4. | Drawbacks of CAES |
| 6.5. | Diabatic Compressed Energy Storage (D-CAES) |
| 6.6. | Huntorf D-CAES - North of Germany |
| 6.7. | McIntosh D-CAES - US Alabama |
| 6.8. | Adiabatic - Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) |
| 6.9. | A - CAES analysis |
| 6.10. | Isothermal - Compressed Air Energy Storage (I - CAES) |
| 6.11. | Main players in CAES technologies |
| 6.12. | CAES Players and Project |
| 6.13. | EnergyDome compressed CO2 |
| 7. | LIQUID AIR ENERGY STORAGE (LAES) OR CO2 |
| 7.1. | Overview |
| 7.2. | LAES Players and their targets |
| 7.3. | LAES economics compared with alternatives |
| 7.4. | World's largest liquid air energy storage |
| 7.5. | Materials and liquefaction processes |
| 7.6. | LAES Historical Evolution |
| 7.7. | IDTechEx LAES conclusions |
| 7.8. | Liquid carbon dioxide energy storage |
| 8. | THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE (TES) |
| 8.1. | TES Technology Overview and Classification |
| 8.2. | Electric Thermal Energy Storage ETES |
| 8.3. | Operating principle |
| 8.4. | IDTechEx appraisal |
| 8.5. | Best at large capacity |
| 8.6. | ETES costing |
| 8.7. | Diurnal TES Systems - Solar Thermal Power Plants (CSP) |
| 9. | REDOX FLOW BATTERIES (RFB) |
| 9.1. | Redox flow batteries overview |
| 9.2. | Redox flow batteries working principle |
| 9.3. | Exploded view of VRFB |
| 9.4. | The case for RFBs: Stationary Batteries Comparison |
| 9.5. | RFB chemistries: All Vanadium (VRFB) |
| 9.6. | RFB chemistries: Zinc Bromine flow battery (ZBB) - Hybrid |
| 9.7. | RFB chemistries: Hydrogen/Bromide - Hybrid |
| 9.8. | RFB Chemistries: all Iron - Hybrid |
| 9.9. | Other RFBs: Organic Redox Flow Battery |
| 9.10. | Some significant RFB orders |
| 10. | NEW FORMS OF BATTERY Na, Al, Zn, Ca, Fe, HIGH TEMPERATURE |
| 10.1. | Overview |
| 10.2. | Value proposition of Na-ion batteries |
| 10.3. | Zn-based batteries |
| 10.4. | Zn-based battery formats |
| 10.5. | Rechargeable zinc battery companies |
| 10.6. | Zinc-air batteries |
| 10.7. | Problems and solutions for rechargeable Zn-air batteries |
| 10.8. | Zinc 8 Energy |
| 10.9. | Zinc 8 Energy IP |
| 10.10. | E-Zinc |
| 10.11. | Zinc bromide batteries |
| 10.12. | Eos Energy Enterprise |
| 10.13. | Eos Energy - static Zn-Br battery |
| 10.14. | Eos Energy technology |
| 10.15. | Rechargeable Zn-MnO2 |
| 10.16. | Zn-ion battery - Salient Energy |
| 10.17. | Salient Energy IP |
| 10.18. | Enerpoly |
| 10.19. | Remarks on Zn-based batteries |
| 10.20. | High-temperature batteries |
| 10.21. | NaS - NGK Insulators |
| 10.22. | Molten calcium battery - Ambri Inc |
| 10.23. | Lithium-ion photovoltaics |
| 11. | LI-ION CAPACITORS, PSEUDOCAPACITORS, SUPERCAPACITORS, SUPERCONDUCTING FLYWHEELS |
| 11.1. | Basics |
| 11.2. | Typical stationary power applications of supercapacitors so far |
| 11.3. | Primary conclusions: regional differences and typical values by application |
| 11.4. | US railgun |
| 11.5. | Some supercapacitor applications targeted by manufacturers by sector |
| 11.6. | Examples of the large emerging market for 0.1 kWh to 1MWh supercapacitors |
| 11.7. | Trackside train and tram regeneration |
| 11.8. | Bombardier, Siemens, Cegelec, Greentech light rail and tram |
| 11.9. | Light rail: regen supercapacitors on train or trackside |
| 11.10. | Wayside Rail HESS: Frequency regulation, energy efficiency |
| 11.11. | Supercapacitors in the energy sector |
| 11.12. | Overview |
| 11.13. | New generation wave power and wave heave compensation |
| 11.14. | New generation tidal power |
| 11.15. | Wind power |
| 11.16. | Wind turbine protection and output smoothing |
| 11.17. | Airborne Wind Energy AWE |
| 11.18. | Utility energy storage and large UPS |
| 11.19. | The role of supercapacitors in the grid |
| 11.20. | Maxwell insight |
| 11.21. | Hybrid electric energy storage HEES: benefits |
| 11.22. | Purdue and Wisconsin Universities insight |
| 11.23. | Solid Oxide Electrolyser Cell SOEC fuel cell HEES with supercapacitor storage in grid |
| 11.24. | Example: Duke Energy Rankin PV intermittency smoothing + load shifting |
| 11.25. | Example: smoothing wind farm power output |
| 11.26. | Freqcon - utility-scale supercapacitors |
| 11.27. | Microgrids |
| 11.28. | Example: Ireland microgrid test bed |
| 11.29. | Borkum Municipality with a flagship project for stationary energy storage |
| 11.30. | Flywheels |
| 12. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 12.1. | Company Profiles |
| 12.2. | Manufacturers of supercapacitors and derivatives for stationary energy storage |
| 12.3. | Explanation of our 10 assessment columns |
| 12.4. | Number of supercapacitor manufacturers by territory 2020 and trend to 2041 |
| Slides | 395 |
|---|---|
| Forecasts to | 2042 |