2045년 항공기 판매량의 24% 는 배터리 전기 항공기가 차지할 것으로 전망

지속 가능한 미래 항공 기술 동향, 트렌드 및 시장 전망 2025-2045

배터리 전기 항공기, eCTOL, 수소 연료 전지, 수소 내연기관, 하이브리드 항공 기술, 지속 가능한 항공 연료(SAF), 온실가스 감축 등 지속가능한 미래항공 산업을 포괄하는 보고서


모두 보기 설명 목차, 표 및 그림 목록 가격 Related Content
일반 항공기, 비즈니스 제트기, 상업용 여객기를 포함한 다양한 항공기 응용분야에 대한 수소 및 배터리 전기 기술의 현황 및 전망을 분석하고 있는 본 보고서에서는 수소 및 배터리 기술의 항공 운항주기에 대한 적합성, 총 소유비용 분석, 탄소 배출량에 미치는 영향 및 다양한 그리드와 수소 공급원에 대해 분석하고 있으며, 미래의 항공 산업의 과제, 전망, 전략 및 향후 20년간 시장 예측/전망을 제공합니다.
이 보고서에서는 탈탄소화를 모색하는 항공산업에서 고려해야 할 주요 기술 및 전망에 대해 아래와 같은 주요 정보를 제공합니다
 
기술별
- 배터리 전기 항공기
- 하이브리드 옵션
- 수소 연소 항공기
- 수소연료전지 (액체 수소, 700bar 가압수소)
 
산업 분야별
- 일반 항공기
- 비즈니스 제트기
- 상업용 항공기
 
시장 전망
- 항공기 유형별, 파워트레인 별 판매 수량 전망
- 항공기 유형별, 파워트레인 별 판매 금액 전망
- 전기 항공기용 배터리 수요 전망
- 전기 프로펠러 항공기요 모터 수요 전망
 
이 보고서에서 다루는 주요 내용/목차는 아래와 같습니다.
 
1. 핵심 요약
 
2. 항공 우주산업 개요
- 주요 항공기 OEM
- 주요 엔진 제조업체
- 항공 우주분야의 주요 스타트업
 
3. 전기 및 하이브리드 항공기
- 일반 항공기 및 소형 항공기
- 비즈니스 제트기
- 상업용 항공기
- 총 소유비용
- 모든 종류의 전기 항공기
- 탄소 배출량에 미치는 영향
 
4 수소 연료전지 및 수소 연소 항공기
- 수소 동력 개요
- 일반 항공기 및 소형 항공기
- 비즈니스 제트기
- 상업용 항공기
- 총 소유비용
- 모든 종류의 수소동력 항공기
- 탄소 배출양에 미치는 영향
 
5. 지속가능한 항공연료 (SAF)
 
6. 항공기용 전기 배터리
- 현재 채택 가능한 옵션 및 벤치마킹
- 실리콘 음극
- 주요 업체
 
7. 전기 프로펠러 항공기
- 모터 요구사항
- 기술 옵션
- 주요 업체 및 제품군
 
8. 시장 전망
- 전기 항공기 판매량 예측
- 수소 항공기 판매량 예측
- 전기 및 수소 항공기 매출 전망
- 전기 항공기 배터리 수요 예측
- 전기 프로펠러 항공기 모터 수요 예측
 
The electric airplane market is in its infancy. To the best of IDTechEx's knowledge, there is only one example of an electric airplane for sale today: the Pipistrel Velis Electro. From IDTechEx's perspective, it has had a stellar start, with a surprising number of deliveries since its first in 2020. Electric powertrains fit small general aviation planes well, helping to drive a predicted 35.7% CAGR in electric general aviation airplanes between 2025 and 2035. But, this is just the beginning of a new era of aviation, with "Sustainable Future Aviation 2025-2045: Trends, Technologies, Forecasts" finding that electric and hydrogen-powered airplanes can contribute to a decarbonized aerospace industry across a spectrum of aircraft. From the smallest two-seaters like the Velis Electro, to the largest planes on the market, like the Boeing 777, electric and hydrogen power can provide value and reduce GHG contribution.
 
Emissions of a Boeing are 777-9 per hour compared to a theoretical electric alternative of the same size.
 
Electric Commercial Airliners Will Need Strategic Deployment
Despite the success of batteries in the automotive industry, and the admirable technological improvements they have shown, it will be almost impossible for battery-electric aircraft to achieve the ranges of existing jet fuel airplanes. The batteries will simply be too heavy, especially for commercial airliners, which need to burn tens of tonnes of fuel before landing to hit their maximum landing weights. This weight limit leaves scarcely a few tonnes of wiggle room for batteries to occupy. A narrow-body airplane like the Boeing 737-10 requires around 100MWh to get its full range. A battery this size would weigh hundreds of tonnes. Even future battery technologies like silicon-anode, metal-anode, or aluminum air will likely be too heavy. As such, full range with battery power alone is a near impossibility.
 
Data source: US Bureau of Transportation, analyzed by IDTechEx
 
The key to the success of battery-powered commercial airliners is to deploy them strategically. Some of the most popular, highest-volume routes flown today are less than 1,000km. Routes like LAX to SFO (Los Angeles to San Francisco) and LHR to FRA (London to Frankfurt) are only 540km and 655km respectively. This is not easily electrifiable today, but there are some avenues open that could help get there, such as:
  • Improved battery technologies
  • Improved plane design with better flight efficiency
  • Higher maximum landing weights to carry more batteries
 
Hydrogen Can Have Widespread Spread Adoption but the Source of the Hydrogen Should be Carefully Considered
Hydrogen has great promise thanks to its gravimetric energy density, at 39.3kWh/kg, it is three times as energy-dense as jet fuel and more than 100 times as energy-dense as today's lithium-ion batteries. This can be hugely exciting until its volumetric limitations are understood. Even in liquid form, hydrogen occupies nearly four times the volume of jet fuel for the same energy. The limiting factor is getting enough storage volume on the airplane to make it useful. It is also limited by the need to be cryogenically cooled to remain a liquid, or pressurized to have useful volumetric energy density as a gas. Despite these limitations, this report explains how hydrogen can be used strategically to fulfill significant air travel demand.
 
Gravimetric energy densities of different fuels
 
While Hydrogen can easily fulfill enough air travel demand to make it worthwhile, "Sustainable Future Aviation 2025-2045: Trends, Technologies, Forecasts" shows that the key challenge for hydrogen will be balancing fuel costs with carbon credentials. Green hydrogen, from renewable water electrolysis, is the greenest, but also the most expensive way of producing hydrogen. Blue hydrogen, produced from natural gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS), is significantly cheaper but does not provide 100% CO2 removal. Conventional grey hydrogen on the other hand can be made very cheaply, and a grey hydrogen-powered fuel cell airplane would be much cheaper to fuel than jet fuel. However, grey hydrogen emits around 10 kg of CO2 for every kg of hydrogen. This report shows the expected net emissions for each hydrogen production type highlighting which can produce a benefit compared to traditional fossil fuels.
 
SAF is Unavoidable to Decarbonize Air Travel
IDTechEx believes that the technology exists today to build a hydrogen airplane, the industry is just in the process of demonstrating the technology, certifying, scaling etc. A process that is going to take many years. But even if hydrogen and electric planes were ready today, the industry would still need SAF to decarbonize by 2050. There is currently a fleet of around 25,000 commercial airliners in use today, and some of them will still be around in 30 years, such is the long life of these airplanes. Business jets and general aviation are even worse. This report finds there are planes in use today in the US that were built more than 80 years ago. The only realistic option to fully decarbonize by 2050 is to adopt SAF for airframes that are built today, but still be in use then.
 
In addition to aging airframes, there will still be other factors necessitating SAF. The maximum range of planes today is unlikely to be reachable with hydrogen, meaning some routes will be confined to kerosene-like fuels indefinitely. Additionally, some airports simply won't be able to afford new electric and hydrogen fuelling infrastructure and will have to take SAF as a drop-in alternative.
 
"Sustainable Future Aviation 2025-2045: Trends, Technologies, Forecasts" analyses the technology options for general aviation, business jets, and commercial airliners. For each one, it considers the total cost of ownership, potential ranges achievable, and impact on carbon footprint. It also gives overviews of key industry players' attitudes towards emerging propulsion technologies and highlights what the best-funded start-ups are working on. It also highlights previously unconsidered bottlenecks like the scaling of electric motors and the power density/longevity compromise of fuel cells. This report can guide strategy, investment, and planning related to the future of air travel.
As the aerospace industry looks to decarbonize, this report covers the key technologies considered for its future:
  • Battery electric airplanes
  • Hybrid propulsion options
  • Hydrogen combustion airplanes
  • Hydrogen fuel cell using:
- liquid hydrogen
- 700 bar pressurized hydrogen
 
The report covers how these technologies are used across:
  • General aviation airplanes
  • Business jets
  • Narrow-body commercial airliners
  • Wide-body commercial airliners
 
The 20-year forecasts in this report cover:
  • Unit sales by plane type (general aviation, business jet, commercial airliner) and powertrain (conventional ICE, battery electric, hydrogen)
  • Sales revenue in US$ by plane type (general aviation, business jet, commercial airliner) and powertrain (conventional ICE, battery electric, hydrogen)
  • Battery demand for battery electric planes
  • Motor demand for electrically propelled planes (battery and fuel cell electric)
Report MetricsDetails
Historic Data2021 - 2023
CAGRElectric general aviation planes can expect a 35.7% CAGR between 2025 and 2035
Forecast Period2024 - 2045
Forecast UnitsUnit sales, revenue (US$ billion), battery demand (GWh), motor demand (GWp)
Regions CoveredWorldwide
Segments CoveredThis report covers the following emerging propulsion technologies - Battery electric flight - Hybrid flight with jet fuel or SAF - SAF - Hydrogen combustion - Hydrogen fuel cell These technologies are explored across - General aviation planes, including single engine fixed wings and multiengine fixed wings - Business jets - Small commercial narrow-body planes (less than 100 seats) - Commercial narrow-body planes (100-200 seats) - Commercial wide-body planes.
IDTechEx의 분석가 액세스
모든 보고서 구입에는 전문가 분석가와의 최대 30분의 전화통화 시간이 포함되어, 보고서의 주요 결과를 귀하가 제시하는 비즈니스 문제에 연결하도록 돕습니다. 이 전화통화는 보고서를 구매한 후 3개월 이내에 사용해야합니다.
추가 정보
이 보고서에 대해 궁금한 점이 있으시면 언제든지 research@IDTechEx.com으로 보고서 팀에 문의하거나, 영업 관리자에게 문의하십시오

AMERICAS (USA): +1 617 577 7890
ASIA (Japan): +81 3 3216 7209
ASIA (Korea): +82 10 3896 6219
EUROPE (UK) +44 1223 812300
Table of Contents
1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1.Battery Electric and Hydrogen-Powered Airplane Key Takeaways
1.2.Aircraft Types Covered in this Report
1.3.Aircraft Type Summary - Private and General Aviation
1.4.Aircraft Type Summary - Business Jet
1.5.Aircraft Type Summary - Commercial Airliner
1.6.Overview of Plane Types Energy and Power Requirements
1.7.Batteries are too Heavy for Larger Planes...
1.8....But Hydrogen is too Light
1.9.Full Electric Aircraft SWOT
1.10.Hydrogen Fuel Cell SWOT
1.11.Hydrogen Combustion SWOT
1.12.SAF Will Have a Key Role - Key Takeaways for SAF
1.13.Converting a Commercial Airliner to Battery Electric
1.14.Building A Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Impact on Range - Airbus A321neo
1.15.Useful Ranges of Hydrogen and Battery Electric Aircraft
1.16.Hydrogen Needs to Come from the Right Source to be Carbon Neutral...
1.17.But Electric Planes can be Carbon Neutral Regardless of the Grid
1.18.Fuel Cell vs Hydrogen Jet Engines
1.19.Typical Airplane Engines
1.20.Motors are Power Dense Enough to Replace Airplane Engines but not Powerful Enough for the Largest Planes
1.21.Battery Electric Airplane Sales Forecast - 2021 to 2045
1.22.Hydrogen Airplane Sales Forecast - 2021 to 2045
1.23.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in the Airplane Market Forecast - 2021 to 2045
1.24.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in Commercial Narrow-Bodies Forecast - 2021 to 2045
1.25.Revenue From Battery Electric, Hydrogen, and ICE Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
1.26.Battery Demand (GWh) From Battery Electric Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
1.27.Electric Motor Demand (GWp) From Battery Electric and Hydrogen Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
2.INTRODUCTION
2.1.Aircraft Types Covered in this Report
2.2.Aircraft Type Summary - Private and General Aviation
2.3.General Aviation Market Overview
2.4.Aircraft Type Summary - Business Jet
2.5.Business Jet Market Overview
2.6.Aircraft Type Summary - Commercial Airliner
2.7.Commercial Airplane Market Overview
2.8.Established Supply Chain Mapping
2.9.Biggest OEMs in Aerospace
2.10.The Big four Engine Companies
2.11.OEM and Engine Mapping by Industry
2.12.Engine Manufacturers by Engine Type
2.13.Start-up Mapping
2.14.Start-up Funding Over Time
2.15.Start-up Funding Leading Players
2.16.Aviation's Contribution to Global Green House Gas Emissions
3.ELECTRIC AND HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES
3.1.Full Electric Aircraft
3.2.Issues With Weight - Part 1
3.3.Issues With Weight - Part 2
3.4.Small Plane Electrification Case Study - Opportunities
3.5.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Existing Models
3.6.Electric Training Plane TCO Assumptions
3.7.Electric Training Plane TCO Analysis
3.8.Electric Training Plane TCO Analysis - US$500/kWh battery
3.9.Electric Training Plane TCO Analysis- Carbon Analysis
3.10.Piper PA-28-181 Electric Conversion Kit
3.11.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Retrofitting Introduction
3.12.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Characterization
3.13.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Retrofitting Example
3.14.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Retrofitting Analysis
3.15.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Retrofitting Economics
3.16.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - TCO
3.17.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - TCO Analysis
3.18.Electric Conversion Analysis of 20 SEFW planes - Range
3.19.Electric Conversion Analysis of 20 SEFW planes - Endurance
3.20.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Carbon Analysis
3.21.Single Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Summary
3.22.Multi-Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Size Characteristics
3.23.Multi-Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Engine Characteristics
3.24.Multi-Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Engine Characteristics
3.25.Multi-Engine Small Plane Case Study - Retrofitting/Conversion Method
3.26.Multi-Engine Small Plane Case Study - Retrofitting/Conversion Analysis
3.27.Multi-Engine Small Plane Case Study - Retrofit TCO for Recreational Use Assumptions
3.28.Multi-Engine Small Plane Case Study - Retrofit TCO for Recreational Use Analysis
3.29.Multi-Engine Small Plane Case Study - Retrofit TCO for Commercial Use
3.30.How Battery Price and Longevity Impact TCO for a Small MEFW
3.31.Electric Conversion Analysis of 26 MEFW planes - Range
3.32.Electric Conversion Analysis of 26 MEFW planes - Endurance
3.33.Multi-Engine Small Plane Electrification Case Study - Carbon Analysis
3.34.MEFW Business Jet Electrification Case Study - Intro
3.35.MEFW Business Jet Electrification Case Study - Gulfstream G650 Electrification Example
3.36.MEFW Business Jet Electrification Case Study - Gulfstream G650 Electrification Example Analysis
3.37.MEFW Business Jet Electrification Case Study - Usage (1)
3.38.MEFW Business Jet Electrification Case Study - Usage (2)
3.39.Electric Business Aircraft in Embraer's Long-Term Plan
3.40.Commercial Airliner Electrification Case Study - Introduction
3.41.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Boeing 737 Max Hypothetical Example
3.42.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Boeing 737 Max Hypothetical Example Analysis
3.43.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Boeing 777 Hypothetical Example
3.44.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Boeing 777 Hypothetical Example Analysis
3.45.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Boeing 777 Max Hypothetical Example Total Cost of Ownership
3.46.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Boeing 777 Max Hypothetical Example Total Cost of Ownership Analysis
3.47.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Potential Routes for an Electric Boeing 777 in the US.
3.48.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Specific Routes that Could be Electrified
3.49.The Impossible Challenge of Charging an Electric Commercial Airliner
3.50.Commercial Airliner Electrification - Carbon Analysis, Single Boeing 777 Hourly Saving
3.51.Double- or Single-Isle Planes for Electrification?
3.52.Multi-Engine Plane Electrification Case Study - Summary
3.53.Key Commercial Airliner Player Roadmaps for Electrification
3.54.Commercial Airliner Electrification to be Led by Start-Ups Like Wright Electric (1)
3.55.Commercial Airliner Electrification to be Led by Start-Ups Like Wright Electric (2)
3.56.Commercial Airliner Electrification to be Led by Start-Ups Like Elysian
3.57.Can Elysian or Wright Electric be the Teslas of Aviation?
3.58.Options for Electric Architectures
3.59.How Hybrid Works During Flight
3.60.Airbus's Abandoned E-Fan X Project
3.61.Challenges with Hybridization According to Airbus
3.62.Suppliers Are Working on Hybrid Products
3.63.Hybrid Power Is Not Just for Large Planes
3.64.Daher Aiming for a Commercial Hybrid GA Product by 2027
3.65.Aura Aero Electric Regional Aircraft (ERA) With More than 1,600km Range
3.66.Heart Aerospace - Hybrid Now but Progressively Electrifying
3.67.Visual Comparison Before and After Hearts Approach Change
3.68.Heart Aerospace Preparing for Take-Off in 2028
3.69.EPFD - A Key Hybrid Flight Project from Industry Leaders
3.70.Table of Electric and Hybrid CTOL Start-Ups
3.71.Table of Electric and Hybrid CTOL Planes
3.72.Key Take Aways of Electric & Hybrid Aviation
4.HYDROGEN FUEL CELL & HYDROGEN COMBUSTION
4.1.1.Hydrogen Fuel Cell SWOT
4.1.2.Hydrogen Combustion SWOT
4.2.Introduction to Hydrogen
4.2.1.The Hydrogen Economy
4.2.2.The Colours of Hydrogen
4.2.3.System Efficiency Between BEVs and FCEVs
4.2.4.What are fuel cells?
4.2.5.Types of fuel cells
4.2.6.Comparison of fuel cell technologies
4.2.7.Overview of PEMFCs
4.2.8.PEMFCs for Aviation
4.2.9.Combustion Versus Fuel Cell for Hydrogen
4.2.10.Hydrogen's Volumetric Density Issues
4.2.11.Gravimetric and Volumetric Energy Densities
4.3.Hydrogen SEFW Case Study
4.3.1.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Introduction
4.3.2.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Weight and Volume Considerations
4.3.3.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Impact on Range
4.3.4.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Total Cost of Ownership Assumptions
4.3.5.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Total Cost of Ownership (1)
4.3.6.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Total Cost of Ownership (2)
4.3.7.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Carbon
4.3.8.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Market Example - Blue Spirit Aero
4.3.9.Building A Hydrogen Variant of an SEFW - Market Example - Deltahawk
4.4.Hydrogen Commercial Airliner Case Study
4.4.1.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner - Introduction
4.4.2.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner - Weight and Volume Considerations - Airbus A321neo
4.4.3.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner - Weight and Volume Analysis - Airbus A321neo
4.4.4.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner - Weight and Volume Analysis - Boeing 777-9
4.4.5.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Impact on Range - Airbus A321neo
4.4.6.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Impact on Range - Airbus Boeing 777-9
4.4.7.Useful Ranges of Hydrogen Aircraft
4.4.8.Critical Target Routes for Hydrogen Conversion
4.4.9.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Total Cost of Ownership Assumptions - Airbus A321neo
4.4.10.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Total Cost of Ownership (1) - Airbus A321neo
4.4.11.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Total Cost of Ownership (2) - Airbus A321neo
4.4.12.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Total Cost of Ownership Assumptions - Boeing 777-9
4.4.13.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Total Cost of Ownership (1) - Boeing 777-9
4.4.14.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Total Cost of Ownership (2) - Boeing 777-9
4.4.15.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Carbon - Airbus A321
4.4.16.Building a Hydrogen Variant of a Commercial Airliner- Carbon - Boeing 777-9
4.4.17.Airbus's ZEROe Concepts
4.4.18.Universal Hydrogen Go Bust After Raising US$100 Million in Funding
4.4.19.US$300 Million in Funding Makes ZeroAvia One to Watch
4.4.20.ZeroAvia's Product Timeline Out to 2040
4.4.21.Electric Aviation Group and the H2ERA
4.4.22.CFM and Airbus Working Towards Hydrogen Combustion in 2035
4.4.23.Hydrogen storage
4.4.24.Honeywell Project NEWBORN - Fuel Cells for Aviation
4.4.25.Key Takeaways of Hydrogen Aircraft
5.SUSTAINABLE AVIATION FUEL (SAF) MARKET & PLAYERS
5.1.Current State of the Aviation Industry
5.2.Overview of Feedstocks for SAF
5.3.Jet Fuel Composition & Types
5.4.SAF as a Drop-In Replacement for Jet A-1
5.5.Jet Fuel Price Action 2020-2024
5.6.Government Targets & Mandates for SAF
5.7.Government Targets & Mandates for SAF - Focus on EU & UK
5.8.Government Incentives for SAF Producers
5.9.Overview of SAF Commitments by Passenger & Cargo Airlines
5.10.Major Passenger Airline Commitments & Activities in SAF
5.11.Major Passenger Airline Commitments & Activities in SAF
5.12.Major Cargo Airline Commitments & Activities in SAF
5.13.SAF Alliances & Industry Initiatives
5.14.Summary of Key Market Drivers for SAF
5.15.Main SAF Production Pathways
5.16.Bio-SAF vs e-SAF - the Two Main Pathways to SAF
5.17.ASTM-Approved Production Pathways
5.18.HEFA-SPK Producer Case Study - Neste
5.19.Gasification-FT bio-SAF Project Case Study - Altalto Immingham
5.20.ATJ Project Case Study
5.21.e-SAF Project Case Study - Norsk e-Fuel
5.22.Production Technology Providers Targeting SAF Market
5.23.Production Technology Providers Targeting SAF Market
5.24.Production Technology Providers Targeting SAF Market
5.25.SAF Project Developers by Production Technology
5.26.Fulcrum BioEnergy - a Failed SAF Producer
5.27.Other Cancelled SAF Projects & Reasons for Failure
5.28.SAF Prices - a Key Issue Holding Back Adoption
5.29.Who Will Pay for the Green Premium of SAF?
5.30.Key Drivers and Challenges for SAF Cost Reduction
5.31.SAF Production Capacities
5.32.Key Takeaways and Outlook on SAF
6.BATTERIES FOR PLANES
6.1.1.The Biggest Bottleneck in Electric Aviation
6.2.Off-the-shelf Options
6.2.1.Introduction to Turnkey Battery Pack Suppliers and Key Takeaways
6.2.2.Off the Shelf Pack Suppliers and their Offerings - North America
6.2.3.Off the Shelf Pack Suppliers and their Offerings - Europe (1)
6.2.4.Off the Shelf Pack Off the Shelf Pack Suppliers and their Offerings - Europe (2)
6.2.5.Off the Shelf Pack Suppliers and their Offerings - China
6.2.6.Off the Shelf Pack Suppliers and their Offerings - Other
6.2.7.Off The Shelf Packs - Cycle Life vs Energy Density for Different Chemistries
6.3.Future Options for Batteries
6.3.1.The Key Differences Between Different Battery Technologies
6.3.2.Electrochemistry Definitions 1
6.3.3.Electrochemistry Definitions 2
6.3.4.Lithium Battery Chemistries
6.3.5.The Promise of Silicon
6.3.6.Value Proposition of High Silicon Content Anodes
6.3.7.The Reality of Silicon
6.4.Examples from Start-ups
6.4.1.Ionblox - Pure Silicon Anode Cells for Aviation
6.4.2.Amprius - Silicon Nanowires
6.4.3.H55 - Building a Practical Battery Pack for Electric Aviation Today
6.4.4.Wright Electric - A Different Approach to Batteries
6.4.5.Key Takeaways from Batteries
7.ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR ELECTRIC PROPELLED AIRPLANES
7.1.1.eCTOL Motor / Powertrain Requirements
7.1.2.Overview of Plane Types Energy and Power Requirements
7.1.3.Typical Airplane Engines
7.1.4.Airplane Engines Power and Weight
7.1.5.Turbofan Power Estimations
7.1.6.Electric Motors and Distributed Electric Propulsion
7.1.7.Challenges in Building a 100MW Electric Propulsion Unit
7.2.Electric Motors for Aviation: Players
7.2.1.H3X is Building MW Scale Motors for Commercial Airplane Applications
7.2.2.Evolito is Pursuing Axial Flux for Aviation Applications
7.2.3.Duxion is Reinventing the Motor to Replace Turbofans
7.2.4.Wright Electric's High Power-to-Weight Motor
7.2.5.magniX
7.2.6.Ascendance
7.2.7.Collins - Aerospace Suppliers Working on Motor Products
7.2.8.SAFRAN - Aerospace Suppliers Working on Motor Products
7.2.9.EMRAX
7.2.10.MAGicALL
7.2.11.Nidec Aerospace
7.2.12.Rolls-Royce / Siemens
7.2.13.Rolls-Royce / Siemens
7.2.14.Other Player Examples
7.2.15.Power Density Comparison: Motors for Aviation
7.2.16.Torque Density Comparison: Motors for Aviation
7.2.17.Key Takeaways from Electric Motors
8.FORECASTS
8.1.Forecast Segmentation
8.2.Forecasting Method
8.3.Real World Examples of S-Curve
8.4.Maximum Adoption of Electric and Hydrogen Commercial Airliners
8.5.Key Assumptions
8.6.Key Assumption - Notes
8.7.Airplane Addressable Market Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.8.Battery Electric Airplane Sales Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.9.Hydrogen Airplane Sales Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.10.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in the Airplane Market Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.11.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in GA Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.12.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in Business Jets Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.13.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in Small Commercial Narrow-Bodies Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.14.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in Commercial Narrow-Bodies Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.15.Adoption of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Power in Commercial Wide-Bodies Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.16.Revenue From Battery Electric Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.17.Revenue From Hydrogen Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.18.Revenue From Battery Electric, Hydrogen, and ICE Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.19.Battery Demand (MWh) From Battery Electric Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
8.20.Electric Motor Demand (GWp) From Battery Electric and Hydrogen Planes Forecast - 2021 to 2045
 

Ordering Information

지속 가능한 미래 항공 기술 동향, 트렌드 및 시장 전망 2025-2045

£$¥
전자 (사용자 1-5명)
£5,650.00
전자 (사용자 6-10명)
£8,050.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 1-5명)
£6,450.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 6-10명)
£8,850.00
전자 (사용자 1-5명)
€6,400.00
전자 (사용자 6-10명)
€9,100.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 1-5명)
€7,310.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 6-10명)
€10,010.00
전자 (사용자 1-5명)
$7,000.00
전자 (사용자 6-10명)
$10,000.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 1-5명)
$7,975.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 6-10명)
$10,975.00
전자 (사용자 1-5명)
元50,000.00
전자 (사용자 6-10명)
元72,000.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 1-5명)
元58,000.00
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 6-10명)
元80,000.00
전자 (사용자 1-5명)
¥990,000
전자 (사용자 6-10명)
¥1,406,000
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 1-5명)
¥1,140,000
전자 및 1 하드 카피 (사용자 6-10명)
¥1,556,000
Click here to enquire about additional licenses.
If you are a reseller/distributor please contact us before ordering.
お問合せ、見積および請求書が必要な方はm.murakoshi@idtechex.com までご連絡ください。

보고서 통계

슬라이드 281
전망 2045
게시 Sep 2024
ISBN 9781835700594
 

콘텐츠 미리보기

pdf Document Sample pages
 
 
 
 

Subscription Enquiry