This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.

If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.

레독스 플로우 배터리 (2018-2028년): 시장, 동향, 응용분야

주거, C&I 및 유틸리티 시장을 위한, 크고 안전하며 지속가능한 배터리

모두 보기 설명 목차, 표 및 그림 목록 가격 Related Content
레독스 플로우 배터리(RFB) 기술은 선결제 비용이 높음에도 불구하고 수천 번의 주기 후에도 우수한 용량 유지가 가능하기 때문에 수익을 얻기까지의 시간이 짧다. RFB는 핵심 구성 요소를 재활용할 수 있기 때문에, 초기 가치의 대부분을 유지할 수 있다. 리튬 이온 배터리는 유틸리티급 RFB의 출현으로 인해 어려움을 겪을 것이며, 이는 전기 이동성 응용분야에 필요한 리튬 자원에 대한 압력을 완화시킬 것이다.
Redox Flow Batteries were initially developed by NASA in the 70's for its space programme. The expiry of a number of patents related to RFBs in 2006 has sparked an industrial race to commercialisation, which will grow to become a $4.5bn market by 2028.
Often perceived as an underdog, redox flow batteries (RFB) may not deliver the same power as a Li-ion battery, but they can compete in terms of cycle life, safety, and reliability for stationary applications. Utilities around the world are avidly testing RFBs in pilot projects, while China is underway in the construction of the largest battery in the world (200 MW / 800 MWh), which will be entirely powered by redox flow batteries. If successful, this project will be replicated across the country and probably also in Europe and the US.
In this report, technology analyst Dr. Lorenzo Grande from IDTechEx analyses the different flow battery chemistries available from a technology standpoint (all-vanadium, all-iron, zinc/bromine, hydrogen/bromine, polysulphide, etc.) as well as by engaging with the world's main stakeholders (UET, Sumitomo, Primus Power, Gildemeister - just to name a few). Overall, 19 companies are included in this report, covering the whole RFB spectrum as well as all the main markets, namely USA, Europe, and Asia. The companies are compared in terms of their target markets and a series of case studies explains who are the most likely winners and why.
Source IDTechEx
RFBs operate by means of electro-active chemicals dissolved in liquid solutions that are named anolyte and catholyte, and which are stored into tanks. By exchanging ions through a membrane, it is possible to generate a cell voltage and extract energy out of such a system. The possibility to modulate both the tank and the membrane size independently allows for the decoupling of power and energy capabilities, thus making this technology extremely flexible and tailored to user needs.
Stationary energy storage is a cost-effective way to increase renewable energy utilisation, as well as to implement energy efficiency measures, both at residential, industrial, and grid level. The redox flow battery technology, despite higher upfront costs and lower energy density, has a shorter payback time thanks to a good capacity retention even after many thousands of cycles. Additionally, redox flow batteries (RFBs) retain most of their initial value thanks to the possibility to recycle their core components more easily than other battery chemistries. Some RFB chemistries, like that based on vanadium, are already commercial and set to capture most of the $6bn market value. Other chemistries, like zinc/bromine and hydrogen/bromine, have the potential to capture significant portions of the market thanks to high-profile collaborations and partnerships already in place.
Lithium-ion batteries will suffer a setback from the emergence of utility-grade flow batteries, which will contribute to ease the pressure on lithium resources that are more needed for electric mobility applications. One final interesting remark is that, with notable exceptions, a sizeable portion of the RFB industry is located in Europe and the US. The success of said companies will fuel the Western World's competitiveness against the Asian Li-ion incumbents.
IDTechEx의 분석가 액세스
모든 보고서 구입에는 전문가 분석가와의 최대 30분의 전화통화 시간이 포함되어, 보고서의 주요 결과를 귀하가 제시하는 비즈니스 문제에 연결하도록 돕습니다. 이 전화통화는 보고서를 구매한 후 3개월 이내에 사용해야합니다.
추가 정보
이 보고서에 대해 궁금한 점이 있으시면 언제든지 research@IDTechEx.com으로 보고서 팀에 문의하거나, 영업 관리자에게 문의하십시오

AMERICAS (USA): +1 617 577 7890
ASIA (Japan): +81 3 3216 7209
ASIA (Korea): +82 10 3896 6219
EUROPE (UK) +44 1223 812300
Table of Contents
1.1.Redox flow batteries will take over stationary storage
1.2.Some technologies are stalling, others are growing
1.3.News from 2018 - BASF invests in ESS Inc.
1.4.News from 2018 - Hunan Vanadium Valley New Energy
1.5.News from 2018 - ViZn energy shuts down
1.6.News from 2018 - Redflow simplifies battery design
1.7.News from 2018 - South Africa to pilot vanadium redox flow battery
1.8.News from 2018 - redT energy awarded £750k grant by UK Government
1.9.News from 2018 - Schmid delivers flow battery to China
1.10.News from 2018 - Vanadium Demand Driven by Flow Batteries
1.11.News from 2018 - Stina Announces Spring / Summer Exploration Program for Vanadium Project
1.12.News from 2018 - ZincNyx Plans Flow Battery Mass Production Within a Year
1.13.News from 2018 - Shell Canada delves into vanadium flow battery technology
1.14.News from 2018 - Lockheed Martin hopes to launch a new flow battery made of inexpensive, nontoxic materials
1.15.News from 2018 - Synergy Group announces US$ 3.2 Million Expansion to the Vanadium Industry
1.16.News from 2018 - Voltstorage tries out residential flow battery
2.1.What is a battery?
2.1.1.Electrochemistry definitions
2.1.2.What does 1 kilowatthour (kWh) look like?
2.1.3.Useful charts for performance comparison
2.2.The battery trilemma
2.2.1.Lessons from the computer industry
2.2.2.Stationary energy storage is not new
2.2.3.The increasingly important role of stationary storage
2.2.4.New avenues for stationary storage
2.2.5.Values provided at the customer side
2.2.6.Values provided at the utility side
2.2.7.Values provided in ancillary services
2.3.Enter Tesla PowerWall
2.3.1.The case for RFBs
2.3.2.Performance comparison of energy storage technologies
2.3.3.The price of RFBs
2.3.4.The price of RFBs - LCOS
2.3.5.The price of RFB - comparisons with other technologies
2.4.Redox flow batteries in the news
2.5.Redox flow batteries and caves
2.6.Guide to understanding the charts
2.6.1.Largest operational RFB projects
2.6.2.Market players (operational projects)
2.6.3.Companies' market share by MW
2.6.4.Companies' market share by MWh
2.6.5.Technology market share by MW
2.6.6.Technology market share by MWh
2.6.7.List of operational projects
2.7.ARPA-E funding on RFBs
3.1.Gaseous and liquid electrodes
3.2.Catholytes and anolytes
3.3.Exploded view of an RFB and polarisation curve
3.4.History of RFBs
3.5.Choice of redox-active species and solvents
3.6.Types of RFBs
3.6.1.RFB chemistries: Iron/Chromium
3.6.2.RFB chemistries: PSB flow batteries
3.6.3.RFB chemistries: Vanadium/Bromine
3.6.4.RFB chemistries: all Vanadium (VRFB)
3.6.5.Hybrid RFBs: Zinc/Bromine
3.6.6.Hybrid RFBs: Hydrogen/Bromine
3.6.7.Hybrid RFBs: all Iron
3.6.8.Other RFBs: organic
3.6.9.Other RFBs: non-aqueous
3.6.10.Lab-scale flow battery projects
3.6.11.Microflow batteries?
3.7.Technology Recap
3.8.Comparison with fuel cells and conventional batteries
3.9.Hype Curve for RFB technologies
3.10.Other RFB configurations
4.2.Current collectors
4.3.Flow distributors and turbulence promoters
4.4.Electrolyte flow circuit
4.4.1.Raw materials for RFB electrolytes
4.4.2.Vanadium and the steel industry
5.1.Power and energy are decoupled
5.2.Fit-and-forget philosophy
5.2.1.Competing technologies: Li-ion
5.2.2.Competing technologies: Na/S
6.1.Liquid electricity
6.2.General Electric
7.1.Cost factors at electrolyte level
7.2.Cost breakdown of a Vanadium-redox flow battery
7.3.The effect of temperature and current density
7.4.Zn/Br batteries from Primus Power in comparison
7.5.Finding the right market
7.5.1.Self-consumption according to Agora Energiewende
7.5.2.Agora Energiewende's opinion
7.6.RFB value chain
8.1.Companies in this report
8.2.Technology and manufacturing readiness
8.3.Addressable markets for stationary storage
8.4.Battery size by market and technology
8.5.Score comparison
9.1.VRFB - UniEnergy Technologies (UET)
9.2.VRFB - VoltStorage
9.3.Zn/Br - Primus Power
9.4.H/Br - EleStor
9.5.Zn/air flow - ViZn Energy
10.1.Market forecast assumptions
10.2.Global value of stationary storage 2018-2028 ($M)
10.3.Global value of RFB storage 2018-2028 ($M)
10.3.1.RFB market share snapshots
10.4.Technology diversification (MWh)
10.4.1.Technology diversification (MWh)
11.3.Enstorage Inc
11.4.ESS Inc
11.5.GILDEMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
11.6.ITN Energy Systems Inc
11.7.JenaBatteries GmbH
11.10.Primus Power Corp
11.11.RedFlow Technologies
11.13.SCHMID Group
11.14.Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd
11.16.Unienergy Technologies
11.17.ViZn Energy
12.1.Technology and manufacturing readiness

보고서 통계

슬라이드 224
Companies 20
전망 2028

Subscription Enquiry