This report is no longer available. Click here to view our current reports or contact us to discuss a custom report.
If you have previously purchased this report then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
1.1. | Overall Market Size in 2022 |
1.1. | Touch market forecast by technology in 2012 |
1.1. | Organisations working in touch screens |
1.2. | Conductance in ohms per square for the different printable conductive materials, at typical thicknesses used, compared with bulk metal |
1.2. | Main Touch Technologies |
1.3. | Leading Market Applications |
1.4. | The Big Opportunity for TCFs |
1.5. | ITO Alternatives |
1.6. | Over 100 Profiled Organizations |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Main touch screen technologies (mainstream and emerging) with and without transparent electrodes (mainly ITO) |
2.1. | Mainstream Touch Technologies and Applications |
3. | TECHNOLOGIES |
3.1. | Mainstream Touch Technologies |
3.1. | How Projected Capacitive Touch Technology Works |
3.1. | Main Characteristics of Projected Capacitive Touch Technology |
3.1.1. | Projected Capacitive |
3.1.2. | Analog Resistive |
3.1.3. | Surface capacitive |
3.1.4. | Infrared |
3.1.5. | Surface Acoustic Wave |
3.2. | Emerging Touch Technologies |
3.2. | How Resistive Touch Technology Works |
3.2. | Main Characteristics of Analog Resistive Touch Technology |
3.2.1. | Embedded |
3.2.2. | Optical Imaging |
3.3. | Other Touch Technologies |
3.3. | How Surface Capacitive Touch Technology Works |
3.3. | Main Characteristics of Surface Capacitive Touch Technology |
3.4. | Main Characteristics of Infrared Touch Technology |
3.4. | How Infrared (IR) Touch Technology Works |
3.4. | Comparison |
3.5. | How Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) Technology Works |
3.5. | Main Characteristics of Surface Acoustic Wave Touch Technology |
3.6. | Main Characteristics of Embedded Touch Technologies |
3.6. | How Optical Touch Technology Works |
3.7. | Touch market forecast by technology in 2012 |
3.7. | Main Characteristics of Optical Imaging Touch Technology |
3.8. | Comparison of the most common touch screen technologies |
4. | MATERIALS USED |
4.1. | Indium-Tin-Oxide (ITO) |
4.1. | Touch Technologies with ITO for the Transparent Conductor |
4.1. | Global Indium Production in the last five years |
4.1.1. | ITO Challenges: Cost and availability |
4.2. | ITO Alternatives |
4.2. | Cost of Indium and global Indium production |
4.2. | Main suppliers of ITO alternatives |
4.2.1. | Organic conductors |
4.2.2. | Carbon Nanotubes |
4.2.3. | Nano-metal |
4.2.4. | Graphene |
4.2.5. | Quantum Tunneling Composite (QTC™) |
4.3. | Global Indium Production in 2011: 640 tonnes |
4.3. | Comparison of TCF material of Heraeus Clevios and ITO films |
4.4. | Global indium production by country from 2007 to 2011 |
4.5. | Conductance in ohms per square for the different printable conductive materials, at typical thicknesses used, compared with bulk metal |
4.6. | Conductivity of several materials |
4.7. | PEDOT:PSS conductivity development |
4.8. | Polymer-based, 14-inch touch screen panel fabricated by GSI Technologies LLC featuring Kodak HCF-225 film/ESTAR™ Base and Clevios™ PEDOT:PSS coating from Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG. |
4.9. | Targeted applications for carbon nanotubes |
4.10. | Cambrios Sample TC Film |
4.11. | Prototype demonstration of a touch screen using silver nanowire TCE. Schematic of a touch screen fabricated (a) without and (b) with complete connection. Insets show the actual working devices. |
4.12. | An electron microscope image of a hybrid electrode developed at Rice University shows solid connections after 500 bends. The transparent material combines single-atom-thick sheets of graphene and a fine mesh of aluminum nanowire o |
4.13. | Left: A transparent graphene film transferred on a 35-inch PET sheet. Right: A graphene-based touchscreen panel connected to a computer |
4.14. | The researchers built up a graphene layer on copper foil and then used rollers to transfer the graphene to a polymer support and then onto a final substrate |
5. | PROCESSES USED |
5.1. | Overview |
5.1. | Comparison of OLED performance. The top electrode made of printed ITO |
5.1. | Overview of the main deposition processes used for transparent conductive (patterned) films in touch screens |
5.2. | TCOs |
5.2.1. | Vacuum processes |
5.2.2. | Wet processes |
5.2.3. | Patterning of TCO layers |
5.2.4. | Recent developments: Printable ITO |
5.3. | Deposition of Organic Materials |
5.4. | Nanomaterials |
5.4.1. | Nanoparticles |
5.5. | New processes |
6. | SUPPLIERS AND COMPANIES |
6.1. | Z mode actuator by Artificial Muscle |
6.1. | Specifications fo Flexx 100 and Flexx 300 |
6.1. | Advanced Touchscreen Technology (ATT) by Wintek |
6.2. | Alps Electric |
6.2. | Specifications of DigiTech ITO film |
6.2. | CLEAR conductive PET film |
6.3. | Touchview product with membrane switch combination |
6.3. | Specifications of GeneralTouch Infrared Touch screen technology |
6.3. | Altera |
6.4. | Analog Devices (ADI) |
6.4. | Specifications Host Optical pro-cap touch panel |
6.4. | Directly produced prepatterned films |
6.5. | AUO 6-inch touch function eBook with Sipix's Microcup® technology |
6.5. | Apple |
6.6. | Applied Materials |
6.6. | A new flexible film made of copper nanowires and plastic conducts electricity illuminating a small light bulb. |
6.7. | Eastman Kodak HCF Film |
6.7. | Arayon Optics |
6.8. | Artificial Muscle Inc. (AMI) |
6.8. | Performance of PEDOT formulation from Eastman Kodak versus ITO |
6.9. | Fujitsu's eFLEPia |
6.9. | Atmel |
6.10. | Avago |
6.10. | Fujitsu's FLEPia Lite |
6.11. | Gunze's touch panel made with Direct Printing Technology, presented early 2009 |
6.11. | Broadcom |
6.12. | Caledon Controls |
6.12. | Hanvon N518 e-reader with pen-input touch screen |
6.13. | Schematic of isiQiri's Q-Foil-technology |
6.13. | CAM Graphics |
6.14. | Cambrios |
6.14. | Airbus A-380 with J Touch's 23" touch panel at the first class |
6.15. | Transmittance vs conductivity for Cu nanowires compared to other technologies |
6.15. | Canatu Ltd. |
6.16. | Cando (AUO) |
6.16. | Sharp's Mebius PC-NJ70A multi-touch netbook, launched in 2009 |
6.17. | Sony's Vaio L Series 3D all-in-one PC, launched in 2009 |
6.17. | Carestream Advanced Materials |
6.18. | Chimei Innolux Corp. (CMO?) |
6.19. | Cirque |
6.20. | CPT |
6.21. | Cypress |
6.22. | DanoTech |
6.23. | DGTUS Tech |
6.24. | DigiTech |
6.25. | DMC |
6.26. | Duke University |
6.27. | Eastman Kodak Co. |
6.28. | EELY |
6.29. | EETI (eGalax) |
6.30. | EFUN |
6.31. | Elan Micorelectronics |
6.32. | Emerging Display Technology (EDT) |
6.33. | ESTECOM |
6.34. | eTurboTouch |
6.35. | FlatFrog |
6.36. | Focaltech Systems |
6.37. | Fujitsu |
6.38. | General Touch |
6.39. | GDS |
6.40. | GestureTek |
6.41. | Gunze |
6.42. | HannStar Display |
6.43. | Hanwang (Hanvon) |
6.44. | Heraeus Clevios (formerly H.C. Starck Clevios) |
6.45. | Higgstec |
6.46. | Hon Hai Precision Industry |
6.47. | Host Optical |
6.48. | Immersion (IMS) |
6.49. | Innolux |
6.50. | isiQiri Interface Technologies |
6.51. | JTouch |
6.52. | Keytec |
6.53. | LG Display |
6.54. | Melfas |
6.55. | Microchip Technology |
6.56. | Microsoft |
6.57. | Mirle Automation |
6.58. | Nanjing Wally |
6.59. | NanoForge |
6.60. | NEC Display Solutions |
6.61. | NextWindow |
6.62. | Nissha Printing |
6.63. | N-trig |
6.64. | NVIDIA |
6.65. | Ocular LCD |
6.66. | Oike & CO., Ltd. |
6.67. | Omek |
6.68. | Optera |
6.69. | Osram Opto Semiconductors |
6.70. | Panasonic Electric Devices (PED) |
6.71. | Pan Jit (Mildex) |
6.72. | Peratech |
6.73. | Perceptive Pixel |
6.74. | Pixcir Microelectronics |
6.75. | Planar |
6.76. | PolyIC |
6.77. | PRO |
6.78. | Quanta |
6.79. | RISIN Technology |
6.80. | Samsung Electronics |
6.81. | SAIT |
6.82. | Sang Bo Corporation (SBK), Korea |
6.83. | Seiko Epson |
6.84. | Sharp |
6.85. | Silicon Integrated Systems (SIS) |
6.86. | Sintek |
6.87. | Sitronics |
6.88. | SMART Technologies |
6.89. | SMK Electronics |
6.90. | Sony |
6.91. | Stantum |
6.92. | Synaptics |
6.93. | Swenc Technology |
6.94. | TAOS Inc. |
6.95. | TE Touch Solutions (ELO) |
6.96. | Texas Instruments (TI) |
6.97. | Toray Advanced Film (TAF) |
6.98. | Toshiba Mobile Display (TMD) |
6.99. | Touch International |
6.100. | Touch Revolution |
6.101. | TPK |
6.102. | Truly Semi |
6.103. | Unidym |
6.104. | UniPixel |
6.105. | USAN Technology |
6.106. | Visual Planet |
6.107. | Wacom |
6.108. | Wintek |
6.109. | Young Fast Optoelectronics |
6.110. | Zytronic |
6.111. | 3M |
7. | MARKET FORECAST FROM 2012 TO 2022 |
7.1. | Touch screen market forecast by application, market value in US$ bn, 2012 to 2022 |
7.1. | Touch screen market forecast by application, market value in US$ bn, 2012 to 2022 |
7.1. | Market forecast by application 2012-2022 |
7.2. | Market forecast by technology 2012-2022 |
7.2. | Touch screen market forecast by technology, 2012 to 2022 |
7.2. | Touch screen market forecast by technology, 2012 to 2022 |
7.3. | Market share by technology, by percentage, 2012 to 2022 |
7.3. | Comparison of the most common touch screen technologies |
7.3. | Primary use markets by technology |
7.3.1. | Projected Capacitive |
7.3.2. | Analog Resistive |
7.3.3. | MARS |
7.3.4. | Surface capacitive |
7.3.5. | Infrared |
7.3.6. | SAW |
7.3.7. | Embedded |
7.3.8. | Optical Imaging |
7.3.9. | Multi-touch |
7.4. | Touch Technology Market applicability by device size |
7.4. | Market size for touch technologies by device size in 2012 |
APPENDIX 1: IDTECHEX PUBLICATIONS AND CONSULTANCY | |
TABLES | |
FIGURES |
Pages | 179 |
---|---|
Tables | 22 |
Figures | 45 |
Companies | 110 |
Forecasts to | 2022 |