This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
1.1. | Definitions and context |
1.2. | Emerging needs |
1.2.1. | Decarbonising, securing, cost-reducing, scaling electricity supply |
1.2.2. | The largest stationary storage markets 2022-2042 |
1.2.3. | Seasonal and months of electricity shortage will not be solved by storage alone |
1.3. | Future toolkit for stationary energy storage |
1.4. | Importance of hydrogen and ammonia for electricity-to-electricity storage |
1.5. | Potential technologies |
1.5.1. | Beyond hydrogen and pumped hydro by storage time and power output |
1.5.2. | Battery contestants compared |
1.5.3. | Storage contestants beyond battery and supercapacitor compared |
1.6. | New options compared in storage time and scale |
1.7. | Levelised cost of storage LCOS comparisons |
1.8. | Long duration energy storage coming center stage |
1.9. | Mature technologies pumped hydro and lithium-ion batteries in detail |
1.10. | Conclusions concerning lithium-based battery competitive position for stationary storage 2022-2042 |
1.11. | Why lithium batteries will lose stationary market share in a few years |
1.12. | Primary conclusions for stationary storage without batteries 2021-2041: big picture |
1.13. | Primary conclusions for stationary storage without batteries 2021-2041: Technology choices |
1.14. | Progress to enduring profitability by technology 2022 |
1.15. | Progress to enduring profitability by technology 2032 |
1.16. | Progress to enduring profitability by technology 2042 |
1.17. | Stationary storage market and technology roadmap 2022-2042 |
1.18. | Possible scenario for stationary storage by eight technologies $ billion 2022-2042 |
1.19. | All energy storage: possible scenario of dollar sales by technology in 2042 |
1.20. | Possible other forecasts |
1.20.1. | Gravity, liquid air and compressed air stationary energy storage MW installed 2020-2031 |
1.20.2. | Installed gravity, liquid air, compressed air energy storage MW to 2030 |
1.20.3. | Forecast for installed liquid air, compressed air and gravity energy storage MWh to 2030 |
1.20.4. | RFB, Na-ion, Zn-based, high temperature battery forecasts GWh and $ billion to 2032 |
1.20.5. | Addressable Li-ion markets (GWh) - 2020-2032 |
1.20.6. | Li-ion battery addressable market (GWh) by sector - 2020-2032 |
1.20.7. | Li-ion batteries for stationary storage GWh 2032-2042 |
1.20.8. | Global supercapacitor market by application $ billion 2021-2041 with 10 top suppliers' sales |
1.21. | Supercapacitor technology roadmap 2022-2042 |
1.22. | Commercialisation timelines for RFB, Na and Zn battery companies |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | The increasingly important role of stationary storage |
2.2. | ESS, BESS, BTM, FTM |
2.3. | Stationary Energy Storage Markets |
2.4. | Here comes a massive intermittency problem |
2.5. | Grid stability and other functions of stationary storage |
2.6. | Emerging W/kg & Wh/kg are a focus for the smaller systems |
2.7. | Mature technologies pumped hydro and lithium-ion batteries |
2.8. | Some parameters and initiatives for different forms of stationary storage |
2.9. | Energy islands and underwater energy storage |
3. | HYDROGEN AND AMMONIA STORAGE |
3.1. | Overview |
3.2. | Hydrogen generation |
3.3. | Storage of hydrogen |
3.4. | Back to electricity with hydrogen turbines |
3.5. | Back to electricity with fuel cells |
4. | GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY STORAGE LIFTING WEIGHTS (GES) |
4.1. | Gravitational Energy Storage (GES) |
4.2. | History repeating itself? |
4.3. | Calculation from Gravitricity technology |
4.4. | Piston Based GES - Energy Stored example |
4.5. | GES Technology Classification |
4.6. | Can the GES reach the market? |
4.7. | Energy Vault - Technology working principle |
4.8. | Energy Vault - Brick Material |
4.9. | Energy Vault Technology and market analysis |
4.10. | Energy Vault Technology and market analysis |
4.11. | Gravitricity - Piston-based Energy storage |
4.12. | Gravitricity technology analysis |
4.13. | Underground - PHES |
4.14. | U-PHES - Gravity Power |
4.15. | U-PHES - Heindl Energy |
4.16. | Detailed description of Heindl Energy technology |
4.17. | U-PHES - Heindl Energy |
4.18. | Underground - PHES: Analysis |
4.19. | Storage using rails: ARES LLC Technology Overview |
4.20. | ARES Technologies: Traction Drive, Ridgeline |
4.21. | Technical Comparison: Traction Drive, Ridgeline |
4.22. | A considerable landscape footprint |
4.23. | ARES Market, and Technology analysis |
4.24. | Mountain Gravity Energy Storage (MGES): Overview |
4.25. | Mountain Gravity Energy Storage (MGES): Analysis |
5. | PUMPED HYDRO AND ITS NEW VARIANTS |
5.1. | Overview |
5.2. | Example of not needing to turn off excess wind power through 24 hours. |
5.3. | Beginning to be used for longer delay/duration where possible |
5.4. | Use hills if you lack mountains: RheEnergise |
5.5. | Going small: Natel Energy |
5.6. | Underwater: Ocean Grazer |
5.7. | Under Water Energy Storage (UWES) - Analysis |
6. | COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE (CAES) |
6.1. | CAES Historical Development |
6.2. | Hydrostor's 200MW/1,600MWh Broken Hill project |
6.3. | CAES Technologies overview |
6.4. | Drawbacks of CAES |
6.5. | Diabatic Compressed Energy Storage (D-CAES) |
6.6. | Huntorf D-CAES - North of Germany |
6.7. | McIntosh D-CAES - US Alabama |
6.8. | Adiabatic - Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) |
6.9. | A - CAES analysis |
6.10. | Isothermal - Compressed Air Energy Storage (I - CAES) |
6.11. | Main players in CAES technologies |
6.12. | CAES Players and Project |
6.13. | EnergyDome compressed CO2 |
7. | LIQUID AIR ENERGY STORAGE (LAES) OR CO2 |
7.1. | Overview |
7.2. | LAES Players and their targets |
7.3. | LAES economics compared with alternatives |
7.4. | World's largest liquid air energy storage |
7.5. | Materials and liquefaction processes |
7.6. | LAES Historical Evolution |
7.7. | IDTechEx LAES conclusions |
7.8. | Liquid carbon dioxide energy storage |
8. | THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE (TES) |
8.1. | TES Technology Overview and Classification |
8.2. | Electric Thermal Energy Storage ETES |
8.3. | Operating principle |
8.4. | IDTechEx appraisal |
8.5. | Best at large capacity |
8.6. | ETES costing |
8.7. | Diurnal TES Systems - Solar Thermal Power Plants (CSP) |
9. | REDOX FLOW BATTERIES (RFB) |
9.1. | Redox flow batteries overview |
9.2. | Redox flow batteries working principle |
9.3. | Exploded view of VRFB |
9.4. | The case for RFBs: Stationary Batteries Comparison |
9.5. | RFB chemistries: All Vanadium (VRFB) |
9.6. | RFB chemistries: Zinc Bromine flow battery (ZBB) - Hybrid |
9.7. | RFB chemistries: Hydrogen/Bromide - Hybrid |
9.8. | RFB Chemistries: all Iron - Hybrid |
9.9. | Other RFBs: Organic Redox Flow Battery |
9.10. | Some significant RFB orders |
10. | NEW FORMS OF BATTERY Na, Al, Zn, Ca, Fe, HIGH TEMPERATURE |
10.1. | Overview |
10.2. | Value proposition of Na-ion batteries |
10.3. | Zn-based batteries |
10.4. | Zn-based battery formats |
10.5. | Rechargeable zinc battery companies |
10.6. | Zinc-air batteries |
10.7. | Problems and solutions for rechargeable Zn-air batteries |
10.8. | Zinc 8 Energy |
10.9. | Zinc 8 Energy IP |
10.10. | E-Zinc |
10.11. | Zinc bromide batteries |
10.12. | Eos Energy Enterprise |
10.13. | Eos Energy - static Zn-Br battery |
10.14. | Eos Energy technology |
10.15. | Rechargeable Zn-MnO2 |
10.16. | Zn-ion battery - Salient Energy |
10.17. | Salient Energy IP |
10.18. | Enerpoly |
10.19. | Remarks on Zn-based batteries |
10.20. | High-temperature batteries |
10.21. | NaS - NGK Insulators |
10.22. | Molten calcium battery - Ambri Inc |
10.23. | Lithium-ion photovoltaics |
11. | LI-ION CAPACITORS, PSEUDOCAPACITORS, SUPERCAPACITORS, SUPERCONDUCTING FLYWHEELS |
11.1. | Basics |
11.2. | Typical stationary power applications of supercapacitors so far |
11.3. | Primary conclusions: regional differences and typical values by application |
11.4. | US railgun |
11.5. | Some supercapacitor applications targeted by manufacturers by sector |
11.6. | Examples of the large emerging market for 0.1 kWh to 1MWh supercapacitors |
11.7. | Trackside train and tram regeneration |
11.8. | Bombardier, Siemens, Cegelec, Greentech light rail and tram |
11.9. | Light rail: regen supercapacitors on train or trackside |
11.10. | Wayside Rail HESS: Frequency regulation, energy efficiency |
11.11. | Supercapacitors in the energy sector |
11.12. | Overview |
11.13. | New generation wave power and wave heave compensation |
11.14. | New generation tidal power |
11.15. | Wind power |
11.16. | Wind turbine protection and output smoothing |
11.17. | Airborne Wind Energy AWE |
11.18. | Utility energy storage and large UPS |
11.19. | The role of supercapacitors in the grid |
11.20. | Maxwell insight |
11.21. | Hybrid electric energy storage HEES: benefits |
11.22. | Purdue and Wisconsin Universities insight |
11.23. | Solid Oxide Electrolyser Cell SOEC fuel cell HEES with supercapacitor storage in grid |
11.24. | Example: Duke Energy Rankin PV intermittency smoothing + load shifting |
11.25. | Example: smoothing wind farm power output |
11.26. | Freqcon - utility-scale supercapacitors |
11.27. | Microgrids |
11.28. | Example: Ireland microgrid test bed |
11.29. | Borkum Municipality with a flagship project for stationary energy storage |
11.30. | Flywheels |
12. | COMPANY PROFILES |
12.1. | Company Profiles |
12.2. | Manufacturers of supercapacitors and derivatives for stationary energy storage |
12.3. | Explanation of our 10 assessment columns |
12.4. | Number of supercapacitor manufacturers by territory 2020 and trend to 2041 |
幻灯片 | 395 |
---|---|
预测 | 2042 |