| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | Low-carbon hydrogen is a key solution to climate change, with both production and demand expected to grow steadily |
| 1.2. | Current state of hydrogen production |
| 1.3. | Hydrogen colors are categorized based on the production technology used |
| 1.4. | Relying solely on green hydrogen is not currently viable and faces multiple challenges |
| 1.5. | Blue hydrogen as a transition solution between grey and green hydrogen |
| 1.6. | Turquoise hydrogen from methane pyrolysis as another low-carbon hydrogen type |
| 1.7. | Cost comparison and adoption of different types of hydrogen |
| 1.8. | Global leading regions in blue hydrogen development |
| 1.9. | Methane pyrolysis as an emerging market with strong SME presence |
| 1.10. | Growth outlook and key drivers for blue hydrogen |
| 1.11. | Summary of national hydrogen targets: Many countries have ambitious strategies in place |
| 1.12. | Regional overview of blue hydrogen: US leading, EU and UK following |
| 1.13. | Business model for blue hydrogen supply chains around industrial hubs for multiple end-uses |
| 1.14. | Hydrogen's versatile applications across both current and emerging uses |
| 1.15. | Overview of blue hydrogen production technologies covered |
| 1.16. | Pros & cons of production technologies (1/3) |
| 1.17. | Pros & cons of production technologies (2/3) |
| 1.18. | Pros & cons of production technologies (3/3) |
| 1.19. | Main types of methane pyrolysis reactors |
| 1.20. | Novel processes for blue hydrogen production: CLC and eSMR have the highest potentials |
| 1.21. | Key innovations in novel blue hydrogen technologies |
| 1.22. | Levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison |
| 1.23. | Cost breakdown comparison |
| 1.24. | Key regional drivers of hydrogen production cost |
| 1.25. | CO2 emission intensity comparison |
| 1.26. | Hydrogen production processes by TRL |
| 1.27. | Hydrogen production processes by stage of development |
| 1.28. | Leading blue hydrogen companies |
| 1.29. | SMR + CCUS value chain |
| 1.30. | POX + CCUS value chain |
| 1.31. | ATR + CCUS value chain |
| 1.32. | Key companies in methane pyrolysis by project scale and technology |
| 1.33. | Turquoise hydrogen production capacity and operational year by company |
| 1.34. | CCUS development supports blue hydrogen growth |
| 1.35. | What is Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)? |
| 1.36. | Two main approaches to blue hydrogen carbon capture: Pre- vs post-combustion |
| 1.37. | Capturing CO2 from ATR & POX is easier |
| 1.38. | Carbon dioxide storage-type maturity and operator landscape |
| 1.39. | Which carbon capture technologies are most mature? |
| 1.40. | Point-source carbon capture technology providers |
| 1.41. | 10-year global blue hydrogen production capacity forecast at different scenarios (Mtpa) |
| 1.42. | Blue hydrogen project pipeline: Blue hydrogen remains an emerging field |
| 1.43. | SMR+CCUS dominates 2026, but ATR+CCUS is forecasted to lead within the next decade |
| 1.44. | Industrial clusters are forecasted to drive the rapid growth in blue hydrogen |
| 1.45. | US forecasted to continue leading the blue hydrogen market, followed by Europe and UK |
| 1.46. | Company profiles |
| 1.47. | Access more with an IDTechEx subscription |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | Introduction to the hydrogen economy and blue hydrogen |
| 2.1.1. | The need for unprecedented emission reductions |
| 2.1.2. | Hydrogen as a clean energy carrier is gaining momentum |
| 2.1.3. | Decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors and hydrogen economy |
| 2.1.4. | Current hydrogen production & demand |
| 2.1.5. | Hydrogen value chain consists processes from production, storage, distribution, and end-use |
| 2.1.6. | Hydrogen colors are categorized based on the production technology used (1/3) |
| 2.1.7. | Hydrogen colors are categorized based on the production technology used (2/3) |
| 2.1.8. | Hydrogen colors are categorized based on the production technology used (3/3) |
| 2.1.9. | Classify hydrogen production based on conversion methods |
| 2.1.10. | Challenges in green hydrogen production |
| 2.1.11. | Blue hydrogen's important role in decarbonization |
| 2.1.12. | Cost comparison and adoption of different types of hydrogen |
| 2.1.13. | Turquoise hydrogen from methane pyrolysis |
| 2.1.14. | Scope and focus of this report |
| 2.2. | Regulatory drivers for blue hydrogen development |
| 2.2.1. | Major drivers for hydrogen production & adoption |
| 2.2.2. | Global leading regions in blue hydrogen development |
| 2.2.3. | Carbon pricing and its role in blue hydrogen market |
| 2.2.4. | Two main approaches to carbon pricing |
| 2.2.5. | The role of Contracts for Difference (CfD) in blue hydrogen market |
| 2.2.6. | Summary of national hydrogen targets |
| 2.2.7. | US: Hydrogen strategy |
| 2.2.8. | US: Funding and financial incentives |
| 2.2.9. | US: Hydrogen policy IRA vs OBBBA |
| 2.2.10. | US: The impact of 45V and 45Q tax credits on the cost of hydrogen |
| 2.2.11. | US: Other political signals put US hydrogen industry at risks |
| 2.2.12. | US: H2 projects face delays and cancellations under the current administration |
| 2.2.13. | UK: Hydrogen strategy |
| 2.2.14. | UK: Blue hydrogen and CCUS cluster |
| 2.2.15. | UK: CCUS clusters - East Coast Cluster |
| 2.2.16. | UK: Progress of ECC's blue hydrogen projects |
| 2.2.17. | UK: CCUS clusters - HyNet North West Cluster |
| 2.2.18. | UK: Progress of HyNet's blue hydrogen projects |
| 2.2.19. | China: Hydrogen strategy |
| 2.2.20. | China: Low prioritization in blue hydrogen |
| 2.2.21. | Canada: Hydrogen strategy |
| 2.2.22. | Canada: International partners and blue hydrogen projects |
| 2.2.23. | The Netherlands: Hydrogen strategy |
| 2.2.24. | The Netherlands: Blue hydrogen initiative by Rotterdam H-vision |
| 2.2.25. | Japan: Hydrogen strategy |
| 2.3. | Commercial drivers for blue hydrogen development |
| 2.3.1. | Commercial drivers for blue hydrogen |
| 2.3.2. | Potential business model for blue hydrogen projects |
| 2.3.3. | Blue hydrogen supply chain |
| 2.4. | Technological drivers for blue hydrogen development |
| 2.4.1. | Current & emerging applications for hydrogen |
| 2.4.2. | Current applications for hydrogen |
| 2.4.3. | Role of hydrogen in synthetic fuel & chemical production |
| 2.4.4. | Use of hydrogen in steel production |
| 2.4.5. | Emerging applications for hydrogen |
| 2.4.6. | Example of a key emerging application - FCEVs |
| 2.4.7. | FCEVs operating modes |
| 2.4.8. | Hydrogen gas blending in natural gas networks |
| 2.4.9. | Summary of major drivers for blue hydrogen development |
| 2.5. | Key challenges and opportunities for blue hydrogen |
| 2.5.1. | Regulatory and social challenges & opportunities for blue hydrogen |
| 2.5.2. | Economic challenges & opportunities for blue hydrogen |
| 2.5.3. | Technological challenges & opportunities for blue hydrogen |
| 2.5.4. | Environmental challenges & opportunities for blue hydrogen |
| 3. | BLUE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES |
| 3.1. | Overview of blue hydrogen technologies |
| 3.1.1. | Overview of blue hydrogen production technologies covered |
| 3.1.2. | Key considerations in designing blue hydrogen processes |
| 3.1.3. | Blue hydrogen technologies overview |
| 3.1.4. | Pre- vs post-combustion CO2 capture for blue hydrogen |
| 3.1.5. | Blue hydrogen production value chain |
| 3.2. | Common features of blue hydrogen processes |
| 3.2.1. | Natural gas pre-treatment: Desulfurization |
| 3.2.2. | Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) |
| 3.2.3. | Natural gas pre-treatment: Pre-reforming |
| 3.2.4. | Gas heated reformer (GHR): Novel pre-reformer |
| 3.2.5. | Water-gas shift (WGS) & sour shift reactors |
| 3.2.6. | Catalysts for auxiliary processes of hydrogen production |
| 3.2.7. | Key catalyst suppliers for HDS |
| 3.2.8. | Key catalyst suppliers for auxiliary processes of hydrogen production |
| 3.2.9. | Hydrogen purification technologies and industrial applications |
| 3.2.10. | Hydrogen purity requirements across industrial applications |
| 3.2.11. | Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) (1/2) |
| 3.2.12. | Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) (2/2) |
| 3.2.13. | PSA & sorbents for hydrogen purification |
| 3.2.14. | Key sorbents suppliers for hydrogen purification |
| 3.2.15. | Hydrogen cryogenic separation |
| 3.2.16. | Hydrogen separation membrane |
| 3.2.17. | Pre-combustion carbon capture is the most viable membrane-based option for blue hydrogen |
| 3.2.18. | Honeywell UOP: Membranes in CO2 fractionation for blue hydrogen |
| 3.2.19. | Air Liquide hybrid technology for CCUS: Blue hydrogen |
| 3.2.20. | Key membrane players targeting emerging hydrogen applications |
| 3.2.21. | Air separation units & oxygen separators (1/2) |
| 3.2.22. | Air separation units & oxygen separators (2/2) |
| 3.2.23. | Auxiliary equipment |
| 3.3. | Steam-methane reforming (SMR) |
| 3.3.1. | Steam-methane reforming (SMR) |
| 3.3.2. | SMR process flow diagram (PFD) |
| 3.3.3. | CO2 capture options for SMR |
| 3.3.4. | CO2 capture retrofit options: Honeywell UOP example |
| 3.3.5. | SMR reformer unit |
| 3.3.6. | Advanced steam reformer catalysts |
| 3.3.7. | SMR reformer tubes and tube alloys |
| 3.3.8. | Players in vessel materials (1/2) |
| 3.3.9. | Players in vessel materials (2/2) |
| 3.3.10. | Alternative reformer designs: Bayonet reformer |
| 3.3.11. | Alternative reformer designs: Convection reformers |
| 3.3.12. | Case study of SMR + CCUS retrofit: Shell's Quest project in Canada |
| 3.3.13. | SMR + CCUS value chain |
| 3.3.14. | SMR + CCUS players around the world |
| 3.3.15. | SMR SWOT Analysis |
| 3.3.16. | SMR summary & key takeaways |
| 3.4. | Partial oxidation (POX) |
| 3.4.1. | Partial oxidation (POX) |
| 3.4.2. | POX process flow diagram (PFD) |
| 3.4.3. | CO2 capture options for POX |
| 3.4.4. | POX reactor |
| 3.4.5. | Catalytic POX (CPOX) |
| 3.4.6. | Shell's blue hydrogen process & Pernis refinery |
| 3.4.7. | POX + CCUS value chain |
| 3.4.8. | POX + CCUS activities around the world |
| 3.4.9. | POX SWOT Analysis |
| 3.4.10. | POX summary & key takeaways |
| 3.5. | 3.5 Autothermal reforming (ATR) |
| 3.5.1. | Autothermal reforming (ATR) |
| 3.5.2. | ATR comparison to SMR & POX |
| 3.5.3. | ATR process flow diagram (PFD) |
| 3.5.4. | CO2 capture options for ATR |
| 3.5.5. | Autothermal reformer: Topsoe case study |
| 3.5.6. | Autothermal reformer materials: Topsoe case study |
| 3.5.7. | ATR catalysts: Topsoe case study |
| 3.5.8. | Current uses of ATR: Topsoe case study |
| 3.5.9. | Other players in ATR + CCUS |
| 3.5.10. | Air Products' ATR + CCS plant in Alberta, Canada |
| 3.5.11. | Key ATR + CCUS projects |
| 3.5.12. | ATR + CCUS recent industry updates |
| 3.5.13. | ATR + CCUS value chain |
| 3.5.14. | ATR + CCUS players around the world |
| 3.5.15. | ATR SWOT Analysis |
| 3.5.16. | ATR summary & key takeaways |
| 3.6. | Coal gasification (CG) |
| 3.6.1. | Coal gasification (CG) process |
| 3.6.2. | Underground coal gasification (UCG) |
| 3.6.3. | Four main types of coal |
| 3.6.4. | CG process flow diagram (PFD) |
| 3.6.5. | CO2 capture options for CG |
| 3.6.6. | CG process gasifiers |
| 3.6.7. | Updraft & downdraft coal gasifiers |
| 3.6.8. | Fluidized bed coal gasifiers |
| 3.6.9. | Entrained flow coal gasifiers |
| 3.6.10. | Coal gasifier performance comparison |
| 3.6.11. | Coal gasifiers pros & cons comparison |
| 3.6.12. | Commercial coal gasifier technology examples (1/2) |
| 3.6.13. | Commercial coal gasifier technology examples (2/2) |
| 3.6.14. | Coal gasification by-product: Ash, slag, and char utilization |
| 3.6.15. | Blue hydrogen projects using CG |
| 3.6.16. | HESC Coal Gasification Project (Australia and Japan collaboration) |
| 3.6.17. | CG + CCUS players around the world |
| 3.6.18. | China leads in coal gasification and accelerates CCUS deployment |
| 3.6.19. | CG SWOT Analysis |
| 3.6.20. | CG summary & key takeaways |
| 3.7. | Methane pyrolysis (turquoise hydrogen) |
| 3.7.1. | Methane pyrolysis: Turquoise hydrogen |
| 3.7.2. | Methane pyrolysis block flow diagram |
| 3.7.3. | Main types of methane pyrolysis reactors |
| 3.7.4. | Methane pyrolysis as an emerging market with strong SME presence |
| 3.7.5. | Key companies in methane pyrolysis by project scale and technology |
| 3.7.6. | Methane pyrolysis activities around the world |
| 3.7.7. | Turquoise hydrogen production capacity and operational year by company |
| 3.7.8. | Thermal pyrolysis & Case study of Modern Hydrogen |
| 3.7.9. | Key thermal pyrolysis players |
| 3.7.10. | Molten media pyrolysis & Case study of Graphitic Energy and VulcanX |
| 3.7.11. | Key molten media pyrolysis players |
| 3.7.12. | Catalytic pyrolysis & Case study of Hazer Group (1/2) |
| 3.7.13. | Catalytic pyrolysis & Case study of Hazer Group (2/2) |
| 3.7.14. | Key catalytic pyrolysis players |
| 3.7.15. | Plasma (thermal) pyrolysis & Case study of Monolith |
| 3.7.16. | Plasma (non-thermal) pyrolysis & Case study of Levidian (1) |
| 3.7.17. | Plasma (non-thermal) pyrolysis & Case study of Levidian (2) |
| 3.7.18. | Key plasma pyrolysis players (1) |
| 3.7.19. | Key plasma pyrolysis players (2) |
| 3.7.20. | Other methane pyrolysis technologies |
| 3.7.21. | Key pyrolysis players using other technologies |
| 3.7.22. | Comparison of pyrolysis processes (1) |
| 3.7.23. | Comparison of pyrolysis processes (2) |
| 3.7.24. | Levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and carbon intensity of methane pyrolysis |
| 3.7.25. | Managing large quantity of carbon black from methane pyrolysis |
| 3.7.26. | Overview and market size of advance carbon |
| 3.7.27. | Market overview of carbon black |
| 3.7.28. | Market overview of specialty carbon black |
| 3.7.29. | Methane pyrolysis SWOT analysis |
| 3.7.30. | Methane pyrolysis summary & key takeaways |
| 3.8. | Biomass processes |
| 3.8.1. | Blue hydrogen from biomass |
| 3.8.2. | Pathways for hydrogen production from biomass |
| 3.8.3. | Gasification and pyrolysis processes are the main technologies for biomass-based blue hydrogen with limited operational projects to date |
| 3.8.4. | Comparison of pyrolysis and gasification processes |
| 3.8.5. | Biomass & waste gasification overview |
| 3.8.6. | Biochar as a by-product and its applications |
| 3.8.7. | Biomass gasifier types |
| 3.8.8. | Case study of pre-treatment methods for biomass gasification |
| 3.8.9. | Fluidized bed reactors serves as versatile and widely adopted gasifiers |
| 3.8.10. | Biomass gasifier performance comparison |
| 3.8.11. | Novel technologies for biomass gasification (1/2) |
| 3.8.12. | Novel technologies for biomass gasification (2/2) |
| 3.8.13. | Bio-syngas for DRI & FerroSilva case study |
| 3.8.14. | Hydrogen from biomass gasification & Mote case study |
| 3.8.15. | Novel gasification & reforming concept & Concord Blue case study |
| 3.8.16. | Biomass & waste pyrolysis overview |
| 3.8.17. | Key technical factors that impact the design of the pyrolysis process |
| 3.8.18. | Pyrolysis reactor designs |
| 3.8.19. | Considerations in pyrolysis plant design: Heating methods |
| 3.8.20. | Size limitations of pyrolysis reactors |
| 3.8.21. | Conventional and novel technologies for biomass pyrolysis |
| 3.8.22. | Hydrogen from waste pyrolysis & Boson Energy case study |
| 3.8.23. | Upstream, downstream, and CCUS considerations |
| 3.8.24. | Biomass processes SWOT Analysis |
| 3.8.25. | Biomass processes summary & key takeaways |
| 3.9. | Novel processes |
| 3.9.1. | Novel processes for blue hydrogen production |
| 3.9.2. | Dry methane reforming (DMR) |
| 3.9.3. | Key industrial technologies of DMR |
| 3.9.4. | Sorption-enhanced SMR (SE-SMR) |
| 3.9.5. | Key sorption-enhanced hydrogen production processes |
| 3.9.6. | Convection reforming of methane: 8RH2 |
| 3.9.7. | Tri-reforming of methane (TRM) |
| 3.9.8. | Advanced autothermal gasification (AATG) |
| 3.9.9. | Chemical looping combustion (CLC) |
| 3.9.10. | Status of chemical looping combustion (CLC) |
| 3.9.11. | Electrified SMR (eSMR) |
| 3.9.12. | Key industrial technologies of eSMR (1/2) |
| 3.9.13. | Key industrial technologies of eSMR (2/2) |
| 3.9.14. | Membrane-assisted reforming: Praxair/Linde's OTM reformer |
| 3.9.15. | Membrane-assisted reforming: CoorsTek's PCER |
| 3.9.16. | Microwave catalytic SMR |
| 3.9.17. | Novel processes summary & key takeaways |
| 3.10. | Comparison of blue hydrogen processes |
| 3.10.1. | Pros & cons of production technologies (1/3) |
| 3.10.2. | Pros & cons of production technologies (2/3) |
| 3.10.3. | Pros & cons of production technologies (3/3) |
| 3.10.4. | Comparative metrics and methodology for hydrogen technologies |
| 3.10.5. | Levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison (1/2) |
| 3.10.6. | Levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison (2/2) |
| 3.10.7. | Cost breakdown comparison (1/2) |
| 3.10.8. | Cost breakdown comparison (2/2) |
| 3.10.9. | Key regional drivers of hydrogen production cost |
| 3.10.10. | CO2 emission intensity comparison (1/2) |
| 3.10.11. | CO2 emission intensity comparison (2/2) |
| 3.10.12. | Carbon pricing can make blue hydrogen cheaper than grey hydrogen |
| 3.10.13. | Hydrogen production processes by TRL |
| 3.10.14. | Hydrogen production processes by stage of development |
| 3.10.15. | Key innovations in blue hydrogen technology (1/2) |
| 3.10.16. | Key innovations in blue hydrogen technology (2/2) |
| 3.10.17. | Leading blue hydrogen companies |
| 4. | CCUS (CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE) FOR BLUE HYDROGEN |
| 4.1. | Introduction to CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage) |
| 4.1.1. | What is Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)? |
| 4.1.2. | Why CCUS and why now? |
| 4.1.3. | CCUS business model overview: Value from CO2 |
| 4.1.4. | Development of the CCS business model |
| 4.1.5. | CCUS business model: Networks and hub model |
| 4.1.6. | CCUS business model: Partial-chain |
| 4.1.7. | CO2 storage |
| 4.1.8. | Carbon dioxide storage-type maturity and operator landscape |
| 4.1.9. | World map of operational and under construction large-scale dedicated CO2 storage sites |
| 4.1.10. | Carbon pricing and its role in blue hydrogen market |
| 4.1.11. | Two main approaches to carbon pricing |
| 4.1.12. | Compliance carbon pricing mechanisms across the globe |
| 4.1.13. | Alternative to carbon pricing in the US: 45Q tax credits |
| 4.1.14. | Why CO2 utilization? |
| 4.1.15. | Current scale for CO2U products |
| 4.1.16. | Main CO2 capture systems |
| 4.1.17. | Which carbon capture technologies are most mature? |
| 4.1.18. | When should different carbon capture technologies be used? |
| 4.1.19. | Point-source carbon capture technology providers |
| 4.1.20. | No single carbon capture technology will be the best across all applications |
| 4.1.21. | High-concentration CO2 sources are the low-hanging fruits |
| 4.1.22. | How much does CCUS cost? |
| 4.1.23. | The momentum behind CCUS is building up |
| 4.1.24. | CCUS capture capacity by region - North America |
| 4.1.25. | Which sectors will see the biggest growth in CCUS? |
| 4.1.26. | Costs and financing of large-scale CCUS projects |
| 4.1.27. | CO2 transportation overview |
| 4.2. | Carbon capture for blue hydrogen and blue ammonia |
| 4.2.1. | Pre- vs post-combustion CO2 capture for blue hydrogen |
| 4.2.2. | Blue hydrogen production - SMR with CCUS |
| 4.2.3. | Capturing CO2 from ATR & POX is easier |
| 4.2.4. | CO2 capture retrofit options for blue H2 production |
| 4.2.5. | Overview of CCUS blue hydrogen projects |
| 4.2.6. | CO2 capture retrofit options: Honeywell UOP example |
| 4.2.7. | Cost comparison: Commercial CO2 capture systems for blue H2 |
| 4.2.8. | Real world data: CO2 capture systems for blue hydrogen |
| 4.2.9. | Technologies for future blue hydrogen projects |
| 4.2.10. | Emerging technologies for blue hydrogen - alternatives to ATR |
| 4.3. | Solvents for carbon capture |
| 4.3.1. | Solvent-based CO₂ capture |
| 4.3.2. | Chemical absorption solvents |
| 4.3.3. | Amine-based post-combustion CO₂ absorption |
| 4.3.4. | The development of amine solvents for carbon capture |
| 4.3.5. | Innovations in amine solvents |
| 4.3.6. | Amine-solvents dominate CCUS but challenges remain |
| 4.3.7. | Amine solvent carbon capture technology providers for post-combustion capture (1/2) |
| 4.3.8. | Amine solvent carbon capture technology providers for post-combustion capture (2/2) |
| 4.3.9. | "Cheap Chinese amines" - Amine solvent technologies from China coming into the international market |
| 4.3.10. | Hot Potassium Carbonate (HPC) process |
| 4.3.11. | HPC carbon capture technology providers for carbon capture |
| 4.3.12. | Chemical absorption solvents used in current operational CCUS point-source projects (1/2) |
| 4.3.13. | Chemical absorption solvents used in current operational CCUS point-source projects (2/2) |
| 4.3.14. | Cost breakdown of chemical solvent post-combustion capture |
| 4.3.15. | Physical absorption solvents |
| 4.3.16. | Comparison of key physical absorption solvents |
| 4.3.17. | Physical solvents used in current operational CCUS point-source projects |
| 4.3.18. | When should solvent-based carbon capture not be used? |
| 4.4. | Solid sorbents for carbon capture |
| 4.4.1. | Solid sorbent-based CO₂ separation |
| 4.4.2. | Adsorbents in pressure swing adsorption: Hydrogen separation |
| 4.4.3. | Adsorbents in pressure swing adsorption: Carbon capture |
| 4.4.4. | Overview of solid sorbents explored for carbon capture |
| 4.4.5. | Zeolite-based adsorbents |
| 4.4.6. | Carbon-based adsorbents |
| 4.4.7. | Metal organic framework (MOF) adsorbents |
| 4.4.8. | Solid amine-based adsorbents |
| 4.4.9. | Solid sorbent processes used in operational CCUS point-source projects |
| 4.4.10. | Solid sorbent materials for carbon capture overview |
| 4.4.11. | Sorption enhanced water gas shift (SEWGS) |
| 4.5. | Cryogenic carbon capture |
| 4.5.1. | Cryogenic CO₂ capture: An emerging alternative |
| 4.5.2. | When should cryogenic carbon capture be used? |
| 4.5.3. | Status of cryogenic CO2 capture technologies |
| 4.5.4. | Cryogenic CO₂ capture in blue hydrogen: Cryocap™ |
| 5. | BLUE HYDROGEN MARKET FORECASTS |
| 5.1. | Blue hydrogen forecast overview and breakdown |
| 5.2. | Forecasting methodology |
| 5.3. | Forecasting assumptions |
| 5.4. | Growth outlook and key drivers for blue hydrogen |
| 5.5. | CCUS development supports blue hydrogen growth |
| 5.6. | 10-year global blue hydrogen production capacity forecast at different scenarios (Mtpa) |
| 5.7. | Blue hydrogen project pipeline: Blue hydrogen remains an emerging field |
| 5.8. | 10-year blue hydrogen production capacity forecast by technology (Mtpa) (1/2) |
| 5.9. | 10-year blue hydrogen production capacity forecast by technology (Mtpa) (2/2) |
| 5.10. | 10-year blue hydrogen market size forecast by technology (US$ billion) |
| 5.11. | 10-year blue hydrogen CO2 capture capacity forecast by technology (Mtpa) |
| 5.12. | 10-year comparison of global blue hydrogen capacity forecast by technology |
| 5.13. | 10-year blue hydrogen production capacity forecast by end-use (Mtpa) (1/2) |
| 5.14. | 10-year blue hydrogen production capacity forecast by end-use (Mtpa) (2/2) |
| 5.15. | 10-year blue hydrogen market size forecast by end-use (US$ billion) |
| 5.16. | 10-year comparison of global blue hydrogen capacity forecast by end-use |
| 5.17. | 10-year blue hydrogen production capacity forecast by region (Mtpa) (1/2) |
| 5.18. | 10-year blue hydrogen production capacity forecast by region (Mtpa) (2/2) |
| 5.19. | 10-year blue hydrogen market size forecast by region (US$ billion) |
| 5.20. | Average blue hydrogen costs are forecast to decline continuously to <$3/kg-H₂ over the next decade |
| 5.21. | Limitations of forecasting methodology |
| 6. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 6.1. | 8 Rivers (Full profile, 2022) |
| 6.2. | 8 Rivers (Updates, 2024) |
| 6.3. | Air Liquide: Carbon Capture Solutions |
| 6.4. | Air Products: Hydrogen Solutions |
| 6.5. | Aker Carbon Capture |
| 6.6. | Aker Horizons |
| 6.7. | Babcock & Wilcox (B&W): BrightLoop Hydrogen Production Technology |
| 6.8. | BASF: Methane Pyrolysis Process |
| 6.9. | Cadent Gas: Hydrogen Pipeline & Blending Projects |
| 6.10. | CAPTICO₂ |
| 6.11. | China Great Wall Industry Corporation (CGWIC) |
| 6.12. | Chiyoda Corporation: CT-CO₂AR |
| 6.13. | Compact Membrane Systems (CMS) |
| 6.14. | Concord Blue Engineering |
| 6.15. | CO₂ Capsol |
| 6.16. | CyanoCapture |
| 6.17. | DiviGas |
| 6.18. | Fluor: Carbon Capture |
| 6.19. | FuelCell Energy |
| 6.20. | Giammarco Vetrocoke |
| 6.21. | Graforce |
| 6.22. | Graphitic Energy (Formerly C-Zero) |
| 6.23. | Hazer Group (Full profile, 2022) |
| 6.24. | Hazer Group (Updates, 2024) |
| 6.25. | Honeywell UOP |
| 6.26. | Honeywell UOP: CO₂ Solutions |
| 6.27. | Horisont Energi |
| 6.28. | Hydrogen Mem-Tech (Full profile, 2023) |
| 6.29. | Hydrogen Mem-Tech (Updates, 2025) |
| 6.30. | Ionada |
| 6.31. | Johnson Matthey: Blue Hydrogen Solutions |
| 6.32. | Kawasaki Heavy Industries: Liquid Hydrogen Supply Chain |
| 6.33. | Levidian |
| 6.34. | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries: KM CDR Process |
| 6.35. | Modern Hydrogen |
| 6.36. | Monolith |
| 6.37. | Mote |
| 6.38. | Nuada: MOF-Based Carbon Capture |
| 6.39. | Shell & Technip Energies Alliance: CANSOLV Carbon Capture Technology |
| 6.40. | SLB Capturi |
| 6.41. | Svante (Full profile, 2022) |
| 6.42. | Svante (Updates, 2024) |
| 6.43. | Svante (Full profile, Updates, 2026) |
| 6.44. | Svante: MOF-Based Carbon Capture |
| 6.45. | Technip Energies (T.EN): Hydrogen |
| 6.46. | Tetronics |
| 6.47. | Topsoe: Blue Hydrogen Technologies |
| 6.48. | Transform Materials |
| 6.49. | Tulum Energy |
| 6.50. | Turquoise Group |