Entfernung von Kohlendioxid (CDR) 2025-2035: Technologien, Akteure, Märkte für Emissionsgutschriften und Prognosen

Technologien zur Entfernung von Kohlendioxid, einschließlich DACCS (Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage), BECCS, Biokohle, Aufforstung/Wiederaufforstung, Mineralisierung, CDR auf Ozeanen, mit Trends, Prognosen und Märkten für Emissionsgutschriften

By
Show All Description Contents, Table & Figures List FAQs Pricing Related Content
In 2024, pre-purchases of durable, engineered carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits in the voluntary carbon credit markets reached a new record high. Corporate demand for these high-quality credits continues to outstrip supply, driving the scale-up of emerging carbon dioxide removal technologies. With the increasing overlap of voluntary and compliance carbon markets - such as mechanisms for Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement - the business case for CDR technologies is solidifying.
 
"Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) 2025-2035:, Technologies, Players, Carbon Credit Markets, and Forecasts" provides a comprehensive outlook of the emerging CDR industry and carbon credit markets, with an in-depth analysis of the technological, economic, regulatory, and environmental aspects that are shaping this market. In it, IDTechEx focuses on technologies that actively remove CO₂ from the atmosphere and sequester it into carbon sinks, namely:
1. Direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), which leverages chemical processes to capture CO₂ directly from the air and sequester it in geologic formations or durable products.
 
2. Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS), which involves strategies that use biomass to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and store it underground or in long-lived products. It includes approaches such as BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage), biochar, biomass burial, and bio-oil underground injection.
 
3. Land-based CDR methods that leverage biological processes to increase carbon stocks in soils, forests, and other terrestrial ecosystems, i.e. afforestation and reforestation and soil carbon sequestration techniques.
 
4. Mineralization CDR technologies that enhance natural mineral processes that permanently bind CO₂ from the atmosphere with rocks through enhanced rock weathering, carbonation of mineral wastes, and oxide looping.
 
5. Ocean-based CDR methods that strengthen the ocean carbon pump through ocean alkalinity enhancement, direct ocean capture, artificial upwelling/downwelling, coastal blue carbon, algae cultivation/marine seaweed sinking, and ocean fertilization.
 
Carbon credit market revenue for durable, engineered carbon dioxide removal technologies will exceed US$14 billion in 2035. Source: IDTechEx
 
These CDR technologies are at a wide range of technology readiness levels. Durable, engineered CDR technologies that have potential for vast scale deployment - such as DACCS and BECCS - currently receive government support through subsidies or tax credits (such as the 45Q tax credit in the US) alongside generating revenue from voluntary carbon credit markets as businesses seek to address scope 3 CO2 emissions. These technologies are expected to make the biggest contribution to carbon credit revenue in 2035 according to IDTechEx forecasting.
 
DACCS reaches the megatonne scale in 2025
In 2024, DAC pioneer Climeworks inaugurated the world's largest direct air capture facility, removing 40,000 tonnes per year of CO2 from the atmosphere. With the completion of 1PointFive's Stratos facility in 2025, DACCS will be catapulted to the megatonne scale. While large-scale facilities are reducing costs, there are now over a hundred companies active in the DACCS space, seeking further improvements that can lower capture costs. With different sorbents, regeneration methods, and equipment designs being pursued, DACCS continues to see significant public sector and private sector funding. By considering economics and energy demand, this report examines which direct air capture technologies are likely to be most successful.
 
Accelerating electrochemical methods of carbon dioxide removal
All forms of durable, engineered carbon dioxide removal technologies have been scaling up because demand for high quality carbon credits currently outstrips supply. One interesting trend is the growth in electrochemical CDR. Energy demand can often be a significant contributor to capture cost. In recent years, several start-ups have begun to develop electrochemical methods of carbon dioxide removal in search of increased energy efficiency and better compatibility with intermittent renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. Electrolysis and electrodialysis technologies are the frontrunners in the direct ocean capture space, and similar pH-swing electrochemical methods have seen increased investment interest for direct air capture. This report analyses the reality of electrochemical CDR - including economics, manufacturing and supply chain development, technical challenges, and key players.
 
Comprehensive analysis and market forecasts
This IDTechEx report assesses the CDR carbon credit market in detail, evaluating the different technologies, latest advancements, and potential adoption drivers and barriers. The report also includes a granular forecast until 2035 for the deployment of eight CDR categories (Temperature-based DACCS, electrochemical DACCS, BECCS, biochar, biomass burial, direct ocean capture, ocean alkalinity enhancement, and enhanced rock weathering), alongside exclusive analysis and interview-based company profiles.
 
Key aspects:
This report provides the following information:
 
Technology and market analysis:
• Data and context on each type of carbon dioxide removal solution including direct air capture.
• Analysis of the challenges and opportunities in the nascent CDR (carbon dioxide removal) carbon credit markets.
• State of the art and innovation in the field for direct air capture - including emerging technologies such as electrochemical approaches and equipment design.
• Detailed overview of CDR technologies: land-based, mineralization-based, ocean-based, DACCS (direct air carbon capture with storage), and BiCRS (biomass with carbon capture and storage).
• Market potential (both voluntary and compliance) of CDR carbon offsets.
• Key strategies and economies for scaling up CDR technologies.
• Assessment of requirements (infrastructure, energy, supply chain, etc) for CDR market uptake, with a focus on direct air capture.
• Climate benefit potential of main CDR solutions.
• Benchmarking based on factors such as technology readiness level (TRL), cost, and scale potential.
• Key regulations and policies influencing the CDR market.
 
Player analysis and trends:
• Primary information from key CDR-related companies.
• Analysis of CDR players' latest developments, observing projects announced, funding, trends, and partnerships.
 
Market forecasts and analysis:
• Granular market forecasts until 2035 for durable, engineered CDR solutions, subdivided in eight technological areas.
Report MetricsDetails
CAGRDurable carbon dioxide removal carbon credit market to reach US$14 billion in 2035. This represents a CAGR of 38.0% (2025-2035).
Forecast Period2025 - 2035
Forecast UnitsRemoval capacity:million tonnes of CO2 per annum (Mtpa), Annual revenue for CDR carbon credits: US$
Regions CoveredWorldwide
Segments CoveredDACCS (temperature-based DAC and electrochemical DAC), BiCRS (BECCS, biochar, biomass burial), Ocean-based durable CDR (direct ocean capture, ocean alkalinity enhancement), Mineralization-based CDR (enhanced rock weathering).
Analyst access from IDTechEx
All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.
Further information
If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact our report team at research@IDTechEx.com or call one of our sales managers:

AMERICAS (USA): +1 617 577 7890
ASIA (Japan and Korea): +81 3 3216 7209
EUROPE (UK) +44 1223 812300
1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1.Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)?
1.2.The CDR technologies covered in this report (1/2)
1.3.The CDR technologies covered in this report (2/2)
1.4.Scale and technology readiness level of carbon dioxide removal methods
1.5.The CDR business model and its challenges: Carbon credits
1.6.The carbon removal supply chain: Carbon credit market players
1.7.Shifting buyer preferences for durable CDR in carbon credit markets
1.8.Overall picture: Voluntary carbon credit markets in 2024
1.9.How expensive were durable carbon removals in 2024?
1.10.DACCS: Summary
1.11.Current status of DACCS
1.12.The role of tax credits in supporting DACCS: 45Q and ITC
1.13.What are the major challenges for scaling up direct air capture?
1.14.DAC technology landscape: Companies
1.15.Which DAC technologies will be the most successful?
1.16.How will DAC technologies develop?
1.17.Solid sorbents - semi-continuous operation can lower energy intensity
1.18.Electrochemical DAC: Key takeaways
1.19.The potential for BiCRS goes beyond BECCS: Benchmarking
1.20.Most existing BECCS projects are in ethanol production
1.21.Solvent capture technologies dominate the BECCS space
1.22.Government support for BECCS is accelerating
1.23.BECCS: Key takeaways
1.24.The state of the global biochar market
1.25.Biochar CDR is scaling up
1.26.Biochar: Key takeaways
1.27.BiCRS Value Chain
1.28.Afforestation and reforestation: Key takeaways
1.29.Key takeaways: Soil carbon sequestration
1.30.Key takeaways: Mineralization CDR
1.31.Key players in ocean-based CDR
1.32.Key takeaways: Ocean-based CDR
1.33.Carbon dioxide removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
1.34.Carbon dioxide removal annual carbon credit revenue forecast by technology (billion US$), 2025-2035
1.35.Carbon dioxide removal market forecast, 2025-2035: Discussion
1.36.The evolution of the durable CDR market
1.37.Access More With an IDTechEx Subscription
2.INTRODUCTION
2.1.Introduction and general analysis
2.1.1.What is carbon dioxide removal (CDR)?
2.1.2.Description of the main CDR methods
2.1.3.Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)?
2.1.4.What is the difference between CDR and CCUS?
2.1.5.High-quality carbon removals: Durability, permanence, additionality
2.1.6.Scale and technology readiness level of carbon dioxide removal methods
2.1.7.Carbon dioxide removal technology benchmarking
2.1.8.Status and potential of CDR technologies
2.1.9.Monitoring, reporting, and verification of CDR
2.1.10.CDR: Deferring the problem?
2.1.11.What is needed to further develop the CDR sector?
2.1.12.CDR market traction in 2024
2.1.13.The Xprize Carbon Removal
2.1.14.Regional factors could determine the best CDR strategy
2.2.Carbon credit markets
2.2.1.Global climate action - the Paris Agreement
2.2.2.Carbon pricing and carbon markets
2.2.3.Compliance carbon pricing mechanisms across the globe
2.2.4.What is the price of CO2 in global carbon pricing mechanisms?
2.2.5.What is a carbon credit?
2.2.6.How are carbon credits certified?
2.2.7.The role of carbon registries in the credit market
2.2.8.Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) of Carbon Credits
2.2.9.How are voluntary carbon credits purchased?
2.2.10.The carbon removal carbon credit market players
2.2.11.Interaction between compliance markets and voluntary markets (geographical)
2.2.12.Interaction between compliance markets and voluntary markets (sectoral)
2.2.13.Governmental carbon crediting mechanisms
2.2.14.Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement: Global, unified carbon credit market
2.2.15.Quality of carbon credits
2.2.16.Carbon removal vs carbon avoidance/reduction credits
2.2.17.Carbon dioxide removal vs emissions reductions
2.2.18.Carbon dioxide removal has a very limited role in $100 billion compliance markets
2.2.19.The state of CDR in the voluntary carbon market
2.2.20.Shifting buyer preferences for durable CDR in carbon credit markets
2.2.21.Overall picture: Voluntary carbon credit markets in 2024
2.2.22.Advanced market commitment in durable CDR
2.2.23.Businesses should be investing in carbon dioxide removal now
2.2.24.Biggest durable carbon removal buyers
2.2.25.Pre-purchases still dominate the durable CDR space
2.2.26.Prices of CDR credits
2.2.27.How expensive were durable carbon removals in 2024?
2.2.28.Current carbon credit prices by company and technology
2.2.29.Carbon market sizes
2.2.30.Are there enough buyers for durable CDR technologies?
2.2.31.CDR technologies: key takeaways
3.DIRECT AIR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (DACCS)
3.1.Introduction to direct air capture (DAC)
3.1.1.What is direct air capture (DAC)?
3.1.2.Why DACCS as a CDR solution?
3.1.3.Current status of DACCS
3.1.4.DACCS project pipeline: Locations and technologies
3.1.5.Momentum: Policy support for DAC by region
3.1.6.The role of tax credits in supporting DACCS: 45Q and ITC
3.1.7.The US has plans to establish 20 large-scale regional DAC Hubs
3.1.8.Momentum: Private investment in DAC
3.1.9.Where did money for DAC come from in 2024?
3.1.10.DAC land requirement is an advantage
3.1.11.DAC vs point-source carbon capture
3.1.12.Power requirements for DAC
3.1.13.Nameplate capacity vs actual net removal
3.1.14.Difficulties sourcing clean energy
3.1.15.Operational flexibility - powering DAC with intermittent renewables
3.1.16.What are the major challenges for scaling up direct air capture?
3.2.Leading DAC technologies
3.2.1.CO2 capture/separation mechanisms in DAC
3.2.2.Direct air capture technologies
3.2.3.Regeneration methods for solid and liquid DAC
3.2.4.Comparing regeneration methods for solid and liquid DAC
3.2.5.Leading DAC companies
3.2.6.Direct air capture space: Technology and location breakdown
3.2.7.Solid sorbents for DAC
3.2.8.Climeworks
3.2.9.Process flow diagram of S-DAC: Climeworks
3.2.10.Solid sorbents - semi-continuous operation can lower energy intensity
3.2.11.Heirloom
3.2.12.Process flow diagram of CaO looping: Heirloom
3.2.13.Liquid solvents for DAC
3.2.14.Liquid solvent-based DAC: Carbon Engineering
3.2.15.Carbon Engineering
3.2.16.Stratos: Bringing DAC to the half megatonne scale
3.2.17.Process flow diagram of L-DAC: Carbon Engineering
3.2.18.DAC process: Climeworks and Carbon Engineering
3.2.19.Electricity and heat sources: Climeworks and Carbon Engineering
3.2.20.Requirements to capture 1 Mt of CO2 per year: Climeworks and Carbon Engineering
3.2.21.DAC technology landscape: Companies
3.2.22.Which DAC technologies will be the most successful?
3.2.23.How will DAC technologies develop?
3.2.24.DACCS carbon credit sales by company
3.3.Electroswing/electrochemical DAC technologies
3.3.1.Electroswing/electrochemical DAC
3.3.2.Types of electrochemical DAC (1/2)
3.3.3.Types of electrochemical DAC (2/2)
3.3.4.Desired characteristics of electrochemical cell components
3.3.5.Electrochemical DAC company landscape
3.3.6.Benchmarking electrochemical DAC methods
3.3.7.Technical challenges in electrochemical DAC
3.3.8.Electrochemical DAC: Flexibility for low-cost intermittent renewable power
3.3.9.Electrochemical DAC costs depend strongly on electricity prices
3.3.10.Electrochemical DAC: Key takeaways
3.4.Novel DAC technologies
3.4.1.Moisture-swing direct air capture (humidity swing)
3.4.2.Ion exchange resins for moisture swing DAC
3.4.3.Cryogenic direct air capture companies
3.4.4.Membrane direct air capture
3.4.5.Reactive direct air capture - combined capture and conversion
3.5.Equipment for DAC - design and manufacturing
3.5.1.Manufacturing supply chains for DAC
3.5.2.Air contactors: Existing designs
3.5.3.Commercial air contactor manufacturing facility
3.5.4.Lessons learned from Carbon Engineering: Adapt existing industrial equipment to establish supply chain
3.5.5.Lessons learned from Global Thermostat: Partnerships essential for technology development
3.5.6.Passive air contacting
3.5.7.Integration DAC into existing industrial processes: Cooling towers, HVAC, and waste heat
3.6.DAC economics
3.6.1.The economics of DAC
3.6.2.The CAPEX of DAC: Sub-system contribution
3.6.3.The OPEX of DAC
3.6.4.Overall capture cost of DAC (1/2)
3.6.5.Overall capture cost of DAC (2/2)
3.6.6.Component specific capture cost contributions for DACCS
3.6.7.Financing DAC
3.6.8.Business models for DAC
3.6.9.Direct air capture carbon credit selling prices
3.7.CO2 storage
3.7.1.DAC must be coupled with permanent storage for carbon dioxide removals
3.7.2.Storing supercritical CO₂ underground
3.7.3.Mechanisms of subsurface CO₂ trapping
3.7.4.CO2 leakage is a small risk
3.7.5.Storage type for geologic CO2 storage: Saline aquifers
3.7.6.Storage type for geologic CO2 storage: Depleted oil and gas fields
3.7.7.Unconventional storage resources: Basalts and ultra-mafic rocks
3.7.8.Estimates of global CO₂ storage space
3.7.9.CO2 storage potential by country
3.7.10.Permitting and authorization of CO2 storage
3.7.11.Class VI permits are delaying DACCS development in US
3.7.12.Examples of storage providers for DAC
3.7.13.Key takeaways: CO2 storage
3.8.DAC Challenges
3.8.1.Challenges associated with DAC technology
3.8.2.Oil and gas sector involvement in DAC
3.8.3.DACCS co-location with geothermal energy
3.8.4.What can DAC learn from the wind and solar industries' scale-up?
3.8.5.What is needed for DAC to achieve the gigatonne capacity by 2050?
3.8.6.DACCS SWOT analysis
3.8.7.DACCS: Summary
4.BIOMASS WITH CARBON REMOVAL AND STORAGE (BICRS)
4.1.Introduction
4.1.1.Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS)
4.1.2.BiCRS possible feedstocks
4.1.3.What type of biomass is currently used for CDR?
4.1.4.The potential for BiCRS goes beyond BECCS: Benchmarking
4.1.5.BiCRS conversion pathways
4.2.Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
4.2.1.Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
4.2.2.Point source capture technologies
4.2.3.Most existing BECCS projects are in ethanol production
4.2.4.Solvent capture technologies dominate the BECCS space
4.2.5.Amine-solvent technologies dominate BECCS
4.2.6.Government support for BECCS is accelerating
4.2.7.BECCS business model - Ørsted example
4.2.8.BECCS dominates the sales of durable, engineered CDR credits
4.2.9.Biogenic CO2 must be coupled with permanent storage for carbon dioxide removals
4.2.10.BECCS projects - trends and discussion
4.2.11.UK BECCS case studies
4.2.12.Ethanol production dominates the BECCS project pipeline
4.2.13.Network connecting bioethanol plants for BECCS
4.2.14.Opportunities in BECCS: Heat generation
4.2.15.Opportunities in BECCS: Waste-to-energy
4.2.16.The challenges of BECCS
4.2.17.The energy and carbon efficiency of BECCS
4.2.18.Importance of regrowth rates on carbon accounting for biogenic emissions
4.2.19.Is BECCS sustainable?
4.2.20.BECCS: Key takeaways
4.3.Biochar
4.3.1.What is biochar?
4.3.2.How is biochar produced? (1/2)
4.3.3.How is biochar produced? (2/2)
4.3.4.Biochar feedstocks
4.3.5.Permanence of biochar carbon removal
4.3.6.Biochar applications
4.3.7.Economic considerations in biochar production (1)
4.3.8.Economic considerations in biochar production (2)
4.3.9.Biochar: Market and business model
4.3.10.The state of the global biochar market
4.3.11.Artisanal vs industrial biochar
4.3.12.Biochar carbon credit selling price
4.3.13.Key players in biochar CDR by scale
4.3.14.Biochar business model: Equipment suppliers and project developers
4.3.15.Biochar business model: Discussion
4.3.16.Biochar legislation and certification
4.3.17.Additionality of biochar carbon removal
4.3.18.Biochar: Key takeaways
4.4.Other BiCRS (bio-oil and biomass burial)
4.4.1.Bio-oil geological storage for CDR
4.4.2.Biomass burial for CO2 removal
4.4.3.Capture costs below $100/tonne of CO2 drive popularity of biomass burial
4.4.4.Biomass burial commercial landscape
4.4.5.Best use of biomass - biochar, BECCS, or burial?
4.4.6.BiCRS Value Chain
5.AFFORESTATION/REFORESTATION
5.1.What are nature-based CDR approaches?
5.2.Why land-based carbon dioxide removal?
5.3.The CDR potential of afforestation and reforestation
5.4.The case for and against A/R for climate mitigation
5.5.Technologies in A/R: Remote sensing
5.6.Company landscape: Robotics in afforestation/reforestation
5.7.Afforestation/reforestation carbon credit market status in 2024
5.8.Afforestation/reforestation is already part of many government net-zero targets
5.9."Just plant more trees!" - sustainability and greenwashing considerations
5.10.Comparing A/R and BECCS solutions
5.11.Afforestation and reforestation: Key takeaways
6.SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION
6.1.What is soil carbon sequestration (SCS)?
6.2.The soil carbon sequestration potential is vast
6.3.Agricultural management practices to improve soil carbon sequestration
6.4.Companies using microbial inoculation for soil carbon sequestration
6.5.Approaches to MRV for soil carbon sequestration
6.6.Additionality, measurement, and permanency of soil carbon is in doubt
6.7.Challenges in SCS deployment
6.8.The soil carbon sequestration value chain
6.9.Market trends for soil carbon sequestration in 2024
6.10.Soil carbon sequestration carbon credit market status in 2024
6.11.Soil carbon sequestration pros and cons
6.12.Key takeaways: Soil carbon sequestration
7.BASED CDR
7.1.CO2 mineralization is key for CDR
7.2.Ex situ mineralization CDR methods
7.3.Source materials for ex situ mineralization
7.4.Ex situ carbonation of mineral wastes
7.5.Carbon dioxide storage in CO2-derived concrete
7.6.CO2-derived concrete: Commercial landscape
7.7.Oxide looping: Mineralization in DAC
7.8.Enhanced weathering
7.9.Enhanced rock weathering overview
7.10.MRV in Enhanced Rock Weathering
7.11.Enhanced weathering commercial landscape
7.12.Enhanced rock weathering CDR market
7.13.Enhanced rock weathering status: Startups
7.14.Key takeaways: Mineralization CDR
8.OCEAN-BASED CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL
8.1.Introduction
8.1.1.Ocean pumps continuously pull CO2 from the atmosphere into the ocean
8.1.2.Ocean-based CDR methods
8.1.3.Definitions of ocean-based CDR technologies
8.1.4.Why ocean-based CDR?
8.1.5.Scale and technology readiness level for ocean-based CDR
8.1.6.Benchmarking of ocean-based CDR methods
8.1.7.Key players in ocean-based CDR
8.2.Ocean-based CDR: Abiotic methods
8.2.1.Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE)
8.2.2.Electrochemical ocean alkalinity enhancement
8.2.3.Ocean alkalinity enhancement status: Start-ups
8.2.4.Direct ocean capture
8.2.5.Direct ocean capture status: Start-ups
8.2.6.Electrochemical direct ocean capture
8.2.7.Electrolysis for direct ocean capture: Avoiding chlorine formation
8.2.8.Other direct ocean capture technologies
8.2.9.Barriers remain for direct ocean capture
8.2.10.Artificial downwelling
8.3.Ocean-based CDR: Biotic methods
8.3.1.Status of coastal blue carbon credits in the voluntary carbon markets
8.3.2.Algal cultivation - seaweed sinking
8.3.3.Ocean fertilization
8.3.4.Several ocean fertilization start-ups have failed
8.3.5.Will ocean fertilization resurge in 2025?
8.3.6.Artificial upwelling
8.3.7.The governance challenge in large-scale deployment of ocean CDR
8.3.8.MRV for marine CDR
8.3.9.Price of ocean-based CDR credits
8.3.10.Key takeaways: Ocean-based CDR
9.CDR MARKET FORECASTS
9.1.Forecast scope: Durable, engineered removals
9.2.Forecast scope: Nature-based approaches
9.3.Overall Carbon Dioxide Removal Forecast Methodology/Scope
9.4.Carbon dioxide removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
9.5.Data table for carbon dioxide removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
9.6.Carbon dioxide removal carbon credit annual revenue forecast by technology (billion US$), 2025-2035
9.7.Data table for carbon dioxide removal carbon credit annual revenue forecast by technology (million US$), 2025-2035
9.8.Carbon dioxide removal market forecast, 2025-2035: discussion
9.9.The evolution of the durable CDR market
9.10.Changes since the previous IDTechEx CDR forecast
9.11.DACCS carbon removal capacity forecast by technology (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
9.12.DACCS carbon credit revenue forecast by technology (million US$), 2025-2035
9.13.DACCS forecast methodology and discussion
9.14.BiCRS forecast methodology
9.15.BECCS, biochar and biomass burial carbon removal capacity forecast (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
9.16.BECCS, biochar, and biomass burial carbon credit revenue forecast (million US$), 2025-2035
9.17.BECCS: Forecast discussion
9.18.Biochar and biomass burial: Forecast discussion
9.19.Enhanced rock weathering carbon removal capacity forecast (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
9.20.Enhanced rock weathering carbon credit revenue forecast (million US$), 2025-2035
9.21.Mineralization CDR: Enhanced rock weathering forecast methodology and discussion
9.22.Ocean-based CDR: Forecast methodology
9.23.Ocean-based carbon removal capacity forecast (million metric tons of CO2 per year), 2025-2035
9.24.Ocean-based carbon credit revenue forecast (million US$), 2025-2035
9.25.Ocean-based CDR: Forecast discussion
10.APPENDIX
10.1.Large-scale DACCS projects database
10.2.Operational BECCUS projects
10.3.BECCS projects under construction or advanced development
10.4.Biochar companies (1/2)
10.5.Biochar companies (2/2)
11.COMPANY PROFILES
11.1.3R-BioPhosphate
11.2.8 Rivers
11.3.8 Rivers
11.4.Airex Energy
11.5.Airhive
11.6.BC Biocarbon
11.7.Brineworks
11.8.CapChar
11.9.Captura
11.10.Carbo Culture
11.11.Carbofex
11.12.Carbogenics
11.13.Carbon Asset Solutions
11.14.Carbon Blade
11.15.CarbonBlue
11.16.Climeworks
11.17.Climeworks
11.18.Climeworks
11.19.CO2 Lock
11.20.DACMA
11.21.Equatic
11.22.Freeze Carbon
11.23.JCCL (Japan Carbon Cycle Labs)
11.24.Myno Carbon
11.25.NeoCarbon
11.26.neustark
11.27.O.C.O Technology
11.28.Paebbl
11.29.Paebbl
11.30.Parallel Carbon
11.31.Phlair
11.32.PyroCCS
11.33.Seaweed Generation
11.34.Skytree
11.35.Takachar
11.36.UNDO
11.37.Vycarb
11.38.WasteX
11.39.Yama
 

About IDTechEx reports

What are the qualifications of the people conducting IDTechEx research?

Content produced by IDTechEx is researched and written by our technical analysts, each with a PhD or master's degree in their specialist field, and all of whom are employees. All our analysts are well-connected in their fields, intensively covering their sectors, revealing hard-to-find information you can trust.

How does IDTechEx gather data for its reports?

By directly interviewing and profiling companies across the supply chain. IDTechEx analysts interview companies by engaging directly with senior management and technology development executives across the supply chain, leading to revealing insights that may otherwise be inaccessible.
 
Further, as a global team, we travel extensively to industry events and companies to conduct in-depth, face-to-face interviews. We also engage with industry associations and follow public company filings as secondary sources. We conduct patent analysis and track regulatory changes and incentives. We consistently build on our decades-long research of emerging technologies.
 
We assess emerging technologies against existing solutions, evaluate market demand and provide data-driven forecasts based on our models. This provides a clear, unbiased outlook on the future of each technology or industry that we cover.

What is your forecast methodology?

We take into account the following information and data points where relevant to create our forecasts:
  • Historic data, based on our own databases of products, companies' sales data, information from associations, company reports and validation of our prior market figures with companies in the industry.
  • Current and announced manufacturing capacities
  • Company production targets
  • Direct input from companies as we interview them as to their growth expectations, moderated by our analysts
  • Planned or active government incentives and regulations
  • Assessment of the capabilities and price of the technology based on our benchmarking over the forecast period, versus that of competitive solutions
  • Teardown data (e.g. to assess volume of materials used)
  • From a top-down view: the total addressable market
  • Forecasts can be based on an s-curve methodology where appropriate, taking into account the above factors
  • Key assumptions and discussion of what can impact the forecast are covered in the report.

How can I be confident about the quality of work in IDTechEx reports?

Based on our technical analysts and their research methodology, for over 25 years our work has regularly received superb feedback from our global clients. Our research business has grown year-on-year.
 
Recent customer feedback includes:
"It's my first go-to platform"
- Dr. Didi Xu, Head of Foresight - Future Technologies, Freudenberg Technology Innovation
 
"Their expertise allows us to make data-driven, strategic decisions and ensures we remain aligned with the latest trends and opportunities in the market."
- Ralf Hug, Global Head of Product Management & Marketing, Marquardt

What differentiates IDTechEx reports?

Our team of in-house technical analysts immerse themselves in industries over many years, building deep expertise and engaging directly with key industry players to uncover hard-to-find insights. We appraise technologies in the landscape of competitive solutions and then assess their market demand based on voice-of-the-customer feedback, all from an impartial point of view. This approach delivers exceptional value to our customers—providing high-quality independent content while saving customers time, resources, and money.

Why should we pick IDTechEx research over AI research?

A crucial value of IDTechEx research is that it provides information, assessments and forecasts based on interviews with key people in the industry, assessed by technical experts. AI is trained only on content publicly available on the web, which may not be reliable, in depth, nor contain the latest insights based on the experience of those actively involved in a technology or industry, despite the confident prose.

How can I justify the ROI of this report?

Consider the cost of the IDTechEx report versus the time and resources required to gather the same quality of insights yourself. IDTechEx analysts have built up an extensive contact network over many years; we invest in attending key events and interviewing companies around the world; and our analysts are trained in appraising technologies and markets.
 
Each report provides an independent, expert-led technical and market appraisal, giving you access to actionable information immediately, rather than you having to spend months or years on your own market research.

Can I speak to analysts about the report content?

All report purchases include up to 30 minutes of telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.

What is the difference between a report and subscription?

A subscription from IDTechEx can include more reports, access to an online information platform with continuously updated information from our analysts, and access to analysts directly.

Before purchasing, I have some questions about the report, can I speak to someone?

Please email research@idtechex.com stating your location and we will quickly respond.

About IDTechEx

Who are IDTechEx's customers?

IDTechEx has served over 35,000 customers globally. These range from large corporations to ambitious start-ups, and from Governments to research centers. Our customers use our work to make informed decisions and save time and resources.

Where is IDTechEx established?

IDTechEx was established in 1999, and is headquartered in Cambridge, UK. Since then, the company has significantly expanded and operates globally, having served customers in over 80 countries. Subsidiary companies are based in the USA, Germany and Japan.

Questions about purchasing a report

How do I pay?

In most locations reports can be purchased by credit card, or else by direct bank payment.

How and when do I receive access to IDTechEx reports?

When paying successfully by credit card, reports can be accessed immediately. For new customers, when paying by bank transfer, reports will usually be released when the payment is received. Report access will be notified by email.

How do I assign additional users to the report?

Users can be assigned in the report ordering process, or at a later time by email.

Can I speak to someone about purchasing a report?

Please email research@idtechex.com stating your location and we will quickly respond.
 

Ordering Information

Entfernung von Kohlendioxid (CDR) 2025-2035: Technologien, Akteure, Märkte für Emissionsgutschriften und Prognosen

£€$元¥₩
Electronic (1-5 users)
£5,650.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
£8,050.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
£6,450.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
£8,850.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
€6,400.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
€9,200.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
€7,400.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
€10,200.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
$7,500.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
$10,750.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
$8,600.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
$11,850.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
元54,000.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
元76,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
元61,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
元84,000.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
¥990,000
Electronic (6-10 users)
¥1,406,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
¥1,140,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
¥1,556,000
Electronic (1-5 users)
₩10,500,000
Electronic (6-10 users)
₩15,000,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
₩12,100,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
₩16,600,000
Click here to enquire about additional licenses.
If you are a reseller/distributor please contact us before ordering.
お問合せ、見積および請求書が必要な方はm.murakoshi@idtechex.com までご連絡ください。
Der Markt für Emissionsgutschriften zur dauerhaften Entfernung von Kohlendioxid wird 2035 ein Volumen von 14 Milliarden US-Dollar erreichen
Buy now Get a quote Ask a question

Report Statistics

Slides 355
Forecasts to 2035
 

Preview Content

pdf Document Webinar Slides
pdf Document Sample pages
 

Customer Testimonial

quote graphic
"The resources produced by IDTechEx are a valuable tool... Their insights and analyses provide a strong foundation for making informed, evidence-based decisions. By using their expertise, we are better positioned to align our strategies with emerging opportunities."
Director of Market Strategy
Centre for Process Innovation (CPI)
 
 
 
ISBN: 9781835701089

Subscription Enquiry