This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
1.1. | Definition and overview |
1.1. | Wurth Texas Instruments demonstrator transmitter and receiver |
1.1. | Wireless charging vs charging with contacts for powering electronic and electrical devices. |
1.2. | Wireless power technologies by emission type, characteristics. Green is greatest use and potential. |
1.2. | Wireless charging forecasts compared |
1.2. | Wireless charging for portable electronics |
1.3. | Situation in 2017 |
1.3. | Global smart phone shipments 2006-2021 billions. |
1.3. | Wireless charging vs energy harvesting winner by power: the next 30 years |
1.3.1. | Mobile phones, other portable electronics, electrical goods |
1.3.2. | Cars and other vehicles |
1.4. | Technology roadmap and market forecasts 2017-2027 |
1.4. | Electric vehicle forecasts 2017-2027 - Numbers |
1.4. | Technology roadmap 2017-2027 |
1.4.1. | Technology roadmap 2017-2027 |
1.4.2. | Market forecasts electrical, electronic, electric vehicle WC 2017-2027 |
1.4.3. | Developers and manufacturers |
1.4.4. | Regional trends |
1.4.5. | Background information from other analysts |
1.4.6. | Addressable markets |
1.4.7. | Global smart phone shipments 2006-2021 billions |
1.4.8. | Electric vehicle forecasts 2017-2027 |
1.5. | Technology |
1.5. | Basic one-on-one WC |
1.5. | Electric toothbrushes and other electric devices WC |
1.6. | Mobile phones and other electronic devices WC |
1.6. | Qualcomm vision |
1.6. | Technical options for static WC |
1.7. | Dynamic charging |
1.7. | IDTechEx vision for clean electricity from free ambient energy powering semi-dynamic and dynamic charging at point of use |
1.7. | Electric vehicle WC |
1.7.1. | Honda dynamic charging |
1.8. | Market dynamics |
1.8. | The trends of power needs and use of energy harvesting and wireless charging to meet them, shown as a function of power requirement |
1.8. | Electric vehicle forecasts 2017-2027 - Numbers |
1.8.1. | Market sweet spot |
1.8.2. | Market dynamics |
1.9. | Summary of on-road wireless charging situation in 2017 |
1.9. | Electric rail to recharge electric vehicles - Stockholm, Sweden |
1.9. | Market dynamics of low vs high power static WC |
1.10. | IEC adopts Qi in 2017 |
1.11. | Pi Charger - late 2017 |
1.12. | The rail alternative |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Main trends |
2.1. | Wireless power transfer technologies |
2.2. | Charging phones vs charging cars: comparison in 2017 |
2.2.1. | Phones |
2.2.2. | Cars |
2.3. | History |
2.4. | Wireless power transfer |
2.4.1. | Adoption - who wins |
2.5. | Qi the winning specification for personal electronics - so far |
2.6. | AirFuel Alliance |
2.7. | Apple and Qi |
2.8. | Wireless vehicle charging |
3. | WIRELESS CHARGING OF PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES |
3.1. | Main trends |
3.1. | Why we need wireless charging |
3.2. | WPC situation September 2015 |
3.2. | Misleading terminology |
3.3. | Challenges |
3.3. | WPC adoption forecast |
3.4. | Innovation with Qi |
3.4. | Real problems |
3.5. | Disney announces room-filling, wireless-charging - late 2017 |
3.5. | WPC program to have a longer range option by end 2015. |
3.6. | Comparison of options |
3.6. | Energous and Apple |
3.7. | Ossia Cota |
3.7. | Multi-standard solutions |
3.8. | Regulatory perception and Qi low frequency compared with higher frequency proposed by others. |
3.8. | Wi-Charge |
3.9. | WiTricity |
3.9. | The big picture |
4. | WIRELESS CHARGING FOR VEHICLES WHEN STATIONARY |
4.1. | Introduction |
4.1. | Proliferation of power electronics in EVs. Newer additions shown in large font |
4.2. | WiTricity slide on standards bodies collaborating to create a single compatible vehicle set for WC |
4.2. | Standards for vehicle WC |
4.3. | Recent activity |
4.3. | Evatran transmitter |
4.3.1. | BMW, Germany Nanyang Singapore |
4.3.2. | Evatran for Tesla, Nissan, Chevrolet |
4.3.3. | Fraunhofer wireless discharging, lightweighting, dynamic |
4.3.4. | Hyundai-Kia Korea: Mojo USA |
4.3.5. | Matrix Charging |
4.3.6. | Oak Ridge National Laboratory's 20-kilowatt wireless charging for electric vehicles |
4.3.7. | PRIMOVE Belgium |
4.3.8. | Wärtsilä Marine Solutions - very high power marine charging |
4.3.9. | Yutong and ZTE China |
4.4. | Oak Ridge National Laboratory's 20-kilowatt wireless charging system features 90 percent efficiency |
4.5. | The new electric buses in Bruges, Belgium |
5. | DYNAMIC CHARGING OF VEHICLES |
5.1. | Introduction |
5.1. | Highways Agency assessment of in-road inductive charging of vehicles September 2015 |
5.1. | Comparison of pn junction and photoelectrochemical photovoltaics |
5.2. | The main options for photovoltaics beyond conventional silicon compared |
5.2. | Priority lane dynamic charging |
5.2. | Road maintenance concerns |
5.3. | Semi dynamic charging |
5.3. | ElectRoad Israel |
5.4. | KAIST OLEVs |
5.4. | Fully dynamic charging |
5.4.1. | Auckland University New Zealand |
5.4.2. | Chinese photovoltaic solar highway experiment |
5.4.3. | Drayson Racing UK |
5.4.4. | ElectRoad Israel |
5.4.5. | Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology |
5.4.6. | Politecnico di Torino |
5.4.7. | Qualcomm USA |
5.4.8. | TDK Japan |
5.4.9. | University of Tokyo Japan |
5.4.10. | Utah State University USA |
5.5. | Timeline |
5.5. | Dynamic and static charging of the On Line Electric Vehicle OLEV bus servicing the KAIST campus in Daejon Korea. |
5.5.1. | Volvo Sweden |
5.6. | Proximity charged tram |
5.6. | Potential for new forms of static energy harvesting power dynamic charging |
5.6.1. | Airborne Wind Energy AWE |
5.6.2. | Favoured technologies |
5.6.3. | Billions in Change |
5.6.4. | Continental |
5.6.5. | EnerKite Germany |
5.6.6. | Google Makani USA |
5.6.7. | e-Wind USA |
5.6.8. | TwingTec Switzerland |
5.6.9. | Ampyx Power Netherlands |
5.6.10. | Altaeros USA |
5.6.11. | Kitemill Norway |
5.6.12. | Kitegen Italy |
5.6.13. | Commercialisation targets |
5.6.14. | IDTechEx assessment |
5.6.15. | ABB assessment |
5.7. | Energy harvesting shock absorbers |
5.7. | Qualcomm USA |
5.7.1. | Linear shock absorbers |
5.7.2. | Rotary shock absorbers |
5.7.3. | Tenneco Automotive Operating Company USA |
5.8. | Qualcomm vision - next enabling and transitional technologies |
5.8. | Witt Energy UK |
5.9. | Photovoltaic harvesting |
5.9. | Test track schematic |
5.9.1. | Flexible, conformal, transparent, UV, IR |
5.9.2. | Technological options |
5.9.3. | Principles of operation |
5.9.4. | Options for flexible PV |
5.9.5. | Many types of photovoltaics needed for harvesting |
5.9.6. | Spray on power for electric vehicles and more |
5.9.7. | New world record for both sides-contacted silicon solar cells |
5.10. | Test track ghost diagram |
5.10. | Powerweave harvesting and storage e-fiber/ e-textile |
5.11. | Solar roads find many uses |
5.11. | AWE conference |
5.12. | View of AWE risks |
5.13. | E-kite ground station |
5.14. | EnerKite presentation |
5.15. | Google Makani M600 prototype |
5.16. | e-Wind proposition hiring land from farmers |
5.17. | TwingTec USP |
5.18. | Ampyx slides - examples |
5.19. | Altaeros presentation |
5.20. | Altaeros BAT airborne wind turbine compared |
5.21. | Kitemill presentation |
5.22. | Kitegen kite providing supplementary power to a ship |
5.23. | ABB assessment |
5.24. | Tether drag solution |
5.25. | Power potential of energy harvesting shock absorbers |
5.26. | Energy harvesting shock absorbers being progressed by the State University of New York |
5.27. | Tufts University and Electric Truck energy harvesting shock absorbers |
5.28. | Wattshocks electricity generating shock absorber |
5.29. | Wattshocks publicity |
5.30. | On-road test SUV |
5.31. | Witt presentation at IDTechEx event Berlin April 2015 - extracts |
5.32. | Kopf Solarshiff pure electric solar powered lake boats in Germany and the UK for up to 150 people |
5.33. | NREL adjudication of efficiencies under standard conditions |
5.34. | Powerweave |
5.35. | Solar roads |
6. | ALTERNATIVES TO WIRELESS CHARGING FOR VEHICLES |
6.1. | Examples of vehicles with solar traction power and no need for charging |
6.1. | Electric vehicles that are never charged externally |
6.1.1. | Introduction |
6.1.2. | Options for energy autonomous vehicles |
6.2. | Robotic charging |
6.2. | Proliferation of actual and potential energy harvesting in land vehicles |
6.3. | Proliferation of actual and potential energy harvesting in marine vehicles |
6.3. | Gantries and catenaries |
6.4. | Robot arms |
6.4. | Proliferation of actual and potential energy harvesting in airborne vehicles |
6.4.1. | DBT-CEV France |
6.4.2. | PowerHydrant USA |
6.4.3. | Tesla solid metal snake USA |
6.4.4. | Volkswagen Germany |
6.5. | Energy Independent Electric Vehicles EIV |
6.5. | Examples of gantry charging for buses. Top ABB TOSA, next Proterra. |
6.6. | PowerHydrant presentation at IDTechEx event 2015 |
6.7. | Tesla solid metal snake |
6.8. | Examples of EIVs that never need charging from external electric sources. |
7. | EXAMPLES OF INTERVIEWS |
7.1. | WAVE bus system |
7.1. | BYD China |
7.2. | Hevo Power USA, WAVE USA, WiTricity USA |
7.2. | Range difficulties with pure electric industrial vehicles |
7.3. | Proterra view on WC vs other charging of buses today. |
7.3. | Idaho State Laboratory USA |
7.4. | Infineon USA/Germany |
7.4. | Qualcomm positioning |
7.5. | Qualcomm car coils |
7.5. | PowerHydrant USA |
7.6. | Qualcomm USA |
7.6. | Qualcomm FABRIC Honda project |
7.7. | WiTricity overview |
7.7. | University of Tokyo, Japan |
7.8. | WiTricity USA |
7.8. | WiTricity IP position |
7.9. | Key extracts from the WiTricity presentation at the IDTechEx event in Berlin 2015 |
7.9. | XALT Energy USA |
IDTECHEX RESEARCH REPORTS AND CONSULTANCY | |
TABLES | |
FIGURES |
Pages | 198 |
---|---|
Tables | 12 |
Figures | 75 |
Forecasts to | 2027 |