本レポートは最新版が発行されています。 次のリンクをクリックして 最新版をご確認ください。
以前に本レポートを購入済みの方は、ページ右側のダウンロード用リンクより、ダウンロードをお試しください。
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | An introduction to printed and flexible sensors |
1.2. | Opportunities for SWIR image sensors |
1.3. | Growth areas for printed piezoresistive sensors |
1.4. | Printed piezoresistive sensor application assessment |
1.5. | Solution processed or hybrid ITO alternatives for capacitive touch |
1.6. | Opportunities for printed temperature sensors |
1.7. | Opportunities for printed gas/humidity sensors |
1.8. | Wearable technology: An opportunity for capacitive strain sensors. |
1.9. | Glucose test strips: A large but declining market |
1.10. | Printed wearable electrode sensors: Opportunities in healthcare and fitness monitoring. |
1.11. | 10-year forecast for printed sensor revenue by sensor type (Sensor categories: Image, pressure, gas & humidity, temperature, strain, wearable, glucose test strips) |
1.12. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by revenue (Sensor categories: Image, pressure, gas & humidity, temperature, strain, wearable) |
1.13. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by revenue: All categories |
1.14. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by unit volume (in m2): All categories |
1.15. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by unit volume (in m2): All categories (excluding biosensors) |
1.16. | Key takeaways |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | What is a sensor? |
2.2. | Sensor value chain example: Digital camera |
2.3. | What defines a 'printed' sensor? |
2.4. | Printed sensor manufacturing |
2.5. | Motivation for printed electronics: Flexibility |
2.6. | Motivation for printed electronics: Ease of manufacturing |
2.7. | A brief overview of screen, slot-die, gravure and flexographic printing |
2.8. | A brief overview of digital printing methods |
2.9. | Towards roll to roll (R2R) printing |
2.10. | Printed sensor categories |
2.11. | What proportion is printed? |
2.12. | Opportunities for printed sensors: Facilitating computational data analysis |
2.13. | Opportunities for printed sensors: Healthcare |
2.14. | Opportunities for printed sensors: Human machine interfaces (HMI) |
3. | PHOTODETECTORS AND IMAGE SENSORS |
3.1.1. | Types of printed photodetectors/image sensors |
3.1.2. | Photodetector working principles |
3.1.3. | Quantifying photodetector and image sensor performance |
3.1.4. | The printed photodetector competitive landscape |
3.2. | Organic photodetectors for large area image sensors |
3.2.1. | Organic photodetectors (OPDs) |
3.2.2. | OPDs: Advantages and disadvantages |
3.2.3. | Reducing OPD dark current |
3.2.4. | Manipulating the detection wavelength |
3.2.5. | Extending OPDs to the NIR region: Use of cavities |
3.2.6. | Manufacturing challenges for cavity OPDs |
3.2.7. | What can you do with organic photodetectors? |
3.2.8. | 'Fingerprint on display' with OPDs |
3.2.9. | Challenges for printed OPDs |
3.2.10. | First OPD production line |
3.2.11. | Applications based on TFT active matrix |
3.2.12. | Manipulating OPD properties by changing molecular structure. |
3.2.13. | OPDs for biometric security |
3.2.14. | Spray-coated organic photodiodes for medical imaging. |
3.2.15. | Flexible image sensors based on amorphous Si |
3.2.16. | Materials for OPDs |
3.2.17. | Challenges for large area OPD adoption |
3.2.18. | Technical requirements/manufacturing approaches for OPD applications: Biometric recognition, smart shelving, x-ray sensing and SWIR imaging |
3.2.19. | SWOT analysis of large area OPD image sensors |
3.2.20. | Organic photodetector forecast |
3.3. | Motivation for infra-red sensing |
3.3.1. | Applications for NIR/SWIR imaging |
3.3.2. | SWIR for autonomous mobility |
3.3.3. | Other SWIR benefits: Better hazard detection |
3.3.4. | Towards broadband hyperspectral imaging |
3.3.5. | SWIR sensitivity of PbS QDs, Si, polymers, InGaAs, HgCdTe, etc... |
3.3.6. | NIR sensing: limitation of Si CMOS |
3.3.7. | Existing long wavelength detection: InGaAs |
3.3.8. | InGaAs sensor design: Solder bumps limit resolution |
3.3.9. | Innovative silicon based SWIR sensors (Trieye) |
3.3.10. | OmniVision: making silicon CMOS sensitive to NIR (II) |
3.3.11. | SWIR: Incumbent and emerging technology options |
3.4. | OPD on CMOS hybrid image sensors |
3.4.1. | OPD on CMOS hybrid image sensors |
3.4.2. | Hybrid organic/CMOS sensor for broadcast cameras |
3.4.3. | Comparing hybrid organic/CMOS sensor with backside illumination CMOS sensor |
3.4.4. | Hybrid organic/CMOS sensor (III) |
3.4.5. | Progress in CMOS global shutter using silicon technology only |
3.4.6. | Fraunhofer FEP: SWIR OPD-on-CMOS sensors |
3.4.7. | SWOT analysis of OPD-on-CMOS image sensors |
3.5. | Quantum dot on CMOS hybrid image sensors |
3.5.1. | Quantum dots as optical sensor materials |
3.5.2. | Lead sulphide as quantum dots |
3.5.3. | Quantum dots: Choice of the material system |
3.5.4. | Applications and challenges for quantum dots in image sensors |
3.5.5. | QD layer advantage in image sensor (I): Increasing sensor sensitivity and gain |
3.5.6. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(II): Reducing thickness |
3.5.7. | Detectivity benchmarking |
3.5.8. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(III): Enabling high resolution global shutter |
3.5.9. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(IV): Low power and high sensitivity to structured light detection for machine vision? |
3.5.10. | Advantage of solution processing: ease of integration with ROIC CMOS? |
3.5.11. | How is the QD layer applied? |
3.5.12. | QD optical layer: Approaches to increase conductivity of QD films |
3.5.13. | Quantum dots: Covering the range from visible to near infrared |
3.5.14. | Hybrid quantum dots for SWIR imaging (I) |
3.5.15. | SWIR Vision Sensors: first QD-Si cameras and/or an alternative to InVisage (now Apple)? |
3.5.16. | SWIR Vision Sensors: First commercial QD-CMOS cameras |
3.5.17. | Emberion: QD-graphene SWIR sensor |
3.5.18. | Emberion: QD-Graphene-Si broad range SWIR sensor |
3.5.19. | QD-on-CMOS from Hanyang University (South Korea) |
3.5.20. | Challenges for QD-Si technology for SWIR imaging. |
3.5.21. | Advantage of solution processing: Ease of integration with CMOS ROICs? |
3.5.22. | Quantum dot films: Processing challenges |
3.5.23. | How is the QD layer applied? |
3.5.24. | PdS QDs: Optical sensor with high responsibility and wide spectrum |
3.5.25. | Results and status for QD-Si sensors |
3.5.26. | Nanoco loses the Apple project |
3.5.27. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (IMEC) |
3.5.28. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (RTI International) |
3.5.29. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (ICFO) |
3.5.30. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (ICFO continued) |
3.5.31. | Overview of OPD-on-CMOS and QD-on-CMOS sensors |
3.5.32. | Prospects for QD/OPD-on-CMOS detectors |
3.5.33. | QD-on-CMOS sensors ongoing technical challenges |
3.5.34. | SWOT analysis of QD-on-CMOS image sensors |
3.6. | Summary: Printed image sensors |
3.6.1. | Comparison of image sensors technologies |
3.6.2. | Printed photodetector application assessment |
3.6.3. | Printed image sensor supplier overview |
3.6.4. | Technology readiness level snapshot of printed image sensors |
3.6.5. | Printed image sensor adoption roadmap |
3.6.6. | Printed image sensor application status summary |
3.6.7. | Printed image sensors forecast methodology |
3.6.8. | 10-year organic photodetector forecast by sales volume (in m2) and revenue |
3.6.9. | 10-year printed/hybrid image sensors forecast by sales volume (in m2) and revenue |
3.6.10. | Company profiles: Printed image sensors |
4. | PRINTED PIEZORESISTIVE SENSORS |
4.1.1. | Printed piezoresistive sensors: An introduction |
4.1.2. | Comparison with capacitive touch sensors |
4.2. | Printed piezoresistive sensor technology |
4.2.1. | What is piezoresistance? |
4.2.2. | Percolation dependent resistance |
4.2.3. | Quantum tunnelling composite |
4.2.4. | Printed piezoresistive sensors: Anatomy |
4.2.5. | Pressure sensing architectures |
4.2.6. | Thru mode sensors |
4.2.7. | Shunt mode sensors |
4.2.8. | Force vs resistance characteristics |
4.2.9. | Manipulating the force-resistance curve |
4.2.10. | Importance of actuator area |
4.2.11. | FSR inks |
4.2.12. | Complete material portfolio approach is common |
4.2.13. | Composition dependence |
4.2.14. | Shunt-mode FSR sensors by the roll |
4.2.15. | Example FSR circuits |
4.2.16. | Effect of circuit design on sensor output |
4.2.17. | 3D multi-touch pressure sensors |
4.2.18. | Matrix pressure sensor architecture |
4.2.19. | Printed foldable force sensing solution |
4.2.20. | Hybrid FSR/capacitive sensors (Tangio) |
4.2.21. | Hybrid FSR/capacitive sensors |
4.2.22. | Curved sensors with consistent zero (Tacterion) |
4.2.23. | Technological development of piezoresistive sensors. |
4.3. | Applications of printed piezoresistive sensors |
4.3.1. | Applications of piezoresistive sensors |
4.3.2. | Medical applications of printed FSR (Tekscan) |
4.3.3. | Teeth topography from Innovation Lab |
4.3.4. | Large-area pressure sensors |
4.3.5. | Force sensor examples: Sensing Tex |
4.3.6. | Force sensor examples: Vista Medical |
4.3.7. | Automotive occupancy and seat belt alarm sensors |
4.3.8. | Consumer electronic applications of printed FSR |
4.3.9. | Textile-based applications of printed FSR |
4.3.10. | SOFTswitch: Force sensor on fabric |
4.3.11. | Pressure sensitive fabric (Vista Medical) |
4.3.12. | Piezoresistive sensors in smartphones |
4.3.13. | A portable MIDI controller - The Morph (Sensel) |
4.3.14. | Smart carpet to enforce social distancing (due to coronavirus) |
4.3.15. | Printed piezoresistive sensor application assessment |
4.4. | Summary: Printed piezoresistive sensors |
4.4.1. | Business models for printed piezoresistive sensors |
4.4.2. | R2R vs S2S manufacturing |
4.4.3. | Readiness level snapshot of printed piezoresistive sensor technologies |
4.4.4. | Force sensitive resistor sensor supplier overview |
4.4.5. | Printed piezoresistive sensor adoption roadmap |
4.4.6. | SWOT analysis of piezoresistive sensors |
4.4.7. | 10-year printed piezoresistive sensor forecast by sales volume (in m2) and revenue (Categories: industrial, medical, consumer, automotive) |
4.4.8. | Summary: Printed piezoresistive sensor applications |
4.4.9. | Company profiles: Piezoresistive sensors |
5. | PRINTED PIEZOELECTRIC SENSORS |
5.1.1. | Piezoelectricity: An introduction |
5.1.2. | Piezoelectric polymers |
5.1.3. | PVDF-based polymer options for sensing and haptic actuators |
5.1.4. | Low temperature piezoelectric inks (I) (Meggitt) |
5.1.5. | Piezoelectric polymers |
5.1.6. | Printed piezoelectric sensor |
5.1.7. | Printed piezoelectric sensors: prototypes |
5.1.8. | Pyzoflex |
5.1.9. | Piezoelectric actuators in loudspeaker/microphones |
5.1.10. | PiezoPaint (Meggit) |
5.1.11. | Haptic actuators |
5.1.12. | Example application: Haptic gloves |
5.1.13. | Combining energy harvesting and sensing |
5.2. | Summary: Printed piezoelectric sensors |
5.2.1. | SWOT analysis of piezoelectric sensors |
5.2.2. | Piezoelectric sensor supplier overview |
5.2.3. | 10-year pressure sensor forecast (piezoelectric and hybrid) by sales volume (in m2) and revenue |
5.2.4. | Summary: Piezoelectric sensors |
5.2.5. | Company profiles: Piezoelectric sensors |
6. | STRAIN SENSORS |
6.1.1. | High-strain sensors (capacitive) |
6.1.2. | Use of dielectric electroactive polymers (EAPs) |
6.2. | Strain sensor applications |
6.2.1. | Players with EAPs: Parker Hannifin |
6.2.2. | Strain sensor applications |
6.2.3. | Players with EAPs: Stretchsense |
6.2.4. | Players with EAPs: Bando Chemical |
6.2.5. | C Stretch Bando: Progress on stretchable sensors |
6.2.6. | Other strain sensors (capacitive & resistive) |
6.2.7. | Strain sensor examples: Polymatech |
6.2.8. | Strain sensor example: Yamaha and Kureha |
6.2.9. | Strain sensor examples: BeBop Sensors |
6.2.10. | Industrial displacement sensors (LEAP Technology) |
6.3. | Summary: Strain sensors |
6.3.1. | Summary: Strain sensors |
6.3.2. | SWOT analysis of flexible strain sensors |
6.3.3. | Printed strain sensor forecast |
6.3.4. | Printed high-strain sensor supplier overview |
6.3.5. | Company profiles: Strain sensors |
7. | ITO REPLACEMENT FOR CAPACITIVE TOUCH |
7.1.1. | Capacitive sensors |
7.1.2. | Printed capacitive sensors |
7.1.3. | Conductive materials for capacitive sensors |
7.2. | Transparent conductive materials: ITO |
7.2.1. | ITO film assessment: performance, manufacture and market trends |
7.2.2. | ITO film shortcomings: flexibility |
7.2.3. | ITO film shortcomings: limited sheet conductivity |
7.2.4. | ITO film shortcomings: Limited sheet resistance |
7.2.5. | ITO film shortcomings: index matching |
7.2.6. | ITO film shortcomings: thinness |
7.2.7. | ITO film shortcomings: price falls and commoditization |
7.2.8. | ITO films: Current prices (2018) |
7.2.9. | Indium: Price fluctuations drive innovation |
7.2.10. | Indium's single supply risk: real or exaggerated? |
7.2.11. | Recycling comes to the rescue? |
7.2.12. | SWOT analysis of ITO |
7.3. | ITO alternatives: Silver nanowires (Ag NW) |
7.3.1. | Silver nanowires: basic introduction |
7.3.2. | Ag NW: growth process |
7.3.3. | Ag NWs: roll to roll formation |
7.3.4. | Ag NW: Trade off between sheet resistance and transmission |
7.3.5. | Ag NWs: Mechanical flexibility |
7.3.6. | Ag NWs: 300,000 cycles and more with 1mm radius |
7.3.7. | Ag NW: Patterning |
7.3.8. | Ag NW: Ready-to-expose films? |
7.3.9. | Ag NW: the haze issue |
7.3.10. | Ag haze: Demonstrating impact of NW aspect ratio |
7.3.11. | Stability |
7.3.12. | Ag NWs: The stability issue been finally solved? |
7.3.13. | Ag NWs: Photostability |
7.3.14. | Ag NWs: Past or existing applications |
7.3.15. | Ag NWs: Emerging applications |
7.3.16. | Improving conductivity between Ag NWs - C3 Nano |
7.3.17. | Foldable displays incorporating C3 Nano's AgNWs |
7.3.18. | Future trends... |
7.3.19. | Combining AgNW and CNTs for a TCF material (Chasm) |
7.3.20. | Prospects for Ag NW adoption |
7.3.21. | SWOT analysis of silver nanowires as a transparent conductor |
7.4. | ITO Alternatives: Metal mesh |
7.4.1. | Metal mesh: Photolithography followed by etching |
7.4.2. | Fujifilm's photo-patterned metal mesh |
7.4.3. | Toppan Printing's copper mesh transparent conductive films |
7.4.4. | Panasonic's large area metal mesh |
7.4.5. | GiS (integrator): Large area metal mesh displays |
7.4.6. | Embossing/imprinting metal mesh |
7.4.7. | O-Film's metal mesh technology: The basics |
7.4.8. | Will O-Film rejuvenate its metal mesh business after disappointing sales? |
7.4.9. | MNTech's metal mesh TCF technology (the incident) |
7.4.10. | J-Touch: substantial metal mesh capacity |
7.4.11. | Nanoimprinting metal mesh with 5um linewidth |
7.4.12. | Metal mesh TCF is flexible |
7.4.13. | Direct printed metal mesh transparent conductive films: performance |
7.4.14. | Direct printed metal mesh transparent conductive films: major shortcomings |
7.4.15. | Komura Tech: Improvement in gravure offset printed fine pattern (<5 um) metal mesh TCF ? |
7.4.16. | Shashin Kagaku: offset printed metal mesh TCF |
7.4.17. | Komori: Gravure offset all-printed metal mesh film? |
7.4.18. | Asahi Kasei: taking steps to commercialize its R2R ultrafine printing process |
7.4.19. | How is the ultrafine feature R2R mold fabricated? |
7.4.20. | Konica Minolta: inkjet printing large area fine pitch metal mesh TCFs with <10um linewidth? |
7.4.21. | Gunze: S2S screen printing finds a market fit? |
7.4.22. | Toray's photocurable screen printed paste for fine line metal mesh |
7.4.23. | Ishihara Chemical's gravure printed photo-sintered Cu paste |
7.4.24. | Toppan Forms: Ag salt inks to achieve 4um printed metal mesh? |
7.4.25. | Eastman Kodak: Transparent ultra low-resistivity RF antenna using printed Cu metal mesh technology |
7.4.26. | Kuroki/ITRI: printed seed layer and plate Cu metal mesh? |
7.4.27. | Replacing photolithography with photoresist printing for ultra fine metal mesh |
7.4.28. | LCY gravure printing photoresist then etching |
7.4.29. | Screen Holding: gravure printing photoresist then etching |
7.4.30. | Consistent Materials' photoresist for metal mesh |
7.4.31. | Tanaka Metal's metal mesh technology |
7.5. | ITO Alternatives: Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) |
7.5.1. | Introduction to Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) |
7.5.2. | CNTs: Ideal vs reality |
7.5.3. | Not all CNTs are equal |
7.5.4. | Benchmarking of different CNT production processes |
7.5.5. | Price position of CNTs (from SWCNT to FWCNT to MWCNT) |
7.5.6. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: performance |
7.5.7. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: performance of commercial films on the market |
7.5.8. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: Matched index |
7.5.9. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: mechanical flexibility |
7.5.10. | Example of wearable device using CNT |
7.6. | ITO alternatives: PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.1. | PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.2. | Patterning PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.3. | Performance of PEDOT:PSS has drastically improved |
7.6.4. | PEDOT:PSS is now on a par with ITO-on-PET |
7.6.5. | PEDOT:PSS is mechanically flexible |
7.6.6. | Stability and spatial uniformity of PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.7. | Commercial product using PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.8. | Use case examples of PEDOT:PSS TCFs |
7.6.9. | Force Foundation: PEDOT used in solution coated smart windows |
7.6.10. | SWOT analysis of PEDOT:PSS as a TCF |
7.7. | Summary of ITO alternatives |
7.7.1. | Quantitative benchmarking of different TCF technologies |
7.7.2. | Technology comparison |
7.7.3. | TCF material supplier overview |
7.7.4. | Company profiles: ITO alternatives for capacitive touch |
8. | TEMPERATURE SENSORS |
8.1.1. | Introduction to printed temperature sensors |
8.1.2. | Types of temperature sensors |
8.1.3. | Comparing resistive temperature sensors and thermistors |
8.1.4. | PST Sensors: Silicon nanoparticles ink |
8.1.5. | Printed silicon nanoparticle sensors (PST) |
8.1.6. | Printed metal RTD sensors: Brewer Science |
8.1.7. | Substrate challenges for printed temperature sensors |
8.1.8. | Academic research: Printed temperature sensor with stabilized PEDOT:PSS |
8.2. | Applications of printed temperature sensors |
8.2.1. | Coffee temperature sensors |
8.2.2. | Research at PARC (Xerox) |
8.2.3. | Time Temperature Indicators (TTIs) |
8.2.4. | Chemical TTIs |
8.2.5. | Chemical Time Temperature Indicators |
8.2.6. | Examples of Chemical Time Temperature Indicators (TTIs) |
8.2.7. | Proof-of-concept prototype of an integrated printed electronic tag |
8.2.8. | Wearable temperature monitors |
8.2.9. | Novel applications for flexible temperature sensors |
8.2.10. | CNT temperature sensors (Brewer Science) |
8.2.11. | Temperature monitoring for electric vehicles batteries |
8.2.12. | Printed temperature sensors and heaters (IEE) |
8.3. | Summary: Printed temperature sensors |
8.3.1. | SWOT analysis of printed temperature sensors |
8.3.2. | Printed temperature sensor supplier overview |
8.3.3. | Prospects for temperature sensors |
8.3.4. | 10-year printed temperature sensors forecast by sales volume (m2) and revenue (Categories: organic and inorganic active materials) |
8.3.5. | Company profiles: Printed temperature sensors |
9. | GAS AND HUMIDITY SENSORS |
9.1.1. | Printed gas sensors: An introduction |
9.2. | Gas sensor technology |
9.2.1. | Gas sensor industry |
9.2.2. | History of chemical sensors |
9.2.3. | Transition to miniaturised gas sensors |
9.2.4. | Comparison between classic and miniaturised sensors |
9.2.5. | Concentrations of detectable atmospheric pollutants |
9.2.6. | Five common detection principles for gas sensors |
9.2.7. | Sensitivity for main available gas sensors |
9.2.8. | Comparison of miniaturised sensor technologies |
9.2.9. | Pellistor gas sensors |
9.2.10. | Metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) gas sensors |
9.2.11. | Printing MOS sensors |
9.2.12. | Electrochemical (EC) gas sensors |
9.2.13. | Infrared gas sensors |
9.2.14. | Electronic nose (e-Nose) |
9.2.15. | Integrating an 'electronic nose' with a flexible IC |
9.2.16. | Screen printed MOS sensors (Figaro) |
9.2.17. | MOS gas sensors with printed electrodes (FIS) |
9.2.18. | Printed components of electrochemical gas sensor |
9.2.19. | Printed traditional EC gas sensor |
9.2.20. | Screen printed miniaturised EC gas sensor |
9.2.21. | Screen printed MOS sensors (Renesas Electronics) |
9.2.22. | Printed carbon nanotube based gas sensors |
9.2.23. | Printed humidity/moisture sensor (Brewer Science) |
9.2.24. | Humidity sensors based on organic electronics (Invisense) |
9.3. | Emerging markets for printed gas sensors |
9.3.1. | Gas sensors will find use in various IoT segments |
9.3.2. | Gas sensors in automotive industry |
9.3.3. | Emerging market: Personal devices |
9.3.4. | Gas sensors for mobile devices |
9.3.5. | Mobile phones with air quality sensors |
9.3.6. | H2S professional gas detector watch |
9.3.7. | Air quality monitoring for smart cities |
9.3.8. | Home And Office Monitoring: A Connected Environment |
9.4. | Summary: Gas and humidity sensors |
9.4.1. | Prospects for gas and humidity sensors |
9.4.2. | The gas sensor value chain |
9.4.3. | Technology readiness level snapshot of gas sensors |
9.4.4. | Supplier overview: Printed gas and humidity sensors |
9.4.5. | Porters' five forces analysis for printed gas sensors |
9.4.6. | Future challenges for sensor manufacturers |
9.4.7. | 10-year printed gas and humidity sensors forecasts by sales volume (in m2) and revenue (Categories: uMOS, electrochemical, CNT, humidity) |
9.4.8. | Company profiles: Gas and humidity sensors |
10. | PRINTED BIOSENSORS |
10.1.1. | Electrochemical biosensors present a simple sensing mechanism |
10.1.2. | Electrochemical biosensor mechanisms |
10.1.3. | Enzymes used in PoC electrochemical biosensors |
10.1.4. | Electrode deposition: screen printing vs sputtering |
10.1.5. | Challenges for printing electrochemical test strips |
10.2. | Biosensors for glucose sensing |
10.2.1. | Anatomy of a glucose test strip |
10.2.2. | Glucose test strip monitoring through an associated reader |
10.2.3. | Sensors for diabetes management roadmap |
10.2.4. | Summary: Printed biosensors |
10.2.5. | Introduction to printed biosensors for diabetes management |
10.2.6. | CGM begins to replace test strips (Abbott) |
10.2.7. | Comparing test strip costs with CGM |
10.2.8. | Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is causing glucose test strip use to decline. |
10.3. | Printed biosensors for other applications |
10.3.1. | Electrochemical sensors are a more accurate method of ketone monitoring |
10.3.2. | Lactic acid monitoring for athletes |
10.3.3. | Traditional lactic acid monitors |
10.3.4. | Cholesterol as an early indicator of cardiovascular disease |
10.3.5. | A real market for PoC cholesterol tests? |
10.4. | Summary: Biosensors |
10.4.1. | The future of electrochemical PoC biosensors |
10.4.2. | SWOT analysis of printed biosensors |
10.4.3. | Supplier overview: Biosensors |
10.4.4. | Printed biosensors market forecast |
10.4.5. | Biosensors: Company profiles |
11. | PRINTED WEARABLE ELECTRODES AND SKIN PATCHES |
11.1.1. | Introduction to printed wearable electrodes and skin patches |
11.1.2. | Applications for electrodes and skin patches |
11.1.3. | Using electrodes to measure biopotential |
11.1.4. | Disposable metal snap electrodes - the current electrode technology |
11.1.5. | Market for metal snap Ag/AgCl electrodes |
11.1.6. | Skin patches with integrated electrodes - an opportunity for printed electrodes. |
11.2. | Examples of printed electrodes in skin patches |
11.2.1. | Smart patch with printed silver ink (Quad Industries) |
11.2.2. | QT Medical develop printed electrodes and interconnects |
11.2.3. | Printed electrodes and interconnects for pregnancy monitoring (Monica Healthcare) |
11.2.4. | Flexible and stretchable electrode (ScreenTec OY) |
11.2.5. | Printed wireless wearable electrodes (Dupont) |
11.2.6. | Printable dry ECG electrodes (Henkel) |
11.2.7. | New printed electrode materials form Henkel |
11.2.8. | Comparing printed and metal snap electrode performance |
11.2.9. | Advantages of printed dry electrode adhesives |
11.2.10. | Grid printed electrodes (Nissha GSI) |
11.2.11. | Alternative printed electrode materials |
11.3. | Electrodes in smart clothing and e-textiles |
11.3.1. | E-Textiles: Where textiles meet electronics |
11.3.2. | Biometric monitoring in apparel |
11.3.3. | Integrating heart rate monitoring into clothing |
11.3.4. | Sensors used in smart clothing for biometrics |
11.3.5. | Companies with biometric monitoring apparel products |
11.3.6. | Textile electrodes |
11.3.7. | E-textile material use over time |
11.3.8. | Printed electrodes on clothing (Toyobo) |
11.3.9. | Monitoring racehorse health with printed electrodes (Toyobo) |
11.3.10. | Stretchable conductive printed electrodes (Nanoleq) |
11.4. | Summary: Flexible wearable electrodes |
11.4.1. | SWOT analysis of printed flexible wearable electrodes |
11.4.2. | Summary: Flexible wearable electrodes |
11.4.3. | Supplier overview: Printed electrodes for skin patches and e-textiles |
11.4.4. | Company profiles: Flexible wearable electrodes |
12. | PRINTED SENSORS WITH FHE |
12.1.1. | Defining flexible hybrid electronics (FHE) |
12.1.2. | FHE Examples: Combing conventional components with flexible/printed electronics on flexible substrates |
12.1.3. | FHE: The best of both worlds? |
12.1.4. | Overcoming the flexibility/functionality compromise |
12.1.5. | What counts as FHE? |
12.1.6. | Integrating sensors in FHE circuits |
12.2. | Examples of printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.2.1. | Wine temperature sensing label |
12.2.2. | Printed electronics enabling multi component integration some use NFC as wireless power |
12.2.3. | Wearable ECG sensor from VTT |
12.2.4. | PlasticArm: An electronic nose with FHE |
12.2.5. | PlasticArm: Utilizing bespoke flexible processors |
12.2.6. | Condition monitoring multimodal sensor array |
12.2.7. | 'Sensor-less' sensing of temperature and movement |
12.2.8. | FHE and printed sensors for smart packaging. |
12.3. | Summary: Printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.3.1. | SWOT analysis of printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.3.2. | Supplier overview: Printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.3.3. | Company profiles: Flexible hybrid electronics |
13. | MARKET FORECASTS |
13.1.1. | Market forecast methodology |
13.1.2. | Difficulties of forecasting discontinuous technology adoption |
13.1.3. | 10-year printed sensors forecast by sales volume (in m2) (sensor categories: image, pressure, gas & humidity, temperature, strain, wearable electrodes) |
13.1.4. | 10-year overall printed sensors forecast by revenue (no biosensors) |
13.1.5. | 10-year overall printed sensors forecast by revenue (with biosensors) |
13.1.6. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by revenue: All categories (except biosensors) |
13.1.7. | Printed image sensors forecast methodology |
13.1.8. | 10-year organic photodetector forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.9. | 10-year printed/hybrid image sensors forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.10. | 10-year piezoresistive sensor forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.11. | 10-year other pressure sensor forecast (piezoelectric and hybrid) by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.12. | 10-year printed strain forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.13. | 10-year printed temperature sensor forecast (Categories: inorganic and organic) |
13.1.14. | 10-year printed gas and humidity sensors forecasts by sales volume (in m2) and revenue (Categories: uMOS, electrochemical, CNT, humidity) |
13.1.15. | 10-year printed biosensors forecast by volume in m2 and revenue |
13.1.16. | 10-year wearable electrodes forecast by volume in m2 and revenue (Categories: Skin patch electrodes, smart clothing electrodes, other wearable electrodes) |
13.1.17. | 10-year forecast: Material opportunities from printed sensors (by revenue and volume) |
スライド | 537 |
---|---|
フォーキャスト | 2030 |