This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Introduction to thermal management |
1.2. | Material opportunities in and around a battery pack: overview |
1.3. | Analysis of battery cooling methods |
1.4. | Global trends in OEM cooling methodologies adopted |
1.5. | Total GWh of electric vehicles by region |
1.6. | Global trends in OEM cooling methodologies adopted |
1.7. | Immersion fluids - overview analysis |
1.8. | TIM for EV battery packs - forecast by category |
1.9. | Motor design - OEM strategy breakdown |
1.10. | Overview of thermal materials in EV modules |
1.11. | Evolving power electronics cooling technology: air to liquid to microchannel |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Introduction to thermal management |
2.2. | Introduction to battery thermal management |
2.3. | Battery thermal management - hot and cold |
2.4. | Material opportunities in and around a battery pack: overview |
3. | THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF LI-ION BATTERIES IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES |
3.1. | Current Technologies and OEM Strategies |
3.1.1. | Active vs passive Cooling |
3.1.2. | Passive battery cooling methods |
3.1.3. | Active battery cooling methods |
3.1.4. | Air cooling - technology appraisal |
3.1.5. | Liquid cooling - technology appraisal |
3.1.6. | Liquid cooling - geometries |
3.1.7. | Liquid cooling - alternative fluids |
3.1.8. | Liquid cooling - large OEM announcements |
3.1.9. | Refrigerant cooling - technology appraisal |
3.1.10. | Hyundai's timeline to refrigerant cooling |
3.1.11. | Analysis of battery cooling methods |
3.1.12. | Main incentives for liquid cooling |
3.1.13. | Electric vehicles: passenger cars |
3.1.14. | IONITY - a European fast charging network |
3.1.15. | Shifting OEM strategies - liquid cooling |
3.1.16. | Global trends in OEM cooling methodologies adopted |
3.1.17. | Total GWh of electric vehicles by region |
3.1.18. | Global trends in OEM cooling methodologies adopted |
3.1.19. | IDTechEx outlook |
3.1.20. | Is tab cooling a solution? |
3.1.21. | Integration with whole vehicle thermal management |
3.2. | Emerging Technologies, Li-ion Battery Cooling |
3.2.1. | Immersion cooling - introduction |
3.2.2. | Single-phase vs two-phase cooling |
3.2.3. | Immersion cooling fluids - requirements |
3.2.4. | Immersion fluids for electric vehicles |
3.2.5. | Immersion fluids - properties |
3.2.6. | Immersion fluids - costs |
3.2.7. | Immersion fluids - summary |
3.2.8. | Player analysis |
3.2.9. | SWOT Analysis - Immersion cooling for electric vehicles |
3.2.10. | Emerging routes - phase change materials (PCMs) |
3.2.11. | PCMs - overview |
3.2.12. | Operating temperature range of commercially available PCMs |
3.2.13. | Emerging routes - thermoelectric cooling |
3.3. | Heat Spreaders, Cooling Plates and Cylindrical Cell Solutions |
3.3.1. | Heat spreaders or interspersed cooling plates - pouches and prismatic |
3.3.2. | Chevrolet Volt and Dana |
3.3.3. | Advanced cooling plates |
3.3.4. | Advanced cooling plates - roll bond aluminium |
3.3.5. | Active cell-to-cell cooling solutions - cylindrical |
3.3.6. | Printed temperature sensors and heaters |
3.4. | Thermal Interface Materials for Lithium-ion Battery Packs |
3.4.1. | Introduction to Thermal Interface Materials (TIM) |
3.4.2. | Overview of TIM by type |
3.4.3. | Thermal management - pack and module overview |
3.4.4. | Thermal Interface Material (TIM) - pack and module overview |
3.4.5. | Switching to gap fillers rather than pads |
3.4.6. | EV use-case examples (1) |
3.4.7. | Battery pack TIM - Options and market comparison |
3.4.8. | The silicone dilemma for the automotive industry |
3.4.9. | TIM: silicone alternatives |
3.4.10. | TIM: the conductive players |
3.4.11. | Notable acquisitions for TIM players |
3.4.12. | TIM for electric vehicle battery packs - trends |
3.4.13. | TIM for EV battery packs - forecast by category |
3.4.14. | TIM for EV battery packs - forecast by TIM type |
3.4.15. | Insulating cell-to-cell foams |
3.5. | Thermal Runaway Importance, Detection and Prevention |
3.5.1. | Fire protection - introduction |
3.5.2. | Battery fires in S Korea |
3.5.3. | Causes of battery fires |
3.5.4. | Many considerations to safety |
3.5.5. | Causes of failure |
3.5.6. | Stages of thermal runaway |
3.5.7. | Detecting thermal runaway in a battery pack |
3.5.8. | Gas generation / detection |
3.5.9. | Cell chemistry and stability |
3.5.10. | Thermal runaway propagation |
3.5.11. | Regulation change |
3.5.12. | Thermal runaway prevention |
3.5.13. | Thermal runaway prevention - cylindrical cell-to-cell |
3.5.14. | Prevention of battery shorting |
3.6. | Battery Enclosures |
3.6.1. | Lightweighting battery enclosures |
3.6.2. | Latest composite battery enclosures |
3.6.3. | Alternatives to phenolic resins |
3.6.4. | Emerging materials in fire safety solutions |
3.6.5. | Extra reinforcement needed? |
3.6.6. | Are polymers suitable housings? |
3.6.7. | EMI shielding |
3.7. | Thermal Management in Electric Vehicle Charging |
3.7.1. | Importance of electric vehicle charging infrastructure |
3.7.2. | Thermal considerations for fast charging |
3.7.3. | Liquid cooled charging stations |
3.7.4. | Immersion cooled charging stations |
4. | THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRIC MOTORS |
4.1. | Electric motor types |
4.2. | Electric motor type - advantages and disadvantages |
4.3. | Cooling electric motors |
4.4. | Current OEM strategies - air cooling |
4.5. | Current OEM strategies - oil cooling |
4.6. | Ricardo's new motor |
4.7. | Current OEM strategies - water-glycol cooling |
4.8. | Recent advancements in liquid cooling |
4.9. | Cooling methods comparison by motor |
4.10. | Motor design - OEM strategy breakdown |
4.11. | Cooling technology - OEM strategies |
4.12. | Electric motor thermal management overview |
4.13. | Emerging technologies - refrigerant cooling |
4.14. | Emerging technologies - immersion cooling |
4.15. | Emerging technologies - phase change materials |
4.16. | Radial flux vs axial flux motors |
4.17. | Axial flux motors - current players |
4.18. | In-wheel motors |
4.19. | DHX ultra high-torque motors |
4.20. | Equipmake spoke geometry PM motor |
4.21. | Diabatix - rapid design of cooling components |
4.22. | Integrated stator housings |
4.23. | Potting & materials |
4.24. | Integration with whole vehicle thermal management |
5. | THERMAL MANAGEMENT IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE POWER ELECTRONICS |
5.1. | Introduction |
5.1.1. | Power electronics in electric vehicles |
5.1.2. | Power switch technology: a generational shift towards SiC and GaN |
5.1.3. | Benchmarking Si vs SiC vs GaN |
5.1.4. | SiC and GaN still have substantial room to improve |
5.1.5. | Where will GaN and SiC win? |
5.2. | Towards Higher Area Power Density and Higher Operating Temperatures |
5.2.1. | Mega trend in power modules: increasing power density |
5.2.2. | Mega trend in power modules: increasing power density |
5.2.3. | Operation temperature increasing |
5.2.4. | Roadmap towards lower thermal resistance |
5.2.5. | Traditional packaging technology |
5.3. | Review of Packaging Approaches in Electric Vehicles |
5.3.1. | Toyota Prius (2004-2010): power module |
5.3.2. | 2008 Lexus power module |
5.3.3. | Toyota Prius (2010-2015): power module |
5.3.4. | Toyota Prius (2016 onwards): power module |
5.3.5. | Chevrolet 2016 Power module (by Delphi) |
5.3.6. | Cadillac 2016 power module (by Hitachi) |
5.3.7. | Hitachi supplies many other vehicle manufacturers |
5.3.8. | Nissan Leaf power module (2012) |
5.3.9. | Honda Accord 2014 Power Module |
5.3.10. | Honda Fit (by Mitsubishi) |
5.3.11. | BWM i3 (by Infineon) |
5.3.12. | Infineon: evolution of HybridPack and beyond |
5.3.13. | Infineon's HybridPack is used by multiple producers (SAIC, Hyundai, etc.) |
5.3.14. | Tesla Model S (discreet IGBT) and Model 3 (SiC module) |
5.4. | Beyond Wire Bonds: Approaches and Techniques to Sustain the Roadmap Towards Higher Temperatures |
5.4.1. | Al wire bond is a common source of failure |
5.4.2. | Al wire bonding remains strong in IGBT modules |
5.4.3. | Al wire bonding also used in SiC modules |
5.4.4. | Technology evolution beyond Al wire bonding |
5.4.5. | Transition towards direct Cu lead bonding |
5.4.6. | Transition towards Cu pin bonding |
5.4.7. | Transition towards Cu wire bonding using Ag sintered buffer plates |
5.5. | Beyond Solder: Materials and Technology to Sustain the Roadmap Towards Higher Temperatures |
5.5.1. | Die and substrate attach are common failure modes in power devices |
5.5.2. | Die attach technology trend |
5.5.3. | The choice of solder technology |
5.5.4. | Why metal sintering? |
5.5.5. | Sintering can be used at multiple levels |
5.5.6. | Transition towards Ag sintering (Tesla 3 with ST SiC modules) |
5.6. | Advanced Substrates: Technologies for High Temperature and Power Levels |
5.6.1. | The choice of ceramic substrate technology |
5.6.2. | AlN: overcoming its mechanical weakness |
5.6.3. | Si3N4: overcoming its mediocre thermal conductivity |
5.6.4. | The approaches to metallisation: DPC, DBC, AMB, AMC, and thick film metallisation |
5.6.5. | Direct plated copper (DPC): pros and cons |
5.6.6. | Double bonded copper (DBC): pros and cons |
5.6.7. | Active metal brazing (AMB): pros and cons |
5.6.8. | Which ceramic substrate-metallisation technology combinations are most reliable? |
5.6.9. | Ceramics: CTE mismatch for ceramics |
5.6.10. | Examples of various substrate choices in EV power modules |
5.7. | Eliminating Thermal Paste: Key Technology Changes to Sustain Roadmap Towards Higher Temperatures |
5.7.1. | Why use TIM in power modules? |
5.7.2. | Which EV inverter modules have TIM? |
5.7.3. | When will the TIM not become the limiting factor? |
5.7.4. | Why the drive to eliminate the TIM? |
5.7.5. | Has TIM been eliminated in any EV inverter modules? |
5.7.6. | Comparison of various thermal greases |
5.7.7. | Thermal grease: other shortcomings |
5.7.8. | Phase change materials (PCM) |
5.7.9. | Thermal resistance of grease and PCMs |
5.8. | Cooling: Technology Changes to Sustain Roadmap Towards Higher Temperatures |
5.8.1. | Evolving air cooling to direct or jet liquid cooling to microchannel cooling |
6. | COMPANY PROFILES |
スライド | 227 |
---|---|
フォーキャスト | 2030 |