This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Ideal graphene vis-à-vis reality |
1.1. | Illustrating how the many manufacturing techniques affect graphene quality, cost, scalability and accessible market |
1.1. | Summary of manufacturing technique attributes including, material sets, graphene quality, target markets and players |
1.2. | Market forecast for graphene in different applications between 2012-2018 |
1.2. | Estimating amount of investment in graphene companies (by company) |
1.2. | Attributes of graphene manufacturing techniques |
1.3. | The state of the industry and best way going forward |
1.3. | Estimating amount of revenue in the graphene industry by company. In million USD |
1.3. | Markets- assessment of value proposition and incumbent rival materials |
1.4. | Graphene players |
1.4. | Graphene companies having moved, or planning to move, up the value chain to offer graphene intermediaries |
1.4. | Markets overview and forecasts |
1.5. | Players |
1.5. | Market forecast for graphene in different applications between 2012-2018 |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | What is graphene? |
2.1. | Examples of graphene nanostructures |
2.1. | Graphene vs. carbon nanotubes |
2.2. | Why is graphene so great? |
3. | THERE ARE MANY TYPES OF GRAPHENE |
3.1. | Different graphene types available on the market |
3.2. | Illustrating how the many manufacturing techniques affect graphene quality, cost, scalability and accessible market |
4. | COST-EFFECTIVE AND SCALABLE MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUE IS THE HOLY GRAIL |
4.1. | Mapping out different manufacturing techniques as a function of graphene quality, cost, accessible market and scalability |
5. | THE STATE OF INVESTMENT, PRODUCTION AND REVENUE IN THE GRAPHENE MARKET |
5.1. | The state of technology company development in the graphene space |
5.2. | Latest news about graphene investment and graphene floatation |
5.3. | Estimating amount of investment in graphene companies. Values are in millions |
5.4. | Estimating amount of revenue in the graphene industry by company (US$ million) |
5.5. | Mapping the link between universities and various start-ups in the graphene space. |
6. | MOVING UP THE VALUE CHAIN IS CRITICAL |
6.1. | Who will be the winner in the graphene space? |
6.1. | A basic illustration of graphene value chain from precursor to end product |
6.2. | Graphene companies having moved, or planning to move, up the value chain to offer graphene intermediaries |
7. | THE IP ACTIVITY IS MOVING FROM THE MANUFACTURING SIDE TO COVER END USES |
7.1. | Graphene patents filed by year and by patent authority |
7.2. | Patent filing by company or institution and by patent authority |
7.3. | Number of papers with the word graphene in the title as a function of year based on Web of Science analysis |
8. | REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE |
8.1. | Manufacturing details- process, material set, scalability, cost, quality, etc |
8.1. | Structural changes when going from graphite to graphite oxide and graphene |
8.1. | Different reduction techniques for oxidised graphite or graphene |
8.2. | Comparison of graphene properties obtained using different reduction techniques |
8.2. | Oxidisation reduction damages the graphene lattice |
8.2. | Reduction methods |
8.3. | Assessment and market view |
8.3. | Sheet resistance as a function of transmittance for different RGO graphenes |
8.3. | Companies commercialising RGO graphene |
8.4. | Pros and cons of RGO graphene |
8.4. | Market position for RGO graphene on a performance cost map. |
8.4. | Companies |
8.5. | Pros and cons |
9. | CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION |
9.1. | Manufacturing details- process, material set, scalability, cost, quality, etc |
9.1. | CVD manufacturing process flow |
9.1. | Carbon solubility of different metals |
9.2. | Companies commercialising CVD graphene |
9.2. | Example of large-sized cylindrical copper furnace |
9.2. | Transfer |
9.3. | Latest developments |
9.3. | Flowchart for a typical transfer process of graphene off a conductive substrate |
9.3. | Pros and cons of graphene |
9.4. | How graphene sheets are transferred and stamped |
9.4. | Substrate-less CVD |
9.5. | Assessment and market view |
9.5. | Improved recipe toward clean and crackless transfer of graphene |
9.6. | Roll-to-roll transfer of graphene sheets on flexible substrates |
9.6. | Companies |
9.7. | Pros and cons |
9.7. | Transferring graphene onto a destination substrate using self-release layers |
9.8. | Transferring CVD graphene using the bubbling method |
9.9. | A roll-to-roll method of transfer graphene off a Cu substrate onto a flexible destination substrate |
9.10. | Production process of graphene powders using a substrate-less CVD |
9.11. | Comparing conductivity of PPG's plasma graphene and exfoliated GNP formulations |
9.12. | Market position of CVD graphene on a performance-price map |
10. | LIQUID PHASE EXFOLIATION |
10.1. | Manufacturing details- process, material set, scalability, cost, quality, etc |
10.1. | From natural graphene to inkjet ink via liquid-phase exfoliation |
10.1. | List of suitable organic solvents for exfoliating graphene |
10.2. | Companies commercialising liquid-phase exfoliated graphene |
10.2. | Liquid-phase exfoliation |
10.2. | Assessment and market view |
10.3. | Companies |
10.3. | Market position of liquid-phase exfoliated graphene on a performance-price map |
10.3. | Pros and cons of commercialising liquid-phase exfoliated graphene |
10.4. | Pros and cons |
11. | PLASMA |
11.1. | Manufacturing details- process, material set, scalability, cost, quality, etc |
11.1. | Companies commercialising plasma graphene |
11.1.1. | Plasma Approach I |
11.1.2. | Plasma Approach II |
11.2. | Assessment and market view |
11.2. | Pros and cons of plasma graphene |
11.3. | Companies |
11.4. | Pros and cons |
12. | A GENERAL MARKET OVERVIEW |
12.1. | Graphene markets- target markets, go-to-market strategy, the interplay between manufacturing technique and application, etc |
12.1. | Primary target markets |
12.1. | Product development timeline per application sector |
12.2. | Head tennis racquet containing graphene |
12.2. | Assessment for graphene target markets |
12.3. | Application/product development lifecycle per market segment |
13. | GRAPHENE CONDUCTIVE INKS |
13.1. | Which applications/market segments will benefit? |
13.1. | Ten year market forecast for conductive inks |
13.1. | Outlining and assessing target markets for functional graphene inks |
13.2. | Examples of printed RFID antennas and smart packaging with graphene |
13.2. | Assessment |
13.3. | Conclusion |
13.3. | The cost structure of a typical RFID antenna |
14. | TRANSISTORS AND LOGIC |
14.1. | Graphene- is it good for transistors? |
14.1. | Cut-off frequency as a function of channel length for different active channels and Degradation output characteristics of graphene transistors |
14.1. | Comparison and assessment of material options for thin film transistors |
14.1.1. | Digital applications |
14.1.2. | Analogue/RF electronics |
14.1.3. | Large area electronics- a comparison with other thin film transistor technologies |
14.2. | Conclusions |
14.2. | Graphene as a barrister material |
15. | GRAPHENE IN POLYMERIC COMPOSITES |
15.1. | Graphene/polymeric composites |
15.1. | A comprehensive table collecting and showing latest results on how adding graphene to various polymers will enhance their electrical, thermal and mechanical properties |
15.2. | Potential target markets that will benefit from graphene composites |
15.2. | How does graphene enhance the performance of polymers and composites? |
15.3. | Which applications/market segments will benefit from graphene-enabled polymers/composites? |
15.4. | Our assessment |
15.5. | Conclusions |
16. | GRAPHENE- LI ION BATTERIES |
16.1. | Is there an added value or performance enhancement? |
16.1. | Graphene supercapacitors on Ragone plots |
16.2. | Graphene-enabled performance benefit in lithium ion batteries |
16.2. | Does graphene add value or improve performance in lithium ion batteries? |
17. | GRAPHENE- TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE FILM |
17.1. | Market for transparent conductive films |
17.1. | Ten year market forecast in million USD for TCFs and TCGs by application |
17.1. | Benchmarking different TCF and TCG technologies on the basis of sheet resistance, optical transmission, ease of customisation, haze, ease of patterning, thinness, stability, flexibility, reflection and low cost. The technology com |
17.2. | SWOT analysis of graphene as an ITO replacement |
17.2. | ITO on film production capacity worldwide |
17.2. | Emerging ITO alternatives |
17.3. | Suppliers of ITO alternatives |
17.3. | Optical transmission as a function of sheet resistance for ITO-on-PET sold by main industry suppliers |
17.4. | Sheet resistance as a function of transmittance for best laboratory scale graphene derived using the oxidation-reduction techniques (it produces powders) |
17.4. | Graphene as an ITO alternative |
17.5. | Current uses of graphene |
17.5. | Sheet resistance as a function of transmittance for best laboratory scale graphene derived using CVD (it produces sheets) |
17.5.2. | Future trends and market drives |
17.6. | Graphene does offer flexibility- is that a differentiator? |
17.6. | Sheet resistance as a function of transmission for graphene compared with ITO |
17.7. | Sheet resistance as a function of thickness for different TCF technologies |
17.7. | Conclusions |
17.8. | Sheet resistance as a function of bending angle for graphene, CNT and ITO films |
17.9. | Flexible graphene transparent conductive sheet |
17.10. | Prototype of a graphene-enabled touch sensor |
17.11. | Prototype of a large-sized graphene transparent conductive film |
17.12. | Examples of flexible transparent conductors realised using non-graphene materials. These materials include PDOT:PSS, CNT, Silver nanoparticle, silver nanowire, etc |
18. | GRAPHENE -SUPERCAPACITOR |
18.1. | Supercapacitors- technology and markets |
18.1. | Schematic of a supercapacitor structure |
18.1. | Examples of supercapacitor and supercabattery applications envisaged by suppliers |
18.2. | Electrode material system used by each supercapacitor manufacturer |
18.2. | Ten year market forecast for supercapacitor |
18.2. | Existing supercapacitor electrode materials by company |
18.3. | Is there an added value or performance enhancement? |
18.3. | Graphene supercapacitors on Ragone plots |
18.3. | Reported values of graphene-enabled specific capacitance and power density |
18.4. | Graphene supercapacitor and supercabattery research results. Red equivalent to present or future lithium-ion batteries. Yellow equivalent to lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries. |
18.4. | Specific capacitance vs identified electrode area per unit of weight for graphene-based supercapacitors and lithium-ion capacitors in the laboratory |
18.4. | Assessment |
18.5. | Research and long term potential |
18.5. | Features of life cycle |
18.5.1. | Introduction |
18.5.2. | Graphene a strong focus |
18.5.3. | Graphene goes well with the new electrolytes |
18.5.4. | Graphene supercapacitors to replace aluminium electrolytic capacitors |
18.5.5. | The energy density merits of graphene are more theoretical than real as yet. |
18.5.6. | Supercapacitor materials maturity and profit |
18.6. | Graphene for lithium metal batteries |
18.6. | Evolution matrix for supercapacitor materials |
18.7. | Stanford supercapacitor textile |
18.7. | Graphene textile for supercapacitors |
18.8. | Conclusions |
19. | GRAPHENE INKS IN RFID TAGS |
19.1. | The big picture - number of tags, classifications, price tags |
19.1. | Examples of RFID antennas in 125KHz, 33.56 MHZ, UHF and 2.45GHZ bands |
19.1. | Different RFID bands- frequency, range |
19.2. | Comparison and assessment of different ink options for printed antennas |
19.2. | Examples of HF antennas |
19.2. | What are the material options for RFID tags and how do they compare? |
19.3. | Does graphene deliver a value in this crowded market? |
19.3. | The approximate cost breakdown of different components in a typical UHF RF ID tag |
19.4. | RFID tags growth |
19.4. | Market shares |
19.5. | Other graphene uses |
19.5. | Cost projection for antennas made using different materials (material costs only) |
19.5.1. | Condom |
19.5.2. | Water purification |
19.6. | Example of roll-to-roll printed graphene RFID tags by Vorbeck |
19.7. | Market share for each material or ink option in the RFID tag business |
19.8. | Benchmarking the market readiness of various nanotechnology-based water purification methods including CNT membrane, zeolite nanocrystals, ZnO nanowires, silver nanowires, TiO2 UV, etc. |
20. | SUMMARY - FORECASTS AND ASSESSMENT |
20.1. | Market forecast for graphene in different applications between 2014-2024 |
20.2. | Ten-year market forecast for graphene at material level across a variety of sectors. |
21. | COMPANY INTERVIEWS |
21.1. | Abalonyx |
21.2. | Anderlab Technologies, India |
21.3. | Angstron Materials, USA |
21.4. | Bluestone Global Tech, USA |
21.5. | Cabot, USA |
21.6. | Canatu, Finland |
21.7. | Cheaptubes, USA |
21.8. | CrayoNano, Norway |
21.9. | Directa Plus |
21.10. | Durham Graphene Science, UK |
21.11. | Grafen Chemical Industries, Turkey |
21.12. | Graphenano, Spain |
21.13. | Graphene Frontiers, USA |
21.14. | Graphene Industries, UK |
21.15. | Graphene Laboratories, USA |
21.16. | Graphene Square, Korea |
21.17. | Graphene Technologies, USA |
21.18. | Graphenea, Spain |
21.19. | Group NanoXplore, Canada |
21.20. | Grupo Antolin Ingenieria, Spain |
21.21. | Haydale, UK |
21.22. | Incubation Alliance, Japan |
21.23. | Nanjing JCNANO Technology |
21.24. | Nanjing XFNANO Materials Tech |
21.25. | Nanoinnova, Spain |
21.26. | Showa Denko, Japan |
21.27. | Sony, Japan |
21.28. | The Sixth Element |
21.29. | Thomas Swan, UK |
21.30. | University of Cambridge, UK |
21.31. | University of Exeter, UK |
21.32. | Vorbeck, USA |
21.33. | Wuxi Graphene Film |
21.34. | XG Sciences, USA |
21.35. | Xiamen Knano Graphene Technology |
21.36. | XinNano Materials, Taiwan |
21.37. | Xolve, USA |
22. | COMPANY PROFILES |
22.1. | 2D Carbon Graphene Material Co., Ltd |
22.1. | The amount of composite materials used in recent airbus planes |
22.2. | The amount of structural weight of composites used in planes, in %, as a function of year |
22.2. | Abalonyx, Norway |
22.3. | Airbus, France |
22.3. | Effect of different nanomaterials in resin fracture toughness |
22.4. | Locations and products of Cambridge Graphene Platform |
22.4. | Aixtron, Germany |
22.5. | AMO GmbH, Germany |
22.5. | Improvement formulation with addition of GRIDSTM 180 |
22.6. | Schematic of the epitaxial process used to grow graphene |
22.6. | Asbury Carbon, USA |
22.7. | AZ Electronics, Luxembourg |
22.7. | Hotmelt-Prepreg-Production |
22.8. | LM graphene synthesis and processing R&D |
22.8. | BASF, Germany |
22.9. | Cambridge Graphene Centre, UK |
22.10. | Cambridge Graphene Platform, UK |
22.11. | Carben Semicon Ltd, Russia |
22.12. | Carbon Solutions, Inc., USA |
22.12. | The difference between dispersible graphene and non-redispersible graphene |
22.13. | Silicon carbide wafer |
22.13. | Catalyx Nanotech Inc. (CNI), USA |
22.14. | CRANN, Ireland |
22.15. | Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI), USA |
22.16. | Grafoid, Canada |
22.17. | GRAnPH Nanotech, Spain |
22.18. | Graphene Devices, USA |
22.18. | Comparison of carbon fibre and graphene reinforcement |
22.19. | Making graphene supercapacitors |
22.19. | Graphene NanoChem, UK |
22.20. | Graphensic AB, Sweden |
22.20. | High-performance laser scribed graphene electrodes (LSG) |
22.21. | Graphene supercapacitor properties |
22.21. | Harbin Mulan Foreign Economic and Trade Company, China |
22.22. | HDPlas, USA |
22.22. | Flexible, all-solid-state supercapacitors |
22.23. | Head, Austria |
22.24. | HRL Laboratories, USA |
22.25. | IBM, USA |
22.26. | iTrix, Japan |
22.27. | JiangSu GeRui Graphene Venture Capital Co., Ltd. |
22.28. | Lockheed Martin, USA |
22.29. | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA |
22.30. | Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Germany |
22.31. | Momentive, USA |
22.32. | Nanjing JCNANO Tech Co., LTD |
22.33. | Nanjing XFNANO Materials Tech Co.,Ltd |
22.34. | Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials, Inc., USA |
22.35. | Nokia, Finland |
22.36. | Pennsylvania State University, USA |
22.37. | Power Booster, China |
22.38. | Quantum Materials Corp, India |
22.39. | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), USA |
22.40. | Rice University, USA |
22.41. | Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, USA |
22.42. | Samsung Electronics, Korea |
22.43. | Samsung Techwin, Korea |
22.44. | SolanPV, USA |
22.45. | Spirit Aerosystems, USA |
22.46. | Sungkyunkwan University Advanced Institute of Nano Technology (SAINT), Korea |
22.47. | Texas Instruments, USA |
22.48. | Thales, France |
22.49. | The Sixth Element |
22.50. | University of California Los Angeles, (UCLA), USA |
22.51. | University of Manchester, UK |
22.52. | University of Princeton, USA |
22.53. | University of Southern California (USC), USA |
22.54. | University of Texas at Austin, USA |
22.55. | University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA |
IDTECHEX RESEARCH REPORTS AND CONSULTANCY | |
TABLES | |
FIGURES |
Pages | 269 |
---|---|
Tables | 31 |
Figures | 90 |
Forecasts to | 2024 |