This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.


| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | Introduction |
| 1.2. | Report scope |
| 1.3. | Li-ion patent analysis overview |
| 1.4. | Patent trends overview |
| 1.5. | Total patent applications |
| 1.6. | Top 5 Li-ion patent assignees |
| 1.7. | NMC patents - player rank |
| 1.8. | LG Chem co-assignees |
| 1.9. | Samsung co-assignees |
| 1.10. | Panasonic co-assignees |
| 1.11. | Trends in Li-ion mirrored by patents |
| 1.12. | Patent examples |
| 1.13. | NMC cathode - top 3 assignee main IPC comparison |
| 1.14. | Top 3 assignee NMC/NCA technology comparison |
| 1.15. | NMC assignee supply chain position |
| 1.16. | Si-anode patent application trend by assignee location |
| 1.17. | Top assignees - total Si-anode patents |
| 1.18. | Recent Si-anode patent citations |
| 1.19. | Top 3 Si-anode assignee main IPC comparison |
| 1.20. | Top 3 assignee Si-anode technology comparison |
| 1.21. | Electrolyte patents - player rank |
| 1.22. | Electrolyte patents - trend by assignee location |
| 1.23. | Electrolyte technology trend |
| 1.24. | CNTs or graphene in LIB patent application trend |
| 1.25. | Nanocarbon patents - player rank |
| 1.26. | Player rank by number of active and pending patents |
| 1.27. | Top 3 CNT/graphene assignee main IPC comparison |
| 1.28. | Future cathode direction |
| 1.29. | Future anode direction |
| 1.30. | Electrolyte overview |
| 1.31. | Future nanocarbon direction |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | Li-ion technology development |
| 2.2. | What is in a cell? |
| 2.3. | Demand for Li-ion shifting |
| 2.4. | European gigafactories announced by 2018 |
| 2.5. | European gigafactories announced to date |
| 2.6. | Why lithium? |
| 2.7. | More than one type of Li-ion battery |
| 2.8. | The battery trilemma |
| 2.9. | Battery wish list |
| 2.10. | The Li-ion supply chain |
| 3. | LI-ION PATENT LANDSCAPE |
| 3.1. | Introduction |
| 3.2. | Report scope |
| 3.3. | Search methodology |
| 3.4. | Example patents criteria |
| 3.5. | Total patent applications |
| 3.6. | Country of origin vs country filed |
| 3.7. | Patent simple families by country |
| 3.8. | Patent simple families by country from 2010 |
| 3.9. | Export of patents |
| 3.10. | Geographic IP landscape |
| 3.11. | Top 5 patent assignees |
| 3.12. | Top 5 assignee share |
| 3.13. | Top 5th - 20th assignees |
| 3.14. | LG Chem co-assignees |
| 3.15. | Samsung co-assignees |
| 3.16. | Panasonic co-assignees |
| 3.17. | Toyota co-assignees |
| 3.18. | GS Yuasa co-assignees |
| 3.19. | Trends in Li-ion mirrored by patents |
| 4. | NMC, NCA PATENT LANDSCAPE |
| 4.1.1. | Cathode recap |
| 4.1.2. | Cathode history |
| 4.1.3. | NMC/NCA patent scope |
| 4.1.4. | NMC/NCA search term |
| 4.1.5. | NMC/NCA patent trend |
| 4.1.6. | NMC/NCA geographic distribution |
| 4.1.7. | Top 10 NMC/NCA assignees |
| 4.1.8. | 10th-20th top NMC/NCA assignees |
| 4.1.9. | Application assignee share |
| 4.1.10. | Application trend of top assignees |
| 4.1.11. | Player rank by number of active and pending patents |
| 4.1.12. | Top 3 NMC assignee's main IPC comparison |
| 4.1.13. | Top 3 assignee technology comparison |
| 4.1.14. | Geographical activity of top 20 assignees |
| 4.1.15. | Top assignees of active and pending simple patent families |
| 4.1.16. | Assignee supply chain position |
| 4.1.17. | NMC citations per application |
| 4.1.18. | Recent NMC citations per application |
| 4.1.19. | Ternary cathode patent overview |
| 4.1.20. | Future cathode direction |
| 4.2. | Example patents |
| 4.2.1. | Patent examples |
| 4.2.2. | High nickel cathode synthesis |
| 4.2.3. | Low cobalt NCA - SMM |
| 4.2.4. | High nickel cathode stabilisation |
| 4.2.5. | Single crystal NCA cathode |
| 4.2.6. | EcoPro high-Ni concentration gradient synthesis |
| 4.2.7. | Cathode concentration gradient |
| 4.2.8. | Streamlined cathode synthesis |
| 4.2.9. | Patent litigation over NMC/NCM - Umicore vs. BASF |
| 4.2.10. | Patent litigation - the positive example of LFP |
| 4.3. | Li- and Mn-rich cathodes |
| 4.3.1. | Li- and Mn-rich cathode search string |
| 4.3.2. | Li- and Mn-rich patent applications trend |
| 4.3.3. | Top assignees |
| 4.3.4. | Application trend of top assignees |
| 4.3.5. | Li and Mn-rich cathode patent examples |
| 4.3.6. | Li and Mn rich - Samsung |
| 4.3.7. | Zenlabs Li- and Mn-rich |
| 4.3.8. | Li and Mn rich oxides |
| 5. | SILICON ANODE PATENT LANDSCAPE |
| 5.1.1. | Anode materials |
| 5.1.2. | Silicon anode patent scope |
| 5.1.3. | Silicon anode patent application trend |
| 5.1.4. | Si-anode application geographic distribution |
| 5.1.5. | Application trend by assignee location |
| 5.1.6. | Top assignees - total patents |
| 5.1.7. | Top assignees - simple patent families |
| 5.1.8. | Application assignee share |
| 5.1.9. | 10th-20th top assignees |
| 5.1.10. | Assignee supply chain position |
| 5.1.11. | Main IPC trend |
| 5.1.12. | Si-anode citations per application |
| 5.1.13. | Recent Si-anode patent citations |
| 5.1.14. | Top 3 assignees compared |
| 5.1.15. | Top 3 assignees trends compared |
| 5.1.16. | Top 3 assignees authorities |
| 5.1.17. | Top 3 Si-anode assignee main IPC comparison |
| 5.1.18. | Top 3 assignee technology comparison |
| 5.2. | Example anode patents |
| 5.2.1. | Silicon anode patent examples |
| 5.2.2. | Si alloys/titanate coating |
| 5.2.3. | Composite C/Si anode particle |
| 5.2.4. | Carbon coated silicon anodes - LG Chem |
| 5.2.5. | Porous silicon-carbon composite particles |
| 5.2.6. | Si/SiC/C composite |
| 5.2.7. | Graphene coated silicon nanowire |
| 5.2.8. | Anode free lithium battery - Samsung |
| 5.2.9. | "Anode-free" lithium battery - SolidEnergy |
| 6. | LTO ANODE PATENT LANDSCAPE |
| 6.1. | Where will LTO play a role? |
| 6.2. | LTO/titanate anode patent application trend |
| 6.3. | LTO/titanate patent geographic distribution |
| 6.4. | Application trend by assignee location |
| 6.5. | Geographical activity of top 20 assignees |
| 6.6. | Top 10 assignees |
| 6.7. | Top assignees - LTO simple patent families |
| 6.8. | Future anode direction |
| 7. | ELECTROLYTE PATENT LANDSCAPE |
| 7.1. | Introduction to Li-ion electrolytes |
| 7.2. | Electrolyte decomposition |
| 7.3. | Electrolyte patent application trend |
| 7.4. | Top 10 assignees |
| 7.5. | Top 10 assignees - electrolyte simple patent families |
| 7.6. | Top 10th - 20th assignees |
| 7.7. | Player rank by number of active and pending patents |
| 7.8. | Electrolyte application geographic distribution |
| 7.9. | Geographical activity of top 20 assignees |
| 7.10. | Application trend by assignee location |
| 7.11. | Application assignee share |
| 7.12. | Technology trend |
| 7.13. | Electrolyte technology distribution |
| 7.14. | Electrolyte patent citations |
| 7.15. | Recent electrolyte patent citations |
| 7.16. | Electrolyte patent simple family technology splits |
| 7.17. | Top 3 electrolyte additive assignee comparison |
| 7.18. | Electrolyte additive patent examples |
| 7.19. | Ionic liquids |
| 7.20. | Ionic Liquid patent application trend |
| 7.21. | Ionic liquid usage |
| 7.22. | Electrolyte overview |
| 8. | SEPARATOR PATENT LANDSCAPE |
| 8.1. | Introduction to separators |
| 8.2. | Separator search string |
| 8.3. | Separator patent application trend |
| 8.4. | Separator application geographic distribution |
| 8.5. | Application trend by assignee location |
| 8.6. | Top 10 assignees |
| 8.7. | Top 10th - 20th assignees |
| 8.8. | Player rank by number of active and pending patents |
| 8.9. | Geographical activity of top 20 assignees |
| 8.10. | Separator overview |
| 9. | NANOCARBONS - CNTS, GRAPHENE |
| 9.1.1. | Conductive agents |
| 9.1.2. | CNTs/graphene in LIB patent application trend |
| 9.1.3. | CNTs or graphene in LIB patent application trend |
| 9.1.4. | Top 10 assignees - CNT, graphene |
| 9.1.5. | Top 10th-20th assignees |
| 9.1.6. | Player rank by number of active and pending patents |
| 9.1.7. | Li-ion CNT/graphene patent citations |
| 9.1.8. | Application trend by assignee location |
| 9.1.9. | CNT/graphene application geographic distribution |
| 9.1.10. | Geographical activity of top 20 assignees |
| 9.1.11. | Patent simple family - geographic distribution |
| 9.1.12. | Top 3 CNT/graphene assignee main IPC comparison |
| 9.1.13. | CNT/Graphene and silicon anodes |
| 9.1.14. | Samsung and LG Chem focus |
| 9.1.15. | Future nanocarbon direction |
| 9.2. | Nanocarbon patent examples |
| 9.2.1. | Si nanowire-graphene anodes - Samsung |
| 9.2.2. | Tin-graphene anode |
| 9.2.3. | Nanocarbon for rate improvement |
| 9.2.4. | Tsinghua University portfolio |
| Slides | 210 |
|---|